[PC-NCSG] Consensus call on NCSG comments on the COE report Human Rights and ICANN

[Stephanie Perrin]

I am not sure how my comments were treated, but I must reiterate this 
one....it does not make sense:

Our comments are divided into two parts.  Part I sets out what we regard 
as the positive features of the report.  Part II lays down more 
specifically our areas of concern with some sections *of the authors* of 
the report.
I had deleted " of the authors"  (because surely we have no concern with 
the authors of the report) and replaced it by some sections of the report.
With that change I can support the draft as attached.
Stephanie
On 14-09-25 3:27 AM, Rudi Vansnick wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> With regards the document containing NCSG comments on the report from 
> the Council of Europe on ICANN and Human Rights, I'm now calling for 
> consensus on the for laying document (see link on 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1swluHqQOEC4RZSO38if3qpBlfCDIqXjoaChoYYmrBfo/). 
> May I ask for a Yes or No e-vote accepting the present version of the 
> document which is also attached to this email. This e-vote will close 
> on 30 september 23:59 UTC.
>
>
> Rudi Vansnick
> Alternate chair PC-NCSG
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140925/1e6a2801/attachment.html>