[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call for observers for your review

Mon Sep 22 15:19:16 EEST 2014

Hi,
OK I see endorsement and support here, shall PC chairs make the consensus
call and get this done?

Rafik

2014-09-22 7:58 GMT+09:00 joy <joy at apc.org>:

> I also support Avri for this
> Joy
> On 18/09/2014 12:30 a.m., Dorothy K. Gordon wrote:
> > Total support for Avri, her knowledge benefits us in so many ways.
> >
> > best
> >
> > Dorothy K. Gordon
> > Director-General
> > Ghana-India Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in ICT
> > Mobile: 233 265005712
> > Direct Line: 233 302 683579
> > Website: www.aiti-kace.com.gh
> > Encrypt Everything - https://gpgtools.org https://silentcircle.com
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stephanie Perrin" <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> > To: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 17 September, 2014 11:56:58 AM GMT +00:00 Casablanca /
> Monrovia
> > Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from
> the GNSO and draft call for observers for your review
> >
> >
> > Let us just endorse Avri, folks, if there are no objections. No time no
> time. Plus I am sure she is going to be terrific and several of us are
> going as observers.
> > Steph
> >
> > On 2014-09-17, 6:40, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Avri volunteered and seemed to get support from several members on the
> NCSG list. Nobody else stepped up, and we?re already past the deadline for
> submitting the name of our representative. I would set a quick deadline for
> a PC consensus call of Avri?s appointment.
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Amr
> >
> >
> > On Sep 17, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Rafik Dammak < rafik.dammak at gmail.com >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> >
> > as a reminder we need to appoint someone for the the CCWG on IANA
> transition
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> >
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> >
> > 2014-09-10 15:03 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak < rafik.dammak at gmail.com > :
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi ,
> >
> >
> > Thanks Avri and Amr, we need to settle out this and appoint NCSG
> representative in the cross-community working group. for procedure matter,
> shall we sent the name to GNSO council? for representation, I would like to
> ask the NCSG policy committee to proceed and respond quickly to this. I do
> think that Avri would make a good representative and liaison there.
> >
> >
> > indeed, everyone is encouraged to join as observer (being observer
> doesn't mean having a lower status regarding participation). I am joining
> myself the CCWG.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-09-08 18:42 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr < aelsadr at egyptig.org > :
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sounds good to me. And like Avri, I believe it?d be good to have as many
> NCSG members sign up for the CWG as possible.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Amr
> >
> >
> > On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Avri Doria < avri at ACM.ORG > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The charter was approved.
> >>
> >> I request that I be designated to continue the role I held in the
> >> Drafting team for this charter, as the NCSG rep on this group.
> >>
> >> I also encourage others to participate in this group.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> avri
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> Subject: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Update from the GNSO and draft call for
> >> observers for your review
> >> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:35:52 +0000
> >> From: Marika Konings < marika.konings at icann.org >
> >> To: CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org < CWG-DT-Stewardship at icann.org >
> >>
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> For your information, the GNSO Council adopted the CWG charter during
> its
> >> meeting today (see resolution below). The GNSO has requested that GNSO
> >> Stakeholder Groups provide the names of members for the CWG by 15
> September
> >> at the latest and has recommended that the chairs of the DT serve as the
> >> interim chairs of the CWG until the CWG has had the opportunity to
> select
> >> its leadership.
> >>
> >> In order to prepare for the call for observers, we've prepared the
> attached
> >> draft call that we would suggest is posted and circulated once most of
> the
> >> chartering organisations have appointed their members (we understand
> that
> >> the SSAC has already adopted the charter and the ALAC vote is finishing
> >> tomorrow). If you have any comments or suggestions, please feel free to
> >> share.
> >>
> >> As your respective organisations identify their members for the CWG,
> please
> >> provide the information to Grace so that they can be added to the
> mailing
> >> list. We hope it will be possible to schedule a first meeting of the
> CWG in
> >> early October so the group can discuss whether or not it would like to
> meet
> >> in Los Angeles, and if so, what the agenda should be and what materials
> >> should be prepared, if any.
> >>
> >> As you'll have noted from the announcement that Grace just shared, the
> ICG
> >> has requested that all formal responses are expected to be submitted by
> 31
> >> December 2014.
> >>
> >> We hope this is helpful.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Marika
> >>
> >> ====================
> >>
> >> Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group to Develop an
> IANA
> >> Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions
> >>
> >> Made by: Avri Doria
> >> Seconded by: Amr Elsadr
> >>
> >> Whereas,
> >> 1. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration
> (NTIA) has
> >> requested that ICANN ?convene a multistakeholder process to develop a
> plan
> >> to transition the U.S. government stewardship role? with regard to the
> IANA
> >> Functions and related root zone management.
> >> 2.
> >> 3.
> >> 4. On June 6 2014, ICANN proposed the creation of an IANA Stewardship
> >> Transition Coordination Group (ICG) ?responsible for preparing a
> transition
> >> proposal reflecting the differing needs of the various affected parties
> of
> >> the IANA functions.?
> >> 5.
> >> 6.
> >> 7. It was determined that the transition proposal should be developed
> within
> >> the directly affected communities (i.e. the IETF for development of
> >> standards for Internet Protocol Parameters; the NRO, the ASO, and the
> RIRs
> >> for functions related the management and distribution of numbering
> >> resources; and the GNSO and ccNSO for functions related to the Domain
> Name
> >> System). These efforts would inform the work of the ICG, whose
> >> responsibility would be to fashion an overall integrated transition
> proposal
> >> from these autonomously developed components.
> >> 8.
> >> 9.
> >> 10. Following distribution of an invitation to participate, a drafting
> team
> >> (DT) was formed with participants from the ccNSO, GNSO, SSAC and ALAC to
> >> develop a charter for a Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA
> >> Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions.
> >> 11.
> >> 12.
> >> 13. The DT delivered the proposed charter for consideration to the
> ccNSO,
> >> GNSO, SSACC and ALAC (see [include link to proposed charter]).
> >> Resolved,
> >> 1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter [include link] and appoints
> >> Jonathan Robinson as the GNSO Council liaison and member to the CWG.
> >> 2.
> >> 3.
> >> 4. Each GNSO Stakeholder Group will identify one member for the CWG by
> 15
> >> September taking into account the charter requirement that best efforts
> >> should be made to ensure that members:
> >> * Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable subject
> matter;
> >> * Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CWG on an
> ongoing
> >> and long-term basis; and
> >> * Where appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and concerns of
> >> individuals in the organization that appoints them.
> >> *
> >> * 3. The GNSO will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a
> call
> >> for observers to join the CWG, each in accordance with its own rules.
> >> *
> >> * 4. Until the CWG selects its co-chairs for the CWG, the GNSO Council
> >> recommends that the co-chairs of the Drafting Team shall serve as the
> >> interim co-chairs of the CWG.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> <Call for Observers - 4 September 2014.docx><Attached Message Part.txt>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140922/b7d0d285/attachment.html>