[PC-NCSG] Consensus call on NCSG comments on the COE report Human Rights and ICANN

[William Drake]

Since APC is a member of NCUC and NCSG it sort of has endorsed already, but there?s no reason not to do a separate thing too??

Bill

On Oct 8, 2014, at 3:04 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joy,
> 
> I dont think there is any specific process, APC can endorse the statement without problem. maybe sending a letter to CoE in that effect?
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> 
> 2014-10-08 7:26 GMT+09:00 joy <joy at apc.org>:
> Hi - one follow up - APC would like to formally endorse this NCSG submission - is there any particular process for doing so? We have posted a link to it on our website: https://www.apc.org
> Thanks
> Joy 
> 
> 
> On 2/10/2014 4:47 a.m., joy wrote:
>> thanks Rafik for following this up
>> Joy 
>> On 2/10/2014 3:40 a.m., Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>> Please send it now, they are revising the report today.... 
>>> STephanie Perrin 
>>> On 2014-10-01, 10:38, Rudi Vansnick wrote: 
>>>> Sorry Rafik, too busy here .. 
>>>> 
>>>> Yes can be considered endorsed. 
>>>> 
>>>> Rudi 
>>>> 
>>>> Op 1-okt.-2014, om 16:11 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven: 
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Rudi, 
>>>>> 
>>>>> can we consider it endorsed? I was just told that we should send comment by today to get them included in the revised report. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rafik 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2014-10-01 9:43 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>: 
>>>>> 
>>>>>     Hi Rudi, 
>>>>> 
>>>>>     I think the deadline is passed and we can consider that the 
>>>>>     report is endorsed? 
>>>>> 
>>>>>     Rafik 
>>>>> 
>>>>>     2014-09-25 16:27 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be 
>>>>>     <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>>: 
>>>>> 
>>>>>         Dear all, 
>>>>> 
>>>>>         With regards the document containing NCSG comments on the 
>>>>>         report from the Council of Europe on ICANN and Human Rights, 
>>>>>         I'm now calling for consensus on the for laying document (see 
>>>>>         link on 
>>>>>         https://docs.google.com/document/d/1swluHqQOEC4RZSO38if3qpBlfCDIqXjoaChoYYmrBfo/).
>>>>>         May I ask for a Yes or No e-vote accepting the present 
>>>>>         version of the document which is also attached to this email. 
>>>>>         This e-vote will close on 30 september 23:59 UTC. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>         Rudi Vansnick 
>>>>>         Alternate chair PC-NCSG 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list 
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org 
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

***********************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
***********************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141008/6ad26396/attachment.html>