[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [] RE: Formation of a GNSO-Board Working Group re the EWG Final Report

[Stephanie Perrin]

Oh sorry, I misread it...I thought we had to provide several names. 
Since I still find the process mystifying, it should be you, as Amr 
suggests.  I am hopeless at that stuff still....although I trust I will 
be better after I am trained next week...
:-)
On 14-10-03 10:54 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have to pick 1.  We are they they in this case.
>
> If you want to do, I am sure you can.
>
> Since Milton is not a lover of process &c. I would be surprised if he
> wanted it.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 03-Oct-14 10:03, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> I volunteer for that task.  they will not likely pick me though.
>> we need lots more names.  I think Milton should volunteer, they will
>> never pick him...
>> cheers steph
>> On 2014-10-03, 8:11, Avri Doria wrote:
>>> another task that need someone from the SG to be assigned to.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: [council] RE: Formation of a GNSO-Board Working Group re the
>>> EWG Final Report
>>> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:25:50 +0100
>>> From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>>> Reply-To: <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>>> Organization: Afilias
>>> To: <jrobinson at afilias.info>, <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> May I please ask you for names to undertake this task.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To be clear, I do not propose to select the list of participants and
>>> would
>>> like to ask for one participant from each SG.
>>>
>>> Since we were offered the opportunity to provide four or five names,  I
>>> suggest we offer a fifth place to one of the Nom Com appointees to the
>>> Council.
>>>
>>> In addition, I intend to request that a member of the GNSO policy
>>> staff is
>>> also in attendance / engaged.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please may I have names asap. Today if possible.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank-you,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info]
>>> Sent: 26 September 2014 02:08
>>> To: council at gnso.icann.org
>>> Subject: FW: Formation of a GNSO-Board Working Group re the EWG Final
>>> Report
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please see below for a reminder of the proposal / request from Steve
>>> Crocker.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Following our discussion in yesterday's council meeting, the suggested
>>> response is that we offer 4 volunteers (one per SG) in response to this
>>> request and who will be in a position to meet in LA.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Assuming we go down this route, I believe we agreed that these volunteers
>>> should primarily certainly be knowledgeable about and experienced in the
>>> GNSO PDP.
>>>
>>> Ideally some or all should additionally be knowledgeable about the
>>> work and
>>> background to the EWG.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please can you review the letter below and the proposed response /
>>> approach
>>> above and provide any additional comment or input you see fit.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bear in mind that a timely and constructive response to Steve's letter is
>>> obviously highly desirable.
>>>
>>> Therefore if you are not in agreement with the above, an alternative such
>>> response will be appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>> From: Steve Crocker [ <mailto:steve at shinkuro.com>
>>> mailto:steve at shinkuro.com]
>>>
>>> Sent: 21 September 2014 03:10
>>>
>>> To: Jonathan Robinson
>>>
>>> Cc: Stephen D. Crocker; Denise Michel; Icann-board ICANN
>>>
>>> Subject: Formation of a GNSO-Board Working Group re the EWG Final Report
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm a bit late getting this out to you, for which I apologize.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> During the Board's retreat last week in Istanbul, we had a session
>>> devoted
>>> to next steps related to the Expert Working Group.  We've reached that
>>> exquisite moment in this process where we have the EWG's report in
>>> hand but
>>> we're not yet ready to formally ask the GNSO to initiate a policy
>>> development process.  Instead, this is the time for us all to put our
>>> heads
>>> together to identify the issues that have to be sorted out before we take
>>> that step.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We suggest we form a joint GNSO-Board working group with a handful of
>>> members from both groups to identify the main issues - technical,
>>> organizational, etc., etc. - that have to be addressed before
>>> attempting to
>>> initiate another policy development process.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have any preconception as to how many people or how you might
>>> choose
>>> them.  I'll leave that entirely up to your judgment.  Fewer is always
>>> better
>>> in terms of logistics, but we all know full well there will be many
>>> who will
>>> want to participate.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope you and your folks were able to participate in the webinars
>>> this past
>>> week.  If not, it might be worthwhile listening to them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The Expert Working Report is a solid piece of work, and it was
>>> intended to
>>> provide a much stronger basis for moving forward with a PDP than we've
>>> ever
>>> had before.  That said, I think it would be wise for all of us to
>>> understand
>>> what failed in earlier PDPs and thus to make sure that we really do
>>> have a
>>> stronger chance this time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My mantra for this effort is that we're going to take the time to get
>>> this
>>> right.  The problem has been lingering for a very long time.  We have
>>> given
>>> this matter high priority and will continue to do so, so it has the
>>> resources and the urgency that comes with high priority issues, but we do
>>> not have a specific deadline or timetable.  Perhaps that's something that
>>> can come from the working group.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please let me know your thinking and we'll move forward.  With the LA
>>> meeting coming up, if we're organized by then, perhaps we can schedule
>>> time
>>> for the working group to meet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg