[PC-NCSG] For Review and Feedback -- Draft NCPH Meeting Agenda

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

Although this is not specific to the NCPH (but rather to the entire GNSO), I think it might be worthwhile to have a discussion with the CSG on the implications of the Board Working Group report on the NomCom?s possible effect of GNSO representation on the ICANN BoDs. The proposed composition of the NomCom in this report would mean less representation by the GNSO on the NomCom (especially by the NCPH).

I am particularly interested in an idea I believe Avri brought up (if I recall correctly) during a council discussion on this topic; increasing GNSO representation on the ICANN BoDs via election of more members directly from the GNSO as opposed to relying on NomCom appointees.

Thanks.

Amr

On Nov 18, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> please find attached the strawman agenda for the NCPH meeting next january, it will be good to get your input about it and what topics we would like to discuss there.
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>
> Date: 2014-11-15 14:29 GMT+09:00
> Subject: For Review and Feedback -- Draft NCPH Meeting Agenda
> To: Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>, Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com>, "rudi.vansnick at isoc.be" <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>, "lori.schulman at ascd.org" <lori.schulman at ascd.org>, Kristina Rosette <krosette at cov.com>, "Metalitz, Steven" <met at msk.com>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, Jimson Olufuye <jolufuye at kontemporary.net>, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>
> Cc: Maryam Bakoshi <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>, Benedetta Rossi <benedetta.rossi at icann.org>
> 
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> Attached please find a draft "strawman" agenda structure (Version "v1") for the January NCPH meeting.  Per our discussion this week,  please share and discuss it with your individual communities as you see fit.  If our previous 2013 effort is a good guide, this is likely to be the first of several agenda drafts before we reach a final version.
> 
> Please provide as many comments/reactions/edit suggestions/etc. as possible via email over the course of the next week. 
> 
> Benedetta will be circulating a Doodle poll to select the date for the next planning call, and I hope we can make some on-line progress prior to that next meeting.
> 
> Please note that I am now including Maryam Bakoshi and Brenda Brewer on the cc list so that they can be ready to assist you in prepping your individual meeting agendas during the course of the events that week.
> 
> Believe it or not, with one major exception, our planning timetable is still pretty consistent with the timing of the 2013 meeting planning effort. The one area where we REALLY need your help is to provide as many traveler/delegate names as soon as  possible so that we can make sure that all intended travelers/delegates have reasonable travel schedules and any visas they may need to get into the U.S. for the meeting. Please provide that info to me as soon as possible so that we can maximize the use of our support resources for the meeting.
> 
> Thank you all for your help and support of this planning effort!
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rob 
> 
> <Agenda - NCPH InterSessional (v1- 14Nov2014).docx>_______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141119/22262913/attachment.html>