[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: [] Proposed Charter for Accountability CCWG

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

At this point we have 2 who are interested , I think in the NCSG member
slot.

Any others?  How long should we give?

I assume the charter will be approved this week, and expect that
creation of the teams needs to happen immediately after.

avri

ps. yes i am assuming a temporary shadow chairish type role that our
alt-chair can take away from me any time he wishes by taking over the
tasks.  but as a past alt--chair who just can't stand the void any
longer, just trying to keep things moving along.  maybe we should have
an election soon.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: [] Proposed Charter for Accountability
CCWG
Date: 	Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:29:10 +1300
From: 	joy <joy at APC.ORG>
Reply-To: 	joy at apc.org
Organization: 	APC
To: 	NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU



Thanks Avri and all
I am also willing to be considered for this group if needed.
Cheers
Joy Liddicoat

On 7/11/2014 8:52 p.m., Avri Doria wrote:
>
> Note: the text of the charter should be same as the one I sent the
> group last week.
>
> Another note: the issue of greater representation for the
> Constituencies of the CwG has come up again in the council.  I pointed
> out that in this case there were neither discussions nor history of an
> ad-hoc group having had greater CSG representation and thus no notion
> of it being grandmothered in.
>
> This charter is up for a vote next week.  NCSG should start selecting
> its member for the group.*  The group will be as open to particIpation
> as in cwg-stewardship, except that this charter calls them
> participants.  Each CWG learns from the experiences of the previous. 
> (In the ordering and learning, CWG-Internet came before
> CWG-Stewarship, it is just that is languished on the GNSO Council
> schedule a very long time, so it was voted on later.)
>
> avri
>
> * the PC is currently trying to get its organizational act together,
> with our past-Chair no longer being a member of the PC, and not having
> elected a new one yet.  According to our charter, as I read it, it
> will need to choose a member from among those who put their names
> forward or have their names put forward.  So those who want to put the
> intensive amount of work for the next year or more that may be
> required to be the member of this CWG, should consider the task.
>
>
>
> On 06-Nov-14 15:07, Robin Gross wrote:
> > fyi
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
>
> >> From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
> >> Subject: [Cross-Community] Proposed Charter for Accountability CCWG
> >> Date: November 6, 2014 12:57:01 PM PST
> >> To: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org"
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> >>
> >> To view the original announcement, see here:
> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-11-05-en
> >>
> >>
> >> Proposed Charter for Enhancing ICANN Accountability Cross Community
> Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration
> >>
> >> On 3 November 2014, the Drafting Team that was formed by the ICANN
> community to develop a charter for the Enhancing ICANN Accountability
> Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) distributed a charter for
> adoption by chartering organizations. The charter includes, among
> other things, a problem statement, goals & objectives, scope, and
> proposed areas for work. The CCWG is expected to organize its
> activities in two Work Streams, consistent with the Revised Enhancing
> ICANN Accountability Process:
> >>
> >>> Work Stream 1: focused on mechanisms enhancing ICANN
> accountability that must be in place or committed to within the time
> frame of the IANA Stewardship Transition; and
> >>> Work Stream 2: focused on addressing accountability topics for
> which a timeline for developing solutions and full implementation may
> extend beyond the IANA Stewardship Transition.
> >>>
> >> Next Steps
> >> Each ICANN Supporting Organization (SO) and Advisory Committee (AC)
> is expected to consider the proposed charter during its upcoming
> November meeting(s). Following the adoption of the charter, chartering
> organizations are expected to identify their representative members to
> serve on the CCWG (each chartering organization will appoint a minimum
> of 2 and a maximum of 5 members to the CCWG). In addition, a call for
> volunteers to join the CCWG will be launched, so that anyone
> interested in this effort may join and participate. The CCWG is
> expected to commence its deliberations in late November or early December.
> >>
> >> All members of the group formerly known as the "Cross Community
> Group" will be added to the CCWG as participants, unless some are
> appointed by chartering organizations to serve as members or decide
> not to join this effort.
> >>
> >> Drafting Team Background
> >> Considering the short timeframe ahead and the relation of part of
> the Accountability work to the IANAStewardship Transition process, the
> Drafting Team worked on an expedited basis to develop the charter. The
> publication date was identified to align with the November meetings of
> ICANN's SOs and ACs, to allow for the question of CCWG charter
> adoption to be discussed. For details of each of the Drafting Team's
> meetings, including interim draft versions of the charter, please see
> here.
> >>
> >> The Drafting Team was formed following the ICANN51 meeting and
> includes members appointed by the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC),
> Address Supporting Organization (ASO), Country Code Supporting
> Organization (ccNSO), Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) and
> Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO).1 In addition, one
> representative from outside the ICANN SO/ACstructure joined the
> Drafting Team to ensure that the charter defined an inclusive process
> for the broader community. For a full list of Drafting Team members,
> please see here.
> >>
> >> Additional Information
> >> The National Telecommunications and Information Administration
> (NTIA) has requested that ICANN"convene a multistakeholder process to
> develop a plan to transition the U.S. government stewardship role"
> with regard to the IANA Functions and related root zone management. In
> making its announcement, the NTIA specified that the transition
> proposal must have broad community support and meet the following
> principles:
> >>
> >> Support and enhance the multistakeholder model
> >> Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS
> >> Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners
> of the IANA services
> >> Maintain the openness of the Internet.
> >> NTIA also specified that it would not accept a proposal that
> replaces the NTIA role with a government-led or an intergovernmental
> organization solution.
> >>
> >> During discussions around the transition process, the community
> raised the broader topic of the impact of the change on ICANN's
> accountability. The Enhancing ICANN Accountability process was
> finalized and posted on 10 October 2014, and can be found here. The
> scope of the Enhancing ICANNAccountability process is defined as
> ensuring that ICANN remains accountable in the absence of its
> historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government and the
> perceived backstop with regard toICANN's organization-wide
> accountability provided by that role, such as the renewal process of
> theIANA functions contract. It calls for an examination, from an
> organizational perspective, of how ICANN's broader accountability
> mechanisms should be strengthened to address the absence of its
> historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government,
> including looking at strengthening existing accountability mechanisms
> (e.g., the ICANN Bylaws and the Affirmation of Commitments).
> >>
> >> Links to additional information:
> >> Proposed Charter [DOC, 67 KB]
> >>
> >> Drafting Team Wiki
> >>
> >> Revised Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process
> >>
> >> For further information, please contact accountability-staff at icann.org.
> >>
> >> 1 RSSAC and SSAC were invited to participate in the Drafting Team,
> but were unable to join the effort.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141109/f404bf1c/attachment.html>