[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak
Tue May 20 09:30:38 EEST 2014
Hi Avri, Joy,
thanks for the comments and suggestion, I will compile them in one doc.
hope that others will send their comments too.
Best Regards,
Rafik
2014-05-20 12:31 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
> Hi,
>
> As interested as I might have been, since he is out of the election and
> has lost, we could probably focus on current issues and where he stands
> on issues like separation; explain his vote, whatever it might have
> been, on .amazon; where he stands on next steps for the TMCH+50 action;
> what is happening with excess funds that can be expected from the
> auctions about to begin; what does he think about the problem issues
> with ICANN privacy. Stuff like that.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 19-May-14 23:23, joy wrote:
> > Sure we could start with:
> > + please give 3 examples of the issues that are of concern to the
> > non-commercial stakeholder group
> > + identify how you have weighed NCSG issues in the balance against other
> > non-contracted party house groups in your role as a Board member (shall
> > we ask for some specific cases?)
> > + in what ways do you consider yourself representative of and
> > accountable to NSCG in your Board role?
> > + please explain your lack of engagement with NCSG during your tenure on
> > the Board and why you believe you merit a further term.
> >
> >
> > On 20/05/2014 3:15 p.m., Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >> Thanks Joy! we should discuss the points we wants to talk with Bill.
> >>
> >> Rafik
> >>
> >> 2014-05-20 12:14 GMT+09:00 joy <joy at apc.org>:
> >>
> >>> Hi Rafik - I have also filled in the doodle poll and am happy to join
> >>> this call
> >>> joy
> >>> On 20/05/2014 3:11 p.m., Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> seeing no objection and because the deadline, I will send the list to
> GNSO
> >>> secretariat: Amr, Avri, Klaus. Rudi and myself.
> >>> however, if needed I can send updated list to Glen if PC members has
> any
> >>> comment.
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards.
> >>>
> >>> Rafik
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2014-05-19 16:56 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rudi,
> >>>
> >>> thanks, I think that you didn't mention your own candidature, but you
> said
> >>> you will get back with names. I will add your name anyway.
> >>>
> >>> Rafik
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2014-05-19 16:51 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be> <
> rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:
> >>>
> >>> I thought I mentioned earlier my candidature for this WG. So add my
> name
> >>>
> >>> to this list.
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards,
> >>>
> >>> Rudi Vansnick
> >>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
> >>> NPOC treasurerrudi.vansnick at npoc.org
> >>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> >>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32www.npoc.org
> >>>
> >>> Op 19-mei-2014, om 02:17 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> het
> >>> volgende geschreven:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everybody,
> >>>
> >>> I have to send names by today, we have till now: Amr, Avri, Klaus and
> >>> myself.
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Rafik
> >>>
> >>> 2014-05-14 11:37 GMT+09:00 Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org>
> <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear Friends
> >>>
> >>> I am also interested serving in this working party.
> >>>
> >>> Yours
> >>>
> >>> Klaus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5/13/2014 8:15 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dear PC members,
> >>>
> >>> we have here an important process where we should appoint members to
> >>> GNSO review working group. we can appoint up to 6 members for NCSG.
> >>>
> >>> I think that Avri is already member. I am also interested to join this
> >>> WG.
> >>>
> >>> the participation request time commitment for the next months and it is
> >>> quite critical for us.
> >>>
> >>> I will share the call with the membership list, but as PC we should
> >>> decide who will be our members in the WG. we have to send the names by
> >>> 19th May
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Rafik
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> From: Glen de Saint G?ry <Glen at icann.org> <Glen at icann.org>
> >>> Date: 2014-05-13 1:04 GMT+09:00
> >>> Subject: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
> >>> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> <
> marika.konings at icann.org>, "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick at icann.org>,
> "gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org" <gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org> <
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear Rafik,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please note the Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working
> >>> Party and please note the very tight timeframe.
> >>> Thank you.
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Glen
> >>>
> >>> *Summary*
> >>>
> >>> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council
> would
> >>> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
> >>> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is
> expected
> >>> to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other
> >>> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer
> >>> should they decide so.
> >>>
> >>> *Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party*
> >>>
> >>> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
> >>> and the Board?s Structural Improvements Committee;
> >>> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[1];
> >>> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
> >>> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
> >>> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
> >>> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping
> to
> >>> ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner
> accurately
> >>> reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
> >>> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
> >>> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
> >>> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
> >>> participation.
> >>>
> >>> *Volunteer Requirements*
> >>>
> >>> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
> >>> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
> >>> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
> >>> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar
> Stakeholder
> >>> Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee
> appointees, up
> >>> to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2
> representative
> >>> from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives
> from
> >>> the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6
> >>> representatives from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition
> to
> >>> the possibility for other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort).
> The
> >>> activities of the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an
> open
> >>> and fully transparent manner.
> >>>
> >>> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
> >>> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective
> criteria
> >>> would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to
> >>> devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to
> be 50
> >>> ? 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately.
> >>> Commitment to and compliance with ICANN?s bottom-up, multistakeholder
> >>> model, and accountability and transparency ethics are a requirement.
> >>>
> >>> *Submitting candidates*
> >>>
> >>> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their
> own
> >>> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
> >>> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
> >>> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to
> fill
> >>> all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names
> of
> >>> the proposed candidates are submitted *by Monday 19 May at the
> latest*as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed candidates
> should
> >>> be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> ).
> >>>
> >>> *Background*
> >>>
> >>> The objective of the GNSO Review[2] is to examine organizational
> >>> effectiveness of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO
> >>> Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
> Constituencies).
> >>> The review scheduled to begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly
> >>> scoped based on objective and quantifiable criteria provided to the
> >>> independent examiner.
> >>>
> >>> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
> >>> from the broader community are important components of this review
> process.
> >>> As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements
> >>> Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working
> Party
> >>> be assembled to function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent
> >>> examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review criteria and the 360
> >>> Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification
> and
> >>> responses to the draft findings and recommendations. Once a final
> report is
> >>> issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO
> Review
> >>> Working Party is expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to
> prepare
> >>> an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement
> >>> activities.
> >>>
> >>> Please see the recent announcement<
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm> <
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm> about
> >>> the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Further Information*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Forming GNSO Review Working Party *Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO
> >>> Review Working Party*
> >>>
> >>> *Summary*
> >>>
> >>> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council
> would
> >>> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
> >>> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is
> expected
> >>> to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other
> >>> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer
> >>> should they decide so.
> >>>
> >>> *Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party*
> >>>
> >>> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
> >>> and the Board?s Structural Improvements Committee;
> >>> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[3];
> >>> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
> >>> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
> >>> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
> >>> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping
> to
> >>> ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner
> accurately
> >>> reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
> >>> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
> >>> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
> >>> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
> >>> participation.
> >>>
> >>> *Volunteer Requirements*
> >>>
> >>> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
> >>> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
> >>> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
> >>> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar
> Stakeholder
> >>> Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee
> appointees, up
> >>> to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2
> representative
> >>> from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives
> from
> >>> the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6
> >>> representatives from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition
> to
> >>> the possibility for other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort).
> The
> >>> activities of the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an
> open
> >>> and fully transparent manner.
> >>>
> >>> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
> >>> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective
> criteria
> >>> would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to
> >>> devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to
> be 50
> >>> ? 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately.
> >>> Commitment to and compliance with ICANN?s bottom-up, multi-stakeholder
> >>> model, and accountability and transparency ethics are a requirement.
> >>>
> >>> *Submitting candidates*
> >>>
> >>> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their
> own
> >>> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
> >>> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
> >>> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to
> fill
> >>> all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names
> of
> >>> the proposed candidates are submitted *by Monday 19 May at the
> latest*as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed candidates
> should
> >>> be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> ).
> >>>
> >>> *Background*
> >>>
> >>> The objective of the GNSO Review[4] is to examine organizational
> >>> effectiveness of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO
> >>> Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
> Constituencies).
> >>> The review scheduled to begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly
> >>> scoped based on objective and quantifiable criteria provided to the
> >>> independent examiner.
> >>>
> >>> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
> >>> from the broader community are important components of this review
> process.
> >>> As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements
> >>> Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working
> Party
> >>> be assembled to function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent
> >>> examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review criteria and the 360
> >>> Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification
> and
> >>> responses to the draft findings and recommendations. Once a final
> report is
> >>> issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO
> Review
> >>> Working Party is expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to
> prepare
> >>> an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement
> >>> activities.
> >>>
> >>> Please see the recent announcement<
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm> <
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>about
> the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Further Information*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ? Forming GNSO Review Working Party<
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf> <
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ? GNSO Review Webinar<
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm.>
> <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm
> .>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Glen de Saint G?ry
> >>>
> >>> GNSO Secretariat
> >>> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> >>> http://gnso.icann.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> [1] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize
> >>> feedback from members of the GNSO community ? a "self-review" relative
> to
> >>> objective and quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN
> >>> organizations, Board and staff also may offer feedback.
> >>>
> >>> [2] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN?s Bylaws<
> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV> <
> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>> [3] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize
> >>> feedback from members of the GNSO community ? a "self-review" relative
> to
> >>> objective and quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN
> >>> organizations, Board and staff also may offer feedback.
> >>>
> >>> [4] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN?s Bylaws<
> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV> <
> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://
> mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://
> mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140520/b779d95a/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list