[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak
Mon May 19 10:56:59 EEST 2014
Rudi,
thanks, I think that you didn't mention your own candidature, but you said
you will get back with names. I will add your name anyway.
Rafik
2014-05-19 16:51 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:
> I thought I mentioned earlier my candidature for this WG. So add my name
> to this list.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rudi Vansnick
> NPOC chair Policy Committee
> NPOC treasurer
> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
> www.npoc.org
>
> Op 19-mei-2014, om 02:17 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have to send names by today, we have till now: Amr, Avri, Klaus and
> myself.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-05-14 11:37 GMT+09:00 Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org>:
>
>> Dear Friends
>>
>> I am also interested serving in this working party.
>>
>> Yours
>>
>> Klaus
>>
>>
>> On 5/13/2014 8:15 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Dear PC members,
>>
>> we have here an important process where we should appoint members to GNSO
>> review working group. we can appoint up to 6 members for NCSG.
>>
>> I think that Avri is already member. I am also interested to join this WG.
>>
>> the participation request time commitment for the next months and it is
>> quite critical for us.
>>
>> I will share the call with the membership list, but as PC we should
>> decide who will be our members in the WG. we have to send the names by
>> 19th May
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Glen de Saint G?ry <Glen at icann.org>
>> Date: 2014-05-13 1:04 GMT+09:00
>> Subject: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
>> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, "Larisa B. Gurnick" <
>> larisa.gurnick at icann.org>, "gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org" <
>> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Rafik,
>>
>>
>> Please note the Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
>> and please note the very tight timeframe.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>> Glen
>>
>> *Summary*
>>
>> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would
>> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
>> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is expected
>> to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other
>> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer
>> should they decide so.
>>
>> *Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party*
>>
>> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
>>
>> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
>> and the Board?s Structural Improvements Committee;
>> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[1];
>> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
>> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
>> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
>> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping to
>> ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner accurately
>> reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
>> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
>> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
>> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
>> participation.
>>
>> *Volunteer Requirements*
>>
>> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
>> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
>> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
>> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar Stakeholder
>> Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee appointees, up
>> to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2 representative
>> from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives from
>> the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6
>> representatives from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to
>> the possibility for other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The
>> activities of the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an open
>> and fully transparent manner.
>>
>> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
>> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective criteria
>> would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to
>> devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to be 50
>> ? 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately.
>> Commitment to and compliance with ICANN?s bottom-up, multistakeholder
>> model, and accountability and transparency ethics are a requirement.
>>
>> *Submitting candidates*
>>
>> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
>> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
>> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
>> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to fill
>> all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names of
>> the proposed candidates are submitted *by Monday 19 May at the latest*as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed candidates should
>> be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org).
>>
>> *Background*
>>
>> The objective of the GNSO Review[2] is to examine organizational
>> effectiveness of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO
>> Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies).
>> The review scheduled to begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly
>> scoped based on objective and quantifiable criteria provided to the
>> independent examiner.
>>
>> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation from
>> the broader community are important components of this review process. As
>> discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements Committee
>> of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working Party be
>> assembled to function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent
>> examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review criteria and the 360
>> Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and
>> responses to the draft findings and recommendations. Once a final report is
>> issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review
>> Working Party is expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare
>> an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement
>> activities.
>>
>> Please see the recent announcement<http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm> about
>> the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
>>
>>
>> *Further Information*
>>
>>
>> Forming GNSO Review Working Party *Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO
>> Review Working Party*
>>
>> *Summary*
>>
>> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would
>> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
>> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is expected
>> to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for other
>> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an observer
>> should they decide so.
>>
>> *Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party*
>>
>> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:
>>
>> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner
>> and the Board?s Structural Improvements Committee;
>> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[3];
>> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
>> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;
>> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
>> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping to
>> ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner accurately
>> reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;
>> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation
>> Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities;
>> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
>> participation.
>>
>> *Volunteer Requirements*
>>
>> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
>> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
>> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
>> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar Stakeholder
>> Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee appointees, up
>> to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up to 2 representative
>> from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2 representatives from
>> the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency, up to 6
>> representatives from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group, in addition to
>> the possibility for other SO/ACs to appoint 1 observer to the effort). The
>> activities of the GNSO Review Working Party will be conducted in an open
>> and fully transparent manner.
>>
>> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
>> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective criteria
>> would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively and to
>> devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is expected to be 50
>> ? 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work commencing immediately.
>> Commitment to and compliance with ICANN?s bottom-up, multi-stakeholder
>> model, and accountability and transparency ethics are a requirement.
>>
>> *Submitting candidates*
>>
>> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
>> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
>> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
>> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to fill
>> all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the names of
>> the proposed candidates are submitted *by Monday 19 May at the latest*as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed candidates should
>> be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org).
>>
>> *Background*
>>
>> The objective of the GNSO Review[4] is to examine organizational
>> effectiveness of the GNSO, including its structure components (GNSO
>> Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies).
>> The review scheduled to begin on or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly
>> scoped based on objective and quantifiable criteria provided to the
>> independent examiner.
>>
>> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation from
>> the broader community are important components of this review process. As
>> discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural Improvements Committee
>> of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO Review Working Party be
>> assembled to function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent
>> examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review criteria and the 360
>> Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and
>> responses to the draft findings and recommendations. Once a final report is
>> issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review
>> Working Party is expected to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare
>> an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement
>> activities.
>>
>> Please see the recent announcement<http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>about the GNSO Review for additional information and background.
>>
>>
>> *Further Information*
>>
>>
>> ? Forming GNSO Review Working Party<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf>
>>
>>
>> ? GNSO Review Webinar<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm.>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Glen de Saint G?ry
>>
>> GNSO Secretariat
>>
>> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
>>
>> http://gnso.icann.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> [1] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize
>> feedback from members of the GNSO community ? a "self-review" relative to
>> objective and quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN
>> organizations, Board and staff also may offer feedback.
>>
>> [2] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN?s Bylaws<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>
>> .
>>
>> [3] 360 Assessment is an online mechanism to collect and summarize
>> feedback from members of the GNSO community ? a "self-review" relative to
>> objective and quantifiable criteria. Interested members of other ICANN
>> organizations, Board and staff also may offer feedback.
>>
>> [4] GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN?s Bylaws<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140519/6a7af4c1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list