[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
Avri Doria
avri
Tue May 13 16:48:12 EEST 2014
Hi,
Yes, I am currently a member. But of course if the PC is going to pick
its members, they could well chose a set of people (not sure where the 6
came from - i would have recommended 3 had i been part of a conversation
on this issue, but anyway) that did not include me.
I also think Klaus may already be on it, but am not sure. He would need
to confirm.
avri
On 13-May-14 03:15, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Dear PC members,
>
> we have here an important process where we should appoint members to
> GNSO review working group. we can appoint up to 6 members for NCSG.
>
> I think that Avri is already member. I am also interested to join this WG.
>
> the participation request time commitment for the next months and it is
> quite critical for us.
>
> I will share the call with the membership list, but as PC we should
> decide who will be our members in the WG. we have to send the names by
> 19th May
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Glen de Saint G?ry* <Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
> Date: 2014-05-13 1:04 GMT+09:00
> Subject: Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working Party
> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org
> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>, "Larisa B. Gurnick"
> <larisa.gurnick at icann.org <mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>>,
> "gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>"
> <gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>>
>
>
> __ __
>
> Dear Rafik,____
>
> __ __
>
> Please note the Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO Review Working
> Party and please note the very tight timeframe.
> Thank you.____
>
> Kind regards,____
>
> __ __
>
> Glen____
>
> */Summary____/*
>
> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would
> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is
> expected to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for
> other Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an
> observer should they decide so.____
>
> */Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party____/*
>
> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:____
>
> 1. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner and
> the Board?s Structural Improvements Committee;____
> 2. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[1]
> <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftn1>;____
> 3. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;____
> 4. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping
> to ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner
> accurately reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;____
> 5. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation Plan
> and champion implementation of improvement activities;____
> 6. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
> participation.____
>
> */Volunteer Requirements____/*
>
> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar
> Stakeholder Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee
> appointees, up to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up
> to 2 representative from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2
> representatives from the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers
> Constituency, up to 6 representatives from the Non-Commercial
> Stakeholder Group, in addition to the possibility for other SO/ACs to
> appoint 1 observer to the effort). The activities of the GNSO Review
> Working Party will be conducted in an open and fully transparent manner.
> ____
>
> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective
> criteria would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively
> and to devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is
> expected to be 50 ? 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work
> commencing immediately. Commitment to and compliance with ICANN?s
> bottom-up, multistakeholder model, and accountability and transparency
> ethics are a requirement. ____
>
> */Submitting candidates____/*
>
> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to
> fill all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the
> names of the proposed candidates are submitted *_by Monday 19 May at the
> latest_* as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed
> candidates should be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat
> (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>).____
>
> */Background____/*
>
> The objective of the GNSO Review[2] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftn2> is to
> examine organizational effectiveness of the GNSO, including its
> structure components (GNSO Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO
> Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies). The review scheduled to begin on
> or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly scoped based on objective and
> quantifiable criteria provided to the independent examiner.____
>
> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
> from the broader community are important components of this review
> process. As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural
> Improvements Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO
> Review Working Party be assembled to function as a liaison between the
> GNSO, the independent examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review
> criteria and the 360 Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively
> supply clarification and responses to the draft findings and
> recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes
> action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review Working Party is expected
> to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation Plan
> and champion implementation of improvement activities.____
>
> Please see the recent announcement
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>
> about the GNSO Review for additional information and background.____
>
> __ __
>
> */Further Information____/*
>
> __ __
>
> Forming GNSO Review Working Party *Call for GNSO Members - Forming GNSO
> Review Working Party____*
>
> */Summary____/*
>
> Following the GNSO Council meeting on 8 May 2014, the GNSO Council would
> like to extend the invitation to join the GNSO Review Working Party to
> members of the GNSO community. The make-up of the Working Party is
> expected to reflect that of the GNSO community, with the opportunity for
> other Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to appoint an
> observer should they decide so.____
>
> */Tasks of the GNSO Review Working Group Party____/*
>
> The task of the GNSO Review Working Group Party will be to:____
>
> 7. Function as a liaison between the GNSO, the independent examiner and
> the Board?s Structural Improvements Committee;____
> 8. Provide input on review criteria and the 360 Assessment[3]
> <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftn3>;____
> 9. Serve as additional conduit for input from, and requests to, GNSO
> constituencies/stakeholder groups, Council;____
> 10. Act as sounding board: offer objective guidance, reactions and
> comments to any preliminary conclusions and assessment and helping
> to ensure the draft report issued by the independent examiner
> accurately reflects the GNSO structure, scope and dynamics;____
> 11. Coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation Plan
> and champion implementation of improvement activities;____
> 12. Perform support communication/awareness activities to encourage
> participation.____
>
> */Volunteer Requirements____/*
>
> The membership of the GNSO Review Working Party is proposed to include
> members representing the diversity of the GNSO community, mirroring the
> make-up of the GNSO Council (up to 3 representatives from the Registry
> Stakeholder Group, up to 3 representatives from the Registrar
> Stakeholder Group, up to 2 representatives from the Nominating Committee
> appointees, up to 2 representatives from the Business Constituency, up
> to 2 representative from the Intellectual Property Constituency, up to 2
> representatives from the Internet Service and Connectivity Providers
> Constituency, up to 6 representatives from the Non-Commercial
> Stakeholder Group, in addition to the possibility for other SO/ACs to
> appoint 1 observer to the effort). The activities of the GNSO Review
> Working Party will be conducted in an open and fully transparent manner.
> ____
>
> Knowledge of the GNSO structure and operations as well as experience in
> evaluating performance and processes based on a set of objective
> criteria would be useful. Members are expected to participate actively
> and to devote sufficient time to the process. Time commitment is
> expected to be 50 ? 80 hours within the next 9 months, with work
> commencing immediately. Commitment to and compliance with ICANN?s
> bottom-up, multi-stakeholder model, and accountability and transparency
> ethics are a requirement. ____
>
> */Submitting candidates____/*
>
> Each Stakeholder Group / Constituency is expected to determine their own
> process for selecting members for this effort taking into account the
> requirements, especially in relation to expected time commitment listed
> above. Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies may, but are not required to
> fill all the slots allocated to their respective groups. Ideally the
> names of the proposed candidates are submitted *_by Monday 19 May at the
> latest_* as work has already commenced. The names of the proposed
> candidates should be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat
> (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>).____
>
> */Background____/*
>
> The objective of the GNSO Review[4] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftn4>is to
> examine organizational effectiveness of the GNSO, including its
> structure components (GNSO Council, GNSO Working Groups, GNSO
> Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies). The review scheduled to begin on
> or about 1 July 2014 will be tightly scoped based on objective and
> quantifiable criteria provided to the independent examiner.____
>
> Involvement of the GNSO community as well as input and participation
> from the broader community are important components of this review
> process. As discussed in GNSO Council meetings, the Structural
> Improvements Committee of the Board (SIC) has requested that a GNSO
> Review Working Party be assembled to function as a liaison between the
> GNSO, the independent examiner and the SIC, to provide input on review
> criteria and the 360 Assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively
> supply clarification and responses to the draft findings and
> recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes
> action on it, as appropriate, the GNSO Review Working Party is expected
> to coordinate with the GNSO community to prepare an Implementation Plan
> and champion implementation of improvement activities.____
>
> Please see the recent announcement
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22apr14-en.htm>about the
> GNSO Review for additional information and background.____
>
> __ __
>
> */Further Information____/*
>
> __ __
>
> __? __Forming GNSO Review Working Party
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-06may14-en.pdf> ____
>
> __ __
>
> __? __GNSO Review Webinar
> <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-23apr14-en.htm.>
> ____
>
> __ __
>
> __ __
>
> __ __
>
> __ __
>
> Glen de Saint G?ry ____
>
> GNSO Secretariat ____
>
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
> ____
>
> http://gnso.icann.org____
>
> __ __
>
>
> ____
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ____
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [1] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftnref1>360 Assessment is an online mechanism to
> collect and summarize feedback from members of the GNSO community ? a
> "self-review" relative to objective and quantifiable criteria.
> Interested members of other ICANN organizations, Board and staff also
> may offer feedback.____
>
> [2] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftnref2>GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN?s
> Bylaws <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>.____
>
> [3] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftnref3>360 Assessment is an online mechanism to
> collect and summarize feedback from members of the GNSO community ? a
> "self-review" relative to objective and quantifiable criteria.
> Interested members of other ICANN organizations, Board and staff also
> may offer feedback.____
>
> [4] <#145f12d57bedb01d__ftnref4>GNSO Review is mandated by ICANN?s
> Bylaws <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#IV>.____
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list