[PC-NCSG] NCSG policy call follow-up

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Brenden,

Thanks! so waiting for the green light (the end of last call) and I will
post the comment.

Best Regards,

Rafik


2014-05-08 10:32 GMT+09:00 Brenden Kuerbis <bkuerbis at internetgovernance.org>
:

> Attached is a clean copy.
>
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Brenden,
>>
>> is it possible to make it asap, I rechecked the announcement and it says "Deadline
>> 8 May, 2014 (midnight UTC)", hope that we are not late
>> please share the cleaned version when ready.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2014-05-08 9:59 GMT+09:00 Brenden Kuerbis <bkuerbis at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Rafik,
>>>
>>> There are a couple copy edits that need to be made before you send. I
>>> can get to them tomorrow morning.
>>> On May 7, 2014 8:01 PM, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Maria,
>>>>
>>>> thank you, I guess you meant 7th not 6th may. I also think that most
>>>> comments were added or resolved.
>>>> I am ready to submit when I get the green light. I attached the latest
>>>> version, I would send .
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-05-08 0:00 GMT+09:00 Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any final objections to adopting and disseminating the
>>>>> proposed IANA statement?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Oe-kqA-5WXGavAy40XEHVzKltNAQrjiuuZ-FH5jJqw/edit
>>>>>
>>>>> The drafters are not accepting any further edits, so I need to know if
>>>>> anyone disagrees with us submitting the documents as it stands. Please let
>>>>> me know of any objections by cob your time today, 6 May. Otherwise, we will
>>>>> submit it on 7 May.
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best, Maria
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7 May 2014 15:06, Stephanie Perrin <
>>>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I support the IANA statement
>>>>>> On May 7, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> since we have to send comment by tomorrow, it will be great to have
>>>>>> PC members votes
>>>>>> @Rudi can you tell us if NPOC support the statement
>>>>>> @Maria is it possible to make a last call to confirm the consensus?
>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-05-07 2:09 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Maria, Rudi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as quick follow-up of today call:
>>>>>>> - NCSG PC members to review the comment on IANA transition and vote
>>>>>>> about it, so we can submit in time (8th May)
>>>>>>> the document is here
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Oe-kqA-5WXGavAy40XEHVzKltNAQrjiuuZ-FH5jJqw/edit
>>>>>>> - EWG survey: reminder was sent to NCSG list and NCSG PC should work
>>>>>>> on filling the survey too.
>>>>>>> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-survey-14mar14-en.htm
>>>>>>> hope that I didn't miss or misunderstand what was agreed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140508/c1a1a5da/attachment.html>