[PC-NCSG] board candidate

[Amr Elsadr]

In that case, Stephanie, my answer would be no. It doesn?t make the MSM bottom-up process a dead duck, but it does raise a concern regarding organising the GNSO into ?Party Houses?. That model used to structure the GNSO doesn?t make much sense to me, and I fail to see how it is a productive practice. Others who have been around longer may have a more in-depth understanding than I do on why this was done. I?m not well educated on the matter.

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 23, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> "If you are speaking of the the Board election  mechanism where 7 people elect one Board seat, and 13 elect another is brain dead. But that was a recommendation from representative of the GNSO that the Board accepted."
> 
> This was the bit that I was referring to?.I am still trying to figure out the process.
> SP
> On Mar 23, 2014, at 1:28 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
>> If you are speaking of the the Board election  mechanism where 7 people elect one Board seat, and 13 elect another is brain dead. But that was a recommendation from representative of the GNSO that the Board accepted.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140323/b6f9a0ff/attachment.html>