[PC-NCSG] URGENT: Pending NCSG Statements

joy joy
Wed Mar 12 03:23:47 EET 2014


thanks Rafik!
On 12/03/2014 1:35 p.m., Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Thanks to everybody, we made it at the end, I think that I safely
> submitted the statements and waiting for acknowledgment .
> I think that we should discuss in singapore meeting how we can improve
> the process and make it more smooth.
> we have some open comments coming soon. @Maria @Rudi is it possible to
> list those public comments (in confluence to track them), the deadline
> and the person in charge to lead the draft effort?maybe we need to
> think about prioritization (some memories for former gnso councillors :)) 
> For example we have the strategic panels reports and that is important
> to respond to. 
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-03-12 5:03 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi Amr,
>
>     Yes, I will send them.
>
>     Rafik
>
>     On Mar 12, 2014 2:43 AM, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>     <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
>
>         Thanks Rudi. In that case, I assume it would be safe for Rafik
>         or Maria to send these out as NCSG comments. I've attached
>         them all again in PDF.
>
>         Thanks to all.
>
>         Amr
>
>
>
>
>
>         On Mar 11, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Rudi Vansnick
>         <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>> wrote:
>
>>         Hi Rafik,
>>
>>         I can confirm NPOC supports the 3 NCSG statements as they
>>         were lastly attached to a message.
>>
>>         Kind regards,
>>
>>         Rudi Vansnick
>>         NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>         NPOC treasurer
>>         rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>         Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>         Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>         <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>         www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>
>>         Op 11-mrt.-2014, om 14:08 heeft Rafik Dammak
>>         <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> het
>>         volgende geschreven:
>>
>>>         Hi Rudi,
>>>
>>>         I am really confused by your response:
>>>
>>>             NPOC's policy committee is reviewing the documents. So
>>>             far, we did not see important changes to the presented
>>>             position statements. 
>>>
>>>
>>>         what kind of changes you were expecting? do you mean that
>>>         you already made some comments to the drafts?
>>>         we have 3 statements drafted which were shared , and we need
>>>         to submit them asap since we are already after the deadline
>>>         . when the NPOC PC will respond exactly?
>>>
>>>             Being involved in the Translation/transliteration WG, we
>>>             have delayed the responses for a few extra weeks as we
>>>             are still expecting a lot of replies to our query.
>>>
>>>
>>>         I thought that any WG want to get answers quickly from
>>>         community to get guidance, so delaying doesn't make so much
>>>         sense IMHO. or do you mean that WG extended the
>>>         questionnaire period? because I didn't see any announcement
>>>         on that matter. 
>>>
>>>         Best,
>>>
>>>         Rafik
>>>
>>>          
>>>
>>>             NPOC treasurer
>>>             rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>             Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>>>             <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>             Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>             <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>             www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>
>>>             Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 15:58 heeft Maria Farrell
>>>             <maria.farrell at GMAIL.COM
>>>             <mailto:maria.farrell at GMAIL.COM>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>>             Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>>             Thanks so much to the drafters of these excellent
>>>>             positions. I personally support all of them and am
>>>>             sorry that my workload this week has been too frantic
>>>>             to allow me to contribute.
>>>>
>>>>             I just spotted a typo and one textual ambiguity in the
>>>>             privacy and proxy document, details attached below in
>>>>             bold and strikethrough, if there is time to revise
>>>>             them. (but these two points are not deal breakers if
>>>>             there is not time.)
>>>>
>>>>             All the best, Maria
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On 7 March 2014 14:36, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>>             <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Hi Rudi,
>>>>
>>>>                 I've attached the three statements to this email,
>>>>                 but unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of
>>>>                 waiting until we have an NCSG-PC call to review and
>>>>                 submit them.The deadlines for these have already
>>>>                 passed, and we've been asking for extensions for
>>>>                 all of them. There has only been an update to one
>>>>                 of them (Translation & Transliteration of Contact
>>>>                 Information PDP WG) based on Kathy's feedback on
>>>>                 the NCSG-list. They're the same comments Chris
>>>>                 Dillon walked us through during the WG call
>>>>                 yesterday. Could you and others please give
>>>>                 feedback on this list?
>>>>
>>>>                 Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>                 Amr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 On Mar 7, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Rudi Vansnick
>>>>                 <rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE
>>>>                 <mailto:rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>                 I agree we need to start do some work in NCSG-PC.
>>>>>                 Can we have a link to the statements as they are
>>>>>                 today so we do not use wrong ones ?
>>>>>                 I would call on the NCSG-PC chair to schedule an
>>>>>                 online meeting so we can validate NCSG-PC
>>>>>                 positions on this.
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Rudi Vansnick
>>>>>                 NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>>>                 NPOC treasurer
>>>>>                 rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>>>                 Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>>>>>                 <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>>>                 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>>>                 <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>>>                 www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 12:16 heeft Rafik Dammak
>>>>>                 <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>>                 <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> het volgende
>>>>>                 geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Hi Amr,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 thanks for the reminder, NCSG PC members should
>>>>>>                 review and indicate their support or not to the
>>>>>>                 statements. we have statements but they are
>>>>>>                 waiting approval!
>>>>>>                 I asked for extension for the PPSAI questionnaire
>>>>>>                 but I don't think that we can take more than one
>>>>>>                 week to respond.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Rafik 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 2014-03-06 18:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr
>>>>>>                 <aelsadr at egyptig.org <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     I don't enjoy nagging, but there are three
>>>>>>                     statements currently awaiting NCSG-PC
>>>>>>                     endorsement:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     1. NCSG response to the Privacy and Proxy
>>>>>>                     Services Accreditation Issues PDP WG
>>>>>>                     2. NCSG response to the gTLD Registration
>>>>>>                     Data Services EWG status update report
>>>>>>                     3. NCSG response to the Translation and
>>>>>>                     Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     The response to the EWG can always be sent as
>>>>>>                     an individual statement endorsed by whoever
>>>>>>                     cares to sign it, but the responses to the
>>>>>>                     two PDP WGs needs to be endorsed by either an
>>>>>>                     SO, an AC, a SG or a constituency. These are
>>>>>>                     very important statements that constitute the
>>>>>>                     NCSG's official contribution to PDP WGs, and
>>>>>>                     it would be a shame if we don't declare a
>>>>>>                     position on them only because we fail to
>>>>>>                     endorse statements already drafted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     I urge you all to read through all three of
>>>>>>                     the statements, ask questions or suggest
>>>>>>                     changes, then either indicate that you
>>>>>>                     support or don't support them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Note: There are still more requests for input
>>>>>>                     pending that have not yet been drafted
>>>>>>                     including the Policy and Implementation WG (a
>>>>>>                     non-PDP WG) and the IRTP-D initial report.
>>>>>>                     Not sure if I missed any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Amr
>>>>>>                     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>                     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>                     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>>>                     <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>                     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>>>>                 PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>>                 PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>>                 http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>>                 PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>                 PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>                 http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             <maria farrell p&p comments.docx>
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>             PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>             http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         PC-NCSG mailing list
>>         PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>         http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140312/78b6ae81/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: joy.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140312/78b6ae81/attachment-0001.vcf>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list