[PC-NCSG] URGENT: Pending NCSG Statements
Amr Elsadr
aelsadr
Mon Mar 10 18:09:24 EET 2014
There is an email on this thread with all three documents attached. I can resend them in a bit, but am on a bus right now.
Thanks.
Amr
Sent from mobile
> On Mar 10, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
>
> is there a convenient place to find these?
>
> avri
>
>
>> On 10-Mar-14 09:38, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks to those who have responded and showed support for the
>> statements. Unfortunately, we only got responses from three out of ten
>> NCSG-PC members. I don?t believe this qualifies as ?rough consensus? as
>> defined in the NCSG charter.
>>
>> It?s rather a shame that NCSG members put their time into following
>> these working groups and make an effort to draft comments when feedback
>> is sought only to be ignored by the policy committee. I still believe it
>> is important to submit the drafted comments, and so will seek
>> endorsement by NCUC. I hope we have better luck with responses there
>> than here.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Amr
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Stephanie Perrin
>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have already supported the P/P questionnaire, and the EWG response,
>>> now I support the T&T position. And thanks to all drafters!!! the
>>> work never stops?.
>>> Stephanie
>>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rudi,
>>>>
>>>> I?ve attached the three statements to this email, but unfortunately,
>>>> we don?t have the luxury of waiting until we have an NCSG-PC call to
>>>> review and submit them.The deadlines for these have already passed,
>>>> and we?ve been asking for extensions for all of them. There has only
>>>> been an update to one of them (Translation & Transliteration of
>>>> Contact Information PDP WG) based on Kathy?s feedback on the
>>>> NCSG-list. They?re the same comments Chris Dillon walked us through
>>>> during the WG call yesterday. Could you and others please give
>>>> feedback on this list?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Amr
>>>>
>>>> <NCSG Response to T&T of Contact Info PDP WG Questions.doc>
>>>> <NCSGResponsetoQuestionsfromProxyPrivacyAccrediationWG.docx
>>>> (00629345).docx>
>>>> <Comments of the NCSG to EWG Status Report March 2014.docx>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 7, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE
>>>> <mailto:rudi.vansnick at ISOC.BE>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree we need to start do some work in NCSG-PC. Can we have a link
>>>>> to the statements as they are today so we do not use wrong ones ?
>>>>> I would call on the NCSG-PC chair to schedule an online meeting so
>>>>> we can validate NCSG-PC positions on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rudi Vansnick
>>>>> NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>>> NPOC treasurer
>>>>> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>>> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>>>>> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>>> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>> Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 12:16 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Amr,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for the reminder, NCSG PC members should review and indicate
>>>>>> their support or not to the statements. we have statements but they
>>>>>> are waiting approval!
>>>>>> I asked for extension for the PPSAI questionnaire but I don't think
>>>>>> that we can take more than one week to respond.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-03-06 18:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org
>>>>>> <mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don?t enjoy nagging, but there are three statements currently
>>>>>> awaiting NCSG-PC endorsement:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. NCSG response to the Privacy and Proxy Services
>>>>>> Accreditation Issues PDP WG
>>>>>> 2. NCSG response to the gTLD Registration Data Services EWG
>>>>>> status update report
>>>>>> 3. NCSG response to the Translation and Transliteration of
>>>>>> Contact Information PDP WG
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The response to the EWG can always be sent as an individual
>>>>>> statement endorsed by whoever cares to sign it, but the
>>>>>> responses to the two PDP WGs needs to be endorsed by either an
>>>>>> SO, an AC, a SG or a constituency. These are very important
>>>>>> statements that constitute the NCSG's official contribution to
>>>>>> PDP WGs, and it would be a shame if we don?t declare a position
>>>>>> on them only because we fail to endorse statements already drafted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I urge you all to read through all three of the statements, ask
>>>>>> questions or suggest changes, then either indicate that you
>>>>>> support or don?t support them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note: There are still more requests for input pending that have
>>>>>> not yet been drafted including the Policy and Implementation WG
>>>>>> (a non-PDP WG) and the IRTP-D initial report. Not sure if I
>>>>>> missed any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amr
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list