[PC-NCSG] URGENT: Pending NCSG Statements

[Rudi Vansnick]

I agree we need to start do some work in NCSG-PC. Can we have a link to the statements as they are today so we do not use wrong ones ?
I would call on the NCSG-PC chair to schedule an online meeting so we can validate NCSG-PC positions on this.

Kind regards,

Rudi Vansnick
NPOC chair Policy Committee
NPOC treasurer
rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
www.npoc.org

Op 7-mrt.-2014, om 12:16 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:

> Hi Amr,
> 
> thanks for the reminder, NCSG PC members should review and indicate their support or not to the statements. we have statements but they are waiting approval!
> I asked for extension for the PPSAI questionnaire but I don't think that we can take more than one week to respond.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> 
> 2014-03-06 18:52 GMT+09:00 Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org>:
> Hi all,
> 
> I don?t enjoy nagging, but there are three statements currently awaiting NCSG-PC endorsement:
> 
> 1. NCSG response to the Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP WG
> 2. NCSG response to the gTLD Registration Data Services EWG status update report
> 3. NCSG response to the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG
> 
> The response to the EWG can always be sent as an individual statement endorsed by whoever cares to sign it, but the responses to the two PDP WGs needs to be endorsed by either an SO, an AC, a SG or a constituency. These are very important statements that constitute the NCSG's official contribution to PDP WGs, and it would be a shame if we don?t declare a position on them only because we fail to endorse statements already drafted.
> 
> I urge you all to read through all three of the statements, ask questions or suggest changes, then either indicate that you support or don?t support them.
> 
> Note: There are still more requests for input pending that have not yet been drafted including the Policy and Implementation WG (a non-PDP WG) and the IRTP-D initial report. Not sure if I missed any.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140307/08e822d3/attachment.html>