[PC-NCSG] NCSG Response to the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditations Issues (PPSAI) PDP WG Questions

[Amr Elsadr]

The charter questions are pretty awful on this PDP. Voluntary takedown by the registrant as opposed to reveal is an option we have proposed as an accreditation clause.

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 4, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> I am reading this now and do not understand what sort of the group sis thinking if.  What is this notion of a Proxy/Privacy service taking anything down.  What would they have responsibilities beyond  Notify and Reveal.
> 
> I started to review and I cannot make sense of the questions.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 01-Mar-14 13:12, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> The PPSAI PDP WG has sent requests for input from the different SOs, ACs and GNSO SGs and constituencies on the working group?s charter questions. Kathy Kleiman has drafted a response to these questions and has received input from other members of the NCSG, including Roy Balleste who made some substantive additions. I?m sending copies of this email to both of them.
>> 
>> The response they?ve drafted is attached to this email, and I am asking for review and endorsement of this statement by the members of the PC to submit it as an NCSG response.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Amr
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg