[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: [council] Reminder - GNSO Liaison to the GAC

[Maria Farrell]

It's a huge one, I'll give you that. Actually in fairness to her, marilyn
cade did a good job of spelling out more of the downsides to this one. god
knows, it'll be a fascinating one, though!

m


On 25 June 2014 14:33, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
wrote:

>  If you decide that an ex govt person with international experience would
> be useful, and you tell me the salary, I might be interested :-)
> all kidding aside, this would be an enormous challenge, and potentially
> very very demanding.  You want someone to actually volunteer to do this???
> cheers steph
>
> On 2014-06-25, 9:28 PM, Maria Farrell wrote:
>
>  FYI, PC colleagues - this position may or may not end up being within
> the NCSG purview - as David points out below. But if we do come to
> proposing a person from NCSG, the PC will need to be involved.
>
>  NB this one is not as urgent as the CWG drafting group position or the
> IANA transition one.
>
> cheers, m
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Cake <dave at difference.com.au>
> Date: 25 June 2014 10:53
> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: [council] Reminder - GNSO Liaison to the GAC
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>
>
>  The GNSO council is seeking to appoint a GNSO liaison to the GAC. This
> person would be expected to liaise between GNSO working groups and the GAC,
> participate in a subset of GAC processes, and attend ICANN meetings (at
> which they would attend most GAC meetings and have the write to speak to
> provide information about the GNSO), and report back to council on GAC
> issues that interact with the GNSO.
>
>  We are seeking to appoint a single person on behalf of the GNSO, so
> there is absolutely no presumption that this person would be from NCSG
> (though of course they could be), and is likely to consume a lot of that
> persons time at meetings. In discussions so far we have been saying that it
> is likely to be a former GNSO councillor and experienced WG participant.
>
>  Suggestions on appropriate candidates, and criteria on which they should
> be selected, from NCSG colleagues are welcome.
>
>  Regards
>
>  David
>
>  Begin forwarded message:
>
>  *From: *"Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>  *Subject: **[council] Reminder - GNSO Liaison to the GAC*
>  *Date: *25 June 2014 10:41:58 am GMT+1
>  *To: *<council at gnso.icann.org>
>  *Reply-To: *<jrobinson at afilias.info>
>
>   All,
>
>  Please recall that we would like to commence the recruitment and
> selection of a GNSO Liaison to the GAC as soon as possible.
>  This item will be discussed under Item 10 in the GNSO Council meeting
> today.
>
>  Please note that the GAC has already approved this at our meeting with
> them on Sunday.
>
>  I have attached the slides from the presentation to the GAC for your
> information.
> I have also attached the draft specification.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing listPC-NCSG at ipjustice.orghttp://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140625/4cbca0bd/attachment-0001.html>