[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: [council] Reminder - GNSO Liaison to the GAC

[Maria Farrell]

FYI, PC colleagues - this position may or may not end up being within the
NCSG purview - as David points out below. But if we do come to proposing a
person from NCSG, the PC will need to be involved.

NB this one is not as urgent as the CWG drafting group position or the IANA
transition one.

cheers, m

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Cake <dave at difference.com.au>
Date: 25 June 2014 10:53
Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: [council] Reminder - GNSO Liaison to the GAC
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu


The GNSO council is seeking to appoint a GNSO liaison to the GAC. This
person would be expected to liaise between GNSO working groups and the GAC,
participate in a subset of GAC processes, and attend ICANN meetings (at
which they would attend most GAC meetings and have the write to speak to
provide information about the GNSO), and report back to council on GAC
issues that interact with the GNSO.

We are seeking to appoint a single person on behalf of the GNSO, so there
is absolutely no presumption that this person would be from NCSG (though of
course they could be), and is likely to consume a lot of that persons time
at meetings. In discussions so far we have been saying that it is likely to
be a former GNSO councillor and experienced WG participant.

Suggestions on appropriate candidates, and criteria on which they should be
selected, from NCSG colleagues are welcome.

Regards

David

Begin forwarded message:

*From: *"Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson at afilias.info>
*Subject: **[council] Reminder - GNSO Liaison to the GAC*
*Date: *25 June 2014 10:41:58 am GMT+1
*To: *<council at gnso.icann.org>
*Reply-To: *<jrobinson at afilias.info>

All,

Please recall that we would like to commence the recruitment and selection
of a GNSO Liaison to the GAC as soon as possible.
This item will be discussed under Item 10 in the GNSO Council meeting today.

Please note that the GAC has already approved this at our meeting with them
on Sunday.

I have attached the slides from the presentation to the GAC for your
information.
I have also attached the draft specification.

Thanks,


Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140625/f66bb9c5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GAC-GNSO CG London Slides - 19 June 2014.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 588929 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140625/f66bb9c5/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Liaison to the GAC-DRAFT 06 June 2014.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 74897 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140625/f66bb9c5/attachment-0003.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 464 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140625/f66bb9c5/attachment-0001.sig>