[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [] Survey questions: rproposed changes

[Avri Doria]

fyi

This is a version of the question currently being edited for the review.

I am currently doing my review off of this base, and would be happy to
include the comments of others.

avri


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[gnso-review-dt] Survey questions: rproposed changes
Date: 	Tue, 1 Jul 2014 12:15:06 +0200
From: 	BRG <philip at brandregistrygroup.org>
To: 	<gnso-review-dt at icann.org>



Hi everyone,
Let me say I think the starting point and breadth of the survey is
excellent. This is no easy task.

Please find attached a number of proposed changes to the survey.
The changes in part reflect my role as a previous Names Council chair,
GNSO council member, Constituency member, and working party member of
the 2008 GNSO council reform. I tried to think through how I would
manage in answering the questions, and where I failed, have proposed
changes.

I have proposed a new section for NomCom as this may help with responses
putting all the relevant questions in one place. NomCom appointees are a
different flavour to other groups, and the questions need to reflect this.

I have also expanded a bit the final section - where I have added
Chuck's substantive proposals - and indicated support to his other comments.

In doing our work, I have reviewed the answers this group got from the
SIC about structure. It is relevant also for us to remember the Board's
original September resolution (below) on the review. The Board expected
the review to be forward looking and we should fulfil that.

Philip
https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2013-09-28-en


In its resolution <https://www.myicann.org/gnso-review?language=es>of 28
September 2013 the ICANN Board stated:

?/The expansion of the TLD space has increased the number and variety of
stakeholders participating in GNSO policy making and a review needs to
take place on schedule to examine whether the current model meets the
needs of *a new generation* of stakeholders. /

//

/GNSO Structure is unlikely to accommodate the anticipated new stream of
stakeholders resulting from the expansion of the TLD space. The GNSO
Review will be an important vehicle for considering and addressing this
issue. *The unbalance that is already occurring* needs to be addressed
by the GNSO Review. /?










-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO survey 2014 v2.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 103936 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140701/5e809347/attachment-0001.doc>