[PC-NCSG] NCSG statement on CCWG on IANA stewardship transition

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I cannot accept it with Seun's edits.

I think we need a frozen version that we take the decision on.  then if
the PC needs to change language to find our consensus we can, but we
can't work on a doc that is still waving from pole to pole.

avri

On 17-Dec-14 10:46, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am planning to do call for consensus and set the deadline for Sunday
> 21st Dec 23:59UTC
> so please review the statement . as reminder we have to submit by 22nd
> Dec and as we discussed in confcall yesterday we still have work to do
> in that working group and solve some open issues.
>
> Rafik 
>
> 2014-12-15 13:01 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi everyone,
>
>     we have 1 week before the deadline to submit NCSG comment
>     (https://docs.google.com/document/d/14mDNLW17CJ_7rHSprzSAW90jhzPjlMiJf8qkbRM_Lek
>     ) regarding the CCWG on IANA transition proposal. The active NCSG
>     members in that WG worked in the statement and resolved the
>     comments . The draft statement was  also shared in NCSG list for
>     membership review. 
>
>     it is time that PC members review it for endorsement , acting as
>     interim PC chair I will make the calls for consensus soon. 
>
>     Best,
>
>     Rafik
>
>     for reference please find the draft proposal
>     here https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-12-01-en 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20141217/03e67ddf/attachment.html>