[PC-NCSG] Cross community letter regarding ICANN's Accountability Process Announcement

[Avri Doria]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi,

As i just said on the Discuss list, I am against signing the letter as
it just contributes to delay.

If there is something we want them to change or fix. lets craft a
letter that says that.

avri


On 27-Aug-14 14:59, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> there was discussion between leaders of SOs/ACs regarding letter to
> ICANN CEO and the board about the proposal for accountability
> process. I copied the letter below. I am submitting it for review
> from NCSG PC and getting membership feedback. I would like that we
> act swiftly about it.
> 
> personally, I advise to sign it at least as community reaction and
> request for clarifying details left behind and not covered in the
> faq. but I want also  to get any additional proposal or comments I
> can share with the chairs of other groups.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Fadi Chehad?, CEO, ICANN
> 
> Dr. Stephen Crocker, Chair, ICANN Board of Directors
> 
> ICANN Board of Directors
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Fadi, Steve and ICANN Directors,
> 
> 
> 
> Regarding ICANN?s announcement on August 14, 2014, Enhancing 
> Accountability: Process and Next Steps 
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-08-14-en>,
>
> 
the Supporting Organisation, Advisory Committee, Stakeholder Group and
> Constituency chairs formally request additional time and
> opportunity to review and discuss the proposal contained in the
> announcement and in the subsequent FAQ?s 
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/enhancing-accountability-faqs-2014-08-22-en>
>
> 
published on August 22, so that next steps can be confirmed with increased
> support from the ICANN community.
> 
> 
> 
> Recognizing that the ICANN plan is a brand new construct that was
> announced without a corresponding public comment period,
> substantial questions and concerns remain unanswered, including
> around the process to date and the plan as constructed.
> 
> 
> 
> The undersigned Supporting Organisation, Advisory Committee,
> Stakeholder Group and Constituency leaders are currently engaging
> our respective groups? bottom-up, consensus processes at this time
> to develop and finalize a list of questions that will require
> clarification or correction.  As a result, additional opportunity
> is needed to ensure understanding of the proposal and the ways in
> which it is responsive to the interests and working methods of the
> ICANN stakeholder groups. We commit to submitting to ICANN staff
> our list of clarifying questions and comments within seven days of
> this letter.
> 
> 
> 
> Since the Enhancing Accountability process will affect ICANN?s
> future, as well as the range of stakeholders impacted by its
> decisions, we trust that this request will be received positively
> and lead to further engagement on this important matter to ensure
> that the SOs, ACs and SGs and Cs not only understand the proposed
> approach, but are able to endorse it.
> 
> 
> 
> Signed,
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ PC-NCSG mailing
> list PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org 
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT/cv5AAoJEOo+L8tCe36Hll0H/3UvVkNrLCl/4iO9CN3qBJEd
JTsaM+UeKXjjIEYwZSGR8+mysCUGIJYEB1fHcCGbxfkxoAH4AY90R10OMBwpCNs3
4v/g04oRwd6/xcflu/QaDv/jk3sHgo34KxjQkyDmkonHo8Sd42cKRJOknoL4lrRA
aMM0iUw1wk8cdqkE+USfjaa061S1URl/favzH0xDNpAwrKOh/f5jXZDK0mjsvgg8
11+HymVyM51H8T9fuChk/Nn50Y0Rr22SGGbQhp5GlcbL3NHqR7DFL58Z1HG/OyY1
N7mhPCxtooYD0iv8p1jvmsAG/G6XdvQANF6uQDIQUWrMcyUPi9o9yME+Xg28S2E=
=EPWM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----