[PC-NCSG] [Privacy] Mark Monitor's counter attack

[Avri Doria]

message sent to discuss list as requested.

avri



On 7 Sep 2013, at 08:37, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Thank you so much for the input.
> 
> BTW, it was signed by me on behalf of the NCSG Policy Committee, not by all the members of the the NCSG
> 
> I will consider writing something to the Discuss list, but i do worry about giving Mark Monitor comments more weight.  Remember, though, people read the ncsg discuss list for attack points as we are one of the few GNSO SG/C's that maintain a required open list archive. 
> 
> avri
> 
> On 7 Sep 2013, at 03:55, William Drake wrote:
> 
>> Wow, you guys have undermined the multistakeholder model.  Congrats!  :-)
>> 
>> MM's letter strikes me as more floral and breathlessly overreactive than legal, but maybe the lawyers amongst us see something that requires that sort of response.
>> 
>> One question?since our input was signed "All members of the NCSG," might it be good to send a message to the members list saying this is happening?  Not just on representational/accountability grounds, but because one can imagine scenarios where someday someone from some corner of 'the community' raises it with an uninformed NCSG member and awkwardness ensues?
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>> Bill
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>