[PC-NCSG] NCSG Comment on ICANN's Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study

[Robin Gross]

Yes, let's endorse it as the Policy Committee statement.  Any other thoughts, support, suggestions for improvements, etc.?  Time is short.

Thanks very much for your work on this statement, Amr.

Best,
Robin


On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I?ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any suggested changes anyone feels need to be made.
> 
> I?ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> For more on the study itself, check this link: https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/whois-pp-abuse-study-24sep13-en.htm
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20131112/6552a726/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20131112/6552a726/attachment.sig>