[PC-NCSG] Fwd: Input Request: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D

[Robin Gross]

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Glen de Saint G?ry <Glen at icann.org>
> Date: March 14, 2013 2:47:08 PM PDT
> To: Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>
> Cc: "gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org Gery"  
> <gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: Input Request: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D
>
>
>
> Stakeholder Group / Constituency Input Template
> Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part D Policy Development Process
>
> PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR RESPONSE AT THE LATEST BY Friday 19 April 2013  
> TO THE GNSO SECRETARIAT (gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org), which  
> will forward your statement to the IRTP Part D Working Group.
>
> The GNSO Council has formed a Working Group of interested  
> stakeholders and Stakeholder Group / Constituency representatives,  
> to collaborate broadly with knowledgeable individuals and  
> organizations, in order to consider recommendations for a number of  
> issues related to the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP). The  
> IRTP is a consensus policy that was adopted by the GNSO Council in  
> 2004, which aims to provide a straightforward procedure for domain  
> name holders to transfer their names from one ICANN-accredited  
> registrar to another.
>
> Part of the working group?s effort will be to incorporate ideas  
> and suggestions gathered from Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies  
> through this Stakeholder Group / Constituency Statement. Inserting  
> your Stakeholder Group?s / Constituency?s response in this form  
> will make it much easier for the Working Group to summarize the  
> responses. This information is helpful to the community in  
> understanding the points of view of various stakeholders. However,  
> you should feel free to add any information you deem important to  
> inform the working group?s deliberations, even if this does not  
> fit into any of the questions listed below.
>
> For further background information on this issue, please review the  
> GNSO Final Issue Report on IRTP Part D. The Working GroupCharter  
> can be found here.
>
> Process
> -        Please identify the member(s) of your stakeholder group /  
> constituency who is (are) participating in this working group
>
> -        Please identify the members of your stakeholder group /  
> constituency who participated in developing the perspective(s) set  
> forth below.
>
>
> -        Please describe the process by which your stakeholder  
> group / constituency arrived at the perspective(s) set forth below.
>
>
> Questions
>
> Please provide your stakeholder group?s / constituency?s views  
> on the IRTP Part D Charter Questions:
> a)      With regard to the IRTP, should reporting requirements for  
> registries and dispute provider be developed in order to make  
> precedent and trend information available to the community and  
> allow reference to past cases in dispute submissions?
> b)      Should additional provisions be included in the Transfer  
> Dispute Resolution Policy (TDRP) that set out how to handle  
> disputes when multiple transfers have occurred?
> c)      Should dispute options for registrants be developed and  
> implanted as part of the IRTP (currently registrants depend on  
> registrars to initiate a dispute on their behalf)?
> d)      Should certain requirements and best practices be put into  
> place for registrars to make information on transfer dispute  
> resolution options available to registrants?
> e)      Are existing penalties for policy violations sufficient or  
> should additional provisions/penalties for specific violations be  
> added into the IRTP?
> f)       Did the universal adoption and implementation of EPP  
> AuthInfo codes* eliminate the need of Standard Forms of  
> Authorization (FOAs)**?
>
> Please note that you are very welcome to provide any additional  
> information that you may think useful for the Working Group to  
> consider as part of its deliberations on these charter questions.
>
> * The Auth-Info Code is a unique code generated on a per-domain  
> basis and is used for authorization or confirmation of a transfer  
> request.
>
> ** An FOA is a standardized form of authorization to initiate a  
> domain name transfer, see also: FOA: Domain Name Transfer ?  
> Initial Authorization for Registrar Transfer
>
>
> Glen de Saint G?ry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20130314/bb03751e/attachment.html>