[PC-NCSG] Statement on RA => ATRT Statement
Avri Doria
avri
Wed Jun 12 16:05:15 EEST 2013
Hi,
I think we have Robin's support , but she hasn't actually said so.
And would love to have someone from the NPOC side concur.
I must admit, I played fast and loose and submitted the RA one as an NCSG response.
I took Alternate Chair's prerogative.
And I will ask to remove it if I get told to do so by the group.
However, because of my ATRT2 conflict, I am staying out of that stmt.
avri
On 12 Jun 2013, at 08:57, <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu> <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu> wrote:
> Thanks! That's two out of six Councilors, NCUC Chair, me and Avri. Probably not enough for an NCSG PC consensus :( ...
>
> Given that this is the third time the draft statement has been sent around, this will go in as an NCUC statement UNLESS there's a couple more Yeas today.
>
> Thanks,
> Mary
>
>
> Mary W S Wong
>
>
> Professor of Law
>
>
> Faculty Chair, Global IP Partnerships
>
>
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>
>
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
>
>
> Two White Street
>
>
> Concord, NH 03301
>
>
> USA
>
>
> Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
>
>
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>
>
> Webpage:
> http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
>
>
>
>
> >>>
> From:
> "Kleinw?chter, Wolfgang"<wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de>
> To:
> David Cake <dave at difference.com.au>, NCSG-Policy Policy <PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> Date:
> 6/12/2013 4:39 AM
> Subject:
> Re: [PC-NCSG] Statement on RA => ATRT Statement
> I join David by giving my full support to the two statements
>
> wolfgang
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org im Auftrag von David Cake
> Gesendet: Mi 12.06.2013 10:24
> An: NCSG-Policy Policy
> Betreff: Re: [PC-NCSG] Statement on RA => ATRT Statement
>
>
> This Councillors is happy to support both Mary's ARTR statement and Avri's statement on RA.
>
> Regards
>
> David
>
> On 12/06/2013, at 3:45 PM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> While there has not been clear 'yes' statements from our Councilors on this list, taking into account the totality of dialogue in all relevant spaces one could arguably infer a rough consensus for the two statements. However, if that's too fast and loose with the rules for you all, I would ask that Mary's ATRT statement be repurposed for submission on behalf of NCUC. The process NCUC has followed over the years for declaring rough consensus on statements is rather more elastic and "sense of the room" oriented, by necessity given our lack of a PC, so we could send this our EC and members lists and if nobody disagrees by tomorrow send it off. NCUC has a Constituency Day meeting with the ATRT and at present we have no input of any kind to discuss with them, which is a bit embarrassing and dysfunctional in terms of the conversation. Mary's statement puts on the table our concerns with the GAC communique and Reconsideration request, and it would be really useful to be able to
> take those up with ATRT on the basis of a submission.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:57 AM, <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Also ditto w.r.t. ART2 statement ...
>
>
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Faculty Chair, Global IP Partnerships
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
>
>
> >>>
> From:
> Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
> To:
> NCSG-Policy Policy <PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> Date:
> 6/11/2013 10:45 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [PC-NCSG] Statement on RA
> Hi
>
> Deadline has gone by, but I still don't feel I have NCSG-PC decision to send it in. I haven't.
>
> I may be able to submit late, but then again, may not.
>
> avri
>
> On 11 Jun 2013, at 17:48, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > oh, and the deadline is today.
> >
> > sorry, but i had given up until the meeting today.
> >
> > submit or no?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > avri
> >
> > On 11 Jun 2013, at 17:06, Avri Doria wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> At this today's policy meeting a public comment on RA was discussed. I reported that I had given up trying to write one, because I found little to say other than that we support the Verisign position against unilateralism by ICANN staff.
> >>
> >> Others argued that this was important to say and that I should submit what I have.
> >>
> >> This is what I have.
> >>
> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KpGVEX0-VKWP6SusSm4z8YVA_BFsqJ3WB3jTJdOWdlw/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> avri
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
> **********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
> Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
> University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
> ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org/>
> william.drake at uzh.ch
> www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org/>
> ***********************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list