[PC-NCSG] Draft Statement

[Avri Doria]

Yet this does not mention .Amazon or the specific issue we are divided on.

It only talks about overreach on the geographical issue.

Avri

William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:
>Hi
>
>My guess from previous discussions on ncsg-discuss would be that we
>don't have consensus on .amazon etc., procedural problems
>notwithstanding.  Does anyone believe otherwise?
>
>Thanks
>
>Bill 
>
>
>On Jul 15, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG> wrote:
>
>> FYI.
>> 
>> Are we interested in supporting this?
>> 
>> I wasn't at the meeting and don't know if anyone was from NCSG.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: "King(Legal), Stacey" <stacek at amazon.com>
>>> Subject: Draft Statement
>>> Date: 14 July 2013 22:52:00 GMT+02:00
>>> To: "kiranm at markmonitor.com" <kiranm at markmonitor.com>,
>"harris at cabase.org.ar" <harris at cabase.org.ar>, "Neuman, Jeff
>(Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us)" <Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us>, "Burr, Becky
>(Becky.Burr at neustar.biz)" <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz>, "Laura Covington
>(lhc at yahoo-inc.com)" <lhc at yahoo-inc.com>, "Nick Wood, Valideus
>(nick.wood at valideus.com) (nick.wood at valideus.com)"
><nick.wood at valideus.com>, "Frederick Felman
>(Frederick.Felman at markmonitor.com)" <Frederick.Felman at markmonitor.com>,
>"Winterfeldt, Brian J. (brian.winterfeldt at kattenlaw.com)"
><brian.winterfeldt at kattenlaw.com>, "avri at dotgay.com" <avri at dotgay.com>
>>> 
>>> All,
>>>  
>>> Attached please find the statement we discussed tonight with the
>couple of modifications recommended.  For those of you who could not
>make it, we are happy to catch up tomorrow to discuss in more detail. 
>It is in no way the final draft, but is intended as an initial draft to
>refine across all constituencies.
>>>  
>>> In sum, this would be a joint statement by all the GNSO, with
>individual statements that each constituency can/will prepare as they
>see fit to address other issues.  We discussed whether things like
>sensitive strings/category 1 should be included, but I think as we get
>into other issues it becomes too difficult to find unanimity.  The geo
>issue appears to be the one issue everyone agrees is problematic and an
>overreach, and indicative of what could happen to any applicant.
>>>  
>>> Please take a look and circulate your comments after review with
>your constituencies.
>>>  
>>> Thank you!
>>>  
>>> Stacey King
>>> Nick Wood
>> <statement.docx>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>PC-NCSG mailing list
>PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

Avri Doria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20130715/280cc96d/attachment-0001.html>