[PC-NCSG] Revised Version of NCUC Response to the Thick Whois PDP WG Questions

[William Drake]

Hi Amr


On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at EGYPTIG.ORG> wrote:

> You're right, Avri?, I do remember Bill listing the PC members with your name on the list. That should have raised a flag.
> 
> So what's the final word? Are we submitting the response to the WG? Should I go ahead and do that on behalf of NCUC, or should Bill?
> 
> ?, or are we going to submit it as an NCSG statement, in which case some changes will have to be made again? Would be happy to get them done. I didn't bring any of this up on yesterday's call because I thought it was all settled.


I agree with Robin's solution:


On Jan 15, 2013, at 8:55 PM, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> I am perfectly fine with this going out as NCUC statement that NCSG subsequently endorses.  
> 
> My point is simply that we are not going to let inaction by some members of the PC prevent the NCSG from getting its work done (including making statements).  The burden and responsibility is on the PC members to engage (or be replaced by those they represent).  Either way, NCSG work goes forward.




This seems appropriate if all the people who participated in the WG did so as NCUC, the WG asked for constituency inputs, and there's no particularly compelling reason for it to be a SG statement if NPOC hasn't responded etc.


You don't need the chair to submit a doc like this, you're the WG members?.


If it's a UC statement, it would also be really good to get it posted on ncuc.org.  Both SG and UC ought to keep track of and leverage their outputs visibility-wise.  

The UC site alas doesn't currently have a main section for Positions and Statements; it would be good to create one and pull together all our stuff there.  The other constituencies all have these, e.g. http://www.bizconst.org/positions.htm 


Cheers

BD

> 
> 
> On Jan 16, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
>> hi,
>> 
>> no problem.  easy to be confused.
>> 
>> i had originally missed the announcement that I was on it and a full month almost went by when I would have sworn i was not on the NCSG-PC.
>> 
>> but according to the WIKI list <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/NCSG-PC>  and an announcement Bill made in the last week on DISCUSS, it turns out that I am.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> On 15 Jan 2013, at 13:53, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 9:39 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I also said I supported it with edits (which you did) on the NCSG-PC list.
>>>> 
>>>> Even if i was recommending the NCUC put it out and the NCSG endorse it.
>>>> 
>>>> avri
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sorry, Avri. I know you said you supported it. I just didn't realize you are on the PC. Is the list on this page outdated?
>>> 
>>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/about/stakeholders-constituencies/ncsg
>>> 
>>> Amr
>>> 
>> 
>