[PC-NCSG] Revised Version of NCUC Response to the Thick Whois PDP WG Questions

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Yes, but ...

If you say you are doing 48 call on a statement and that silence during this period will be taken as agreement, 
and acknowledging that the NCSG-PC is a rough consensus not full-consensus committee, we will be in a stronger position when we claim NCSG support.

To just say that someone never said anything, is a weaker argument with a last call.

And to have someone come in at the last minute and say, but you did not get our view is a real recipe for continued failure to state a common view when we have a common view.

avri


On 15 Jan 2013, at 13:51, Robin Gross wrote:

> All NCSG-PC members have a responsibility to read these documents and participate in these discussions that formulate NCSG positions.  We are not going to say we don't have a NCSG statement because some members of the PC have not voiced any opinion, when they have been asked and been given time to do so.  We must have PC members paying attention and voicing their views.  Silence will be taken as agreement.
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
> 
> 
> On Jan 15, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I think it is safest to send it out as a NCUC stmt and to send an NCSG stmt endorsing it if we are sure we have the endorsement.  
>> 
>> Personally, I do not want to take a chance of having someone state that their constituency never agreed to it.  So I would like for the NCSG-PC endorsement to be explicit.  Ie. whoever is our PC Chair to do a rough consensus call and explicitly ask the members of the NCSG-PC to support a specific stmt.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 15 Jan 2013, at 13:10, Robin Gross wrote:
>> 
>>> Why isn't this going out as NCSG statement as was discussed on the NCSG PC list yesterday?
>>> 
>>> No NCSG-PC members objected to its content in the timeframe given, so I thought it was to be a NCSG statement.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Robin
>>> 
>>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I've attached a copy of the answers revised for consistency in the language used as requested. Mainly to make sure that the responses are consistently from NCUC, not NCSG (except for references to the NCSG email list and Policy Committee) in addition to consistencies in the use of upper and lower case letters and so forth.
>>>> 
>>>> Unless there are any reasons to the contrary, I think this document can be forwarded to Glen as NCUC's response to the WG's questions.
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you all.
>>>> 
>>>> Amr<thick Whois - SG - C Input Template - Final 5 December 2012 - NCUC Response.doc>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> IP JUSTICE
>>> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
>>> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
>>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org
> 
> 
>