[PC-NCSG] (Se) electing a new Chair and Alternate Chair

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

True only the chair role is mandated.  We insitituted the alternate 
chair last year just to make sure the work got done by somebody. But 
looking at our work performance, perhasp 2 alternates are indeed necessary.

Did you have a nominee / volunteer in mind?

As for balancing between constituencies, if we balance with 2,then we 
unbalance with 3.
Too bad we don't have either more constituencies or more affiliated NCSG 
members.

avri

On 12/13/2013 9:05 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi Avri,
>
> The NCSG charter doesn't limit the number of PC alternate chairs. If 
> others are agreeable, I suggest having two alternates. Perhaps one 
> from each constituency.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> Sent from mobile
>
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ella.com 
> <mailto:avri at ella.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ok, so we have two people willing to stand for Chair/Alternate chair.
>>
>> - anyone else interested or can i close the nomination process in 24 
>> hours.
>>
>> Also in that time period please let the list know whether you are 
>> comfortable, assuming we have only 2 candidates, to let them work out 
>> roles for themselves.
>>
>> If we are not, or if we have more than 2 candidates, I would then 
>> suggest a online poll (ysing doodle or some such) where we could 
>> vote, with the top vote getter being chair, and the second vote 
>> getter being alternate chair.
>>
>> Though, given we are a rough consensus sort of body, if we can find a 
>> solution without needing to poll, that would seem good to me.
>>
>> avri
>> acting as alternate-chair
>>
>> On 12/10/2013 10:50 AM, Maria Farrell wrote:
>>> Hi all and thanks Avri,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to put my name forward with Rudi's for this.
>>>
>>> cheers, m
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 December 2013 15:24, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi,
>>>
>>>     my understanding that PC members decide about chairs , as Avri
>>>     explained. and we should give people enough time to think and
>>>     decide.I am not sure that everybody can make it for today call.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>>     2013/12/11 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be
>>>     <mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>>
>>>
>>>         Hi Avri,
>>>
>>>         With the NCSG monthly meeting in front of us (in about 1
>>>         hour) I think we can get consensus today.
>>>         I?m willing to take seat, but will of course allow Maria to
>>>         respond also to this request.
>>>
>>>         See you in 1 hour.
>>>
>>>         Rudi Vansnick
>>>         NPOC chair Policy Committee
>>>         NPOC treasurer
>>>         rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
>>>         Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 <tel:%2B32%20%280%299%20329%2039%2016>
>>>         Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>>>         <tel:%2B32%20%280%29475%2028%2016%2032>
>>>         www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org>
>>>
>>>         Op 10-dec.-2013, om 14:44 heeft Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>>>         <mailto:avri at acm.org>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>>         Hi,
>>>>
>>>>         With a new policy committee, it is time to elect a new
>>>>         chair/alt-chair combo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         As the outgoing alt-chair who does not wish to remain in a
>>>>         chairing role, I am making a few suggestions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         I would like to suggest that we fill these roles with one
>>>>         person from NPOC and one person from NCUC.
>>>>
>>>>         I suggest that we pick these two and then let them decide
>>>>         between themselves which will take what role. Alternatively
>>>>         the committee as a whole could decide using rough consensus.
>>>>
>>>>         I would like to suggest that we consider asking Maria and
>>>>         Rudy to take on the policy committee leadership for the
>>>>         next year.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Avri Doria_______________________________________________
>>>>         PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>         PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>>         http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>         PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>         http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>     PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>>>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20131213/789dc135/attachment-0001.html>