[PC-NCSG] Yet another issue (YAI?) GNSO Review

[William Drake]

FWIW I would support a 'no delay' position.

Bill


On Aug 28, 2013, at 7:44 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gnso-review-15jul13-en.htm
> 
> We missed the comment period.
> 
> it is in reply period
> 
> 2 replies Google and ISPCP are against the delay.
> 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/
> 
> Personally I agree with them and am inclined to send a personal note, saying i agree the review  should not be delayed because the current  GNSO structure,  impacted by its 'binaries in opposition' modalities, doesn't work.
> 
> Should we try for something NCSGish?  Do we have a common view on:
> 
> GNSO Review now on schedule
> GNSO delayed until the world is more stable
> 
> Or are we happy with the GNSO as it is - mostly deadlocked.
> 
> We have until 6 Sept.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

**********************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake at uzh.ch (w), wjdrake at gmail.com (h),
  www.williamdrake.org
***********************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20130829/27d1e60d/attachment.html>