[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Privacy group submission on the EWG
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak
Wed Aug 28 04:18:33 EEST 2013
Hi Avri,
I support this approach and the endorsement by NCSG membership of the
comments! and I want to thank the group of volunteers who worked on the
drafting.
Best,
Rafik
2013/8/27 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
> hi,
>
> I suggest the NCSG-PC send the following:
>
> The NCSG community has reviewed and NCSG PC endorses the comments
> submitted by the NCSG Policy group and consigned by it members.
>
> The statements fully endorsed are:
>
> (list here)
>
> signed NCSG-PC
>
> anyone object?
> anyone want to add anything else to the note.
>
>
> avri
>
>
>
> On 26 Aug 2013, at 11:27, Robin Gross wrote:
>
> > Dear NCSG PC Members:
> >
> > Can NCSG PC support these comments that were submitted by a group of
> NCSG members last week? We've got a short timeframe for submitting the
> endorsement, so can we spend a moment to consider this in the next day or
> two please?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Robin
> >
> >
> > On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
> >
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >>> From: Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG>
> >>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Privacy group submission on the EWG
> >>> Date: August 22, 2013 9:53:35 AM PDT
> >>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> >>> Reply-To: Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Members of the NCSG Privacy group <
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/privacy> have submitted the
> following comments to the gTLD Service model comment period.
> >>>
> >>> ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Who on
> the EWG Specializes in Abuse of the Whois Data? Kathy Kleiman
> >>> ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services We
> Strongly Object to a Centralized Whois/Registrant Data Database; What were
> Plans B and C? Kathy Kleiman
> >>> ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Why is
> the Whois Broken? Kathy Kleiman
> >>> ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services The EWG
> Use Cases Seem Fundamentally Flawed Kathy Kleiman
> >>> ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Data
> Elements Will Require a Separate Review by the ICANN Community Kathy
> Kleiman
> >>> ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services
> Potential Conflict of Interest Edward Morris
> >>> ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Has the
> EWG Evaluated Closely What is at Stake for Registrants? Edward Morris
> >>> found at: <
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/share-24jun13-en.htm
> >
> >>>
> >>> The NCSG PC is being asked to endorse these statements as an NCSG
> position.
> >>>
> >>> The membership is invited to discuss, to send in comments of their
> own, to inform the Policy Committee through discussions on NCSG-DISCUSS on
> their views on endorsing these statement, ... whatever really.
> >>>
> >>> The Policy Committee has until 6 Sept 13 to send in and
> endorsement/comments.
> >>>
> >>> thanks
> >>>
> >>> avri
> >>> written as:
> >>> Alternate Chair, PC-NCSG
> >>> Participant in NCSG Policy group
> >>> a co-signer of the statements
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> PC-NCSG mailing list
> >> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> >> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20130828/7e9318a1/attachment.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list