[PC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Privacy group submission on the EWG

Marie-laure Lemineur mllemineur
Tue Aug 27 04:19:54 EEST 2013


Agree. 
Best, 
Marie-laure

Sent from my iPad

On 26/08/2013, at 18:49, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> Yes, let's do it.  Anyone object?
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
> 
> On Aug 26, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
>> hi,
>> 
>> I suggest the NCSG-PC send the following:
>> 
>> The NCSG community has reviewed and NCSG PC endorses the comments submitted by the NCSG Policy group and consigned by it members.
>> 
>> The statements fully endorsed are:
>> 
>> (list here)
>> 
>> signed NCSG-PC
>> 
>> anyone object?
>> anyone want to add anything else to the note.
>> 
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 26 Aug 2013, at 11:27, Robin Gross wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear NCSG PC Members:
>>> 
>>> Can NCSG PC support these comments that were submitted by a group of NCSG members last week?  We've got a short timeframe for submitting the endorsement, so can we spend a moment to consider this in the next day or two please?
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Robin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG>
>>>>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG Privacy group submission on the EWG
>>>>> Date: August 22, 2013 9:53:35 AM PDT
>>>>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>>>> Reply-To: Avri Doria <avri at ACM.ORG>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Members of the NCSG Privacy group <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/privacy>  have submitted the following comments to the gTLD Service model comment period.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Who on the    EWG Specializes in Abuse of the Whois Data?   Kathy Kleiman
>>>>>    ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services We Strongly Object to a Centralized Whois/Registrant Data Database; What were Plans B and C?   Kathy Kleiman
>>>>>    ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Why is the    Whois Broken?   Kathy Kleiman
>>>>>    ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services The EWG    Use Cases Seem Fundamentally Flawed   Kathy Kleiman
>>>>>    ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Data    Elements Will Require a Separate Review by the ICANN Community   Kathy Kleiman
>>>>>    ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Potential    Conflict of Interest   Edward Morris
>>>>>    ? Input to Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services Has the    EWG Evaluated Closely What is at Stake for Registrants?   Edward Morris
>>>>> found at: <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/share-24jun13-en.htm>
>>>>> 
>>>>> The NCSG PC is being asked to endorse these statements as an NCSG position.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> The membership is invited to discuss, to send in comments of their own, to inform the Policy Committee through discussions on NCSG-DISCUSS on their views on endorsing these statement, ... whatever really.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Policy Committee has until 6 Sept 13 to send in and endorsement/comments.
>>>>> 
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>> avri
>>>>> written as:
>>>>> Alternate Chair, PC-NCSG
>>>>> Participant in NCSG Policy group
>>>>> a co-signer of the statements
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg




More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list