[PC-NCSG] [gnso-iocrc-dt] Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I thought this was out for SG/C review.

When did it morph into an approved resolution?

avri

On 17 Sep 2012, at 17:09, Shatan, Gregory S. wrote:

> The resolution and rationale are now posted at http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-13sep12-en.htm.
>  
> Greg Shatan
>  
>  
> Gregory S. Shatan 
> Deputy Chair| Tech Transactions Group 
> IP | Technology | Media 
> ReedSmithLLP 
> The business of relationships
> 599 Lexington Avenue
> New York, NY 10022
> 212.549.0275 | Phone
> 917.816.6428 | Mobile
> 212.521.5450 | Fax
> gshatan at reedsmith.com
> www.reedsmith.com 
> Abu Dhabi | Beijing | Century City | Chicago | 
> Dubai | Falls Church | Greece | Hong Kong | 
> London | Los Angeles | Munich | New York| 
> Paris | Philadelphia | Pittsburgh | Princeton | 
> Richmond | San Francisco | Shanghai |
> Silicon Valley | Washington DC | Wilmington
>  
>  
> From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of St?phane Van Gelder
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:27 AM
> To: Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] FW: Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues
>  
> Thanks for sending it on Jeff.
>  
> Cherine's note is obviously of great importance to this group. Please note the deadline set by the Board for them to get a response from the GNSO and adjust your work schedule accordingly.
>  
> If the group has a problem with either the deadline or the work it is being asked to do here, please let the Council know asap.
>  
> Once again, my thanks to this group for its hard work on these issues.
>  
> St?phane Van Gelder
> Directeur G?n?ral / General manager
> INDOM NetNames France
> ----------------
> Registry Relations and Strategy Director
> NetNames
> T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
> F: +22 (0)1 48 01 83 61
> 
>  
> Le 17 sept. 2012 ? 04:08, Neuman, Jeff a ?crit :
> 
> 
> FYI.  I know this came out on Friday, but I am not sure this was sent to the group. 
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 
> 
>  
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of David Olive
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 9:27 PM
> To: council at gnso.icann.org
> Cc: Margie Milam
> Subject: [council] FW: Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues
>  
> For your information.
>  
> Regards,      David
>  
>  
> From: Cherine Chalaby 
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 1:32 PM
> To: stephane.vangelder at indom.com
> Cc: Margie Milam; New gTLD Program Committee
> Subject: Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues
>  
> Dear St?phane,
> I wanted to reach out to you and the GNSO Council to let you know about an issue of interest to the GNSO that the New gTLD Program Committee addressed this week: the protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC names.  The Committee passed a resolution yesterday requesting that the GNSO consider a proposed solution for the first round to protect at the second level the names of Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC, consistent with the GAC advice to the Board.
> We have been apprised of, and appreciate, the significant work currently underway by the GNSO?s IOC/RC Drafting Team, and the potential PDP under consideration.  We crafted the resolution in a way that recognises that GNSO work is ongoing.  The resolution and the rationale will be posted next Monday.
> The Committee adopted this resolution now, rather than wait until Toronto, to provide sufficient time for the GNSO to develop its views on this request taking into account the timeline for the first round.   It is important that this issue is resolved early next year so that additional protections, if they are adopted, are in place for the first round.  As a result, the Committee is seeking the GNSO?s response by January 31, 2013.
> We look forward to receiving the GNSO's response and are available to discuss this issue in further detail in Toronto.    
> Sincerely,
> Cherine Chalaby
>  
> 
>  
> * * *
> This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your cooperation.
> * * *
> To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
> Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00