[PC-NCSG] TODAY'S MOTIONS

[Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu]

My responses below. Going to ccNSO lunch now - see you all in a bit.


Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584  


>>> 


From:  
William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> 

To: 
NCSG-Policy <PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org> 

Date:  
10/17/2012 12:45 PM 

Subject:  
[PC-NCSG] TODAY'S MOTIONS 

So, maybe we should talk about what we intend to do on these? 



Motion on the Adoption of a Working Group on Consumer Trust, Consumer
Choice, and Competition (CTCCC):

Made by: John Berard, Seconded by: Carlos Aguirre
 
Wendy expresses her concerns, and then we vote?.what? 

[MARY] I'm supposed to come up with more conciliatory language on
Resolved #1. We can propose striking it altogether - which will not be
taken as friendly - and/or then propose changing "endorse" to
"acknowledge". If the "endorsed" language stays in I suppose we vote no
- unless we don't mind sending on the letter to the Board, since it
contains our minority statement. In that case we can ask to separate the
Resolved clauses so that we vote No on #1 and Yes on #2.


2. Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process on
Uniformity of Contracts to Address Registration Abuse
 Made by: Zahid Jamil
 
If I recall correctly, sounded like Jeff and registries not excited
about this, saw as redundant and unnecessary.  May be deferred, can't
recall.  If not, no? 

[MARY] Support deferral if someone asks, if not, No. 



3. Motion to Request an Issue Report on the Uniformity of Reporting
Made by: John Berard, Seconded by: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
 
a priori an IR seems ok, unless we don't like the terms or want to
amend?? 

[MARY] Haven't followed this much. Concerned about workload so may
depend on whether new Council and Staff can set timelines, priorities,
etc. for all the Issue Reports and PDP stuff going on. Marika said one
of these reports is pretty much done - could be this one - so in that
case I don't really care. Yes?


4. Motion on the Initiation of a Policy Development Process on the
Protection of Certain International Organization Names in all GTLDs.
Made by: Jeff Neuman, Seconded by: Mary Wong
 
Were we proposing any friendlies, I forgot 

[MARY] No friendlies since NPOC said they're okay with the wording, so
Yes.

 
5. Motion to approve the Charter for the ?thick? Whois PDP Working
Group
Made by: Jeff Neuman, Seconded by: St?phane van Gelder


We raise Avri's concerns about the rejected HR language, and then?? 

[MARY] Yes, I think, AFTER expressing the concerns but only for the
record, alas. 



6. Motion on the Adoption of the IRTP Part C Final Report and
Recommendations
Made by: St?phane van Gelder, Seconded by: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Amended by: Mary Wong (in bold)


Yes 
[MARY] Yes. 




7. GNSO Council Motion to Initiate Issues Report on Recommendation 2 of
the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group (IRD-WG) Final
Report
 Made by: Ching Chiao, Seconded by:Rafik Dammak


Yes 
[MARY] Yes. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20121017/39307d07/attachment.html>