[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options

Robin Gross robin
Tue Oct 9 20:58:29 EEST 2012


I agree.  Option 1 is my preference also.

Thanks,
Robin

On Oct 9, 2012, at 4:47 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:

> Hi avri,
>
> +1 for keeping the statu quo, I think that gnso spend (too much  
> time) in operational and procedural side.
>
> Rafik
>
> On Oct 6, 2012 10:41 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
> guidance on this one welcome too.
>
> i tend toward the status quo.
>
> avri
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an  
>> issue options
>> Date: 24 September 2012 06:32:13 EDT
>> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl- 
>> sc at icann.org>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> In relation to the agenda item 'Raising an issue - Has this been  
>> sufficiently clarified', three possible approaches were identified  
>> during the last meeting:
>> Maintain status quo - which means only the GNSO Council or a group  
>> chartered by the GNSO Council can request an item to be reviewed  
>> by the SCI. Possibly consider communicating to other SO/ACs /  
>> individuals, that if there are issues they would like to see  
>> reviewed by the SCI, that they will need to channel these via the  
>> GNSO Council and/or a group chartered by the GNSO Council.
>> Add the possibility for other ICANN SO/ACs to make a direct  
>> request to the SCI ? this would require a change to the SCI  
>> Charter and would need GNSO Council approval.
>> Add the possibility for any chartered group to make a direct  
>> request to the SCI ? this would require a change to the SCI  
>> Charter and would need GNSO Council approval. Some also noted that  
>> a definition of 'chartered' would be needed as it is not clear  
>> whether SO/ACs are chartered.
>> Members are encouraged to share their views on these three options  
>> and/or identify any other options that should be considered to  
>> address this issue ahead of the next meeting.
>>
>> With best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20121009/514b7ddf/attachment.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list