[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options

[Avri Doria]

guidance on this one welcome too.

i tend toward the status quo.

avri

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options
> Date: 24 September 2012 06:32:13 EDT
> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> In relation to the agenda item 'Raising an issue - Has this been sufficiently clarified', three possible approaches were identified during the last meeting:
> Maintain status quo - which means only the GNSO Council or a group chartered by the GNSO Council can request an item to be reviewed by the SCI. Possibly consider communicating to other SO/ACs / individuals, that if there are issues they would like to see reviewed by the SCI, that they will need to channel these via the GNSO Council and/or a group chartered by the GNSO Council.
> Add the possibility for other ICANN SO/ACs to make a direct request to the SCI ? this would require a change to the SCI Charter and would need GNSO Council approval.
> Add the possibility for any chartered group to make a direct request to the SCI ? this would require a change to the SCI Charter and would need GNSO Council approval. Some also noted that a definition of 'chartered' would be needed as it is not clear whether SO/ACs are chartered.
> Members are encouraged to share their views on these three options and/or identify any other options that should be considered to address this issue ahead of the next meeting.
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20121005/ddd431e4/attachment.html>