[PC-NCSG] FW: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Proposed Revised Motion

[Avri Doria]

Thanks for posting this.

I again recommend:

Remember IOC & RC are already protected. Maximally protected. They do not need further protection.

Defer the motion because it is illegitimate for the g-council to vote before the end of a comment period.

Amend the motion to indicate that a change can only occur if the Board agrees to restart the application clock. To make such a substantive change to an ongoing process at this late date is fundamentally unfair to applicants, especially noncommercial applicants or community applicants.

Support the idea brought up by both Portugal and NPOC that giving preferential treatment to these two without full consideration being given to the UN + 9 is prejudicial. If this its a serious concern for ICANN and the GNSO, then initiate a PDP process on reserved names.


avri

Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk> wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>Please find attached the latest version of the motion regarding the IOC
>and Red Cross names that we will be discussing tomorrow.
>
>Thanks
>
>KK
>
>