[PC-NCSG] Motion deadlines for next Council meeting (IOC/RC issue?)
Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu
Mary.Wong
Wed Apr 4 19:50:21 EEST 2012
** High Priority **
Thanks for the quick work and excellent suggestions! If there is no
objection, the following motion is what I'll propose to the Council
before COB today (with a few tweaks to Avri's, Alain's and KK's
drafts):
Whereas the GNSO Council passed a resolution approving new protections
for the first round of the new gTLD program as recommended by the GNSO's
International Olympic Committee (IOC) and Red Cross/Red Crescent (RC)
Drafting Team;
Whereas this resolution indicated that further discussions were
required on associated policies relating to protections for certain
international organizations at the second level;
Whereas comments have been received coincident with the motion that
included requests from international governmental organizations
requesting the same protective rights as the IOC/RCRC have received for
the current and future rounds of the new gTLD program,
And whereas the development of criteria for the grant of protective
rights for such organizations based on standards such as "international
Legal Personality" was proposed at the ICANN meeting in San Jos?, Costa
Rica,
Resolved,
The GNSO Council request an issue report that would precede the
possibility of a PDP that covers the following issues:
- Definition of the type of organizations that should receive special
protection at the top and second level, including the "international
legal personality" test;
- Policies required to protect such organizations at the top and second
level; and
- Whether such policies are within the bylaws and the defined powers of
the GNSO.
Please let me know immediately if you object to the proposed motion.
Thanks!
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong at law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>>
From: Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>
To:"'William Drake'" <william.drake at uzh.ch>, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
CC:NCSG-Policy <pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org>
Date: 4/4/2012 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] Motion deadlines for next Council meeting
(IOC/RC issue?)
+1 - I don't think mentioning the name of a stakeholder group in a
motion is advisable or is even allowed. Although from a legal point of
view I can see many questions and issues arising from the term
'International Legal Personality', let's go for it and see how it plays
out.
Cheers
KK
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Senior Lecturer,
Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
Director of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law
University of Strathclyde,
The Law School,
Graham Hills building,
50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
Selected publications:
http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
Website: www.komaitis.org
-----Original Message-----
From: pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org
[mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org] On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: ???????, 4 ???????? 2012 9:01 ??
To: Avri Doria
Cc: NCSG-Policy
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] Motion deadlines for next Council meeting
(IOC/RC issue?)
I've never seen a motion mention the stakeholder group that suggested
it, so this would seem advisable.
On Apr 4, 2012, at 3:12 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it is a good idea to include the idea of the International
Legal Personality' suggestion in the wereas, but perhaps it would be
better done without specifically mentioning NPOC, just like the
Portuguese weren't mentioned. Would it work for NPOC to drop : "by NPOC
in San Jos?".
>
> just a thought
>
> avri
>
>
>
> On 3 Apr 2012, at 21:00, Alain Berranger wrote:
>
>> After consultations with NPOC-EC, this is what I suggest:
>>
>> Whereas the GNSO council passed a resolution promoting new policies
>> for the New gTLD application Period recommended by GAC/GNSO
>> International Olympic Committee (IOC) and Red Cross (RC) Names
>> Discussion Group Drafting Team,
>>
>> Whereas this resolution indicated that further policy discussions
>> were required on associated policies of extra protection for certain
>> organizations at the second level,
>>
>> Whereas the comments made coincident with the motion included those
>> from organizations such as IGOs and other Charitable organizations
>> requesting the same protective rights as the IOC/RCRC received in
the
>> current and future rounds,
>>
>> Whereas the criteria of "International Legal Personality" was
>> proposed by NPOC in San Jos? for consideration in granting future
>> protective rights,
>>
>> Resolved,
>>
>> The GNSO Council request an issues report and the possibility of a
PDP that covers the following issues:
>>
>> - Definition of the type of organizations that should receive
special
>> protection at the top and second level, including the "International
>> legal personality" test;
>> - Policies required to protect such organizations at the top and
>> second level;
>> - Whether such policies are within the bylaws and the defined powers
of the GNSO.
>>
>> Alain
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Konstantinos Komaitis
<k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Thanks Mary for the reminder and Avri for drafting this. I corrected
some typos and I am in favour of this being presented as a motion.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> KK
>>
>> As the GNSO council passed a resolution promoting new policies for
>> the New gTLD application Period recommended by GAC/GNSO
International
>> Olympic Committee (IOC) and Red Cross (RC) Names Discussion Group
>> Drafting Team,
>>
>> As this motion indicated that further policy discussions were
>> required on associated policies of extra protection for certain
>> organizations at the second level,
>>
>> As the comments made coincident with the motion included those from
>> organizations such as IGOs and other Charitable organizations
>> requesting the same protective rights as the IOC/RCRC received in
the
>> current and future rounds
>>
>> Resolved
>>
>> The GNSO Council request an issues report in the possibility of a
PDP that covers the following issues:
>>
>> - Definition of the type of organization that should receive special
>> protection at the top and second level;
>> - Policies required to protect such organizations at the top and
>> second level
>> - Whether such policy is within the bylaws and the defined powers of
the GNSO.
>>
>> Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
>>
>> Senior Lecturer,
>> Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses Director of LLM
>> Information Technology and Telecommunications Law University of
>> Strathclyde, The Law School, Graham Hills building,
>> 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
>> UK
>> tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
>>
http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-
>> Regulation-isbn9780415477765 Selected publications:
>> http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
>> Website: www.komaitis.org
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org
>> [mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>> Sent: ???????, 2 ???????? 2012 9:58 ??
>> To: NCSG-Policy
>> Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] Motion deadlines for next Council meeting
>> (IOC/RC issue?)
>>
>> How is this for start.
>>
>> As the GNSO council passed a resolution promoting new policies for
>> the New gTLD application Period recommended by thw XYZ Drafting
Team,
>>
>> As this motion indicated that further policy discussion were
required
>> on associated policies of extra protection for certain organizations
>> at the second level,
>>
>> As the comments made coincident with the motion included those from
>> organizations such as IGOs and other Charitable organization
>> requesting the same protective rights as the IOC/RC received in the
>> current and future rounds
>>
>> Resolved
>>
>> The GNSO Council request an issues report in the possibility of a
PDP that covers the following issues:
>>
>> - Definition of type organization that should receive special
>> protection at the top and second level;
>> - Policies required to protect such organizations at the top and
>> second level
>> - Whether such policy is within the bylaws defined powers of the
GNSO.
>>
>>
>> (I have not checked the new PDP rules to make sure it contains all
the proper elements for a PDP issues report request, but i wanted to
help get the ball rolling while i avoided something else i was supposed
to be doing).
>>
>>
>> Figure it will get delayed at least one meeting just on principle.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 2 Apr 2012, at 16:44, <Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu>
<Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Is this Wednesday. If we want to propose a PDP or reformulation of
the IOC/RC drafting team, guess one needs to be drafted by then, but I'm
seriously out of pocket, plus we haven't actually had the discussion
about what, exactly, we ought to be proposing and why. Does anyone want
to pick this up?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Mary
>>>
>>>
>>> Mary W S Wong
>>> Professor of Law
>>> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>>> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
>>> SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA
>>> Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
>>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>>> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
>>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
>>> (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
>> Member, Board of Directors, CECI, http://www.ceci.ca
>> Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business,
>> www.schulich.yorku.ca Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership
>> Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org NA representative, Chasquinet
>> Foundation, www.chasquinet.org Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN,
>> http://npoc.org/
>> O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
>> Skype: alain.berranger
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20120404/85b8ad10/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list