[PC-NCSG] Draft motion on UDRP
Joy Liddicoat
joy
Wed Nov 9 04:49:13 EET 2011
Thanks Mary for this draft ? great job. Some quick thoughts and suggested amendments in the attached (mindful of my newness to this area and the labyrinth of ICANN process related rules?.):
? How specific does the resolution need to be? Would it be enough to have resolution 1 (ie the first para starting ?RESOVLED?) and in RESOLVED 2 simply request the drafting team to submit the working group charter to the GNSO for approval at its next meeting?
? The preamble could be strengthened by taking (1) ? (3) in the RESOLVED 2 para and putting it in the preamble ? giving a nod to the concerns in the ICANN staff report, but stating that these are manageable, without bogging down the resolution with that detail
? In relation to the resolutions and areas of focus ? I wonder if this casts the net too widely? By suggesting a focus on process and substance and multiple working groups the risk is (even supposing the motion is successful) that the task is too big. Perhaps a smaller more tightly focused piece of work would have more chance of getting traction and be more difficult to argue against?
? I like (3) ? phasing the work, but could this also be narrowed to make it more manageable, for example: focusing initially on certain types of disputes (such as only those related to ccTLDs) or certain parts of the process
? Does RESOLVED 3 need ?and such other similar issues and recommendations as it considers appropriate? added ? to cover all bases?
I?ve attached a revised version with these suggested amendments (though not on point 4 above - re narrowing the scope - at this stage). Fire away all!
Cheers
Joy
From: pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org [mailto:pc-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org] On Behalf Of Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2011 12:01 p.m.
To: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org; Robin Gross
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] Draft motion on UDRP
Sorry this was done in a bit of a hurry - can folks please comment on the attached? I'm in airports tomorrow morning and get on a plane for Asia around noon EST, so either someone else takes over the drafting pen if this is too far from what you had in mind and takes charge of sending it in, or if you can let me know ASAP, I can send it in either as-is or with just a bit of tinkering.
Thanks,
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From:
Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>
To:
<pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org>
Date:
11/8/2011 5:53 PM
Subject:
[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [liaison6c] TR: Document and motion Deadline 9 November for GNSO Council meeting on 17 Novembre at 20:00 UTC
Begin forwarded message:
From: Glen de Saint G?ry <Glen at icann.org>
Date: November 8, 2011 2:46:50 PM PST
To: liaison6c <liaison6c at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [liaison6c] TR: Document and motion Deadline 9 November for GNSO Council meeting on 17 Novembre at 20:00 UTC
Dear Councillors,
Reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later than (NLT) 8 days in advance (i.e.Wednesday, 9 November 2011) of the GNSO Council meeting on 17 November, 2011 at 20:00 UTC.
If you have reports for consideration, please send them directly to me at <mailto:GNSO.Secretariat at gnso.icann.org> GNSO.Secretariat at gnso.icann.org so that they can be forwarded to the Council. Motions should be sent to the Council mailing list.
Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint G?ry
GNSO Secretariat
<mailto:gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
<http://gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin at ipjustice.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20111109/7943fbf3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PROPOSED NCUC MOTION ON REVIEW OF THE UDRP(2).docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 17410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20111109/7943fbf3/attachment-0001.docx>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list