[NCSG-FC] NCSG Additional Budget Request (ABR) Form - Invitation to edit

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Sat Jan 12 20:22:55 EET 2019

Hi Steph

Here is an ad hoc process I as NCUC and NCSG chair. I consulted with ICANN
staff as well as NCSG  members and NCUC members  for ABRs, looked over what
was accepted in other stakeholder groups and constituencies (that makes it
hard to say no to us) consider priorities of NCSG and Cs and members
comments. FC was not active at the time so I sent it to NCSG EC. NCSG EC
does not check NCSG mailing list regularly so it's better to share with
them whatever you share with the mailing list in advance so that they don't
consider it as a late submission.

Here is the Google doc of ABRs last year:

But since we don't really have time I guess you can just wing it by using
the Google Doc form and sending it to the mailing list.

I personally think FC should have nothing to do with how Cs submit their
ABRs. They can suggest something but not impose.


On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:04 PM Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> I would like to back Bruna up here.  Guys, we have to focus on substance.
> So far, nobody has  a draft ABR that is circulating for comments.  Bruna
> and I should not have to do this ourselves.  I know that Farzi wound up
> drafting ABRs last year, at the last minute.  Bruna and I are now doing the
> same.
> Process is important, but it does not replace substance. Let's get some
> projets going, people.  After Monday, you will have a whole year to work on
> the forms.
> Cheers Stephanie
> On 2019-01-12 11:26, Bruna Martins dos Santos wrote:
> Dear Remmy,
> I do agree that the FC has to work together with the Leadership teams in
> both constituencies and I mentioned to Thato in a call we had this week
> that NCUC EC is here to support him in all possible ways. But just so we
> can work together, I believe that communication is key - that meaning we
> could have a closer conversation between the FC, the NCUC EC and the
> constituency.
> At the same time, Remmy, I hope I am misinterpretating
> <https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=misinterpretating> your
> email as I did not appreciate the tone of it, as well as your attempt to
> challenge a decision taken by the NCUC Executive Committee.  As explained,
> we very much appreciate the FC work and do want to work together to the
> committee, but we did not find it feasible to adopt the proposed form given
> that the ABRs deadline is coming in less than 3 days. By adopting the
> proposed form now we would have to have an extra amount of work in reading
> through the suggestions, selecting which ones we are submitting and then
> starting to draft the actual ABR form. Today is the 12th of January and the
> deadline for ABRs submission, as you may know, is the 15th - therefore the
> FC suggestion was not adopted this year in order to avoid adding another
> layer of work in the ABRs submission when we really dont have time for
> that.
> With regards to your comment on transparency, you might have seen my email
> to the NCUC list asking for ABRs suggestions and volunteers to draft it.
> While I think this is something that the FC could be onboard I am not going
> to take the time to ask why neither of you volunteered to draft anything or
> sent us any suggestion yet, because I do think we have to work together and
> I dont believe that picking fights with each other will help us achieving
> anything here. But, Remmy, as soon as NCUC submits its ABRs, they will be
> shared on the list - I might even be able to do it before the deadline just
> so we have time for corrections and community comments. I do believe that
> the deadline is not ideal, but we are all volunteers here and I am working
> with and how I can, and I do believe that the FC is doing the same.
> Having said that, can we count with any of the FC members help in drafting
> ABRs ?
> Best,
> bruna
> Em sáb, 12 de jan de 2019 às 07:40, Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>> Thanks Bruna
>> Giving the foregoing and latent position of NCUC to an attempt to enhance
>> process, I think it's important for FC representatives to be included in
>> their constituency Excom to enable them work in line and in alignment with
>> the C's rather than across purposes.
>> For instance, there is no clear reason for the non adoption or comment to
>> improve it which was initiated due to the call by NCSG chair, and to help
>> in collation of ABR afterwards, thus the NCUC decline is already counter
>> productive to transparency and accountability effort by FC.
>> But take it that FC reps are part of Excom it will afford FC to have
>> sufficient background to the decline and come up with more acceptable
>> concept.
>> In fact it seems we have three C's - NPOC, NCUC and FC under NCSG.
>> Until we revisit this honestly not much progress will be made as we
>> continue to fall short of ICANN processes of genuine transparency and
>> accountability in our folds.
>> Happy weekend everyone as we ponder.
>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019, 7:44 p.m. Bruna Martins dos Santos <
>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> NCUC EC Discussed it on our call yesterday and we decided that adopting
>>> the form is not an optimal solution for now.
>>> Although we very much appreciate the FC work and the idea of coming up
>>> with a mechanism to make our lives easier, in light of the short timeframe
>>> NCUC might not be able to adopt it now. Hopefully we will have the chance
>>> to enhance the proposed form for next year's ABRs process, and with the
>>> appropriate timeframe.
>>> Thank you very much.
>>> best,
>>> Bruna
>>> Em sex, 11 de jan de 2019 às 10:56, Thato Mfikwe <thatomfikwe at gmail.com>
>>> escreveu:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> Just a friendly reminder that the ABR form need to be circulated today,
>>>> please make your input since we have very limited time to meet the deadline.
>>>> Should there be no comments by 10pm UTC, Iit will be considered and
>>>> taken that everyone is okay with the structure and extend of data
>>>> collected, thanks.
>>>> Thato Mfikwe.
>>>> On Wednesday, January 9, 2019, Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Good day
>>>>> This is the draft template for the ABR to help us coordinate the
>>>>> process.
>>>>> Kindly review and let's have your comments before it's shared on NCSG
>>>>> list on or before Friday.
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Remmy Nweke
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>> From: Remmy Nweke (via Google Forms) <remmyn at gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019, 5:27 p.m.
>>>>> Subject: NCSG Additional Budget Request (ABR) Form - Invitation to edit
>>>>> To: <remmyn at gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: <thatomfikwe at gmail.com>
>>>>> Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com> has invited you to *edit* the
>>>>> following form:
>>>>> NCSG Additional Budget Request (ABR) Form
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1YV0dz666KqgF1Hhudno-S4045Y7c1-X0ktVwrwEa_zQ/edit?usp=sharing_eil&ts=5c34cf75>
>>>>> Open in Forms
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1YV0dz666KqgF1Hhudno-S4045Y7c1-X0ktVwrwEa_zQ/edit?usp=sharing_eip&ts=5c34cf75>
>>>>> This is a courtesy copy of an email for your record only. It's not the
>>>>> same email your collaborators received. Click here
>>>>> <https://support.google.com/drive/?p=courtesy_copy> to learn more. [image:
>>>>> Logo for Google Forms] <https://drive.google.com>
>>> --
>>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>> @boomartins
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-FC mailing list
>>> NCSG-FC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-fc
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-FC mailing list
>> NCSG-FC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-fc
> --
> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> @boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-fc/attachments/20190112/1cbe08b4/attachment.html>

More information about the NCSG-FC mailing list