From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Feb 3 15:42:19 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:42:19 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Thanks Pedro for the comments. Yes the budget related documents show high cost by supported traveler. We should review the different options in the strawman document. @everyone please review and share your input. @Tomslin Samme-Nlar Greg didn't say anything about deadline for input but was it discussed at GNSO council leadership? Best, Rafik On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 20:38 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rafik, > > Just as a first comment before reading through all documents (focusing > (for now) only on the graphs and shorter docs), although this may be deeply > unpopular, comparing the budget for other events that I participated in one > way or another of the organization and/or supervision, hotel accommodation > seems to be in a higher percentage (meaning it looks a bit > disproportionate), especially if we take into account that flight costs > refer to the participation of (many) people from all over the world. I > note, however, that this may be caused by the large amount of days some > ICANN meetings have. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC > & NCSG > (ICANN), > YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC > Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em seg., 20 de jan. de 2025 ?s 22:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > >> Hi all, >> >> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should >> review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >> context. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community >> Group >> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >> >> >> >> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >> | >> >> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >> | >> >> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >> | >> >> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >> | >> >> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >> | >> >> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >> | >> >> - ICANN >> | >> >> - ATT00001.txt >> | >> >> >> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. >> Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell >> us what you think >> >> For more information click here >> >> >> Dear SG/C Chairs, >> >> >> >> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >> >> >> >> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >> >> >> >> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >> provide feedback on: >> >> 1. What options are missing? >> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be >> put out for public comment). >> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >> >> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to ICANN. >> I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and will >> likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the ?strawman? >> will be necessary. >> >> >> >> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts their >> work. >> >> >> >> Thank You! >> >> >> >> Greg >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - Meeting >> #1 - How We Meet Community Group >> >> >> >> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >> know the content is safe. >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had a >> wonderful start to 2025. >> >> >> >> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the ICANN >> Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >> Date: 13 January 2024 >> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >> >> >> >> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. >> Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for >> this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC >> Chairs: >> >> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >> 2. Agenda >> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy >> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >> >> Background Documents: >> >> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >> >> >> >> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are keeping >> a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, meeting >> agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any document that >> we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >> >> >> >> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. >> >> >> >> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >> >> >> >> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at >> the meeting! >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> Alp Eken >> >> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and >> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You >> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Feb 3 15:54:10 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:54:10 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] ICANN82 NCSG Membership Agenda In-Reply-To: <1216D5E8-0B74-424F-B378-C0E2B17ACBF0@icann.org> References: <1216D5E8-0B74-424F-B378-C0E2B17ACBF0@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Andrea, I added other suggestions there. We will discuss that too at our next EC call. Best, Rafik On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, 23:35 Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hello all, > > > > I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Membership agenda for > ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LBE4BdUc1RWsl7b1-R1yWnMKPUMDYAh50wQzy2IDohM/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Feb 3 16:03:40 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 23:03:40 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Topics for session with GAC Message-ID: Hi all, As you know we will have 30 min session with GAC in Seattle meeting. We envisioned this from our side as an outreach to GAC and sharing our perspective on some topics. We have this list of possible topics but we have to shorten it to 2 or 3 topics (unlikely we will be able to cover 3 topics well in 30 minutes) The list is: 1. HRIA on DNS Abuse, 2. Registration Data, 3. gTLD Applicant Suppport, 4. Closed Generics, 5. PICs, 6. Latin Diacritics I believe HRIA on DNS abuse is among our top priority, possibly registration data too. But looking forward to hear from the committee member about the shortlist. I would like to confirm who also can join and lead for the proposed topics. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Mon Feb 3 19:03:22 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 17:03:22 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Canceled: NCSG EC Meeting | Thursday, 13 February 2025 at 00:00 UTC Message-ID: Please join the NCSG EC meeting on Thursday, 13 February 2025 at 00:00-01:00 UTC. Join Zoom Meeting https://icann.zoom.us/j/91409019340?pwd=YXNZMUZoSWR6Zk9hdnhsdDU5aFF3QT09 Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 2Zqq^jHVrW Audio Only Details: One tap mobile +19294362866,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (New York) +13017158592,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (Washington DC) Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/aIcEmRH4i Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 4187517854 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 1816 bytes Desc: not available URL: From PolicyCalendar at icann.org Mon Feb 3 19:04:14 2025 From: PolicyCalendar at icann.org (ICANN Policy Calendar) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 17:04:14 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG EC Meeting | Monday, 17 February 2025 at 13:00 UTC Message-ID: <98ddcc47d63a4a3cae079737564d29af@icann.org> Please join the NCSG EC meeting on Monday, 17 February 2025 at 13:00-14:00 UTC. Join Zoom Meeting https://icann.zoom.us/j/91409019340?pwd=YXNZMUZoSWR6Zk9hdnhsdDU5aFF3QT09 Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 2Zqq^jHVrW Audio Only Details: One tap mobile +19294362866,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (New York) +13017158592,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (Washington DC) Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/aIcEmRH4i Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 4187517854 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2039 bytes Desc: not available URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Mon Feb 3 19:09:16 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 17:09:16 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NEW DATE/TIME Meeting Invitation | NCSG EC Meeting | Monday, 17 February 2025 at 13:00 UTC Message-ID: Dear all, Please join the NCSG EC meeting that will be held on Monday, 17 February 2025 at 13:00 UTC. Check your time zone here. Join details are attached and noted below for your convenience. Join Zoom Meeting https://icann.zoom.us/j/91409019340?pwd=YXNZMUZoSWR6Zk9hdnhsdDU5aFF3QT09 [icann.zoom.us] Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 2Zqq^jHVrW Audio Only Details: One tap mobile +19294362866,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (New York) +13017158592,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (Washington DC) Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/aIcEmRH4i [icann.zoom.us] Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 4187517854 Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: acglandon76 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG EC Meeting Monday, 17 February 2025 at 13-00 UTC.ics Type: text/calendar Size: 2119 bytes Desc: NCSG EC Meeting Monday, 17 February 2025 at 13-00 UTC.ics URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Tue Feb 4 01:05:00 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:05:00 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Hi Rafik, My analysis, topic by topic: - A. Meeting Locations & Purposes - 1 - Should be done, but does not seem to have that high of an impact, because ICANN already plans in advance. There is an ideal time in advance to buy airline tickets (too early makes the price go up again), but space contracts are actually cheaper. That, however, doesn't seem like such a substantial saving. - 2 - If the economy here is really substantial, it should be done. However, it does not seem a high impact option. - 3 - Seems like a bad idea, plain and simple. ICANN should rotate more, not less, going for regions where the local costs of the meetings would be lower, prioritizing cost-effectiveness instead of comfort. - 4 - This is a really high-impact alternative resource-wise, but this applies to everything (including negative impacts). Should be done only if the other alternatives that are well received do not accumulate to the amount needed. - 5 - This is a relatively impactful measure that could be implemented, but with a lot of care. I feel there is room for optimization here, but the community would have to organize itself a little better and with more previous planning. - 6 - When allied with 5, this is an interesting alternative when we are talking about good impact without too much harm being done. - 7 - Seems like a bad idea. It is better to have more online work, culminating in physical meetings, than having a multiple-day online meeting, considering that those who do not work specifically with ICANN wouldn't be able to focus without traveling (because of timezones, work commitments that would continue, etc). - B. Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources - 1 and 2 (the idea behind those two is too close to be separated on a comment) - See number 5, 'A', with the difference that this alternative seems much less impactful (financially speaking). - 3 - Really do not have a good idea on this one. Does not seem high-impact financially, but could be, and it largely affects the experience of both onsite and online participants. - 4 - This one should be considered after we have AI tools that are efficient enough, and it would indeed be a good alternative. At the moment, however, this should not be considered, since it would be against a major concern of the community about accessibility. - 5 - See comment on A, '4 to 6', above. - 6 - This seems like the most consensual thing to let go of if we are thinking about necessary and good to have. - 7 - For sure. If it is possible and could fill much of the gap, this should be priority one. - 8 - Heavily against it. This seems like the worst alternative of them all. - C. Travel-Related Matters - 1 - I really don't like this option. I think having staff on site is important and this is a good perk for the job, which seems to be very hard. ICANN already seems to be cutting costs in this space, and going beyond what is already being implemented could have negative impacts on the meetings for the rest of the community. - 2 - Can't comment on this one without more info on what this item really means. It looks, as of now, of a way to justify suppressing funded travelers, but this justification looks fragile and could be biased. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em seg., 3 de fev. de 2025 ?s 10:42, Rafik Dammak escreveu: > Thanks Pedro for the comments. Yes the budget related documents show high > cost by supported traveler. We should review the different options in the > strawman document. > @everyone please review and share your input. > @Tomslin Samme-Nlar Greg didn't say anything > about deadline for input but was it discussed at GNSO council leadership? > > Best, > > Rafik > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 20:38 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Rafik, >> >> Just as a first comment before reading through all documents (focusing >> (for now) only on the graphs and shorter docs), although this may be deeply >> unpopular, comparing the budget for other events that I participated in one >> way or another of the organization and/or supervision, hotel accommodation >> seems to be in a higher percentage (meaning it looks a bit >> disproportionate), especially if we take into account that flight costs >> refer to the participation of (many) people from all over the world. I >> note, however, that this may be caused by the large amount of days some >> ICANN meetings have. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >> & NCSG >> (ICANN), >> YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC >> Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em seg., 20 de jan. de 2025 ?s 22:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should >>> review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >>> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >>> context. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >>> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >>> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >>> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet >>> Community Group >>> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>> >>> >>> >>> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >>> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - ICANN >>> | >>> >>> - ATT00001.txt >>> | >>> >>> >>> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. >>> Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell >>> us what you think >>> >>> For more information click here >>> >>> >>> Dear SG/C Chairs, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >>> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >>> >>> >>> >>> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >>> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >>> >>> >>> >>> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >>> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >>> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >>> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >>> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >>> provide feedback on: >>> >>> 1. What options are missing? >>> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be >>> put out for public comment). >>> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >>> >>> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to >>> ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and >>> will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the >>> ?strawman? will be necessary. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts >>> their work. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank You! >>> >>> >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >>> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - Meeting >>> #1 - How We Meet Community Group >>> >>> >>> >>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >>> know the content is safe. >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> >>> >>> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had a >>> wonderful start to 2025. >>> >>> >>> >>> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the >>> ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >>> Date: 13 January 2024 >>> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >>> >>> >>> >>> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. >>> Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for >>> this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC >>> Chairs: >>> >>> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >>> 2. Agenda >>> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy >>> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >>> >>> Background Documents: >>> >>> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >>> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >>> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >>> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >>> >>> >>> >>> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are keeping >>> a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, meeting >>> agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any document that >>> we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >>> >>> >>> >>> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. >>> >>> >>> >>> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >>> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >>> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >>> >>> >>> >>> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at >>> the meeting! >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Alp Eken >>> >>> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >>> >>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >>> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). >>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From PolicyCalendar at icann.org Tue Feb 4 18:40:47 2025 From: PolicyCalendar at icann.org (ICANN Policy Calendar) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:40:47 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG EC Meeting | Monday, 14 April 2025 at 13:00 UTC Message-ID: <78ec8dcfa194480190a2f080c44b6216@icann.org> Please join the NCSG EC meeting on Monday, 14 April 2025 at 13:00-14:00 UTC. Join Zoom Meeting https://icann.zoom.us/j/91409019340?pwd=YXNZMUZoSWR6Zk9hdnhsdDU5aFF3QT09 Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 2Zqq^jHVrW Audio Only Details: One tap mobile +19294362866,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (New York) +13017158592,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (Washington DC) Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/aIcEmRH4i Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 4187517854 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 1909 bytes Desc: not available URL: From PolicyCalendar at icann.org Tue Feb 4 18:41:02 2025 From: PolicyCalendar at icann.org (ICANN Policy Calendar) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:41:02 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG EC Meeting | Monday, 19 May 2025 at 13:00 UTC Message-ID: <65678d7ae2204b9f80f263f74035e552@icann.org> Please join the NCSG EC meeting on Monday, 19 May 2025 at 13:00-14:00 UTC. Join Zoom Meeting https://icann.zoom.us/j/91409019340?pwd=YXNZMUZoSWR6Zk9hdnhsdDU5aFF3QT09 Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 2Zqq^jHVrW Audio Only Details: One tap mobile +19294362866,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (New York) +13017158592,,91409019340#,,,,*4187517854# US (Washington DC) Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/aIcEmRH4i Meeting ID: 914 0901 9340 Passcode: 4187517854 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 1901 bytes Desc: not available URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Wed Feb 5 18:35:53 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:35:53 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 Message-ID: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> Hello all! Have the NPOC reps decided who will be using the travel slot for ICANN83? The names are due on Monday. Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: NCSG-EC on behalf of Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC Reply-To: Rafik Dammak Date: Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 18:46 To: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana , Tapani Tarvainen , Wale Adedokun Cc: NCSG EC Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 Hi Pedro, thanks for confirmation. @Tapani Tarvainen @Wale Adedokun can you confirm who from NPOC will have the travel slot? Best, Rafik Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 05:01, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > a ?crit : Hi Rafik, Just signaling that, considering I'm going to ICANN82 through the NCSG EC slot, the next one should go to Amin. We just need to confirm internally, but that would be the natural course in order to rotate. Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat], IODA [ioda.org.br] and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:04, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > escreveu: Hi all, We need to confirm who from EC will attend ICANN meeting in Prague. We have 3 slots. 1 usually goes to NCSG Chair, 1 slot for NCUC representative and 1 slo for NPOC representative. Please confirm who from each constituency will get the travel slot and respond within the next 7 days. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message ------- Dear all, In order to service your travel needs for ICANN83 Prague in a timely fashion, please submit your meeting database to gnso-secs at icann.org by Monday, 10 February 2025. It is important all funded travel air booking is completed by due date given in ICANN Travel emails. There seems to be some struggle in this area, if you could please make sure all names put forward understand the deadlines. Please share with all funded travelers, the travel support guidelines wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg and highlight the communications responsibilities section: ICANN Travel Support attempts to reach a supported traveler four times before deeming the supported traveler unresponsive: 1. ICANN Travel Support sends ?welcome email.? 2. If there is no response after seven business days, ICANN Travel Support sends a second email, copying ICANN support staff. 3. If there is no response five business days after the second email, ICANN Travel Support sends a third email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. 4. If there is no response five business days after the third email, ICANN Travel Support sends a fourth email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. If there is no response three days after the fourth attempt to reach the supported traveler, the community group may substitute another traveler. A timely response would be appreciated in view of visa issues and the OFAC review. The deadline for submissions is critical to allow for confirmed reservation numbers as required for visa and travel arrangements. TRAVEL BOOKING PROCESS In order for Funded Travelers to start booking travel, they MUST complete Steps 1, 2, and 3. WHO WHAT 1 Funded Traveler Register for meeting using the Funded Traveler Registration Link provided by ICANN Travel Support 2 Funded Traveler Approved for Trade Regulations Review 3 Funded Traveler Receive Travel Funding Confirmation Email from ICANN Travel Support 4 Funded Traveler Book Air Travel for meeting Approved dates of Arrival and Departure ARRIVAL DATE DEPARTURE DATE Sunday, 08 June Friday, 13 June For air, this must be booked using either via our online booking platform (Concur) or official travel agency (FCM). ICANN org does not allow self-booking. Please note that when requesting travel support, in the interest of fairness and in light of budget restrictions we would like you to take the following into consideration: 1. Respond timely to ICANN Travel regarding your upcoming travel and book by deadline given in email. 2. If you require a visa to enter the country, please make sure to acquire your visa immediately. Follow link here for assistance. 3. Friday, 25 April 2025 (45 days before travel) is the last day to submit additions/replacements. 4. Requests past the deadline will be handled on a case-by-case basis by ICANN. All additional travelers added after the 90-day deadline are subject to availability, may NOT be placed in the same hotel as their funded traveler groups, and may not be able to attend due to visa issues. 5. If possible, please book direct travel requests. Detours and multi-stop trips are unfortunately not guaranteed. 6. If travelers want to extend their stay this must be done at their own expense and should contact the hotel directly once the ICANN hotel confirmation has be sent to them. 7. Privately Booked Reservations: ICANN will not refund or take over accommodations directly booked by the funded traveler. If a replacement has an existing hotel reservation, they will need to cancel their reservation and ICANN will not be able to take over their reservation. Reminder: * GNSO supported traveler with a designated hotel accommodation funding, a hotel room is automatically secured for you, please DO NOT book your own hotel as it is un-reimbursable. * All personal data provided to ICANN org in for purposes of providing travel support for participants related to ICANN events will be processed in accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy [icann.org]. Should you have any questions or concerns about this Privacy Policy and our privacy practices, you may contact us at privacy at icann.org. * As a reminder, for the AGM meeting only, incoming Councilors get funding, as well as the then-incumbent Councilors. Many thanks for your cooperation! Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Policy Team Supporting the GNSO _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info Wed Feb 5 21:03:53 2025 From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info (Tapani Tarvainen) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:03:53 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-EC] REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 In-Reply-To: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> References: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Andrea, I will be using NPOC's NCSG EC travel slot to Prague. As Wale will be there as a fellow he won't need it. Best, Tapani On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:35:53PM +0000, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC (ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is) wrote: > > Hello all! > > Have the NPOC reps decided who will be using the travel slot for ICANN83? The names are due on Monday. > > Thanks! > Kind Regards, > Andrea > > > From: NCSG-EC on behalf of Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > Reply-To: Rafik Dammak > Date: Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 18:46 > To: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana , Tapani Tarvainen , Wale Adedokun > Cc: NCSG EC > Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 > > Hi Pedro, > > thanks for confirmation. > @Tapani Tarvainen @Wale Adedokun can you confirm who from NPOC will have the travel slot? > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 05:01, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, > > Just signaling that, considering I'm going to ICANN82 through the NCSG EC slot, the next one should go to Amin. We just need to confirm internally, but that would be the natural course in order to rotate. > > Cordially, > > Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat], IODA [ioda.org.br] and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:04, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > escreveu: > Hi all, > > We need to confirm who from EC will attend ICANN meeting in Prague. We have 3 slots. 1 usually goes to NCSG Chair, 1 slot for NCUC representative and 1 slo for NPOC representative. Please confirm who from each constituency will get the travel slot and respond within the next 7 days. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ------- > > Dear all, > In order to service your travel needs for ICANN83 Prague in a timely fashion, please submit your meeting database to gnso-secs at icann.org by Monday, 10 February 2025. It is important all funded travel air booking is completed by due date given in ICANN Travel emails. There seems to be some struggle in this area, if you could please make sure all names put forward understand the deadlines. > Please share with all funded travelers, the travel support guidelines wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg and highlight the communications responsibilities section: > ICANN Travel Support attempts to reach a supported traveler four times before deeming the supported traveler unresponsive: > > 1. ICANN Travel Support sends ?welcome email.? > 2. If there is no response after seven business days, ICANN Travel Support sends a second email, copying ICANN support staff. > 3. If there is no response five business days after the second email, ICANN Travel Support sends a third email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. > 4. If there is no response five business days after the third email, ICANN Travel Support sends a fourth email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. > If there is no response three days after the fourth attempt to reach the supported traveler, the community group may substitute another traveler. > > A timely response would be appreciated in view of visa issues and the OFAC review. The deadline for submissions is critical to allow for confirmed reservation numbers as required for visa and travel arrangements. > > TRAVEL BOOKING PROCESS > > In order for Funded Travelers to start booking travel, they MUST complete Steps 1, 2, and 3. > > > WHO > > WHAT > > 1 > > Funded Traveler > > Register for meeting using the Funded Traveler Registration Link provided by ICANN Travel Support > > 2 > > Funded Traveler > > Approved for Trade Regulations Review > > 3 > > Funded Traveler > > Receive Travel Funding Confirmation Email from ICANN Travel Support > > 4 > > Funded Traveler > > Book Air Travel for meeting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Approved dates of Arrival and Departure > ARRIVAL DATE > > DEPARTURE DATE > > Sunday, 08 June > > Friday, 13 June > > > > For air, this must be booked using either via our online booking platform (Concur) or official travel agency (FCM). ICANN org does not allow self-booking. > > > Please note that when requesting travel support, in the interest of fairness and in light of budget restrictions we would like you to take the following into consideration: > > > 1. Respond timely to ICANN Travel regarding your upcoming travel and book by deadline given in email. > > 2. If you require a visa to enter the country, please make sure to acquire your visa immediately. Follow link here for assistance. > > 3. Friday, 25 April 2025 (45 days before travel) is the last day to submit additions/replacements. > > 4. Requests past the deadline will be handled on a case-by-case basis by ICANN. All additional travelers added after the 90-day deadline are subject to availability, may NOT be placed in the same hotel as their funded traveler groups, and may not be able to attend due to visa issues. > > 5. If possible, please book direct travel requests. Detours and multi-stop trips are unfortunately not guaranteed. > > 6. If travelers want to extend their stay this must be done at their own expense and should contact the hotel directly once the ICANN hotel confirmation has be sent to them. > > 7. Privately Booked Reservations: ICANN will not refund or take over accommodations directly booked by the funded traveler. If a replacement has an existing hotel reservation, they will need to cancel their reservation and ICANN will not be able to take over their reservation. > > > Reminder: > > * GNSO supported traveler with a designated hotel accommodation funding, a hotel room is automatically secured for you, please DO NOT book your own hotel as it is un-reimbursable. > * All personal data provided to ICANN org in for purposes of providing travel support for participants related to ICANN events will be processed in accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy [icann.org]. Should you have any questions or concerns about this Privacy Policy and our privacy practices, you may contact us at privacy at icann.org. > * As a reminder, for the AGM meeting only, incoming Councilors get funding, as well as the then-incumbent Councilors. > > Many thanks for your cooperation! > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > > Terri > Policy Team Supporting the GNSO > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec -- Tapani Tarvainen From andrea.glandon at icann.org Wed Feb 5 21:05:58 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 19:05:58 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 In-Reply-To: References: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> Message-ID: Great, thank you! Kind Regards, Andrea ?On 2/5/25, 13:04, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG-EC" on behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > wrote: Hi Andrea, I will be using NPOC's NCSG EC travel slot to Prague. As Wale will be there as a fellow he won't need it. Best, Tapani On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:35:53PM +0000, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC (ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is ) wrote: > > Hello all! > > Have the NPOC reps decided who will be using the travel slot for ICANN83? The names are due on Monday. > > Thanks! > Kind Regards, > Andrea > > > From: NCSG-EC > on behalf of Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > > Reply-To: Rafik Dammak > > Date: Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 18:46 > To: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >, Tapani Tarvainen >, Wale Adedokun > > Cc: NCSG EC > > Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 > > Hi Pedro, > > thanks for confirmation. > @Tapani Tarvainen> @Wale Adedokun> can you confirm who from NPOC will have the travel slot? > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 05:01, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >> a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, > > Just signaling that, considering I'm going to ICANN82 through the NCSG EC slot, the next one should go to Amin. We just need to confirm internally, but that would be the natural course in order to rotate. > > Cordially, > > Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > Lawyer [nic.br]>, GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br]> Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br]>, NCUC [ncuc.org]> & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat]>, IODA [ioda.org.br]> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net]> > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:04, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC >> escreveu: > Hi all, > > We need to confirm who from EC will attend ICANN meeting in Prague. We have 3 slots. 1 usually goes to NCSG Chair, 1 slot for NCUC representative and 1 slo for NPOC representative. Please confirm who from each constituency will get the travel slot and respond within the next 7 days. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ------- > > Dear all, > In order to service your travel needs for ICANN83 Prague in a timely fashion, please submit your meeting database to gnso-secs at icann.org > by Monday, 10 February 2025. It is important all funded travel air booking is completed by due date given in ICANN Travel emails. There seems to be some struggle in this area, if you could please make sure all names put forward understand the deadlines. > Please share with all funded travelers, the travel support guidelines wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg and highlight the communications responsibilities section: > ICANN Travel Support attempts to reach a supported traveler four times before deeming the supported traveler unresponsive: > > 1. ICANN Travel Support sends ?welcome email.? > 2. If there is no response after seven business days, ICANN Travel Support sends a second email, copying ICANN support staff. > 3. If there is no response five business days after the second email, ICANN Travel Support sends a third email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. > 4. If there is no response five business days after the third email, ICANN Travel Support sends a fourth email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. > If there is no response three days after the fourth attempt to reach the supported traveler, the community group may substitute another traveler. > > A timely response would be appreciated in view of visa issues and the OFAC review. The deadline for submissions is critical to allow for confirmed reservation numbers as required for visa and travel arrangements. > > TRAVEL BOOKING PROCESS > > In order for Funded Travelers to start booking travel, they MUST complete Steps 1, 2, and 3. > > > WHO > > WHAT > > 1 > > Funded Traveler > > Register for meeting using the Funded Traveler Registration Link provided by ICANN Travel Support > > 2 > > Funded Traveler > > Approved for Trade Regulations Review > > 3 > > Funded Traveler > > Receive Travel Funding Confirmation Email from ICANN Travel Support > > 4 > > Funded Traveler > > Book Air Travel for meeting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Approved dates of Arrival and Departure > ARRIVAL DATE > > DEPARTURE DATE > > Sunday, 08 June > > Friday, 13 June > > > > For air, this must be booked using either via our online booking platform (Concur) or official travel agency (FCM). ICANN org does not allow self-booking. > > > Please note that when requesting travel support, in the interest of fairness and in light of budget restrictions we would like you to take the following into consideration: > > > 1. Respond timely to ICANN Travel regarding your upcoming travel and book by deadline given in email. > > 2. If you require a visa to enter the country, please make sure to acquire your visa immediately. Follow link here for assistance. > > 3. Friday, 25 April 2025 (45 days before travel) is the last day to submit additions/replacements. > > 4. Requests past the deadline will be handled on a case-by-case basis by ICANN. All additional travelers added after the 90-day deadline are subject to availability, may NOT be placed in the same hotel as their funded traveler groups, and may not be able to attend due to visa issues. > > 5. If possible, please book direct travel requests. Detours and multi-stop trips are unfortunately not guaranteed. > > 6. If travelers want to extend their stay this must be done at their own expense and should contact the hotel directly once the ICANN hotel confirmation has be sent to them. > > 7. Privately Booked Reservations: ICANN will not refund or take over accommodations directly booked by the funded traveler. If a replacement has an existing hotel reservation, they will need to cancel their reservation and ICANN will not be able to take over their reservation. > > > Reminder: > > * GNSO supported traveler with a designated hotel accommodation funding, a hotel room is automatically secured for you, please DO NOT book your own hotel as it is un-reimbursable. > * All personal data provided to ICANN org in for purposes of providing travel support for participants related to ICANN events will be processed in accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy [icann.org]. Should you have any questions or concerns about this Privacy Policy and our privacy practices, you may contact us at privacy at icann.org >. > * As a reminder, for the AGM meeting only, incoming Councilors get funding, as well as the then-incumbent Councilors. > > Many thanks for your cooperation! > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > > Terri > Policy Team Supporting the GNSO > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] [lists.ncsg.is]> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] -- Tapani Tarvainen _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] From andrea.glandon at icann.org Wed Feb 5 21:09:18 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 19:09:18 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 In-Reply-To: References: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> Message-ID: <151A3202-EC29-412C-AB34-05B47F4BE340@icann.org> Hello all, Noting that Wale has a fellowship for ICANN83, I also see that Amin has been awarded a fellowship for this meeting. Will Pedro then be using the NCSG EC slot for 83? Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea ?On 2/5/25, 13:06, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC" on behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > wrote: Great, thank you! Kind Regards, Andrea On 2/5/25, 13:04, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG-EC" > on behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >> wrote: Hi Andrea, I will be using NPOC's NCSG EC travel slot to Prague. As Wale will be there as a fellow he won't need it. Best, Tapani On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:35:53PM +0000, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC (ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >) wrote: > > Hello all! > > Have the NPOC reps decided who will be using the travel slot for ICANN83? The names are due on Monday. > > Thanks! > Kind Regards, > Andrea > > > From: NCSG-EC >> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC >> > Reply-To: Rafik Dammak >> > Date: Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 18:46 > To: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>, Tapani Tarvainen >>, Wale Adedokun >> > Cc: NCSG EC >> > Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 > > Hi Pedro, > > thanks for confirmation. > @Tapani Tarvainen >> @Wale Adedokun >> can you confirm who from NPOC will have the travel slot? > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 05:01, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > >>> a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, > > Just signaling that, considering I'm going to ICANN82 through the NCSG EC slot, the next one should go to Amin. We just need to confirm internally, but that would be the natural course in order to rotate. > > Cordially, > > Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > Lawyer [nic.br] >>, GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >> Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>, NCUC [ncuc.org] >> & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>, IODA [ioda.org.br] >> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >> > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:04, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > >>> escreveu: > Hi all, > > We need to confirm who from EC will attend ICANN meeting in Prague. We have 3 slots. 1 usually goes to NCSG Chair, 1 slot for NCUC representative and 1 slo for NPOC representative. Please confirm who from each constituency will get the travel slot and respond within the next 7 days. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ------- > > Dear all, > In order to service your travel needs for ICANN83 Prague in a timely fashion, please submit your meeting database to gnso-secs at icann.org > >> by Monday, 10 February 2025. It is important all funded travel air booking is completed by due date given in ICANN Travel emails. There seems to be some struggle in this area, if you could please make sure all names put forward understand the deadlines. > Please share with all funded travelers, the travel support guidelines wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg and highlight the communications responsibilities section: > ICANN Travel Support attempts to reach a supported traveler four times before deeming the supported traveler unresponsive: > > 1. ICANN Travel Support sends ?welcome email.? > 2. If there is no response after seven business days, ICANN Travel Support sends a second email, copying ICANN support staff. > 3. If there is no response five business days after the second email, ICANN Travel Support sends a third email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. > 4. If there is no response five business days after the third email, ICANN Travel Support sends a fourth email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. > If there is no response three days after the fourth attempt to reach the supported traveler, the community group may substitute another traveler. > > A timely response would be appreciated in view of visa issues and the OFAC review. The deadline for submissions is critical to allow for confirmed reservation numbers as required for visa and travel arrangements. > > TRAVEL BOOKING PROCESS > > In order for Funded Travelers to start booking travel, they MUST complete Steps 1, 2, and 3. > > > WHO > > WHAT > > 1 > > Funded Traveler > > Register for meeting using the Funded Traveler Registration Link provided by ICANN Travel Support > > 2 > > Funded Traveler > > Approved for Trade Regulations Review > > 3 > > Funded Traveler > > Receive Travel Funding Confirmation Email from ICANN Travel Support > > 4 > > Funded Traveler > > Book Air Travel for meeting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Approved dates of Arrival and Departure > ARRIVAL DATE > > DEPARTURE DATE > > Sunday, 08 June > > Friday, 13 June > > > > For air, this must be booked using either via our online booking platform (Concur) or official travel agency (FCM). ICANN org does not allow self-booking. > > > Please note that when requesting travel support, in the interest of fairness and in light of budget restrictions we would like you to take the following into consideration: > > > 1. Respond timely to ICANN Travel regarding your upcoming travel and book by deadline given in email. > > 2. If you require a visa to enter the country, please make sure to acquire your visa immediately. Follow link here for assistance. > > 3. Friday, 25 April 2025 (45 days before travel) is the last day to submit additions/replacements. > > 4. Requests past the deadline will be handled on a case-by-case basis by ICANN. All additional travelers added after the 90-day deadline are subject to availability, may NOT be placed in the same hotel as their funded traveler groups, and may not be able to attend due to visa issues. > > 5. If possible, please book direct travel requests. Detours and multi-stop trips are unfortunately not guaranteed. > > 6. If travelers want to extend their stay this must be done at their own expense and should contact the hotel directly once the ICANN hotel confirmation has be sent to them. > > 7. Privately Booked Reservations: ICANN will not refund or take over accommodations directly booked by the funded traveler. If a replacement has an existing hotel reservation, they will need to cancel their reservation and ICANN will not be able to take over their reservation. > > > Reminder: > > * GNSO supported traveler with a designated hotel accommodation funding, a hotel room is automatically secured for you, please DO NOT book your own hotel as it is un-reimbursable. > * All personal data provided to ICANN org in for purposes of providing travel support for participants related to ICANN events will be processed in accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy [icann.org] . Should you have any questions or concerns about this Privacy Policy and our privacy practices, you may contact us at privacy at icann.org > >>. > * As a reminder, for the AGM meeting only, incoming Councilors get funding, as well as the then-incumbent Councilors. > > Many thanks for your cooperation! > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > > Terri > Policy Team Supporting the GNSO > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] [lists.ncsg.is] >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] -- Tapani Tarvainen _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5lCrpHVjAR7yf8YFBYyxuuHeHSsAeJUPQY9tvA22yOA0jDk8_i3z9wele3PvULaVxHE2mOjSEu_cYbGrAeiNgZiICd9jig$ [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Thu Feb 6 19:02:16 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:02:16 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 In-Reply-To: <151A3202-EC29-412C-AB34-05B47F4BE340@icann.org> References: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> <151A3202-EC29-412C-AB34-05B47F4BE340@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Andrea, Sorry for missing this one! Amin, as informed in another email, will forfeit his fellowship slot and will maintain the NCSG EC one. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qua., 5 de fev. de 2025 ?s 16:09, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > Hello all, > > Noting that Wale has a fellowship for ICANN83, I also see that Amin has > been awarded a fellowship for this meeting. Will Pedro then be using the > NCSG EC slot for 83? > > Thanks! > Kind Regards, > Andrea > > > > > ?On 2/5/25, 13:06, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC" < > ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is on > behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > wrote: > > > Great, thank you! > > > Kind Regards, > Andrea > > > > > > > > > On 2/5/25, 13:04, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG-EC" < > ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is > ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is>> on behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>> wrote: > > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > > I will be using NPOC's NCSG EC travel slot to Prague. > > > > > As Wale will be there as a fellow he won't need it. > > > > > Best, > > > > > Tapani > > > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:35:53PM +0000, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC ( > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >) wrote: > > > > Hello all! > > > > Have the NPOC reps decided who will be using the travel slot for > ICANN83? The names are due on Monday. > > > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > From: NCSG-EC ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is> >> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via > NCSG-EC ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >> > > Reply-To: Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com> rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>> > > Date: Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 18:46 > > To: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> >>, Tapani Tarvainen < > ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info >>, Wale > Adedokun >> > > Cc: NCSG EC > >> > > Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers > Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 > > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > thanks for confirmation. > > @Tapani Tarvainen ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>>> @Wale Adedokun >> > can you confirm who from NPOC will have the travel slot? > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 05:01, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com >>> a > ?crit : > > Hi Rafik, > > > > Just signaling that, considering I'm going to ICANN82 through the NCSG > EC slot, the next one should go to Amin. We just need to confirm > internally, but that would be the natural course in order to rotate. > > > > Cordially, > > > > Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > > Lawyer [nic.br]< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$>>>, > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br]< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YjCq0Kpg$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YjCq0Kpg$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YjCq0Kpg$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YjCq0Kpg$>>> > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br]< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$>>>, > NCUC [ncuc.org]< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YPyai3RQ$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YPyai3RQ$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YPyai3RQ$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YPyai3RQ$>>> > & NCSG < > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>> < > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>> < > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home&gt;>> > (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat]< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youthlacigf.lat/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_Y6MmPRXQ$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youthlacigf.lat/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_Y6MmPRXQ$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youthlacigf.lat/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_Y6MmPRXQ$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youthlacigf.lat/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_Y6MmPRXQ$>>>, > IODA [ioda.org.br]< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ioda.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_azJoo2Dw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ioda.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_azJoo2Dw$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ioda.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_azJoo2Dw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ioda.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_azJoo2Dw$>>> > and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net]< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_aUernVWQ$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_aUernVWQ$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_aUernVWQ$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_aUernVWQ$ > >>> > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received > by mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:04, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >>> escreveu: > > Hi all, > > > > We need to confirm who from EC will attend ICANN meeting in Prague. We > have 3 slots. 1 usually goes to NCSG Chair, 1 slot for NCUC representative > and 1 slo for NPOC representative. Please confirm who from each > constituency will get the travel slot and respond within the next 7 days. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ------- > > > > Dear all, > > In order to service your travel needs for ICANN83 Prague in a timely > fashion, please submit your meeting database to gnso-secs at icann.org > gnso-secs at icann.org>> gnso-secs at icann.org> gnso-secs at icann.org>>> by Monday, 10 February 2025. It is important all > funded travel air booking is completed by due date given in ICANN Travel > emails. There seems to be some struggle in this area, if you could please > make sure all names put forward understand the deadlines. > > Please share with all funded travelers, the travel support guidelines > wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg < > https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg> < > https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg> < > https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg>> and highlight the > communications responsibilities section: > > ICANN Travel Support attempts to reach a supported traveler four times > before deeming the supported traveler unresponsive: > > > > 1. ICANN Travel Support sends ?welcome email.? > > 2. If there is no response after seven business days, ICANN Travel > Support sends a second email, copying ICANN support staff. > > 3. If there is no response five business days after the second email, > ICANN Travel Support sends a third email, copying ICANN support staff and > the community group chair. > > 4. If there is no response five business days after the third email, > ICANN Travel Support sends a fourth email, copying ICANN support staff and > the community group chair. > > If there is no response three days after the fourth attempt to reach the > supported traveler, the community group may substitute another traveler. > > > > A timely response would be appreciated in view of visa issues and the > OFAC review. The deadline for submissions is critical to allow for > confirmed reservation numbers as required for visa and travel arrangements. > > > > TRAVEL BOOKING PROCESS > > > > In order for Funded Travelers to start booking travel, they MUST > complete Steps 1, 2, and 3. > > > > > > WHO > > > > WHAT > > > > 1 > > > > Funded Traveler > > > > Register for meeting using the Funded Traveler Registration Link > provided by ICANN Travel Support > > > > 2 > > > > Funded Traveler > > > > Approved for Trade Regulations Review > > > > 3 > > > > Funded Traveler > > > > Receive Travel Funding Confirmation Email from ICANN Travel Support > > > > 4 > > > > Funded Traveler > > > > Book Air Travel for meeting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Approved dates of Arrival and Departure > > ARRIVAL DATE > > > > DEPARTURE DATE > > > > Sunday, 08 June > > > > Friday, 13 June > > > > > > > > For air, this must be booked using either via our online booking > platform (Concur) or official travel agency (FCM). ICANN org does not allow > self-booking. > > > > > > Please note that when requesting travel support, in the interest of > fairness and in light of budget restrictions we would like you to take the > following into consideration: > > > > > > 1. Respond timely to ICANN Travel regarding your upcoming travel and > book by deadline given in email. > > > > 2. If you require a visa to enter the country, please make sure to > acquire your visa immediately. Follow link here< > https://community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg> < > https://community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg>> < > https://community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg>> < > https://community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg&gt;>> for assistance. > > > > 3. Friday, 25 April 2025 (45 days before travel) is the last day to > submit additions/replacements. > > > > 4. Requests past the deadline will be handled on a case-by-case basis by > ICANN. All additional travelers added after the 90-day deadline are subject > to availability, may NOT be placed in the same hotel as their funded > traveler groups, and may not be able to attend due to visa issues. > > > > 5. If possible, please book direct travel requests. Detours and > multi-stop trips are unfortunately not guaranteed. > > > > 6. If travelers want to extend their stay this must be done at their own > expense and should contact the hotel directly once the ICANN hotel > confirmation has be sent to them. > > > > 7. Privately Booked Reservations: ICANN will not refund or take over > accommodations directly booked by the funded traveler. If a replacement has > an existing hotel reservation, they will need to cancel their reservation > and ICANN will not be able to take over their reservation. > > > > > > Reminder: > > > > * GNSO supported traveler with a designated hotel accommodation funding, > a hotel room is automatically secured for you, please DO NOT book your own > hotel as it is un-reimbursable. > > * All personal data provided to ICANN org in for purposes of providing > travel support for participants related to ICANN events will be processed > in accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy [icann.org]< > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&e=> > < > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&e=>>. > Should < > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&e=>.  Should> > < > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&amp;d=DwMFAg&amp;c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&amp;r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&amp;m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&amp;s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&amp;e=&gt;.&nbsp;&nbsp;Should>> > you have any questions or concerns about this Privacy Policy and our > privacy practices, you may contact us at privacy at icann.org privacy at icann.org> >> privacy at icann.org >>. > > * As a reminder, for the AGM meeting only, incoming Councilors get > funding, as well as the then-incumbent Councilors. > > > > Many thanks for your cooperation! > > Thank you. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Terri > > Policy Team Supporting the GNSO > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NCSG-EC mailing list > > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] [lists.ncsg.is]< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$ > >>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NCSG-EC mailing list > > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] > > > > > > > > > -- > Tapani Tarvainen > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5lCrpHVjAR7yf8YFBYyxuuHeHSsAeJUPQY9tvA22yOA0jDk8_i3z9wele3PvULaVxHE2mOjSEu_cYbGrAeiNgZiICd9jig$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5lCrpHVjAR7yf8YFBYyxuuHeHSsAeJUPQY9tvA22yOA0jDk8_i3z9wele3PvULaVxHE2mOjSEu_cYbGrAeiNgZiICd9jig$> > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Thu Feb 6 19:03:12 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:03:12 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 In-Reply-To: References: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> <151A3202-EC29-412C-AB34-05B47F4BE340@icann.org> Message-ID: <3AB1C7A9-DA1C-4F98-83C5-427CF34C6753@icann.org> Thank you! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Date: Thursday, February 6, 2025 at 11:02 To: Andrea Glandon Cc: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" Subject: Re: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 Hi Andrea, Sorry for missing this one! Amin, as informed in another email, will forfeit his fellowship slot and will maintain the NCSG EC one. Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat], IODA [ioda.org.br] and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qua., 5 de fev. de 2025 ?s 16:09, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > escreveu: Hello all, Noting that Wale has a fellowship for ICANN83, I also see that Amin has been awarded a fellowship for this meeting. Will Pedro then be using the NCSG EC slot for 83? Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea On 2/5/25, 13:06, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC" > on behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >> wrote: Great, thank you! Kind Regards, Andrea On 2/5/25, 13:04, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG-EC" > >> on behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > >>> wrote: Hi Andrea, I will be using NPOC's NCSG EC travel slot to Prague. As Wale will be there as a fellow he won't need it. Best, Tapani On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:35:53PM +0000, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC (ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > >>) wrote: > > Hello all! > > Have the NPOC reps decided who will be using the travel slot for ICANN83? The names are due on Monday. > > Thanks! > Kind Regards, > Andrea > > > From: NCSG-EC > >>> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > >>> > Reply-To: Rafik Dammak > >>> > Date: Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 18:46 > To: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > >>>, Tapani Tarvainen > >>>, Wale Adedokun > >>> > Cc: NCSG EC > >>> > Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 > > Hi Pedro, > > thanks for confirmation. > @Tapani Tarvainen > >>> @Wale Adedokun > >>> can you confirm who from NPOC will have the travel slot? > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 05:01, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > >> > >>>> a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, > > Just signaling that, considering I'm going to ICANN82 through the NCSG EC slot, the next one should go to Amin. We just need to confirm internally, but that would be the natural course in order to rotate. > > Cordially, > > Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > Lawyer [nic.br [nic.br]] >>, GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br [gedai.com.br]] >> Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br [isoc.org.br]] >>, NCUC [ncuc.org [ncuc.org]] >> & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>, IODA [ioda.org.br [ioda.org.br]] >> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net [br.creativecommons.net]] >> > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:04, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > >> > >>>> escreveu: > Hi all, > > We need to confirm who from EC will attend ICANN meeting in Prague. We have 3 slots. 1 usually goes to NCSG Chair, 1 slot for NCUC representative and 1 slo for NPOC representative. Please confirm who from each constituency will get the travel slot and respond within the next 7 days. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message ------- > > Dear all, > In order to service your travel needs for ICANN83 Prague in a timely fashion, please submit your meeting database to gnso-secs at icann.org > >> > >>> by Monday, 10 February 2025. It is important all funded travel air booking is completed by due date given in ICANN Travel emails. There seems to be some struggle in this area, if you could please make sure all names put forward understand the deadlines. > Please share with all funded travelers, the travel support guidelines wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg and highlight the communications responsibilities section: > ICANN Travel Support attempts to reach a supported traveler four times before deeming the supported traveler unresponsive: > > 1. ICANN Travel Support sends ?welcome email.? > 2. If there is no response after seven business days, ICANN Travel Support sends a second email, copying ICANN support staff. > 3. If there is no response five business days after the second email, ICANN Travel Support sends a third email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. > 4. If there is no response five business days after the third email, ICANN Travel Support sends a fourth email, copying ICANN support staff and the community group chair. > If there is no response three days after the fourth attempt to reach the supported traveler, the community group may substitute another traveler. > > A timely response would be appreciated in view of visa issues and the OFAC review. The deadline for submissions is critical to allow for confirmed reservation numbers as required for visa and travel arrangements. > > TRAVEL BOOKING PROCESS > > In order for Funded Travelers to start booking travel, they MUST complete Steps 1, 2, and 3. > > > WHO > > WHAT > > 1 > > Funded Traveler > > Register for meeting using the Funded Traveler Registration Link provided by ICANN Travel Support > > 2 > > Funded Traveler > > Approved for Trade Regulations Review > > 3 > > Funded Traveler > > Receive Travel Funding Confirmation Email from ICANN Travel Support > > 4 > > Funded Traveler > > Book Air Travel for meeting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Approved dates of Arrival and Departure > ARRIVAL DATE > > DEPARTURE DATE > > Sunday, 08 June > > Friday, 13 June > > > > For air, this must be booked using either via our online booking platform (Concur) or official travel agency (FCM). ICANN org does not allow self-booking. > > > Please note that when requesting travel support, in the interest of fairness and in light of budget restrictions we would like you to take the following into consideration: > > > 1. Respond timely to ICANN Travel regarding your upcoming travel and book by deadline given in email. > > 2. If you require a visa to enter the country, please make sure to acquire your visa immediately. Follow link here for assistance. > > 3. Friday, 25 April 2025 (45 days before travel) is the last day to submit additions/replacements. > > 4. Requests past the deadline will be handled on a case-by-case basis by ICANN. All additional travelers added after the 90-day deadline are subject to availability, may NOT be placed in the same hotel as their funded traveler groups, and may not be able to attend due to visa issues. > > 5. If possible, please book direct travel requests. Detours and multi-stop trips are unfortunately not guaranteed. > > 6. If travelers want to extend their stay this must be done at their own expense and should contact the hotel directly once the ICANN hotel confirmation has be sent to them. > > 7. Privately Booked Reservations: ICANN will not refund or take over accommodations directly booked by the funded traveler. If a replacement has an existing hotel reservation, they will need to cancel their reservation and ICANN will not be able to take over their reservation. > > > Reminder: > > * GNSO supported traveler with a designated hotel accommodation funding, a hotel room is automatically secured for you, please DO NOT book your own hotel as it is un-reimbursable. > * All personal data provided to ICANN org in for purposes of providing travel support for participants related to ICANN events will be processed in accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy [icann.org [icann.org]] . Should you have any questions or concerns about this Privacy Policy and our privacy practices, you may contact us at privacy at icann.org > >> > >>>. > * As a reminder, for the AGM meeting only, incoming Councilors get funding, as well as the then-incumbent Councilors. > > Many thanks for your cooperation! > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > > Terri > Policy Team Supporting the GNSO > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > >> > >>> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > >> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] [lists.ncsg.is [lists.ncsg.is]] >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > >> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] -- Tapani Tarvainen _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ > >> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5lCrpHVjAR7yf8YFBYyxuuHeHSsAeJUPQY9tvA22yOA0jDk8_i3z9wele3PvULaVxHE2mOjSEu_cYbGrAeiNgZiICd9jig$ > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec [lists.ncsg.is] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From julf at Julf.com Thu Feb 6 19:48:21 2025 From: julf at Julf.com (Johan Helsingius) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:48:21 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 In-Reply-To: References: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> <151A3202-EC29-412C-AB34-05B47F4BE340@icann.org> Message-ID: <3e9b6b54-84d7-430a-b873-ca5328c4952a@Julf.com> Why would one forfeit a slot? Julf On 06/02/2025 18:02, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > Sorry for missing this one! Amin, as informed in another email, will > forfeit his fellowship slot and will maintain the NCSG EC one. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ISOC BR ,NCUC www.ncuc.org> & NCSG gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), YouthLACIGF >,IODA and CC Brasil br.creativecommons.net/> > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received > by mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qua., 5 de fev. de 2025 ?s 16:09, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC ec at lists.ncsg.is > escreveu: > > Hello all, > > Noting that Wale has a fellowship for ICANN83, I also see that Amin > has been awarded a fellowship for this meeting. Will Pedro then be > using the NCSG EC slot for 83? > > Thanks! > Kind Regards, > Andrea > > > > > ?On 2/5/25, 13:06, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC" > bounces at lists.ncsg.is> > on behalf of ncsg- > ec at lists.ncsg.is ec at lists.ncsg.is >> wrote: > > > Great, thank you! > > > Kind Regards, > Andrea > > > > > > > > > On 2/5/25, 13:04, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG- > EC" bounces at lists.ncsg.is> > bounces at lists.ncsg.is > bounces at lists.ncsg.is>>> on behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > > >>> wrote: > > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > > I will be using NPOC's NCSG EC travel slot to Prague. > > > > > As Wale will be there as a fellow he won't need it. > > > > > Best, > > > > > Tapani > > > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:35:53PM +0000, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC > (ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is ec at lists.ncsg.is > ec at lists.ncsg.is ec at lists.ncsg.is >>) wrote: > > > > Hello all! > > > > Have the NPOC reps decided who will be using the travel slot for > ICANN83? The names are due on Monday. > > > > Thanks! > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > From: NCSG-EC bounces at lists.ncsg.is> > bounces at lists.ncsg.is > bounces at lists.ncsg.is>>>> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > ec at lists.ncsg.is > ec at lists.ncsg.is ec at lists.ncsg.is >>> > > Reply-To: Rafik Dammak > >>> > > Date: Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 18:46 > > To: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > > > > >>>, Tapani Tarvainen > > > > > >>>, Wale Adedokun > > >>> > > Cc: NCSG EC > > > > >>> > > Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 | Prague | Supported > Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 > > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > thanks for confirmation. > > @Tapani Tarvainen > > > > >>> @Wale > Adedokun > > > > >>> can you confirm > who from NPOC will have the travel slot? > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 05:01, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > > > > > >> > >>>> a ?crit : > > Hi Rafik, > > > > Just signaling that, considering I'm going to ICANN82 through the > NCSG EC slot, the next one should go to Amin. We just need to > confirm internally, but that would be the natural course in order to > rotate. > > > > Cordially, > > > > Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > > Lawyer [nic.br ] __https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4! > 70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$ > >>>, GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br ] > >>> Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br isoc.org.br>] PtGJab4! > 70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$ > >>>, NCUC [ncuc.org ] > >>> & NCSG > ;> ;> ;> (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] > >>>, IODA [ioda.org.br ] > >>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net ] > >>> > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If > received by mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:04, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC > ec at lists.ncsg.is > ec at lists.ncsg.is ec at lists.ncsg.is >> ec at lists.ncsg.is ec at lists.ncsg.is > ec at lists.ncsg.is ec at lists.ncsg.is >>>> escreveu: > > Hi all, > > > > We need to confirm who from EC will attend ICANN meeting in > Prague. We have 3 slots. 1 usually goes to NCSG Chair, 1 slot for > NCUC representative and 1 slo for NPOC representative. Please > confirm who from each constituency will get the travel slot and > respond within the next 7 days. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ------- > > > > Dear all, > > In order to service your travel needs for ICANN83 Prague in a > timely fashion, please submit your meeting database to gnso- > secs at icann.org secs at icann.org > secs at icann.org secs at icann.org >> secs at icann.org secs at icann.org > secs at icann.org secs at icann.org >>> by Monday, 10 > February 2025. It is important all funded travel air booking is > completed by due date given in ICANN Travel emails. There seems to > be some struggle in this area, if you could please make sure all > names put forward understand the deadlines. > > Please share with all funded travelers, the travel support > guidelines wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg > x/lgvxAg > community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg > > community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg>>;> and highlight the communications > responsibilities section: > > ICANN Travel Support attempts to reach a supported traveler four > times before deeming the supported traveler unresponsive: > > > > 1. ICANN Travel Support sends ?welcome email.? > > 2. If there is no response after seven business days, ICANN > Travel Support sends a second email, copying ICANN support staff. > > 3. If there is no response five business days after the second > email, ICANN Travel Support sends a third email, copying ICANN > support staff and the community group chair. > > 4. If there is no response five business days after the third > email, ICANN Travel Support sends a fourth email, copying ICANN > support staff and the community group chair. > > If there is no response three days after the fourth attempt to > reach the supported traveler, the community group may substitute > another traveler. > > > > A timely response would be appreciated in view of visa issues and > the OFAC review. The deadline for submissions is critical to allow > for confirmed reservation numbers as required for visa and travel > arrangements. > > > > TRAVEL BOOKING PROCESS > > > > In order for Funded Travelers to start booking travel, they MUST > complete Steps 1, 2, and 3. > > > > > > WHO > > > > WHAT > > > > 1 > > > > Funded Traveler > > > > Register for meeting using the Funded Traveler Registration Link > provided by ICANN Travel Support > > > > 2 > > > > Funded Traveler > > > > Approved for Trade Regulations Review > > > > 3 > > > > Funded Traveler > > > > Receive Travel Funding Confirmation Email from ICANN Travel Support > > > > 4 > > > > Funded Traveler > > > > Book Air Travel for meeting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Approved dates of Arrival and Departure > > ARRIVAL DATE > > > > DEPARTURE DATE > > > > Sunday, 08 June > > > > Friday, 13 June > > > > > > > > For air, this must be booked using either via our online booking > platform (Concur) or official travel agency (FCM). ICANN org does > not allow self-booking. > > > > > > Please note that when requesting travel support, in the interest > of fairness and in light of budget restrictions we would like you to > take the following into consideration: > > > > > > 1. Respond timely to ICANN Travel regarding your upcoming travel > and book by deadline given in email. > > > > 2. If you require a visa to enter the country, please make sure > to acquire your visa immediately. Follow link here community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg > > community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg>>;> fSfxAg> ;> community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg&gt;> community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg&gt;>>;> for assistance. > > > > 3. Friday, 25 April 2025 (45 days before travel) is the last day > to submit additions/replacements. > > > > 4. Requests past the deadline will be handled on a case-by-case > basis by ICANN. All additional travelers added after the 90-day > deadline are subject to availability, may NOT be placed in the same > hotel as their funded traveler groups, and may not be able to attend > due to visa issues. > > > > 5. If possible, please book direct travel requests. Detours and > multi-stop trips are unfortunately not guaranteed. > > > > 6. If travelers want to extend their stay this must be done at > their own expense and should contact the hotel directly once the > ICANN hotel confirmation has be sent to them. > > > > 7. Privately Booked Reservations: ICANN will not refund or take > over accommodations directly booked by the funded traveler. If a > replacement has an existing hotel reservation, they will need to > cancel their reservation and ICANN will not be able to take over > their reservation. > > > > > > Reminder: > > > > * GNSO supported traveler with a designated hotel accommodation > funding, a hotel room is automatically secured for you, please DO > NOT book your own hotel as it is un-reimbursable. > > * All personal data provided to ICANN org in for purposes of > providing travel support for participants related to ICANN events > will be processed in accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy > [icann.org ] url? > u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&e= > ;>. Should > ;> you have any questions or concerns about this Privacy Policy and our privacy practices, you may contact us at privacy at icann.org > >> > >>>. > > * As a reminder, for the AGM meeting only, incoming Councilors > get funding, as well as the then-incumbent Councilors. > > > > Many thanks for your cooperation! > > Thank you. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Terri > > Policy Team Supporting the GNSO > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NCSG-EC mailing list > > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > > > EC at lists.ncsg.is>>> EC at lists.ncsg.is> EC at lists.ncsg.is>> EC at lists.ncsg.is> EC at lists.ncsg.is>>>> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/ > listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf- > nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>>> > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] [lists.ncsg.is ] urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4! > 70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$ > >>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NCSG-EC mailing list > > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > > > >> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/ > listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf- > nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>>> > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] > > > > > > > > > -- > Tapani Tarvainen > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is EC at lists.ncsg.is > EC at lists.ncsg.is EC at lists.ncsg.is >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ > ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg- > ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b- > Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>>> > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is EC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ > ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4! > 5lCrpHVjAR7yf8YFBYyxuuHeHSsAeJUPQY9tvA22yOA0jDk8_i3z9wele3PvULaVxHE2mOjSEu_cYbGrAeiNgZiICd9jig$ > [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec> > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 03:04:10 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:04:10 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: REMINDER ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 In-Reply-To: References: <120223DB-1DA4-4888-AE38-EC1FE9C1028E@icann.org> <151A3202-EC29-412C-AB34-05B47F4BE340@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi, Thanks Pedro for the info. now we confirmed for all EC slots and for most PC slots. Unfortunately, Peter cannot make it to the Prague meeting due to reasons outside of his control. I will initiate the travel slot replacement process for that slot and send a call for applications to the NCSG list like last time. Best regards, Rafik Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 02:02, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : > Hi Andrea, > > Sorry for missing this one! Amin, as informed in another email, will > forfeit his fellowship slot and will maintain the NCSG EC one. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC > & NCSG > (ICANN), > YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC > Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qua., 5 de fev. de 2025 ?s 16:09, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > >> Hello all, >> >> Noting that Wale has a fellowship for ICANN83, I also see that Amin has >> been awarded a fellowship for this meeting. Will Pedro then be using the >> NCSG EC slot for 83? >> >> Thanks! >> Kind Regards, >> Andrea >> >> >> >> >> ?On 2/5/25, 13:06, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC" < >> ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is on >> behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > wrote: >> >> >> Great, thank you! >> >> >> Kind Regards, >> Andrea >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2/5/25, 13:04, "NCSG-EC on behalf of Tapani Tarvainen via NCSG-EC" < >> ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is >> > ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is>> on behalf of ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >> > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hi Andrea, >> >> >> >> >> I will be using NPOC's NCSG EC travel slot to Prague. >> >> >> >> >> As Wale will be there as a fellow he won't need it. >> >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> >> >> >> Tapani >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:35:53PM +0000, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC ( >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >) wrote: >> > >> > Hello all! >> > >> > Have the NPOC reps decided who will be using the travel slot for >> ICANN83? The names are due on Monday. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > Kind Regards, >> > Andrea >> > >> > >> > From: NCSG-EC > ncsg-ec-bounces at lists.ncsg.is> > >> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via >> NCSG-EC > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >> >> > Reply-To: Rafik Dammak > rafik.dammak at gmail.com> > rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>> >> > Date: Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 18:46 >> > To: Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> > >>, Tapani Tarvainen < >> ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info > ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info >>, Wale >> Adedokun > wale at abu.edu.ng >> >> > Cc: NCSG EC >> >> >> > Subject: [Ext] Re: [NCSG-EC] ICANN83 | Prague | Supported Travelers >> Database Due | Monday, 10 February 2025 >> > >> > Hi Pedro, >> > >> > thanks for confirmation. >> > @Tapani Tarvainen> ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> > ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>>> @Wale Adedokun> >> >> can you confirm who from NPOC will have the travel slot? >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > Rafik >> > >> > Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 05:01, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com >> > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>>> > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com >>> >> a ?crit : >> > Hi Rafik, >> > >> > Just signaling that, considering I'm going to ICANN82 through the NCSG >> EC slot, the next one should go to Amin. We just need to confirm >> internally, but that would be the natural course in order to rotate. >> > >> > Cordially, >> > >> > Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >> > Lawyer [nic.br]< >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdU-2bjQ$>>>, >> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br]< >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YjCq0Kpg$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YjCq0Kpg$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YjCq0Kpg$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YjCq0Kpg$>>> >> Researcher >> > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br]< >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bdNzMSeA$>>>, >> NCUC [ncuc.org]< >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YPyai3RQ$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YPyai3RQ$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YPyai3RQ$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_YPyai3RQ$>>> >> & NCSG < >> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>> < >> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>> < >> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home&gt;>> >> (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat]< >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youthlacigf.lat/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_Y6MmPRXQ$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youthlacigf.lat/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_Y6MmPRXQ$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youthlacigf.lat/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_Y6MmPRXQ$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/youthlacigf.lat/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_Y6MmPRXQ$>>>, >> IODA [ioda.org.br]< >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ioda.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_azJoo2Dw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ioda.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_azJoo2Dw$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ioda.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_azJoo2Dw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ioda.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_azJoo2Dw$>>> >> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net]< >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_aUernVWQ$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_aUernVWQ$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_aUernVWQ$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_aUernVWQ$ >> >>> >> > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >> by mistake, please reply informing it. >> > >> > >> > Em ter., 21 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:04, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is >>> escreveu: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We need to confirm who from EC will attend ICANN meeting in Prague. We >> have 3 slots. 1 usually goes to NCSG Chair, 1 slot for NCUC representative >> and 1 slo for NPOC representative. Please confirm who from each >> constituency will get the travel slot and respond within the next 7 days. >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > Rafik >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ------- >> > >> > Dear all, >> > In order to service your travel needs for ICANN83 Prague in a timely >> fashion, please submit your meeting database to gnso-secs at icann.org >> > gnso-secs at icann.org>>> gnso-secs at icann.org> > gnso-secs at icann.org>>> by Monday, 10 February 2025. It is important all >> funded travel air booking is completed by due date given in ICANN Travel >> emails. There seems to be some struggle in this area, if you could please >> make sure all names put forward understand the deadlines. >> > Please share with all funded travelers, the travel support guidelines >> wiki space: https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg < >> https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg> < >> https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg> < >> https://community.icann.org/x/lgvxAg>> and highlight the >> communications responsibilities section: >> > ICANN Travel Support attempts to reach a supported traveler four times >> before deeming the supported traveler unresponsive: >> > >> > 1. ICANN Travel Support sends ?welcome email.? >> > 2. If there is no response after seven business days, ICANN Travel >> Support sends a second email, copying ICANN support staff. >> > 3. If there is no response five business days after the second email, >> ICANN Travel Support sends a third email, copying ICANN support staff and >> the community group chair. >> > 4. If there is no response five business days after the third email, >> ICANN Travel Support sends a fourth email, copying ICANN support staff and >> the community group chair. >> > If there is no response three days after the fourth attempt to reach >> the supported traveler, the community group may substitute another traveler. >> > >> > A timely response would be appreciated in view of visa issues and the >> OFAC review. The deadline for submissions is critical to allow for >> confirmed reservation numbers as required for visa and travel arrangements. >> > >> > TRAVEL BOOKING PROCESS >> > >> > In order for Funded Travelers to start booking travel, they MUST >> complete Steps 1, 2, and 3. >> > >> > >> > WHO >> > >> > WHAT >> > >> > 1 >> > >> > Funded Traveler >> > >> > Register for meeting using the Funded Traveler Registration Link >> provided by ICANN Travel Support >> > >> > 2 >> > >> > Funded Traveler >> > >> > Approved for Trade Regulations Review >> > >> > 3 >> > >> > Funded Traveler >> > >> > Receive Travel Funding Confirmation Email from ICANN Travel Support >> > >> > 4 >> > >> > Funded Traveler >> > >> > Book Air Travel for meeting >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Approved dates of Arrival and Departure >> > ARRIVAL DATE >> > >> > DEPARTURE DATE >> > >> > Sunday, 08 June >> > >> > Friday, 13 June >> > >> > >> > >> > For air, this must be booked using either via our online booking >> platform (Concur) or official travel agency (FCM). ICANN org does not allow >> self-booking. >> > >> > >> > Please note that when requesting travel support, in the interest of >> fairness and in light of budget restrictions we would like you to take the >> following into consideration: >> > >> > >> > 1. Respond timely to ICANN Travel regarding your upcoming travel and >> book by deadline given in email. >> > >> > 2. If you require a visa to enter the country, please make sure to >> acquire your visa immediately. Follow link here< >> https://community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg> < >> https://community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg>> < >> https://community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg>> < >> https://community.icann.org/x/fSfxAg&gt;>> for assistance. >> > >> > 3. Friday, 25 April 2025 (45 days before travel) is the last day to >> submit additions/replacements. >> > >> > 4. Requests past the deadline will be handled on a case-by-case basis >> by ICANN. All additional travelers added after the 90-day deadline are >> subject to availability, may NOT be placed in the same hotel as their >> funded traveler groups, and may not be able to attend due to visa issues. >> > >> > 5. If possible, please book direct travel requests. Detours and >> multi-stop trips are unfortunately not guaranteed. >> > >> > 6. If travelers want to extend their stay this must be done at their >> own expense and should contact the hotel directly once the ICANN hotel >> confirmation has be sent to them. >> > >> > 7. Privately Booked Reservations: ICANN will not refund or take over >> accommodations directly booked by the funded traveler. If a replacement has >> an existing hotel reservation, they will need to cancel their reservation >> and ICANN will not be able to take over their reservation. >> > >> > >> > Reminder: >> > >> > * GNSO supported traveler with a designated hotel accommodation >> funding, a hotel room is automatically secured for you, please DO NOT book >> your own hotel as it is un-reimbursable. >> > * All personal data provided to ICANN org in for purposes of providing >> travel support for participants related to ICANN events will be processed >> in accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy [icann.org]< >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&e=> >> < >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&e=>>. >> Should < >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&e=>.  Should> >> < >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&amp;d=DwMFAg&amp;c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&amp;r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&amp;m=A_rkvV7hcBAIOU12pQX6fSkWBC6-P-bPaQDowX2oR_A&amp;s=WwqcPGGS1mvkGHO5BjVc3E9ewPva_WoF-Snq25kq0OM&amp;e=&gt;.&nbsp;&nbsp;Should>> >> you have any questions or concerns about this Privacy Policy and our >> privacy practices, you may contact us at privacy at icann.org > privacy at icann.org> > >> > privacy at icann.org >>. >> > * As a reminder, for the AGM meeting only, incoming Councilors get >> funding, as well as the then-incumbent Councilors. >> > >> > Many thanks for your cooperation! >> > Thank you. >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > Terri >> > Policy Team Supporting the GNSO >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > NCSG-EC mailing list >> > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> >> > >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> >> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] [lists.ncsg.is]< >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!70CllOQGYaV6FiJAtqjSxtb000RFiL0zY0qBX81BSD7ie7BoiUpuMmeaOZ-6lPVc8VXsUrEKX7AFdCmwVG1Mh_bgZV0gXw$ >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > NCSG-EC mailing list >> > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > >> > >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> >> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Tapani Tarvainen >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > >> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$> >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!7o2G7L2DFYYlzXY0jeU5iYmf-nH5y42oc0rOeel8b-Yot_iB4MGYQIp14Od1NRWlSRQcr0qa8W0UzvQg_HxLPdA15K85Fw$>> >> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5lCrpHVjAR7yf8YFBYyxuuHeHSsAeJUPQY9tvA22yOA0jDk8_i3z9wele3PvULaVxHE2mOjSEu_cYbGrAeiNgZiICd9jig$ >> < >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec__;!!PtGJab4!5lCrpHVjAR7yf8YFBYyxuuHeHSsAeJUPQY9tvA22yOA0jDk8_i3z9wele3PvULaVxHE2mOjSEu_cYbGrAeiNgZiICd9jig$> >> [lists[.]ncsg[.]is] >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 05:45:16 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 12:45:16 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [EXTERNAL] NCSG Project Proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Wisdom, Juan, I updated invoice template Milton shared and put the 3 of us there, please check and keep it as a trace. I will confirm with Milton and then I will send it to Ajith. Best, Rafik Le sam. 1 f?vr. 2025 ? 01:10, Wisdom Donkor a ?crit : > Great. Thanks for the update. Lets get intouch with Milton for the invoice > to be prepaid for them > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, 2:51?pm Pedro de Perdig?o Lana, < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Wisdom, all, >> >> Since the communication with Milton was already being made, to avoid >> having multiple channels of communication with him, I was waiting for his >> return on the bank data. I've received it now and will proceed to inform it >> to Ajith (: >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >> & NCSG >> (ICANN), >> YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC >> Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em ter., 28 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:13, Wisdom Donkor >> escreveu: >> >>> Please reach out to Milton and copy myself, Rafik. and Juan >>> >>> *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) >>> President & CEO >>> Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa >>> Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) >>> P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. >>> agdic.info >>> Tel: +233 20 812 8851 >>> Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >>> ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group >>> Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous >>> Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association >>> Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF >>> Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee >>> Member >>> >>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________ >>> Specialization: >>> E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet >>> Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber >>> Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name >>> Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, >>> Event Planning & Management, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:13?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> All right! As far as I understand, then, I should wait for now (until >>>> Milton shares the relevant info), right? >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>> & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), >>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em dom., 26 de jan. de 2025 ?s 21:47, Wisdom Donkor < >>>> wisdom.dk at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Hello Rafik, >>>>> Thanks for the information. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025, 12:44?am Rafik Dammak, >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>> >>>>>> Milton will prepare the form for the payment he usually uses for PIR, >>>>>> but you can reach him out about the process and/or check with Ajith. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 23:35, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Rafik! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we already have the bank account data, or should I ask Milton >>>>>>> directly? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qui., 23 de jan. de 2025 ?s 18:15, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We can use the NCUC bank account as I discussed with Milton. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025, 22:45 Rafik Dammak >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I got the task to follow up with him. I will share updates in >>>>>>>>> coming days. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025, 22:37 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just so we can follow up with Ajith - do we have an answer from >>>>>>>>>> Milton regarding the bank account? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador ( >>>>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR ) >>>>>>>>>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial >>>>>>>>>> (UCoimbra), >>>>>>>>>> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>>>> e CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se >>>>>>>>>> recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Em s?b., 4 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:30, Wisdom Donkor < >>>>>>>>>> wisdom.dk at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Caleb and Pedro. It?s now essential to standardize >>>>>>>>>>> all our financial and accounting processes. I had a brief chat with Milton >>>>>>>>>>> in Riyadh and mentioned that we would be reaching out to him for >>>>>>>>>>> discussions on the financials and also to have that as part of our >>>>>>>>>>> reporting. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rafik can reach out to him either to arrange for a meeting or >>>>>>>>>>> get an update from him. >>>>>>>>>>> *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) >>>>>>>>>>> President & CEO >>>>>>>>>>> Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | >>>>>>>>>>> Africa Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) >>>>>>>>>>> P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. >>>>>>>>>>> agdic.info >>>>>>>>>>> Tel: +233 20 812 8851 >>>>>>>>>>> Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review >>>>>>>>>>> working group Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and >>>>>>>>>>> Implementing Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG >>>>>>>>>>> Member | IGF Support Fund Association Executive Committee Member, World >>>>>>>>>>> Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory >>>>>>>>>>> Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee Member >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Specialization: >>>>>>>>>>> E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet >>>>>>>>>>> Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber >>>>>>>>>>> Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name >>>>>>>>>>> Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, >>>>>>>>>>> Event Planning & Management, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 9:16?PM Caleb Ogundele < >>>>>>>>>>> muyiwacaleb at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From what I understand, Milton handles that bank account and >>>>>>>>>>>> there is also another signatory. While that is as it may, I Wisdom or >>>>>>>>>>>> former NCUC Chair can provide information. >>>>>>>>>>>> However, I think Rafik mentioned he willask Milton so that >>>>>>>>>>>> would solve it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 2:55?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, can someone clarify to me what is the actual >>>>>>>>>>>>> status of this bank account, so I can properly answer Ajith regarding this >>>>>>>>>>>>> point? I don't know if it is directly related to the NCUC or if it is under >>>>>>>>>>>>> Milton's name, and then he administers it for the non-commercial community >>>>>>>>>>>>> when needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Em s?b., 4 de jan. de 2025 ?s 17:41, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Rafik, I'll answer Ajith first thing on Monday, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can plan the initial workflow at our EC meeting. Should I message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milton, or would it be better for you or Wisdom to do it, considering you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the directly related chairs here? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Juan and Wisdom that this can be watched by NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FC (which will be have a task similar to an internal audit committee, as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> far as I understand). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Em s?b., 4 de jan. de 2025 ?s 10:31, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think what is suggested by Ajith is fine and we can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> respond quickly to that. For the bank account, we can check with Milton, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not an optimal situation but it can be the workaround for now. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should share this with NCSG EC then the PC. at least it will be on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agenda of the EC call next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About the other points, we can work on them and define a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeline for the delivery and write the scope of work for the fellow and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how to follow-up for progress (I guess possible task for me to prepare a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strawperson proposal and share it). The policy topics being collected are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just started and will be refined and consultation will be continuous. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the Finance Committee, we are still at the stage of formation and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resuming its activities but it will be in the loop and informed about this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le ven. 3 janv. 2025 ? 23:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy new year! I was mostly off during the holidays, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to action today. I am also adding Amin to the loop, considering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his (now official) appointment to the NCSG EC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm ok with everything that Ajith said. Do you agree with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his last message, so we can proceed? We will probably need to receive the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> funding through the NCUC (NCSG does not have a bank account, right?), so we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would also need to confirm details with Milton. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After that, if you all believe this would be a good idea, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we possibly would also need an expanded NCSG leadership meeting to define >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the topics that were left to be decided on after the approval of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project (selection process, what would be our priority topics (do we ask >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the community? do we use the list already formed in the email Rafik send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about policy priorities?), how would be the fellow relation with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-commercial leadership, etc) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Em qui., 2 de jan. de 2025 ?s 02:51, Ajith Francis < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afrancis at pir.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wishing you a very happy New Year! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope you had a good start to the new year. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am writing to you with good news. We're happy to move >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward with this project plan but could I suggest a few minor changes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, we will disburse the lumpsum funds directly to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NCSG as we have always done and the NCSG would have to allocate and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make payments. Secondly, PIR would not be able to provide in-kind support >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the technical infrastructure. If you prefer, you can allocate an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional nominal sum to the project plan to take it to USD7000. In >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition, a brief report (a few pages max) would be expected for us to know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how the funds were utilized and provide a summary of the progress made. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If these points are okay with the NCSG, we can plan to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing from you, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ajith >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2024 11:01 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Ajith Francis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* Rafik Dammak ; Juan Manuel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rojas ; Wisdom Donkor < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wisdom.dk at gmail.com>; Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>; Jean F. Qu?ralt < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JFQueralt at theiofoundation.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] NCSG Project Proposal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CAUTION: This email came from outside your organization. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don?t trust emails, links, or attachments from senders that seem suspicious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or you are not expecting.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your answer and kind words, Ajith, and no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem in waiting on our side - you were already very patient with us >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during this whole process. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wishing you happy holidays! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Empresarial (UCoimbra), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC BR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Se recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Em qua., 18 de dez. de 2024 ?s 10:15, Ajith Francis < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afrancis at pir.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks so much for sending this over. This looks great and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> promising. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to run this internally and get back to you. But >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a heads up that there is a chance you may only hear back from me early >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the new year as many folks are PIR are taking extended breaks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ajith >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2024 2:27 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Ajith Francis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* Rafik Dammak ; Juan Manuel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rojas ; Wisdom Donkor < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wisdom.dk at gmail.com>; Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>; Jean F. Qu?ralt < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JFQueralt at theiofoundation.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] NCSG Project Proposal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CAUTION: This email came from outside your organization. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don?t trust emails, links, or attachments from senders that seem suspicious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or you are not expecting.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ajith, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm forwarding the final version of the proposal. All the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ECs (NCSG, NCUC, NPOC) have already reviewed it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the ~33h delay in sending it, couldn't finish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text yesterday due to a few things that are happening here in Brazil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are occupying a lot of my time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if there are any doubts or if any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complement/rectification is needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lawyer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> *Caleb Ogundele* >>>>>>>>>>>> Email: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG PIR Invoice 2025.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 99280 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wisdom.dk at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 08:16:46 2025 From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:16:46 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [EXTERNAL] NCSG Project Proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Noted with thanks On Fri, 7 Feb 2025, 3:45?am Rafik Dammak, wrote: > Hi Wisdom, Juan, > > I updated invoice template Milton shared and put the 3 of us there, please > check and keep it as a trace. I will confirm with Milton and then I will > send it to Ajith. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le sam. 1 f?vr. 2025 ? 01:10, Wisdom Donkor a > ?crit : > >> Great. Thanks for the update. Lets get intouch with Milton for the >> invoice to be prepaid for them >> >> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, 2:51?pm Pedro de Perdig?o Lana, < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Wisdom, all, >>> >>> Since the communication with Milton was already being made, to avoid >>> having multiple channels of communication with him, I was waiting for his >>> return on the bank data. I've received it now and will proceed to inform it >>> to Ajith (: >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>> & NCSG >>> (ICANN), >>> YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC >>> Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em ter., 28 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:13, Wisdom Donkor >>> escreveu: >>> >>>> Please reach out to Milton and copy myself, Rafik. and Juan >>>> >>>> *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) >>>> President & CEO >>>> Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa >>>> Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) >>>> P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. >>>> agdic.info >>>> Tel: +233 20 812 8851 >>>> Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>> ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group >>>> Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous >>>> Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund >>>> Association Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant >>>> | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs >>>> Advisory Committee Member >>>> >>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>> Specialization: >>>> E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet >>>> Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber >>>> Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name >>>> Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, >>>> Event Planning & Management, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:13?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> All right! As far as I understand, then, I should wait for now (until >>>>> Milton shares the relevant info), right? >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>> & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em dom., 26 de jan. de 2025 ?s 21:47, Wisdom Donkor < >>>>> wisdom.dk at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Rafik, >>>>>> Thanks for the information. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025, 12:44?am Rafik Dammak, >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Milton will prepare the form for the payment he usually uses for >>>>>>> PIR, but you can reach him out about the process and/or check with Ajith. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 ? 23:35, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Rafik! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do we already have the bank account data, or should I ask Milton >>>>>>>> directly? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qui., 23 de jan. de 2025 ?s 18:15, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We can use the NCUC bank account as I discussed with Milton. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025, 22:45 Rafik Dammak >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I got the task to follow up with him. I will share updates in >>>>>>>>>> coming days. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025, 22:37 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just so we can follow up with Ajith - do we have an answer from >>>>>>>>>>> Milton regarding the bank account? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador ( >>>>>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR ) >>>>>>>>>>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial >>>>>>>>>>> (UCoimbra), >>>>>>>>>>> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>>>>> e CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se >>>>>>>>>>> recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Em s?b., 4 de jan. de 2025 ?s 20:30, Wisdom Donkor < >>>>>>>>>>> wisdom.dk at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Caleb and Pedro. It?s now essential to standardize >>>>>>>>>>>> all our financial and accounting processes. I had a brief chat with Milton >>>>>>>>>>>> in Riyadh and mentioned that we would be reaching out to him for >>>>>>>>>>>> discussions on the financials and also to have that as part of our >>>>>>>>>>>> reporting. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rafik can reach out to him either to arrange for a meeting or >>>>>>>>>>>> get an update from him. >>>>>>>>>>>> *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) >>>>>>>>>>>> President & CEO >>>>>>>>>>>> Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | >>>>>>>>>>>> Africa Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) >>>>>>>>>>>> P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. >>>>>>>>>>>> agdic.info >>>>>>>>>>>> Tel: +233 20 812 8851 >>>>>>>>>>>> Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: >>>>>>>>>>>> @wisdom_dk >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review >>>>>>>>>>>> working group Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and >>>>>>>>>>>> Implementing Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG >>>>>>>>>>>> Member | IGF Support Fund Association Executive Committee Member, World >>>>>>>>>>>> Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory >>>>>>>>>>>> Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee Member >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Specialization: >>>>>>>>>>>> E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet >>>>>>>>>>>> Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber >>>>>>>>>>>> Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name >>>>>>>>>>>> Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, >>>>>>>>>>>> Event Planning & Management, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 9:16?PM Caleb Ogundele < >>>>>>>>>>>> muyiwacaleb at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From what I understand, Milton handles that bank account and >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is also another signatory. While that is as it may, I Wisdom or >>>>>>>>>>>>> former NCUC Chair can provide information. >>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I think Rafik mentioned he willask Milton so that >>>>>>>>>>>>> would solve it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 2:55?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, can someone clarify to me what is the actual >>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of this bank account, so I can properly answer Ajith regarding this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point? I don't know if it is directly related to the NCUC or if it is under >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milton's name, and then he administers it for the non-commercial community >>>>>>>>>>>>>> when needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Em s?b., 4 de jan. de 2025 ?s 17:41, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Rafik, I'll answer Ajith first thing on Monday, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can plan the initial workflow at our EC meeting. Should I message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milton, or would it be better for you or Wisdom to do it, considering you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the directly related chairs here? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Juan and Wisdom that this can be watched by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NCSG FC (which will be have a task similar to an internal audit committee, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as far as I understand). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Em s?b., 4 de jan. de 2025 ?s 10:31, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think what is suggested by Ajith is fine and we can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> respond quickly to that. For the bank account, we can check with Milton, it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not an optimal situation but it can be the workaround for now. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should share this with NCSG EC then the PC. at least it will be on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agenda of the EC call next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About the other points, we can work on them and define a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeline for the delivery and write the scope of work for the fellow and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how to follow-up for progress (I guess possible task for me to prepare a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strawperson proposal and share it). The policy topics being collected are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just started and will be refined and consultation will be continuous. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the Finance Committee, we are still at the stage of formation and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resuming its activities but it will be in the loop and informed about this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le ven. 3 janv. 2025 ? 23:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy new year! I was mostly off during the holidays, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming back to action today. I am also adding Amin to the loop, considering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his (now official) appointment to the NCSG EC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm ok with everything that Ajith said. Do you agree with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his last message, so we can proceed? We will probably need to receive the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> funding through the NCUC (NCSG does not have a bank account, right?), so we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would also need to confirm details with Milton. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After that, if you all believe this would be a good idea, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we possibly would also need an expanded NCSG leadership meeting to define >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the topics that were left to be decided on after the approval of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project (selection process, what would be our priority topics (do we ask >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the community? do we use the list already formed in the email Rafik send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about policy priorities?), how would be the fellow relation with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-commercial leadership, etc) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Em qui., 2 de jan. de 2025 ?s 02:51, Ajith Francis < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afrancis at pir.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wishing you a very happy New Year! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope you had a good start to the new year. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am writing to you with good news. We're happy to move >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward with this project plan but could I suggest a few minor changes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, we will disburse the lumpsum funds directly to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NCSG as we have always done and the NCSG would have to allocate and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make payments. Secondly, PIR would not be able to provide in-kind support >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the technical infrastructure. If you prefer, you can allocate an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional nominal sum to the project plan to take it to USD7000. In >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition, a brief report (a few pages max) would be expected for us to know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how the funds were utilized and provide a summary of the progress made. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If these points are okay with the NCSG, we can plan to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceed forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing from you, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ajith >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2024 11:01 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Ajith Francis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* Rafik Dammak ; Juan Manuel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rojas ; Wisdom Donkor < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wisdom.dk at gmail.com>; Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>; Jean F. Qu?ralt < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JFQueralt at theiofoundation.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] NCSG Project Proposal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CAUTION: This email came from outside your organization. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don?t trust emails, links, or attachments from senders that seem suspicious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or you are not expecting.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your answer and kind words, Ajith, and no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem in waiting on our side - you were already very patient with us >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during this whole process. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wishing you happy holidays! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Empresarial (UCoimbra), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC BR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Se recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Em qua., 18 de dez. de 2024 ?s 10:15, Ajith Francis < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> afrancis at pir.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks so much for sending this over. This looks great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and promising. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to run this internally and get back to you. But >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a heads up that there is a chance you may only hear back from me early >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the new year as many folks are PIR are taking extended breaks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ajith >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2024 2:27 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Ajith Francis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* Rafik Dammak ; Juan Manuel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rojas ; Wisdom Donkor < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wisdom.dk at gmail.com>; Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>; Jean F. Qu?ralt < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JFQueralt at theiofoundation.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] NCSG Project Proposal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CAUTION: This email came from outside your organization. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don?t trust emails, links, or attachments from senders that seem suspicious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or you are not expecting.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ajith, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm forwarding the final version of the proposal. All the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ECs (NCSG, NCUC, NPOC) have already reviewed it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the ~33h delay in sending it, couldn't finish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text yesterday due to a few things that are happening here in Brazil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and are occupying a lot of my time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if there are any doubts or if any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complement/rectification is needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lawyer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , NCUC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & NCSG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , IODA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Caleb Ogundele* >>>>>>>>>>>>> Email: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 10:29:38 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:29:38 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas Message-ID: Hi all, I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC and GAC, the current status is: - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. They didn't propose anything yet from their side. - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their side yet. - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : HRIA on DNS gTLD Applicant Support Public Interest Commitments (PICs) I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and which we should pick up. - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due time. In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar can share from his side. For the NCSG issue forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can you share more about the selected topic and agenda? So please give me your input about the points above. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 15:29:37 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 22:29:37 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Draft Agenda for EC call 17th February Message-ID: hi all, I am sending a draft agenda for our next EC meeting on 17th February. It is open for comment, edit and amendments. Let me know what you think: 1- Introduction 2- Welcome new EC members 3- Review of action items reference https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/NCSG+ExComm+Meeting - operating procedure review, improvement for membership application review - PIR policy grant - timeline for membership applications review - Policy/topics tracker 4- Plan for ICANN82 Seattle - NCSG sessions, agenda for joint session, EC meeting 5- Membership applications review 6- AOB Regarding applications review, we need to confirm that all EC members can access the civicrm membership system and asking everyone to start reviewing the backlog of applications. The agenda item above is regarding flagged applications that require further discussion, otherwise the other without any concern can be approved. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Mon Feb 10 03:52:35 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 22:52:35 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Draft Agenda for EC call 17th February In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik and EC, No topics to add on my side! Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em sex., 7 de fev. de 2025 ?s 10:29, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > hi all, > > I am sending a draft agenda for our next EC meeting on 17th February. It > is open for comment, edit and amendments. Let me know what you think: > > 1- Introduction > 2- Welcome new EC members > 3- Review of action items > reference > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/NCSG+ExComm+Meeting > - operating procedure review, improvement for membership application > review > - PIR policy grant > - timeline for membership applications review > - Policy/topics tracker > 4- Plan for ICANN82 Seattle > - NCSG sessions, agenda for joint session, EC meeting > 5- Membership applications review > 6- AOB > > Regarding applications review, we need to confirm that all EC members can > access the civicrm membership system and asking everyone to start reviewing > the backlog of applications. The agenda item above is regarding flagged > applications that require further discussion, otherwise the other > without any concern can be approved. > > Best, > > Rafik > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Mon Feb 10 13:01:14 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:01:14 +1100 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Hi Rafik, I think that email came from staff after the leadership meeting, so no deadlines have been discussed. However, we are meeting tomorrow or today (depending on where you are in the world) and I will update once I get this information. Warmly, Tomslin On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 00:42, Rafik Dammak wrote: > Thanks Pedro for the comments. Yes the budget related documents show high > cost by supported traveler. We should review the different options in the > strawman document. > @everyone please review and share your input. > @Tomslin Samme-Nlar Greg didn't say anything > about deadline for input but was it discussed at GNSO council leadership? > > Best, > > Rafik > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 20:38 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Rafik, >> >> Just as a first comment before reading through all documents (focusing >> (for now) only on the graphs and shorter docs), although this may be deeply >> unpopular, comparing the budget for other events that I participated in one >> way or another of the organization and/or supervision, hotel accommodation >> seems to be in a higher percentage (meaning it looks a bit >> disproportionate), especially if we take into account that flight costs >> refer to the participation of (many) people from all over the world. I >> note, however, that this may be caused by the large amount of days some >> ICANN meetings have. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >> & NCSG >> (ICANN), >> YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC >> Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em seg., 20 de jan. de 2025 ?s 22:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should >>> review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >>> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >>> context. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >>> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >>> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >>> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet >>> Community Group >>> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>> >>> >>> >>> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >>> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - ICANN >>> | >>> >>> - ATT00001.txt >>> | >>> >>> >>> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. >>> Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell >>> us what you think >>> >>> For more information click here >>> >>> >>> Dear SG/C Chairs, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >>> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >>> >>> >>> >>> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >>> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >>> >>> >>> >>> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >>> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >>> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >>> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >>> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >>> provide feedback on: >>> >>> 1. What options are missing? >>> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be >>> put out for public comment). >>> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >>> >>> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to >>> ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and >>> will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the >>> ?strawman? will be necessary. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts >>> their work. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank You! >>> >>> >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >>> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - Meeting >>> #1 - How We Meet Community Group >>> >>> >>> >>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >>> know the content is safe. >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> >>> >>> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had a >>> wonderful start to 2025. >>> >>> >>> >>> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the >>> ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >>> Date: 13 January 2024 >>> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >>> >>> >>> >>> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. >>> Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for >>> this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC >>> Chairs: >>> >>> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >>> 2. Agenda >>> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy >>> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >>> >>> Background Documents: >>> >>> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >>> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >>> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >>> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >>> >>> >>> >>> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are keeping >>> a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, meeting >>> agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any document that >>> we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >>> >>> >>> >>> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. >>> >>> >>> >>> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >>> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >>> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >>> >>> >>> >>> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at >>> the meeting! >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Alp Eken >>> >>> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >>> >>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >>> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). >>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Feb 11 02:20:37 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:20:37 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Thanks Tomslin, Greg sent an email saying the deadline is 14th Feb. so last chance to chime in and share input . Rafik Le lun. 10 f?vr. 2025 ? 20:01, Tomslin Samme-Nlar a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, > > I think that email came from staff after the leadership meeting, so no > deadlines have been discussed. However, we are meeting tomorrow or today > (depending on where you are in the world) and I will update once I get this > information. > > Warmly, > Tomslin > > > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 00:42, Rafik Dammak wrote: > >> Thanks Pedro for the comments. Yes the budget related documents show high >> cost by supported traveler. We should review the different options in the >> strawman document. >> @everyone please review and share your input. >> @Tomslin Samme-Nlar Greg didn't say anything >> about deadline for input but was it discussed at GNSO council leadership? >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 20:38 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rafik, >>> >>> Just as a first comment before reading through all documents (focusing >>> (for now) only on the graphs and shorter docs), although this may be deeply >>> unpopular, comparing the budget for other events that I participated in one >>> way or another of the organization and/or supervision, hotel accommodation >>> seems to be in a higher percentage (meaning it looks a bit >>> disproportionate), especially if we take into account that flight costs >>> refer to the participation of (many) people from all over the world. I >>> note, however, that this may be caused by the large amount of days some >>> ICANN meetings have. >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>> & NCSG >>> (ICANN), >>> YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC >>> Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em seg., 20 de jan. de 2025 ?s 22:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < >>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should >>>> review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >>>> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >>>> context. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >>>> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >>>> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >>>> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet >>>> Community Group >>>> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >>>> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - ICANN >>>> | >>>> >>>> - ATT00001.txt >>>> | >>>> >>>> >>>> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. >>>> Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell >>>> us what you think >>>> >>>> For more information click here >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear SG/C Chairs, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >>>> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >>>> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >>>> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >>>> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >>>> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >>>> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >>>> provide feedback on: >>>> >>>> 1. What options are missing? >>>> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be >>>> put out for public comment). >>>> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >>>> >>>> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to >>>> ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and >>>> will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the >>>> ?strawman? will be necessary. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts >>>> their work. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank You! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Greg >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >>>> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - >>>> Meeting #1 - How We Meet Community Group >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >>>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >>>> know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had >>>> a wonderful start to 2025. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the >>>> ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >>>> Date: 13 January 2024 >>>> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. >>>> Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for >>>> this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC >>>> Chairs: >>>> >>>> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >>>> 2. Agenda >>>> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy >>>> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >>>> >>>> Background Documents: >>>> >>>> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >>>> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >>>> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >>>> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are >>>> keeping a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, >>>> meeting agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any >>>> document that we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >>>> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >>>> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at >>>> the meeting! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Alp Eken >>>> >>>> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >>>> >>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >>>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >>>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >>>> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). >>>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >>>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >>>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Tue Feb 11 04:59:02 2025 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:59:02 +1100 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Hi all, *A. Meeting Locations & Purposes* I personally support #7. On #1, what I don't see is possible impact of booking flights "well in advance" can cause to overall cost due to the risk of closer-to-date changes *B. Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources* I find #1 and #2 interesting if done together. *C. Travel-Related Matters* No to the options provided. Warmly, Tomslin On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, 12:32 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC, wrote: > Hi all, > > there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should > review the different options proposed in the strawman document. > I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some > context. > > Best, > > Rafik > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < > gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> > Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 > Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community > Group > To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org > > > > - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * > - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf > | > > - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf > | > > - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf > | > > - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf > | > > - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf > | > > - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf > | > > - ICANN > | > > - ATT00001.txt > | > > > Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. > Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell > us what you think > > For more information click here > > > Dear SG/C Chairs, > > > > I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for ?How > We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). > > > > As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential > recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. > > > > Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN > meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet > Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft > strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I > think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and > provide feedback on: > > 1. What options are missing? > 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be put > out for public comment). > 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? > > I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to ICANN. > I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and will > likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the ?strawman? > will be necessary. > > > > Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts their > work. > > > > Thank You! > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM > *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - Meeting > #1 - How We Meet Community Group > > > > *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > Dear all, > > > > Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had a > wonderful start to 2025. > > > > Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the ICANN > Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: > Date: 13 January 2024 > Time: 1700-1800 UTC > > > > We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. > Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for > this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC > Chairs: > > 1. Meeting invitation ICS file > 2. Agenda > 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy > 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report > > Background Documents: > > 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups > 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings > 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings > 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings > > > > We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are keeping a > drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, meeting > agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any document that > we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link > > > > Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. > > > > I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any > questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue > please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . > > > > We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at > the meeting! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Alp Eken > > Policy Development Support Senior Specialist > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > > _______________________________________________ > GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org > To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your > personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance > with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and > the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can > visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or > configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or > disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Feb 11 08:32:34 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:32:34 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: hi all, regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: 1- I think #1 is common sense practice about deciding and planning earlier to control cost, 2- I am not in favor of #2, the risk is there will be recurring countries with challenges for parts of the community to attend i.e.g access to visa etc. I think IETF does or did that and it is not a good example IMHO of diversity. 3- #3 proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented .e.g are we will visit some regions more than others within the 5 years time frame? 4- I know it can be almost a taboo but we really should question having 3 meetings per year , it is a non negligible time commitment and I believe it is a hindrance for many to participate. 5- While it can bring some cost reduction regarding hotels and venues, it doesn't change the impact on attendees and based on policy forum examples, it will require overhaul of agenda and schedule. it can also impact the possibility of having the NCPH day meeting 6- I think that makes sense as an approach as we are trying for an NCPH meeting but it can possibly impact GNSO council SPS or WGs F2F (I didn't hear about any since EPDP on RDS)? 7- if it is a virtual meeting in the same format as during the pandemic it might work fine, with challenges but can be handled better than full remote participation as-is now. It will be kind of interessional. regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources 1- I think that is already ongoing. I think such a constraint will encourage everyone org and community to rethink what the sessions priority. 2- if that is targeting all sessions, setting criteria and deciding will be impossible. We usually have a challenge to agree on the community session. I think it is inapplicable but if it is about some informational session mostly proposed by ICANN staff, it might be worthy to explore. 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. 4- reducing interpretation and scribing, I think that can impact local attendance experience. 5- not sure how the block schedule can be revisited, GNSO already uses the weekend (well we used saturday and sunday previously). it might be more related to other parts of the community? 6- I understand that reduction of networking receptions is already implemented? 7- that can be explored but as noted requires much effort to work with local hosts and sponsors. I think it is typical of any conference 8- we can say to that proposal in many languages Regarding Travel-Related Matters 1- I think it is already being implemented and we need to see the impact in terms of support and meeting staff. 2- this is a pandora box : who will decide who should attend and it will create more tension within the community. I highly doubt if that is effective or good usage of community time. regarding metrics. 1- average is not a good metric and doesn't give a good idea about distribution of cost 2- for the rest I guess they are fine to set We need to consolidate and get a common position. At least we can agree on what is no-go for us. Best, Rafik Le mar. 11 f?vr. 2025 ? 12:57, Tomslin Samme-Nlar a ?crit : > Hi all, > > *A. Meeting Locations & Purposes* > I personally support #7. On #1, what I don't see is possible impact of > booking flights "well in advance" can cause to overall cost due to the risk > of closer-to-date changes > > *B. Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources* > I find #1 and #2 interesting if done together. > > *C. Travel-Related Matters* > No to the options provided. > > > Warmly, > Tomslin > > On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, 12:32 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC, < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should >> review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >> context. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community >> Group >> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >> >> >> >> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >> | >> >> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >> | >> >> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >> | >> >> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >> | >> >> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >> | >> >> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >> | >> >> - ICANN >> | >> >> - ATT00001.txt >> | >> >> >> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. >> Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell >> us what you think >> >> For more information click here >> >> >> Dear SG/C Chairs, >> >> >> >> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >> >> >> >> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >> >> >> >> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >> provide feedback on: >> >> 1. What options are missing? >> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be >> put out for public comment). >> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >> >> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to ICANN. >> I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and will >> likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the ?strawman? >> will be necessary. >> >> >> >> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts their >> work. >> >> >> >> Thank You! >> >> >> >> Greg >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - Meeting >> #1 - How We Meet Community Group >> >> >> >> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >> know the content is safe. >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had a >> wonderful start to 2025. >> >> >> >> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the ICANN >> Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >> Date: 13 January 2024 >> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >> >> >> >> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. >> Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for >> this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC >> Chairs: >> >> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >> 2. Agenda >> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy >> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >> >> Background Documents: >> >> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >> >> >> >> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are keeping >> a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, meeting >> agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any document that >> we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >> >> >> >> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. >> >> >> >> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >> >> >> >> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at >> the meeting! >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> Alp Eken >> >> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and >> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You >> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Tue Feb 11 22:40:38 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:40:38 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Hi Rafik, I think there is already a high level of agreement among us three, at least. The biggest divergence seems to be around having one online meeting a year (I think just reducing it from 3 to 2 and improving the online decentralized methodology of work is better). And I'd still get back to my first suggestion, reg: possible downgrade regarding what hotels ICANN chooses, even if it is not popular (but, then again, nice to have vs. necessary to have). Maybe something a bit less luxurious, while still very comfortable, would already have a substantial impact, but ICANN should look a bit more around that so this could be objectively evaluated since it could heavily affect the "experience" criteria mentioned in the documents. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 11 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > hi all, > > regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: > 1- I think #1 is common sense practice about deciding and planning earlier > to control cost, > 2- I am not in favor of #2, the risk is there will be recurring countries > with challenges for parts of the community to attend i.e.g access to visa > etc. I think IETF does or did that and it is not a good example IMHO of > diversity. > 3- #3 proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented .e.g are > we will visit some regions more than others within the 5 years time frame? > 4- I know it can be almost a taboo but we really should question having 3 > meetings per year , it is a non negligible time commitment and I believe it > is a hindrance for many to participate. > 5- While it can bring some cost reduction regarding hotels and venues, it > doesn't change the impact on attendees and based on policy forum examples, > it will require overhaul of agenda and schedule. it can also impact the > possibility of having the NCPH day meeting > 6- I think that makes sense as an approach as we are trying for an NCPH > meeting but it can possibly impact GNSO council SPS or WGs F2F (I didn't > hear about any since EPDP on RDS)? > 7- if it is a virtual meeting in the same format as during the pandemic it > might work fine, with challenges but can be handled better than full > remote participation as-is now. It will be kind of interessional. > > regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources > 1- I think that is already ongoing. I think such a constraint will > encourage everyone org and community to rethink what the sessions priority. > 2- if that is targeting all sessions, setting criteria and deciding will > be impossible. We usually have a challenge to agree on the community > session. I think it is inapplicable but if it is about some informational > session mostly proposed by ICANN staff, it might be worthy to explore. > 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. > 4- reducing interpretation and scribing, I think that can impact local > attendance experience. > 5- not sure how the block schedule can be revisited, GNSO already uses the > weekend (well we used saturday and sunday previously). it might be more > related to other parts of the community? > 6- I understand that reduction of networking receptions is already > implemented? > 7- that can be explored but as noted requires much effort to work with > local hosts and sponsors. I think it is typical of any conference > 8- we can say to that proposal in many languages > > Regarding Travel-Related Matters > 1- I think it is already being implemented and we need to see the impact > in terms of support and meeting staff. > 2- this is a pandora box : who will decide who should attend and it will > create more tension within the community. I highly doubt if that is > effective or good usage of community time. > > regarding metrics. > 1- average is not a good metric and doesn't give a good idea about > distribution of cost > 2- for the rest I guess they are fine to set > > We need to consolidate and get a common position. At least we can agree on > what is no-go for us. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > > > > Le mar. 11 f?vr. 2025 ? 12:57, Tomslin Samme-Nlar > a ?crit : > >> Hi all, >> >> *A. Meeting Locations & Purposes* >> I personally support #7. On #1, what I don't see is possible impact of >> booking flights "well in advance" can cause to overall cost due to the risk >> of closer-to-date changes >> >> *B. Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources* >> I find #1 and #2 interesting if done together. >> >> *C. Travel-Related Matters* >> No to the options provided. >> >> >> Warmly, >> Tomslin >> >> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, 12:32 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC, < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should >>> review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >>> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >>> context. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >>> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >>> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >>> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet >>> Community Group >>> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>> >>> >>> >>> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >>> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >>> | >>> >>> - ICANN >>> | >>> >>> - ATT00001.txt >>> | >>> >>> >>> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. >>> Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell >>> us what you think >>> >>> For more information click here >>> >>> >>> Dear SG/C Chairs, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >>> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >>> >>> >>> >>> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >>> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >>> >>> >>> >>> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >>> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >>> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >>> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >>> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >>> provide feedback on: >>> >>> 1. What options are missing? >>> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be >>> put out for public comment). >>> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >>> >>> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to >>> ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and >>> will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the >>> ?strawman? will be necessary. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts >>> their work. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank You! >>> >>> >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >>> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - Meeting >>> #1 - How We Meet Community Group >>> >>> >>> >>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >>> know the content is safe. >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> >>> >>> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had a >>> wonderful start to 2025. >>> >>> >>> >>> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the >>> ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >>> Date: 13 January 2024 >>> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >>> >>> >>> >>> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. >>> Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for >>> this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC >>> Chairs: >>> >>> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >>> 2. Agenda >>> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy >>> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >>> >>> Background Documents: >>> >>> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >>> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >>> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >>> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >>> >>> >>> >>> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are keeping >>> a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, meeting >>> agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any document that >>> we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >>> >>> >>> >>> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. >>> >>> >>> >>> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >>> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >>> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >>> >>> >>> >>> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at >>> the meeting! >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Alp Eken >>> >>> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >>> >>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >>> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). >>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>> >> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Feb 13 10:09:54 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:09:54 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, some updates to share for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH - Regular quarterly house meetings - WSIS + 20 In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed previously with them Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. let me know if you agree with this list for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support any comment or question for the rest? Best, Rafik Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi all, > > I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC > and GAC, the current status is: > - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: > membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. > They didn't propose anything yet from their side. > - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics > policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC > waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( > https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en > ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. > - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial topic > of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their side yet. > - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: > 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) > 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : > HRIA on DNS > gTLD Applicant Support > Public Interest Commitments (PICs) > > I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how > much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and > which we should pick up. > > - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair Ram > Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due time. > > In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead > for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can > handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. > > Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new > policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in > Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. > For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar > can share from his side. For the NCSG issue > forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can you > share more about the selected topic and agenda? > > So please give me your input about the points above. > > Best, > > Rafik > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 14 09:18:56 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:18:56 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: thanks Pedro, we need to summarize the response then. For the meeting frequency, we can go with 2 F2F and raise the point about the impact of virtual meetings. Regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: 1- we are in favor 2- we are not in favor 3- the proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented 4- meeting reduction (a big change that requires buy-in in the list otherwise I will leave that blank) 5- we are not in favor 6- need to check impact such SPS GNSO council meeting or NCPH meeting 7- conditional for having 2 F2F meetings and virtual meeting is to review the approach for virtual meeting to take into account the challenges Regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources 1- we are in favor 2- concern about the feasibility and how this will be implemented by the community 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. 4- concerns about local attendance experience. 5- it is unclear how the block schedule can be revisited, requires more details 6- no position 7- we are in favor for looking for sponsorship and support 8- we are not in favor Regarding Travel-Related Matters 1- requires assessment of the impact in terms of support and meeting staff. 2- we are not in favor @everyone last chance to send your input as the deadline is today, let me know if you have concern about responses above. Best, Rafik Le mer. 12 f?vr. 2025 ? 05:40, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, > > I think there is already a high level of agreement among us three, at > least. The biggest divergence seems to be around having one online meeting > a year (I think just reducing it from 3 to 2 and improving the online > decentralized methodology of work is better). > > And I'd still get back to my first suggestion, reg: possible downgrade > regarding what hotels ICANN chooses, even if it is not popular (but, then > again, nice to have vs. necessary to have). Maybe something a bit less > luxurious, while still very comfortable, would already have a substantial > impact, but ICANN should look a bit more around that so this could be > objectively evaluated since it could heavily affect the "experience" > criteria mentioned in the documents. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC > & NCSG > (ICANN), > YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC > Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em ter., 11 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > >> hi all, >> >> regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: >> 1- I think #1 is common sense practice about deciding and planning >> earlier to control cost, >> 2- I am not in favor of #2, the risk is there will be recurring countries >> with challenges for parts of the community to attend i.e.g access to visa >> etc. I think IETF does or did that and it is not a good example IMHO of >> diversity. >> 3- #3 proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented .e.g are >> we will visit some regions more than others within the 5 years time frame? >> 4- I know it can be almost a taboo but we really should question having 3 >> meetings per year , it is a non negligible time commitment and I believe it >> is a hindrance for many to participate. >> 5- While it can bring some cost reduction regarding hotels and venues, it >> doesn't change the impact on attendees and based on policy forum examples, >> it will require overhaul of agenda and schedule. it can also impact the >> possibility of having the NCPH day meeting >> 6- I think that makes sense as an approach as we are trying for an NCPH >> meeting but it can possibly impact GNSO council SPS or WGs F2F (I didn't >> hear about any since EPDP on RDS)? >> 7- if it is a virtual meeting in the same format as during the pandemic >> it might work fine, with challenges but can be handled better than full >> remote participation as-is now. It will be kind of interessional. >> >> regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources >> 1- I think that is already ongoing. I think such a constraint will >> encourage everyone org and community to rethink what the sessions priority. >> 2- if that is targeting all sessions, setting criteria and deciding will >> be impossible. We usually have a challenge to agree on the community >> session. I think it is inapplicable but if it is about some informational >> session mostly proposed by ICANN staff, it might be worthy to explore. >> 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. >> 4- reducing interpretation and scribing, I think that can impact local >> attendance experience. >> 5- not sure how the block schedule can be revisited, GNSO already uses >> the weekend (well we used saturday and sunday previously). it might be more >> related to other parts of the community? >> 6- I understand that reduction of networking receptions is already >> implemented? >> 7- that can be explored but as noted requires much effort to work with >> local hosts and sponsors. I think it is typical of any conference >> 8- we can say to that proposal in many languages >> >> Regarding Travel-Related Matters >> 1- I think it is already being implemented and we need to see the impact >> in terms of support and meeting staff. >> 2- this is a pandora box : who will decide who should attend and it will >> create more tension within the community. I highly doubt if that is >> effective or good usage of community time. >> >> regarding metrics. >> 1- average is not a good metric and doesn't give a good idea about >> distribution of cost >> 2- for the rest I guess they are fine to set >> >> We need to consolidate and get a common position. At least we can agree >> on what is no-go for us. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Le mar. 11 f?vr. 2025 ? 12:57, Tomslin Samme-Nlar >> a ?crit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> *A. Meeting Locations & Purposes* >>> I personally support #7. On #1, what I don't see is possible impact of >>> booking flights "well in advance" can cause to overall cost due to the risk >>> of closer-to-date changes >>> >>> *B. Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources* >>> I find #1 and #2 interesting if done together. >>> >>> *C. Travel-Related Matters* >>> No to the options provided. >>> >>> >>> Warmly, >>> Tomslin >>> >>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, 12:32 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC, < >>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should >>>> review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >>>> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >>>> context. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >>>> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >>>> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >>>> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet >>>> Community Group >>>> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >>>> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >>>> | >>>> >>>> - ICANN >>>> | >>>> >>>> - ATT00001.txt >>>> | >>>> >>>> >>>> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. >>>> Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell >>>> us what you think >>>> >>>> For more information click here >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear SG/C Chairs, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >>>> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >>>> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >>>> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >>>> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >>>> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >>>> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >>>> provide feedback on: >>>> >>>> 1. What options are missing? >>>> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be >>>> put out for public comment). >>>> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >>>> >>>> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to >>>> ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and >>>> will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the >>>> ?strawman? will be necessary. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts >>>> their work. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank You! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Greg >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >>>> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - >>>> Meeting #1 - How We Meet Community Group >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >>>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >>>> know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had >>>> a wonderful start to 2025. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the >>>> ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >>>> Date: 13 January 2024 >>>> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. >>>> Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for >>>> this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC >>>> Chairs: >>>> >>>> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >>>> 2. Agenda >>>> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy >>>> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >>>> >>>> Background Documents: >>>> >>>> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >>>> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >>>> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >>>> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are >>>> keeping a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, >>>> meeting agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any >>>> document that we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >>>> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >>>> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at >>>> the meeting! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Alp Eken >>>> >>>> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >>>> >>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >>>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >>>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >>>> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). >>>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >>>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >>>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Fri Feb 14 14:10:23 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:10:23 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Agreed, Rafik. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2025 ?s 04:19, Rafik Dammak escreveu: > thanks Pedro, > we need to summarize the response then. For the meeting frequency, we can > go with 2 F2F and raise the point about the impact of virtual meetings. > > Regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: > 1- we are in favor > 2- we are not in favor > 3- the proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented > 4- meeting reduction (a big change that requires buy-in in the list > otherwise I will leave that blank) > 5- we are not in favor > 6- need to check impact such SPS GNSO council meeting or NCPH meeting > 7- conditional for having 2 F2F meetings and virtual meeting is to review > the approach for virtual meeting to take into account the challenges > > Regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources > 1- we are in favor > 2- concern about the feasibility and how this will be implemented by the > community > 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. > 4- concerns about local attendance experience. > 5- it is unclear how the block schedule can be revisited, requires more > details > 6- no position > 7- we are in favor for looking for sponsorship and support > 8- we are not in favor > > Regarding Travel-Related Matters > 1- requires assessment of the impact in terms of support and meeting staff. > 2- we are not in favor > > @everyone last chance to send your input as the deadline is today, let me > know if you have concern about responses above. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > Le mer. 12 f?vr. 2025 ? 05:40, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : > >> Hi Rafik, >> >> I think there is already a high level of agreement among us three, at >> least. The biggest divergence seems to be around having one online meeting >> a year (I think just reducing it from 3 to 2 and improving the online >> decentralized methodology of work is better). >> >> And I'd still get back to my first suggestion, reg: possible downgrade >> regarding what hotels ICANN chooses, even if it is not popular (but, then >> again, nice to have vs. necessary to have). Maybe something a bit less >> luxurious, while still very comfortable, would already have a substantial >> impact, but ICANN should look a bit more around that so this could be >> objectively evaluated since it could heavily affect the "experience" >> criteria mentioned in the documents. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >> & NCSG >> (ICANN), >> YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC >> Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em ter., 11 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: >> >>> hi all, >>> >>> regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: >>> 1- I think #1 is common sense practice about deciding and planning >>> earlier to control cost, >>> 2- I am not in favor of #2, the risk is there will be recurring >>> countries with challenges for parts of the community to attend i.e.g access >>> to visa etc. I think IETF does or did that and it is not a good example >>> IMHO of diversity. >>> 3- #3 proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented .e.g are >>> we will visit some regions more than others within the 5 years time frame? >>> 4- I know it can be almost a taboo but we really should question having >>> 3 meetings per year , it is a non negligible time commitment and I believe >>> it is a hindrance for many to participate. >>> 5- While it can bring some cost reduction regarding hotels and venues, >>> it doesn't change the impact on attendees and based on policy >>> forum examples, it will require overhaul of agenda and schedule. it can >>> also impact the possibility of having the NCPH day meeting >>> 6- I think that makes sense as an approach as we are trying for an NCPH >>> meeting but it can possibly impact GNSO council SPS or WGs F2F (I didn't >>> hear about any since EPDP on RDS)? >>> 7- if it is a virtual meeting in the same format as during the pandemic >>> it might work fine, with challenges but can be handled better than full >>> remote participation as-is now. It will be kind of interessional. >>> >>> regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources >>> 1- I think that is already ongoing. I think such a constraint will >>> encourage everyone org and community to rethink what the sessions priority. >>> 2- if that is targeting all sessions, setting criteria and deciding will >>> be impossible. We usually have a challenge to agree on the community >>> session. I think it is inapplicable but if it is about some informational >>> session mostly proposed by ICANN staff, it might be worthy to explore. >>> 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. >>> 4- reducing interpretation and scribing, I think that can impact local >>> attendance experience. >>> 5- not sure how the block schedule can be revisited, GNSO already uses >>> the weekend (well we used saturday and sunday previously). it might be more >>> related to other parts of the community? >>> 6- I understand that reduction of networking receptions is already >>> implemented? >>> 7- that can be explored but as noted requires much effort to work with >>> local hosts and sponsors. I think it is typical of any conference >>> 8- we can say to that proposal in many languages >>> >>> Regarding Travel-Related Matters >>> 1- I think it is already being implemented and we need to see the impact >>> in terms of support and meeting staff. >>> 2- this is a pandora box : who will decide who should attend and it will >>> create more tension within the community. I highly doubt if that is >>> effective or good usage of community time. >>> >>> regarding metrics. >>> 1- average is not a good metric and doesn't give a good idea about >>> distribution of cost >>> 2- for the rest I guess they are fine to set >>> >>> We need to consolidate and get a common position. At least we can agree >>> on what is no-go for us. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Le mar. 11 f?vr. 2025 ? 12:57, Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>> a ?crit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> *A. Meeting Locations & Purposes* >>>> I personally support #7. On #1, what I don't see is possible impact of >>>> booking flights "well in advance" can cause to overall cost due to the risk >>>> of closer-to-date changes >>>> >>>> *B. Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources* >>>> I find #1 and #2 interesting if done together. >>>> >>>> *C. Travel-Related Matters* >>>> No to the options provided. >>>> >>>> >>>> Warmly, >>>> Tomslin >>>> >>>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, 12:32 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC, < >>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We should >>>>> review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >>>>> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >>>>> context. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >>>>> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >>>>> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >>>>> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet >>>>> Community Group >>>>> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >>>>> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> - ICANN >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> - ATT00001.txt >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. >>>>> Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell >>>>> us what you think >>>>> >>>>> For more information click here >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dear SG/C Chairs, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >>>>> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >>>>> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >>>>> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >>>>> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >>>>> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >>>>> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >>>>> provide feedback on: >>>>> >>>>> 1. What options are missing? >>>>> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be >>>>> put out for public comment). >>>>> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >>>>> >>>>> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to >>>>> ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and >>>>> will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the >>>>> ?strawman? will be necessary. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts >>>>> their work. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank You! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Greg >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >>>>> >>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >>>>> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >>>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - >>>>> Meeting #1 - How We Meet Community Group >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do >>>>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and >>>>> know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had >>>>> a wonderful start to 2025. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the >>>>> ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >>>>> Date: 13 January 2024 >>>>> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable >>>>> contributions. Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we >>>>> prepared for this group, and background documents that were previously >>>>> shared with SOAC Chairs: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >>>>> 2. Agenda >>>>> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy >>>>> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >>>>> >>>>> Background Documents: >>>>> >>>>> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >>>>> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >>>>> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >>>>> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are >>>>> keeping a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, >>>>> meeting agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any >>>>> document that we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >>>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >>>>> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >>>>> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone >>>>> at the meeting! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Alp Eken >>>>> >>>>> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >>>>> >>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of >>>>> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list >>>>> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( >>>>> https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of >>>>> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the >>>>> Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, >>>>> including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling >>>>> delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Feb 15 01:18:45 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:18:45 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Hi all, I will send the comment to Greg, including support for reduction to 2 meetings . Best, Rafik On Fri, Feb 14, 2025, 21:10 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed, Rafik. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC > & NCSG > (ICANN), > YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC > Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2025 ?s 04:19, Rafik Dammak > escreveu: > >> thanks Pedro, >> we need to summarize the response then. For the meeting frequency, we >> can go with 2 F2F and raise the point about the impact of virtual meetings. >> >> Regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: >> 1- we are in favor >> 2- we are not in favor >> 3- the proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented >> 4- meeting reduction (a big change that requires buy-in in the list >> otherwise I will leave that blank) >> 5- we are not in favor >> 6- need to check impact such SPS GNSO council meeting or NCPH meeting >> 7- conditional for having 2 F2F meetings and virtual meeting is to >> review the approach for virtual meeting to take into account the challenges >> >> Regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources >> 1- we are in favor >> 2- concern about the feasibility and how this will be implemented by the >> community >> 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. >> 4- concerns about local attendance experience. >> 5- it is unclear how the block schedule can be revisited, requires more >> details >> 6- no position >> 7- we are in favor for looking for sponsorship and support >> 8- we are not in favor >> >> Regarding Travel-Related Matters >> 1- requires assessment of the impact in terms of support and meeting >> staff. >> 2- we are not in favor >> >> @everyone last chance to send your input as the deadline is today, let me >> know if you have concern about responses above. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> Le mer. 12 f?vr. 2025 ? 05:40, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : >> >>> Hi Rafik, >>> >>> I think there is already a high level of agreement among us three, at >>> least. The biggest divergence seems to be around having one online meeting >>> a year (I think just reducing it from 3 to 2 and improving the online >>> decentralized methodology of work is better). >>> >>> And I'd still get back to my first suggestion, reg: possible downgrade >>> regarding what hotels ICANN chooses, even if it is not popular (but, then >>> again, nice to have vs. necessary to have). Maybe something a bit less >>> luxurious, while still very comfortable, would already have a substantial >>> impact, but ICANN should look a bit more around that so this could be >>> objectively evaluated since it could heavily affect the "experience" >>> criteria mentioned in the documents. >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>> & NCSG >>> (ICANN), >>> YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC >>> Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em ter., 11 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < >>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: >>> >>>> hi all, >>>> >>>> regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: >>>> 1- I think #1 is common sense practice about deciding and planning >>>> earlier to control cost, >>>> 2- I am not in favor of #2, the risk is there will be recurring >>>> countries with challenges for parts of the community to attend i.e.g access >>>> to visa etc. I think IETF does or did that and it is not a good example >>>> IMHO of diversity. >>>> 3- #3 proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented .e.g >>>> are we will visit some regions more than others within the 5 years time >>>> frame? >>>> 4- I know it can be almost a taboo but we really should question having >>>> 3 meetings per year , it is a non negligible time commitment and I believe >>>> it is a hindrance for many to participate. >>>> 5- While it can bring some cost reduction regarding hotels and venues, >>>> it doesn't change the impact on attendees and based on policy >>>> forum examples, it will require overhaul of agenda and schedule. it can >>>> also impact the possibility of having the NCPH day meeting >>>> 6- I think that makes sense as an approach as we are trying for an NCPH >>>> meeting but it can possibly impact GNSO council SPS or WGs F2F (I didn't >>>> hear about any since EPDP on RDS)? >>>> 7- if it is a virtual meeting in the same format as during the pandemic >>>> it might work fine, with challenges but can be handled better than full >>>> remote participation as-is now. It will be kind of interessional. >>>> >>>> regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources >>>> 1- I think that is already ongoing. I think such a constraint will >>>> encourage everyone org and community to rethink what the sessions priority. >>>> 2- if that is targeting all sessions, setting criteria and deciding >>>> will be impossible. We usually have a challenge to agree on the community >>>> session. I think it is inapplicable but if it is about some informational >>>> session mostly proposed by ICANN staff, it might be worthy to explore. >>>> 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. >>>> 4- reducing interpretation and scribing, I think that can impact local >>>> attendance experience. >>>> 5- not sure how the block schedule can be revisited, GNSO already uses >>>> the weekend (well we used saturday and sunday previously). it might be more >>>> related to other parts of the community? >>>> 6- I understand that reduction of networking receptions is already >>>> implemented? >>>> 7- that can be explored but as noted requires much effort to work with >>>> local hosts and sponsors. I think it is typical of any conference >>>> 8- we can say to that proposal in many languages >>>> >>>> Regarding Travel-Related Matters >>>> 1- I think it is already being implemented and we need to see the >>>> impact in terms of support and meeting staff. >>>> 2- this is a pandora box : who will decide who should attend and it >>>> will create more tension within the community. I highly doubt if that is >>>> effective or good usage of community time. >>>> >>>> regarding metrics. >>>> 1- average is not a good metric and doesn't give a good idea about >>>> distribution of cost >>>> 2- for the rest I guess they are fine to set >>>> >>>> We need to consolidate and get a common position. At least we can agree >>>> on what is no-go for us. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le mar. 11 f?vr. 2025 ? 12:57, Tomslin Samme-Nlar < >>>> mesumbeslin at gmail.com> a ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> *A. Meeting Locations & Purposes* >>>>> I personally support #7. On #1, what I don't see is possible impact of >>>>> booking flights "well in advance" can cause to overall cost due to the risk >>>>> of closer-to-date changes >>>>> >>>>> *B. Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources* >>>>> I find #1 and #2 interesting if done together. >>>>> >>>>> *C. Travel-Related Matters* >>>>> No to the options provided. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Warmly, >>>>> Tomslin >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, 12:32 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC, < >>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We >>>>>> should review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >>>>>> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >>>>>> context. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >>>>>> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >>>>>> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >>>>>> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet >>>>>> Community Group >>>>>> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >>>>>> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> - ICANN >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> - ATT00001.txt >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download >>>>>> links. Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 >>>>>> (UTC+00:00). Tell us what you think >>>>>> >>>>>> For more information click here >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear SG/C Chairs, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for >>>>>> ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >>>>>> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >>>>>> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >>>>>> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >>>>>> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >>>>>> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >>>>>> provide feedback on: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. What options are missing? >>>>>> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not >>>>>> be put out for public comment). >>>>>> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to >>>>>> ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and >>>>>> will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the >>>>>> ?strawman? will be necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts >>>>>> their work. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank You! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Greg >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 >>>>>> >>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >>>>>> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >>>>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - >>>>>> Meeting #1 - How We Meet Community Group >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. >>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender >>>>>> and know the content is safe. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve >>>>>> had a wonderful start to 2025. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the >>>>>> ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >>>>>> Date: 13 January 2024 >>>>>> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable >>>>>> contributions. Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we >>>>>> prepared for this group, and background documents that were previously >>>>>> shared with SOAC Chairs: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >>>>>> 2. Agenda >>>>>> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting >>>>>> Strategy >>>>>> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >>>>>> >>>>>> Background Documents: >>>>>> >>>>>> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >>>>>> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >>>>>> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >>>>>> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are >>>>>> keeping a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, >>>>>> meeting agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any >>>>>> document that we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >>>>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight >>>>>> timeline. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >>>>>> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >>>>>> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone >>>>>> at the meeting! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Alp Eken >>>>>> >>>>>> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >>>>>> >>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of >>>>>> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list >>>>>> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( >>>>>> https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of >>>>>> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the >>>>>> Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, >>>>>> including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling >>>>>> delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sat Feb 15 01:30:02 2025 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:30:02 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: <4dc64fca6b7f4193a88bf10c5b076156@amazon.com> <0100019474f81e50-a3ee597c-b322-405d-a31d-c79451fb9daa-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Thanks Rafik. Supporting our position! Farzaneh On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 6:19?PM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hi all, > > I will send the comment to Greg, including support for reduction to 2 > meetings . > > Best, > > Rafik > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025, 21:10 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Agreed, Rafik. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >> & NCSG >> (ICANN), >> YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC >> Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2025 ?s 04:19, Rafik Dammak < >> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >> >>> thanks Pedro, >>> we need to summarize the response then. For the meeting frequency, we >>> can go with 2 F2F and raise the point about the impact of virtual meetings. >>> >>> Regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: >>> 1- we are in favor >>> 2- we are not in favor >>> 3- the proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented >>> 4- meeting reduction (a big change that requires buy-in in the list >>> otherwise I will leave that blank) >>> 5- we are not in favor >>> 6- need to check impact such SPS GNSO council meeting or NCPH meeting >>> 7- conditional for having 2 F2F meetings and virtual meeting is to >>> review the approach for virtual meeting to take into account the challenges >>> >>> Regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources >>> 1- we are in favor >>> 2- concern about the feasibility and how this will be implemented by the >>> community >>> 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. >>> 4- concerns about local attendance experience. >>> 5- it is unclear how the block schedule can be revisited, requires more >>> details >>> 6- no position >>> 7- we are in favor for looking for sponsorship and support >>> 8- we are not in favor >>> >>> Regarding Travel-Related Matters >>> 1- requires assessment of the impact in terms of support and meeting >>> staff. >>> 2- we are not in favor >>> >>> @everyone last chance to send your input as the deadline is today, let >>> me know if you have concern about responses above. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> >>> Le mer. 12 f?vr. 2025 ? 05:40, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : >>> >>>> Hi Rafik, >>>> >>>> I think there is already a high level of agreement among us three, at >>>> least. The biggest divergence seems to be around having one online meeting >>>> a year (I think just reducing it from 3 to 2 and improving the online >>>> decentralized methodology of work is better). >>>> >>>> And I'd still get back to my first suggestion, reg: possible downgrade >>>> regarding what hotels ICANN chooses, even if it is not popular (but, then >>>> again, nice to have vs. necessary to have). Maybe something a bit less >>>> luxurious, while still very comfortable, would already have a substantial >>>> impact, but ICANN should look a bit more around that so this could be >>>> objectively evaluated since it could heavily affect the "experience" >>>> criteria mentioned in the documents. >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC >>>> & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), >>>> YouthLACIGF , IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em ter., 11 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:32, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < >>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> hi all, >>>>> >>>>> regarding Meeting Locations and Purposes: >>>>> 1- I think #1 is common sense practice about deciding and planning >>>>> earlier to control cost, >>>>> 2- I am not in favor of #2, the risk is there will be recurring >>>>> countries with challenges for parts of the community to attend i.e.g access >>>>> to visa etc. I think IETF does or did that and it is not a good example >>>>> IMHO of diversity. >>>>> 3- #3 proposal impact is unclear and how it will be implemented .e.g >>>>> are we will visit some regions more than others within the 5 years time >>>>> frame? >>>>> 4- I know it can be almost a taboo but we really should question >>>>> having 3 meetings per year , it is a non negligible time commitment and I >>>>> believe it is a hindrance for many to participate. >>>>> 5- While it can bring some cost reduction regarding hotels and venues, >>>>> it doesn't change the impact on attendees and based on policy >>>>> forum examples, it will require overhaul of agenda and schedule. it can >>>>> also impact the possibility of having the NCPH day meeting >>>>> 6- I think that makes sense as an approach as we are trying for an >>>>> NCPH meeting but it can possibly impact GNSO council SPS or WGs F2F (I >>>>> didn't hear about any since EPDP on RDS)? >>>>> 7- if it is a virtual meeting in the same format as during the >>>>> pandemic it might work fine, with challenges but can be handled better >>>>> than full remote participation as-is now. It will be kind of interessional. >>>>> >>>>> regarding Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources >>>>> 1- I think that is already ongoing. I think such a constraint will >>>>> encourage everyone org and community to rethink what the sessions priority. >>>>> 2- if that is targeting all sessions, setting criteria and deciding >>>>> will be impossible. We usually have a challenge to agree on the community >>>>> session. I think it is inapplicable but if it is about some informational >>>>> session mostly proposed by ICANN staff, it might be worthy to explore. >>>>> 3- depends how much it impacts remote participation and the experience. >>>>> 4- reducing interpretation and scribing, I think that can impact local >>>>> attendance experience. >>>>> 5- not sure how the block schedule can be revisited, GNSO already uses >>>>> the weekend (well we used saturday and sunday previously). it might be more >>>>> related to other parts of the community? >>>>> 6- I understand that reduction of networking receptions is already >>>>> implemented? >>>>> 7- that can be explored but as noted requires much effort to work with >>>>> local hosts and sponsors. I think it is typical of any conference >>>>> 8- we can say to that proposal in many languages >>>>> >>>>> Regarding Travel-Related Matters >>>>> 1- I think it is already being implemented and we need to see the >>>>> impact in terms of support and meeting staff. >>>>> 2- this is a pandora box : who will decide who should attend and it >>>>> will create more tension within the community. I highly doubt if that is >>>>> effective or good usage of community time. >>>>> >>>>> regarding metrics. >>>>> 1- average is not a good metric and doesn't give a good idea about >>>>> distribution of cost >>>>> 2- for the rest I guess they are fine to set >>>>> >>>>> We need to consolidate and get a common position. At least we can >>>>> agree on what is no-go for us. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le mar. 11 f?vr. 2025 ? 12:57, Tomslin Samme-Nlar < >>>>> mesumbeslin at gmail.com> a ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> *A. Meeting Locations & Purposes* >>>>>> I personally support #7. On #1, what I don't see is possible impact >>>>>> of booking flights "well in advance" can cause to overall cost due to the >>>>>> risk of closer-to-date changes >>>>>> >>>>>> *B. Meeting Format, Logistics & Funding Sources* >>>>>> I find #1 and #2 interesting if done together. >>>>>> >>>>>> *C. Travel-Related Matters* >>>>>> No to the options provided. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Warmly, >>>>>> Tomslin >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025, 12:32 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC, < >>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> there is some update and request for input on "How to meet". We >>>>>>> should review the different options proposed in the strawman document. >>>>>>> I will share this later with larger NCSG membership and adding some >>>>>>> context. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>> De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < >>>>>>> gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> >>>>>>> Date: sam. 18 janv. 2025 ? 00:53 >>>>>>> Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet >>>>>>> Community Group >>>>>>> To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * >>>>>>> - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - ICANN >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - ATT00001.txt >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download >>>>>>> links. Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 >>>>>>> (UTC+00:00). Tell us what you think >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For more information click here >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear SG/C Chairs, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals >>>>>>> for ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential >>>>>>> recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN >>>>>>> meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet >>>>>>> Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft >>>>>>> strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I >>>>>>> think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and >>>>>>> provide feedback on: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. What options are missing? >>>>>>> 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not >>>>>>> be put out for public comment). >>>>>>> 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to >>>>>>> ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and >>>>>>> will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the >>>>>>> ?strawman? will be necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts >>>>>>> their work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank You! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 < >>>>>>> how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org> >>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM >>>>>>> *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org >>>>>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - >>>>>>> Meeting #1 - How We Meet Community Group >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. >>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender >>>>>>> and know the content is safe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve >>>>>>> had a wonderful start to 2025. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the >>>>>>> ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: >>>>>>> Date: 13 January 2024 >>>>>>> Time: 1700-1800 UTC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable >>>>>>> contributions. Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we >>>>>>> prepared for this group, and background documents that were previously >>>>>>> shared with SOAC Chairs: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. Meeting invitation ICS file >>>>>>> 2. Agenda >>>>>>> 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting >>>>>>> Strategy >>>>>>> 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Background Documents: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups >>>>>>> 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings >>>>>>> 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings >>>>>>> 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are >>>>>>> keeping a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, >>>>>>> meeting agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any >>>>>>> document that we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight >>>>>>> timeline. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any >>>>>>> questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue >>>>>>> please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone >>>>>>> at the meeting! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alp Eken >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Policy Development Support Senior Specialist >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of >>>>>>> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list >>>>>>> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( >>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of >>>>>>> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the >>>>>>> Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, >>>>>>> including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling >>>>>>> delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Mon Feb 17 05:43:06 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:43:06 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik, Sorry for the delay, I was having a really rough time at work and was working on urgency-only tasks that required a bit extra time, but I finally got a lot of unfinished tasks out of the way this weekend and got up to date with my ICANN obligations. I think I briefly mentioned this in a call or in another email, but we had some progress and are finishing the first draft of the NCSG Issue Forum - it will be a "phase 2" of the work started in the Issue Forum in ICANN 81, but this time centered in the concerns regarding back-end registries/Registry Service Providers. The plan is to go around and ask potential non-commercial applicants what are the questions they would have when reading the handbook and getting RSPs in the session to interact with them, once again establishing a dialogue with ICANN staff about the non-financial assistance they want to integrate with the ASP. I'll have more details and share a well-developed draft soon to collect input and help from the non-commercial leadership! I'd be glad to take the ASP lead, but I need to confirm that this isn't the bilateral meeting that will conflict with an NCUC agenda - it's getting late here and I can't find the emails about the GAC bilateral and the RSSAC bilateral, maybe Andrea can help me with that, please? Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qui., 13 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:10, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > Hi all, > > some updates to share > for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: > > - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities > - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH > - Regular quarterly house meetings > - WSIS + 20 > > In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board seat > 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 > procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. > I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed > previously with them > Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and ask > how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. > let me know if you agree with this list > > for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to the > GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD > Applicant Support > > any comment or question for the rest? > > Best, > > Rafik > Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi all, >> >> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC >> and GAC, the current status is: >> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics >> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC >> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their >> side yet. >> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >> HRIA on DNS >> gTLD Applicant Support >> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >> >> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how >> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and >> which we should pick up. >> >> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair >> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due >> time. >> >> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead >> for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can >> handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. >> >> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new >> policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in >> Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >> can share from his side. For the NCSG issue >> forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can you >> share more about the selected topic and agenda? >> >> So please give me your input about the points above. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Mon Feb 17 06:28:01 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 13:28:01 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Pedro, We don't have a bilateral with RSSAC or SSAC. The meeting with GAC will be Sunday 09 March 09:30-10:00 local time and that is clashing with the NPOC session and the first GNSO council working session. Best, Rafik Le lun. 17 f?vr. 2025 ? 12:43, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, > > Sorry for the delay, I was having a really rough time at work and was > working on urgency-only tasks that required a bit extra time, but I finally > got a lot of unfinished tasks out of the way this weekend and got up to > date with my ICANN obligations. > > I think I briefly mentioned this in a call or in another email, but we had > some progress and are finishing the first draft of the NCSG Issue Forum - > it will be a "phase 2" of the work started in the Issue Forum in ICANN 81, > but this time centered in the concerns regarding back-end > registries/Registry Service Providers. The plan is to go around and ask > potential non-commercial applicants what are the questions they would have > when reading the handbook and getting RSPs in the session to interact with > them, once again establishing a dialogue with ICANN staff about the > non-financial assistance they want to integrate with the ASP. I'll have > more details and share a well-developed draft soon to collect input and > help from the non-commercial leadership! > > I'd be glad to take the ASP lead, but I need to confirm that this isn't > the bilateral meeting that will conflict with an NCUC agenda - it's getting > late here and I can't find the emails about the GAC bilateral and the RSSAC > bilateral, maybe Andrea can help me with that, please? > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR , NCUC > & NCSG > (ICANN), > YouthLACIGF , IODA and CC > Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qui., 13 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:10, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > >> Hi all, >> >> some updates to share >> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >> >> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >> - Regular quarterly house meetings >> - WSIS + 20 >> >> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board seat >> 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >> previously with them >> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and ask >> how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >> let me know if you agree with this list >> >> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to the >> GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >> Applicant Support >> >> any comment or question for the rest? >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC >>> and GAC, the current status is: >>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics >>> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC >>> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their >>> side yet. >>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>> HRIA on DNS >>> gTLD Applicant Support >>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>> >>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how >>> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and >>> which we should pick up. >>> >>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair >>> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due >>> time. >>> >>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead >>> for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can >>> handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. >>> >>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new >>> policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in >>> Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>> can share from his side. For the NCSG issue >>> forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can you >>> share more about the selected topic and agenda? >>> >>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Mon Feb 17 16:59:15 2025 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:59:15 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Recording & attendance NCSG- EC call 17 February 2025 Message-ID: Dear NCSG EC members, Please find below the recording and attendance of the NCSG EC call held today on the 17 February 2025 at 13:00 UTC Attendees: Tapani Tarvainen, Rafik Dammak, Pedro de Perdigao Lana, Amin Hacha, Adedokum Adewale, ICANN org: Nathalie Peregrine Audio Replay Zoom replay You may also find the information here Thank you! Nathalie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Feb 18 08:02:36 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:36 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana do you have anything we can share or if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work Best, Rafik Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi all, > > some updates to share > for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: > > - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities > - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH > - Regular quarterly house meetings > - WSIS + 20 > > In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board seat > 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 > procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. > I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed > previously with them > Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and ask > how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. > let me know if you agree with this list > > for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to the > GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD > Applicant Support > > any comment or question for the rest? > > Best, > > Rafik > Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi all, >> >> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC >> and GAC, the current status is: >> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics >> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC >> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their >> side yet. >> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >> HRIA on DNS >> gTLD Applicant Support >> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >> >> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how >> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and >> which we should pick up. >> >> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair >> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due >> time. >> >> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead >> for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can >> handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. >> >> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new >> policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in >> Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >> can share from his side. For the NCSG issue >> forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can you >> share more about the selected topic and agenda? >> >> So please give me your input about the points above. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Tue Feb 18 14:17:39 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:17:39 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi everyone, *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The more we get our community involved, the merrier! After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > Thank you! > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma and > Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could be > added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] > , > NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF > [youthlacigf.lat] > , > IODA [ioda.org.br] > > and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] > > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < > andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > > Hello Pedro, > > > > I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda for > ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you would > like me to send this to? > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing > [docs.google.com] > > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Feb 18 15:27:12 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:27:12 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applications review Message-ID: hi all, As follow-up of what we discussed at the last EC call, I am sending here a summary of what was proposed: - all EC members should have access now to the membership system. Please let me know Tapani if you are facing any access issues. - all EC members should review the individual and organizational applications in the system. Let us know if you have any questions about using the system. - Review will be conducted till Seattle meeting - Any application which has no objection or flagged for follow-up will be considered as approved . Email to be sent in order to inform the new member about the application result, adding the NCSG mailing list and announcement sent to NCSG list. Then the new members' names will be sent to the corresponding constituencies - EC members will have the meeting in Seattle F2F and provide RP to Wale, will discuss the applications flagged for concern and follow-up. EC will decide on the follow-up and reach the applicants. The goal is to finish all application reviews and decisions by the end of March if possible. Per operating procedure, applicants should reply within one month of EC inquiry. - After working on that backlog, we will have a regular review of applicants , expecting a peak after the Seattle meeting. as reminder here the NCSG charter and relevant operating procedure: - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Charter - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures As shared, we are also reviewing the operating procedures and make suggestions with regard to adding timeframe etc. Let me know if you have any comments/questions. Best, Rafik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Feb 18 15:34:17 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:34:17 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] ICANN82 NCSG Membership Agenda In-Reply-To: <1216D5E8-0B74-424F-B378-C0E2B17ACBF0@icann.org> References: <1216D5E8-0B74-424F-B378-C0E2B17ACBF0@icann.org> Message-ID: hi everyone, as discussed during the EC call, I would like to get your input/suggestions for the NCSG membership session: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LBE4BdUc1RWsl7b1-R1yWnMKPUMDYAh50wQzy2IDohM/edit?tab=t.0 Best, Rafik Le mer. 29 janv. 2025 ? 23:35, Andrea Glandon via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : > Hello all, > > > > I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Membership agenda for > ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LBE4BdUc1RWsl7b1-R1yWnMKPUMDYAh50wQzy2IDohM/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Wed Feb 19 03:34:58 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:34:58 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik, all, We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program Handbook Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak escreveu: > Hi all, > > a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. > On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material about > HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and to be > added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii > @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > do you have anything we can share or if > we can prepare something quickly based on previous work > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi all, >> >> some updates to share >> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >> >> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >> - Regular quarterly house meetings >> - WSIS + 20 >> >> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board seat >> 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >> previously with them >> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and ask >> how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >> let me know if you agree with this list >> >> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to the >> GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >> Applicant Support >> >> any comment or question for the rest? >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC >>> and GAC, the current status is: >>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics >>> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC >>> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their >>> side yet. >>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>> HRIA on DNS >>> gTLD Applicant Support >>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>> >>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how >>> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and >>> which we should pick up. >>> >>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair >>> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due >>> time. >>> >>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead >>> for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can >>> handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. >>> >>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new >>> policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in >>> Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>> can share from his side. For the NCSG issue >>> forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can you >>> share more about the selected topic and agenda? >>> >>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG Comment - Third Proceeding for Proposed Language for Draft Sections of Next Round AGB..pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 336631 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG Comment - Second Proceeding for Proposed Language for Draft Sections of the Next Round Applicant Guidebook.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 242820 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: [Info] NCUC Issues Forum.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 657909 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Public Comment - Draft Applicant Support Program (ASP) Handbook.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 273290 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Wed Feb 19 03:58:33 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:58:33 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG Policy Fellowship Project - Recirculating Message-ID: As requested in our last NCSG EC meeting, I am recirculating the proposal that was already approved by PIR, especially to our newer members. We need only to define the policy priorities, selection process, and details about how the selected fellow will work. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pM1Z-Wh-6msTdRxV17gDxLeT8Y1Paopi4fpB6gM6sqQ/edit Please feel free to contribute! Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Wed Feb 19 04:19:28 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:19:28 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applications review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, Just as a reminder and to facilitate the usage of the system, this is the link you should use to log in: https://members.ncsg.is/ To analyze cases, be they individual or organizational, click first "view details", check the info, and afterward click on "Approve or comment application" at the end. As far as I remember, we have as a practice need to justify only when we mark "no", so others can learn the reason and also interact with you if they believe a mistake was made. I was a bit confused when using the system the first few times, so I thought this could be helpful. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 10:27, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > hi all, > > As follow-up of what we discussed at the last EC call, I am sending here a > summary of what was proposed: > - all EC members should have access now to the membership system. Please > let me know Tapani if you are facing any access issues. > - all EC members should review the individual and organizational > applications in the system. Let us know if you have any questions about > using the system. > - Review will be conducted till Seattle meeting > - Any application which has no objection or flagged for follow-up will be > considered as approved . Email to be sent in order to inform the new member > about the application result, adding the NCSG mailing list and announcement > sent to NCSG list. Then the new members' names will be sent to the > corresponding constituencies > - EC members will have the meeting in Seattle F2F and provide RP to Wale, > will discuss the applications flagged for concern and follow-up. EC will > decide on the follow-up and reach the applicants. The goal is to finish all > application reviews and decisions by the end of March if possible. Per > operating procedure, applicants should reply within one month of EC inquiry. > - After working on that backlog, we will have a regular review of > applicants , expecting a peak after the Seattle meeting. > > as reminder here the NCSG charter and relevant operating procedure: > - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Charter > - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures > > > As shared, we are also reviewing the operating procedures and make > suggestions with regard to adding timeframe etc. > > Let me know if you have any comments/questions. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wisdom.dk at gmail.com Wed Feb 19 12:01:16 2025 From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:01:16 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> Message-ID: This needs to be done as early as possible. I will encourage all to at least spend a little time out from your busy schedule to review the document. *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) President & CEO Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. agdic.info Tel: +233 20 812 8851 Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee Member ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Specialization: E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, Event Planning & Management, On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 12:17?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would > like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be > done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 > > My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least one > person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the > Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan > already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as > Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* > > Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The > more we get our community involved, the merrier! > > After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an > Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < > andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > >> Thank you! >> >> >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Andrea >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >> *To: *Andrea Glandon >> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >> >> >> >> Hi Andrea, >> >> >> >> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma >> and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could >> be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >> >> >> >> Cordially, >> >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> >> Lawyer [nic.br] >> , >> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >> >> Researcher >> >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> >> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >> , >> NCUC [ncuc.org] >> >> & NCSG (ICANN), >> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >> , >> IODA [ioda.org.br] >> >> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >> >> >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> >> >> >> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >> >> Hello Pedro, >> >> >> >> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda for >> ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you would >> like me to send this to? >> >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >> [docs.google.com] >> >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> *Andrea Glandon* >> >> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Wed Feb 19 17:47:52 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:47:52 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik, As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very fruitful to have this discussion. (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate session only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi Rafik, all, > > We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an > explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important > commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public > Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program > Handbook > > Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we > elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of > the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the > CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would > benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) > > I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak > escreveu: > >> Hi all, >> >> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material >> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and >> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii >> @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >> do you have anything we can share or if >> we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak a >> ?crit : >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> some updates to share >>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>> >>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>> - WSIS + 20 >>> >>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board seat >>> 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >>> previously with them >>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and >>> ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>> let me know if you agree with this list >>> >>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to the >>> GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>> Applicant Support >>> >>> any comment or question for the rest? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a >>> ?crit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC >>>> and GAC, the current status is: >>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics >>>> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC >>>> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >>>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their >>>> side yet. >>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>> HRIA on DNS >>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>> >>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how >>>> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and >>>> which we should pick up. >>>> >>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair >>>> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due >>>> time. >>>> >>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead >>>> for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can >>>> handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. >>>> >>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the >>>> new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet >>>> him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG issue >>>> forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can >>>> you share more about the selected topic and agenda? >>>> >>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Feb 20 01:57:13 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:57:13 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Pedro, Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them with GAC. If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :) Best, Rafik On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rafik, > > As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our > side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is > deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very > fruitful to have this discussion. > > (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate session > only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: > >> Hi Rafik, all, >> >> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an >> explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important >> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public >> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program >> Handbook >> >> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we >> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of >> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the >> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would >> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) >> >> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak < >> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material >>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and >>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii >>> @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>> do you have anything we can share or >>> if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak a >>> ?crit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> some updates to share >>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>>> >>>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>>> - WSIS + 20 >>>> >>>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board seat >>>> 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >>>> previously with them >>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and >>>> ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>>> let me know if you agree with this list >>>> >>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to >>>> the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>>> Applicant Support >>>> >>>> any comment or question for the rest? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a >>>> ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, >>>>> ALAC and GAC, the current status is: >>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics >>>>> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC >>>>> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >>>>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their >>>>> side yet. >>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>>> HRIA on DNS >>>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>>> >>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how >>>>> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and >>>>> which we should pick up. >>>>> >>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair >>>>> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due >>>>> time. >>>>> >>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the >>>>> lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela >>>>> can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous >>>>> improvement. >>>>> >>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the >>>>> new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet >>>>> him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG issue >>>>> forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can >>>>> you share more about the selected topic and agenda? >>>>> >>>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Feb 20 02:24:10 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:24:10 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Pedro, Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can secure their presence. Best, Rafik Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : > Hi everyone, > > *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would > like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be > done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 > > My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least one > person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the > Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan > already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as > Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* > > Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The > more we get our community involved, the merrier! > > After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an > Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < > andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > >> Thank you! >> >> >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Andrea >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >> *To: *Andrea Glandon >> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >> >> >> >> Hi Andrea, >> >> >> >> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma >> and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could >> be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >> >> >> >> Cordially, >> >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> >> Lawyer [nic.br] >> , >> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >> >> Researcher >> >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> >> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >> , >> NCUC [ncuc.org] >> >> & NCSG (ICANN), >> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >> , >> IODA [ioda.org.br] >> >> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >> >> >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> >> >> >> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >> >> Hello Pedro, >> >> >> >> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda for >> ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you would >> like me to send this to? >> >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >> [docs.google.com] >> >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> *Andrea Glandon* >> >> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Thu Feb 20 04:59:13 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:59:13 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sometimes I make stupid questions, but better safe than sorry hehe Thanks! *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR ) Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA e CC Brasil . Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro. Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 20:57, Rafik Dammak escreveu: > Hi Pedro, > > Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them with > GAC. > If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :) > > Best, > > Rafik > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Rafik, >> >> As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our >> side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is >> deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very >> fruitful to have this discussion. >> >> (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate session >> only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >> >>> Hi Rafik, all, >>> >>> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an >>> explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important >>> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public >>> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program >>> Handbook >>> >>> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we >>> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of >>> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the >>> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would >>> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) >>> >>> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak < >>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >>>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material >>>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and >>>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii >>>> @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>> do you have anything we can share or >>>> if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak a >>>> ?crit : >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> some updates to share >>>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>>>> >>>>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>>>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>>>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>>>> - WSIS + 20 >>>>> >>>>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board >>>>> seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >>>>> previously with them >>>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and >>>>> ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>>>> let me know if you agree with this list >>>>> >>>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to >>>>> the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>>>> Applicant Support >>>>> >>>>> any comment or question for the rest? >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a >>>>> ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, >>>>>> ALAC and GAC, the current status is: >>>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics >>>>>> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC >>>>>> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >>>>>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their >>>>>> side yet. >>>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>>>> HRIA on DNS >>>>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>>>> >>>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and >>>>>> how much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts >>>>>> and which we should pick up. >>>>>> >>>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC >>>>>> chair Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that >>>>>> on due time. >>>>>> >>>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the >>>>>> lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela >>>>>> can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous >>>>>> improvement. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the >>>>>> new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet >>>>>> him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG issue >>>>>> forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can >>>>>> you share more about the selected topic and agenda? >>>>>> >>>>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Feb 20 10:09:11 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:09:11 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applications review In-Reply-To: <2039266974.32341.1739960981601.JavaMail.zimbra@forum.org.ng> References: <2039266974.32341.1739960981601.JavaMail.zimbra@forum.org.ng> Message-ID: thanks Adewale, @Tapani Tarvainen is there any config that needs to be set for that? Rafik Le mer. 19 f?vr. 2025 ? 19:29, Adewale Adedokun a ?crit : > Hello Rafik and all, > I have attempted to review some of the applications, unfortunately my name > is not included in the approval or comment section, I guess there is need > to update the interface. > > regards, > > Wale > > E.A. Adedokun, PhD. > Professor of Computer Engineering. > Event Coordinator, Nigeria Network Operators' Group > wale at nog.ng > wale at forum.org.ng > wale at abu.edu.ng > +234-8037035811. > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"NCSG EC" > *To: *"NCSG EC" > *Sent: *Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:27:12 PM > *Subject: *[NCSG-EC] Applications review > > hi all, > > As follow-up of what we discussed at the last EC call, I am sending here a > summary of what was proposed: > - all EC members should have access now to the membership system. Please > let me know Tapani if you are facing any access issues. > - all EC members should review the individual and organizational > applications in the system. Let us know if you have any questions about > using the system. > - Review will be conducted till Seattle meeting > - Any application which has no objection or flagged for follow-up will be > considered as approved . Email to be sent in order to inform the new member > about the application result, adding the NCSG mailing list and announcement > sent to NCSG list. Then the new members' names will be sent to the > corresponding constituencies > - EC members will have the meeting in Seattle F2F and provide RP to Wale, > will discuss the applications flagged for concern and follow-up. EC will > decide on the follow-up and reach the applicants. The goal is to finish all > application reviews and decisions by the end of March if possible. Per > operating procedure, applicants should reply within one month of EC inquiry. > - After working on that backlog, we will have a regular review of > applicants , expecting a peak after the Seattle meeting. > > as reminder here the NCSG charter and relevant operating procedure: > - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Charter > - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures > > > As shared, we are also reviewing the operating procedures and make > suggestions with regard to adding timeframe etc. > > Let me know if you have any comments/questions. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info Thu Feb 20 12:40:09 2025 From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info (Tapani Tarvainen) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:40:09 +0200 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applications review In-Reply-To: References: <2039266974.32341.1739960981601.JavaMail.zimbra@forum.org.ng> Message-ID: Hi Rafik, all, Indeed there is, and not just one. As I mentioned briefly during our call, the EC members' names are hard-coded there, and not just once but in at least ten places (I'm not sure I've found all yet) and they need to be changed one by one. It's taking a bit long also because I'm trying to do something that should've been done long ago, namely document them, and in a way that'd make it easy to ask the support company to automate the process: all those menus and forms should pull the EC members out of the database instead of having them hard-coded all over the place. Anyway, I should be ready with it soon, depending on how many other urgent things fall my way. I'll let you know when I'm done. Regards, Tapani On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 05:09:11PM +0900, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote: > thanks Adewale, @Tapani Tarvainen is there > any config that needs to be set for that? > > Rafik > > Le mer. 19 f?vr. 2025 ? 19:29, Adewale Adedokun a > ?crit : > > > Hello Rafik and all, > > I have attempted to review some of the applications, unfortunately my name > > is not included in the approval or comment section, I guess there is need > > to update the interface. > > > > regards, > > > > Wale > > > > E.A. Adedokun, PhD. > > Professor of Computer Engineering. > > Event Coordinator, Nigeria Network Operators' Group > > wale at nog.ng > > wale at forum.org.ng > > wale at abu.edu.ng > > +234-8037035811. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *From: *"NCSG EC" > > *To: *"NCSG EC" > > *Sent: *Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:27:12 PM > > *Subject: *[NCSG-EC] Applications review > > > > hi all, > > > > As follow-up of what we discussed at the last EC call, I am sending here a > > summary of what was proposed: > > - all EC members should have access now to the membership system. Please > > let me know Tapani if you are facing any access issues. > > - all EC members should review the individual and organizational > > applications in the system. Let us know if you have any questions about > > using the system. > > - Review will be conducted till Seattle meeting > > - Any application which has no objection or flagged for follow-up will be > > considered as approved . Email to be sent in order to inform the new member > > about the application result, adding the NCSG mailing list and announcement > > sent to NCSG list. Then the new members' names will be sent to the > > corresponding constituencies > > - EC members will have the meeting in Seattle F2F and provide RP to Wale, > > will discuss the applications flagged for concern and follow-up. EC will > > decide on the follow-up and reach the applicants. The goal is to finish all > > application reviews and decisions by the end of March if possible. Per > > operating procedure, applicants should reply within one month of EC inquiry. > > - After working on that backlog, we will have a regular review of > > applicants , expecting a peak after the Seattle meeting. > > > > as reminder here the NCSG charter and relevant operating procedure: > > - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Charter > > - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures > > > > > > As shared, we are also reviewing the operating procedures and make > > suggestions with regard to adding timeframe etc. > > > > Let me know if you have any comments/questions. > > > > Best, > > > > Rafik > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NCSG-EC mailing list > > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > > > > -- Tapani Tarvainen From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Thu Feb 20 16:04:41 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:04:41 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> Message-ID: Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer and @Juan Manuel Rojas , and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak escreveu: > > Hi Pedro, > > Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did a > quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the previous > forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the speakers > from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can secure their > presence. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would >> like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be >> done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >> >> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least one >> person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the >> Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >> >> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The >> more we get our community involved, the merrier! >> >> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an >> Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> >>> Andrea >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Andrea, >>> >>> >>> >>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma >>> and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could >>> be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> >>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>> , >>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>> >>> Researcher >>> >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>> , >>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>> >>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>> , >>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>> >>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>> >>> >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>> >>> Hello Pedro, >>> >>> >>> >>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda for >>> ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you would >>> like me to send this to? >>> >>> >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>> [docs.google.com] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> *Andrea Glandon* >>> >>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>> >>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>> >>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jumaropi at yahoo.com Thu Feb 20 16:14:33 2025 From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> Message-ID: <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Hey Pedro,? I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC? Best Regards, JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc. Director - MINKA DIGITAL ColombiaNPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO M.Sc. Information Technology Registered Linux User No.533108. http://www.jmanurojas.com Cel. +57 301 743 56 00 Instagram: jmanurojas -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana escribi?: Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer and @Juan Manuel Rojas, and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer, GEDAI/UFPR ResearcherPhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak escreveu: Hi Pedro, Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did a quick review and I think the?agenda is fine as follow-up from the previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can secure their presence. Best, Rafik Le?mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ??21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC a ?crit?: Hi everyone, We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. Juan already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject. Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The more we get our community involved, the merrier! After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer, GEDAI/UFPR ResearcherPhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon escreveu: Thank you! ? Kind Regards, Andrea ? ? From:Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 To: Andrea Glandon Subject: [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda ? Hi Andrea, ? For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. ? Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana Lawyer [nic.br], GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ISOC BR [isoc.org.br], NCUC [ncuc.org] & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat], IODA [ioda.org.br] and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. ? ? Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon escreveu: Hello Pedro, ? I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you would like me to send this to? ? https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] ? Thanks! Andrea Glandon Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID:? acglandon76 ? ? ? _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 02:55:50 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:55:50 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, Please find attached the slides deck with the draft agenda for the NCPH meeting. Let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions or if you want to lead one of the topics. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 20 f?vr. 2025 ? 11:59, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : > Sometimes I make stupid questions, but better safe than sorry hehe > > Thanks! > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR > ) > Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), > Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > e CC Brasil . > Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida por > engano, favor responder informando o erro. > > > Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 20:57, Rafik Dammak > escreveu: > >> Hi Pedro, >> >> Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them with >> GAC. >> If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :) >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rafik, >>> >>> As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our >>> side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is >>> deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very >>> fruitful to have this discussion. >>> >>> (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate >>> session only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi Rafik, all, >>>> >>>> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an >>>> explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important >>>> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public >>>> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program >>>> Handbook >>>> >>>> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we >>>> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of >>>> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the >>>> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would >>>> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) >>>> >>>> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak < >>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >>>>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material >>>>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and >>>>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii >>>>> @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>> do you have anything we can share or >>>>> if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak >>>>> a ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> some updates to share >>>>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>>>>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>>>>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>>>>> - WSIS + 20 >>>>>> >>>>>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board >>>>>> seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>>>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>>>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >>>>>> previously with them >>>>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and >>>>>> ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>>>>> let me know if you agree with this list >>>>>> >>>>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to >>>>>> the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>>>>> Applicant Support >>>>>> >>>>>> any comment or question for the rest? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak >>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, >>>>>>> ALAC and GAC, the current status is: >>>>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>>>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>>>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, >>>>>>> ethics policy and community participant code, continuous >>>>>>> improvement program) with ALAC waiting for their comments and >>>>>>> Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >>>>>>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from >>>>>>> their side yet. >>>>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>>>>> HRIA on DNS >>>>>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>>>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and >>>>>>> how much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts >>>>>>> and which we should pick up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC >>>>>>> chair Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that >>>>>>> on due time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the >>>>>>> lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela >>>>>>> can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous >>>>>>> improvement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the >>>>>>> new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet >>>>>>> him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG >>>>>>> issue forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>> can you share more about the selected topic and agenda? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CSG - NCSG 8 March.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 34914 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wisdom.dk at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 09:15:18 2025 From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:15:18 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Looks good *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) President & CEO Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. agdic.info Tel: +233 20 812 8851 Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee Member ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Specialization: E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, Event Planning & Management, On Fri, 21 Feb 2025, 12:56?am Rafik Dammak, wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find attached the slides deck with the draft agenda for the NCPH > meeting. Let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions or if you want > to lead one of the topics. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > Le jeu. 20 f?vr. 2025 ? 11:59, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : > >> Sometimes I make stupid questions, but better safe than sorry hehe >> >> Thanks! >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR >> ) >> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), >> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> e CC Brasil . >> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida por >> engano, favor responder informando o erro. >> >> >> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 20:57, Rafik Dammak < >> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >> >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them with >>> GAC. >>> If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :) >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Rafik, >>>> >>>> As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our >>>> side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is >>>> deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very >>>> fruitful to have this discussion. >>>> >>>> (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate >>>> session only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Hi Rafik, all, >>>>> >>>>> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an >>>>> explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important >>>>> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public >>>>> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program >>>>> Handbook >>>>> >>>>> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we >>>>> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of >>>>> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the >>>>> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would >>>>> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) >>>>> >>>>> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak < >>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >>>>>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material >>>>>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and >>>>>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii >>>>>> @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>> do you have anything we can share >>>>>> or if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak >>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> some updates to share >>>>>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>>>>>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>>>>>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>>>>>> - WSIS + 20 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board >>>>>>> seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>>>>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>>>>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >>>>>>> previously with them >>>>>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views >>>>>>> and ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>>>>>> let me know if you agree with this list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to >>>>>>> the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>>>>>> Applicant Support >>>>>>> >>>>>>> any comment or question for the rest? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak >>>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, >>>>>>>> ALAC and GAC, the current status is: >>>>>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>>>>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>>>>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>>>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant >>>>>>>> support, ethics policy and community participant code, continuous >>>>>>>> improvement program) with ALAC waiting for their comments and >>>>>>>> Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>>>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>>>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this >>>>>>>> initial topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic >>>>>>>> from their side yet. >>>>>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>>>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>>>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>>>>>> HRIA on DNS >>>>>>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>>>>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and >>>>>>>> how much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts >>>>>>>> and which we should pick up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC >>>>>>>> chair Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that >>>>>>>> on due time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the >>>>>>>> lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela >>>>>>>> can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous >>>>>>>> improvement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited >>>>>>>> the new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot >>>>>>>> meet him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>>>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>>>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG >>>>>>>> issue forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>> can you share more about the >>>>>>>> selected topic and agenda? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 13:28:36 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:28:36 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [NCSG-PC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Peter, Thanks for the feedback. I think for the outcomes is really up to us and based on discussion. People need to propose and lead to concrete outcomes. The agenda is only a vehicle to structure and facilitate that purpose but cannot guarantee the results. CSG lead asked us what we expect as outcome from the topics proposed from our side. I believe some topics have clear expected outcome either a follow-up activity to be actionned or planning like for board seat 14. Anyway, I can emphasize to CSG lead that we want concrete outcomes. Building better relation with CSG is one of the goal of those meetings and that is why we want to ensure that they are scheduled and planned accordingly. It is also the space to work with them on common goals and that require listening and discuss in first place. This meeting is not day 0 but session in saturday which can be seen as first day of meeting at least for those from GNSO . But if you are meaning the one envisioned for Muscat meeting then yes there will be more preparation before that of course. Again, planning need everyone participation and input. Best, Rafik On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, 20:11 Akinremi Peter Taiwo wrote: > Thanks Rafik for the excellent sharing. > > The agenda looks good. > > What I am a bit worried about is for the meeting to generate a concrete > outcome. Most times csg folks just discuss and is difficult to grasp what > is it they wanted to achieve. The zero day is going to demand extra time > from our dedicated members if we don?t know why it is importance to us > except is to keep both SG relationships intact and inform which mostly > isn?t the case when we meet. > > Best regards > > *Taiwo Peter Akinremi* > ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- > *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo > *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com > ___________________________________________ > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 7:56?PM Rafik Dammak > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please find attached the slides deck with the draft agenda for the NCPH >> meeting. Let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions or if you want >> to lead one of the topics. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> >> Le jeu. 20 f?vr. 2025 ? 11:59, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : >> >>> Sometimes I make stupid questions, but better safe than sorry hehe >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR >>> ) >>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), >>> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> e CC Brasil . >>> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida por >>> engano, favor responder informando o erro. >>> >>> >>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 20:57, Rafik Dammak < >>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi Pedro, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them with >>>> GAC. >>>> If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :) >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Rafik, >>>>> >>>>> As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our >>>>> side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is >>>>> deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very >>>>> fruitful to have this discussion. >>>>> >>>>> (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate >>>>> session only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Rafik, all, >>>>>> >>>>>> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of >>>>>> an explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important >>>>>> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public >>>>>> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program >>>>>> Handbook >>>>>> >>>>>> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we >>>>>> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of >>>>>> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the >>>>>> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would >>>>>> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) >>>>>> >>>>>> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >>>>>>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material >>>>>>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and >>>>>>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii >>>>>>> @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>> do you have anything we can share >>>>>>> or if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak >>>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> some updates to share >>>>>>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>>>>>>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>>>>>>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>>>>>>> - WSIS + 20 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board >>>>>>>> seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>>>>>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>>>>>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >>>>>>>> previously with them >>>>>>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views >>>>>>>> and ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>>>>>>> let me know if you agree with this list >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send >>>>>>>> to the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>>>>>>> Applicant Support >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> any comment or question for the rest? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak >>>>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, >>>>>>>>> ALAC and GAC, the current status is: >>>>>>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>>>>>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>>>>>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>>>>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant >>>>>>>>> support, ethics policy and community participant code, continuous >>>>>>>>> improvement program) with ALAC waiting for their comments and >>>>>>>>> Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>>>>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>>>>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this >>>>>>>>> initial topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic >>>>>>>>> from their side yet. >>>>>>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>>>>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>>>>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>>>>>>> HRIA on DNS >>>>>>>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>>>>>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and >>>>>>>>> how much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts >>>>>>>>> and which we should pick up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC >>>>>>>>> chair Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that >>>>>>>>> on due time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the >>>>>>>>> lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela >>>>>>>>> can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous >>>>>>>>> improvement. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited >>>>>>>>> the new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot >>>>>>>>> meet him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>>>>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>>>>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG >>>>>>>>> issue forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>>> can you share more about the >>>>>>>>> selected topic and agenda? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-PC mailing list >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 14:25:14 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:25:14 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer , how about you two? Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas escreveu: > Hey Pedro, > I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC > > Best Regards, > > *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* > Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia > NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO > M.Sc. Information Technology > > Registered Linux User No.*533108.* > http://www.jmanurojas.com > > > *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+ > PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > > > > > > El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de Perdig?o > Lana escribi?: > > > Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for others in > this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. > > @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer > and @Juan Manuel Rojas , and others who are > interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss the Issue Forum? > I'll be available during most of the weekend, but traveling Sunday morning > (UTC-3). > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak > escreveu: > > > Hi Pedro, > > Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did a > quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the previous > forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the speakers > from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can secure their > presence. > > Best, > > Rafik > > Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : > > Hi everyone, > > *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would > like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be > done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 > > My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least one > person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the > Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan > already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as > Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* > > Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The > more we get our community involved, the merrier! > > After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an > Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < > andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > > Thank you! > > > > Kind Regards, > > Andrea > > > > > > *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 > *To: *Andrea Glandon > *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma and > Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could be > added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. > > > > Cordially, > > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > Lawyer [nic.br] > , > GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] > > Researcher > > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > > Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] > , > NCUC [ncuc.org] > > & NCSG (ICANN), YouthLACIGF > [youthlacigf.lat] > , > IODA [ioda.org.br] > > and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] > > > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > > > > Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < > andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: > > Hello Pedro, > > > > I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda for > ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you would > like me to send this to? > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing > [docs.google.com] > > > > > Thanks! > > *Andrea Glandon* > > Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > *Skype ID:* acglandon76 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From compsoftnet at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 13:11:06 2025 From: compsoftnet at gmail.com (Akinremi Peter Taiwo) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 06:11:06 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [NCSG-PC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Rafik for the excellent sharing. The agenda looks good. What I am a bit worried about is for the meeting to generate a concrete outcome. Most times csg folks just discuss and is difficult to grasp what is it they wanted to achieve. The zero day is going to demand extra time from our dedicated members if we don?t know why it is importance to us except is to keep both SG relationships intact and inform which mostly isn?t the case when we meet. Best regards *Taiwo Peter Akinremi* ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com ___________________________________________ On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 7:56?PM Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find attached the slides deck with the draft agenda for the NCPH > meeting. Let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions or if you want > to lead one of the topics. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > Le jeu. 20 f?vr. 2025 ? 11:59, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : > >> Sometimes I make stupid questions, but better safe than sorry hehe >> >> Thanks! >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR >> ) >> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), >> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> e CC Brasil . >> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida por >> engano, favor responder informando o erro. >> >> >> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 20:57, Rafik Dammak < >> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >> >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them with >>> GAC. >>> If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :) >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Rafik, >>>> >>>> As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our >>>> side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is >>>> deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very >>>> fruitful to have this discussion. >>>> >>>> (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate >>>> session only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Hi Rafik, all, >>>>> >>>>> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an >>>>> explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important >>>>> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public >>>>> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program >>>>> Handbook >>>>> >>>>> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we >>>>> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of >>>>> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the >>>>> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would >>>>> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) >>>>> >>>>> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak < >>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >>>>>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material >>>>>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and >>>>>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii >>>>>> @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>> do you have anything we can share >>>>>> or if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak >>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> some updates to share >>>>>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>>>>>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>>>>>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>>>>>> - WSIS + 20 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board >>>>>>> seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>>>>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>>>>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >>>>>>> previously with them >>>>>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views >>>>>>> and ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>>>>>> let me know if you agree with this list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to >>>>>>> the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>>>>>> Applicant Support >>>>>>> >>>>>>> any comment or question for the rest? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak >>>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, >>>>>>>> ALAC and GAC, the current status is: >>>>>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>>>>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>>>>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>>>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant >>>>>>>> support, ethics policy and community participant code, continuous >>>>>>>> improvement program) with ALAC waiting for their comments and >>>>>>>> Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>>>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>>>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this >>>>>>>> initial topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic >>>>>>>> from their side yet. >>>>>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>>>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>>>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>>>>>> HRIA on DNS >>>>>>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>>>>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and >>>>>>>> how much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts >>>>>>>> and which we should pick up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC >>>>>>>> chair Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that >>>>>>>> on due time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the >>>>>>>> lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela >>>>>>>> can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous >>>>>>>> improvement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited >>>>>>>> the new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot >>>>>>>> meet him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>>>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>>>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG >>>>>>>> issue forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>> can you share more about the >>>>>>>> selected topic and agenda? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From milisemlani at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 14:31:46 2025 From: milisemlani at gmail.com (Mili Semlani) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:31:46 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Wed and Thur next week are better for me. -- With gratitude *Mili Semlani* LinkedIn : community building for new media Instagram : evocative travel stories and mind musings On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer > , how about you two? > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < > jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: > >> Hey Pedro, >> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >> >> Best Regards, >> >> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >> M.Sc. Information Technology >> >> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >> http://www.jmanurojas.com >> >> >> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >> >> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >> Version: 3.1 >> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+ >> PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de Perdig?o >> Lana escribi?: >> >> >> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for others in >> this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >> >> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , and >> others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss the >> Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but traveling >> Sunday morning (UTC-3). >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >> >> >> Hi Pedro, >> >> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did a >> quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the previous >> forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the speakers >> from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can secure their >> presence. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would >> like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be >> done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >> >> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least one >> person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the >> Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >> >> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The >> more we get our community involved, the merrier! >> >> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an >> Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Andrea >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >> *To: *Andrea Glandon >> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >> >> >> >> Hi Andrea, >> >> >> >> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma >> and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could >> be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >> >> >> >> Cordially, >> >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> >> Lawyer [nic.br] >> , >> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >> >> Researcher >> >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> >> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >> , >> NCUC [ncuc.org] >> >> & NCSG (ICANN), >> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >> , >> IODA [ioda.org.br] >> >> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >> >> >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> >> >> >> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >> >> Hello Pedro, >> >> >> >> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda for >> ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you would >> like me to send this to? >> >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >> [docs.google.com] >> >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> *Andrea Glandon* >> >> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >> >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 16:44:27 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 23:44:27 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applications review In-Reply-To: References: <2039266974.32341.1739960981601.JavaMail.zimbra@forum.org.ng> Message-ID: Hi Tapani, Thanks for the clarification and I hope we can get this fixed. In the meantime, as a workaround Andrea will prepare spreadsheets with a list of applicants to be sent to EC members and we can put our decision there. Hopefully, it will be a temporary solution for this time. As I got the contact for the vendor, we will follow-up with them about this request and see how much it will cost. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 20 f?vr. 2025 ? 19:40, Tapani Tarvainen a ?crit : > Hi Rafik, all, > > Indeed there is, and not just one. As I mentioned briefly during our > call, the EC members' names are hard-coded there, and not just once > but in at least ten places (I'm not sure I've found all yet) and they > need to be changed one by one. It's taking a bit long also because I'm > trying to do something that should've been done long ago, namely > document them, and in a way that'd make it easy to ask the support > company to automate the process: all those menus and forms should pull > the EC members out of the database instead of having them hard-coded > all over the place. > > Anyway, I should be ready with it soon, depending on how many other > urgent things fall my way. I'll let you know when I'm done. > > Regards, > > Tapani > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 05:09:11PM +0900, Rafik Dammak ( > rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote: > > > thanks Adewale, @Tapani Tarvainen is there > > any config that needs to be set for that? > > > > Rafik > > > > Le mer. 19 f?vr. 2025 ? 19:29, Adewale Adedokun a > > ?crit : > > > > > Hello Rafik and all, > > > I have attempted to review some of the applications, unfortunately my > name > > > is not included in the approval or comment section, I guess there is > need > > > to update the interface. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Wale > > > > > > E.A. Adedokun, PhD. > > > Professor of Computer Engineering. > > > Event Coordinator, Nigeria Network Operators' Group > > > wale at nog.ng > > > wale at forum.org.ng > > > wale at abu.edu.ng > > > +234-8037035811. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > *From: *"NCSG EC" > > > *To: *"NCSG EC" > > > *Sent: *Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:27:12 PM > > > *Subject: *[NCSG-EC] Applications review > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > As follow-up of what we discussed at the last EC call, I am sending > here a > > > summary of what was proposed: > > > - all EC members should have access now to the membership system. > Please > > > let me know Tapani if you are facing any access issues. > > > - all EC members should review the individual and organizational > > > applications in the system. Let us know if you have any questions > about > > > using the system. > > > - Review will be conducted till Seattle meeting > > > - Any application which has no objection or flagged for follow-up will > be > > > considered as approved . Email to be sent in order to inform the new > member > > > about the application result, adding the NCSG mailing list and > announcement > > > sent to NCSG list. Then the new members' names will be sent to the > > > corresponding constituencies > > > - EC members will have the meeting in Seattle F2F and provide RP to > Wale, > > > will discuss the applications flagged for concern and follow-up. EC > will > > > decide on the follow-up and reach the applicants. The goal is to > finish all > > > application reviews and decisions by the end of March if possible. Per > > > operating procedure, applicants should reply within one month of EC > inquiry. > > > - After working on that backlog, we will have a regular review of > > > applicants , expecting a peak after the Seattle meeting. > > > > > > as reminder here the NCSG charter and relevant operating procedure: > > > - https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Charter > > > - > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures > > > > > > > > > As shared, we are also reviewing the operating procedures and make > > > suggestions with regard to adding timeframe etc. > > > > > > Let me know if you have any comments/questions. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Rafik > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > NCSG-EC mailing list > > > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > > > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > > > > > > > > -- > Tapani Tarvainen > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 17:08:29 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:08:29 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Mili, Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani escreveu: > Wed and Thur next week are better for me. > > -- > With gratitude > *Mili Semlani* > LinkedIn : community building > for new media > Instagram : evocative travel > stories and mind musings > > > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >> , how about you two? >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >> >>> Hey Pedro, >>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>> >>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>> >>> >>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>> >>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>> Version: 3.1 >>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+ >>> PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de Perdig?o >>> Lana escribi?: >>> >>> >>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for others in >>> this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>> >>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , and >>> others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss the >>> Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but traveling >>> Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>> >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did a >>> quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the previous >>> forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the speakers >>> from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can secure their >>> presence. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would >>> like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be >>> done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>> >>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least one >>> person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the >>> Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>> >>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The >>> more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>> >>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an >>> Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> >>> Andrea >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Andrea, >>> >>> >>> >>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma >>> and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could >>> be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> >>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>> , >>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>> >>> Researcher >>> >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>> , >>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>> >>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>> , >>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>> >>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>> >>> >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>> >>> Hello Pedro, >>> >>> >>> >>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda for >>> ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you would >>> like me to send this to? >>> >>> >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>> [docs.google.com] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> *Andrea Glandon* >>> >>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>> >>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>> >>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Fri Feb 21 17:23:27 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:23:27 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] ICANN82 NCSG EC Signup Room Message-ID: <1a8eebcf896146228b821f0daf19ab6b@icann.org> Room will be added later. This Zoom will be available for Wale to join. https://icann.zoom.us/j/91409019340?pwd=YXNZMUZoSWR6Zk9hdnhsdDU5aFF3QT09 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 1534 bytes Desc: not available URL: From compsoftnet at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 15:57:28 2025 From: compsoftnet at gmail.com (Akinremi Peter Taiwo) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:57:28 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [NCSG-PC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Rafik. I am referring to muscat meeting ++ Agreed that people need to proposed something that would lead to concrete outcome. And I appreciate clarifying the essence of the meeting or engagement to build stronger ties which is not only limited to board seat 14. I believe your chairing with csg can drive expected outcomes. Best regards *Taiwo Peter Akinremi* ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- - *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com ___________________________________________ On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 6:28?AM Rafik Dammak wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for the feedback. > I think for the outcomes is really up to us and based on discussion. > People need to propose and lead to concrete outcomes. The agenda is only a > vehicle to structure and facilitate that purpose but cannot guarantee the > results. CSG lead asked us what we expect as outcome from the topics > proposed from our side. I believe some topics have clear expected outcome > either a follow-up activity to be actionned or planning like for board seat > 14. Anyway, I can emphasize to CSG lead that we want concrete outcomes. > Building better relation with CSG is one of the goal of those meetings and > that is why we want to ensure that they are scheduled and planned > accordingly. It is also the space to work with them on common goals and > that require listening and discuss in first place. > > This meeting is not day 0 but session in saturday which can be seen as > first day of meeting at least for those from GNSO . But if you are meaning > the one envisioned for Muscat meeting then yes there will be more > preparation before that of course. Again, planning need everyone > participation and input. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, 20:11 Akinremi Peter Taiwo > wrote: > >> Thanks Rafik for the excellent sharing. >> >> The agenda looks good. >> >> What I am a bit worried about is for the meeting to generate a concrete >> outcome. Most times csg folks just discuss and is difficult to grasp what >> is it they wanted to achieve. The zero day is going to demand extra time >> from our dedicated members if we don?t know why it is importance to us >> except is to keep both SG relationships intact and inform which mostly >> isn?t the case when we meet. >> >> Best regards >> >> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi* >> ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- >> *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo >> *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com >> ___________________________________________ >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 7:56?PM Rafik Dammak >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please find attached the slides deck with the draft agenda for the NCPH >>> meeting. Let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions or if you want >>> to lead one of the topics. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> >>> Le jeu. 20 f?vr. 2025 ? 11:59, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : >>> >>>> Sometimes I make stupid questions, but better safe than sorry hehe >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador ( >>>> GEDAI/UFPR ) >>>> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), >>>> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> e CC Brasil . >>>> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida >>>> por engano, favor responder informando o erro. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 20:57, Rafik Dammak < >>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them >>>>> with GAC. >>>>> If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :) >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Rafik, >>>>>> >>>>>> As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on >>>>>> our side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and >>>>>> is deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very >>>>>> fruitful to have this discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate >>>>>> session only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Rafik, all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of >>>>>>> an explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important >>>>>>> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public >>>>>>> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program >>>>>>> Handbook >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we >>>>>>> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of >>>>>>> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the >>>>>>> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would >>>>>>> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >>>>>>>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any >>>>>>>> material about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with >>>>>>>> them and to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh >>>>>>>> badii @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>> do you have anything we can share >>>>>>>> or if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak >>>>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> some updates to share >>>>>>>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>>>>>>>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>>>>>>>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>>>>>>>> - WSIS + 20 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board >>>>>>>>> seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>>>>>>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>>>>>>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we >>>>>>>>> discussed previously with them >>>>>>>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views >>>>>>>>> and ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>>>>>>>> let me know if you agree with this list >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send >>>>>>>>> to the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>>>>>>>> Applicant Support >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> any comment or question for the rest? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak >>>>>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, >>>>>>>>>> CSG, ALAC and GAC, the current status is: >>>>>>>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we >>>>>>>>>> shared: membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and >>>>>>>>>> plan. They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>>>>>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant >>>>>>>>>> support, ethics policy and community participant code, >>>>>>>>>> continuous improvement program) with ALAC waiting for their >>>>>>>>>> comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>>>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>>>>>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>>>>>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this >>>>>>>>>> initial topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any >>>>>>>>>> topic from their side yet. >>>>>>>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>>>>>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>>>>>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>>>>>>>> HRIA on DNS >>>>>>>>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>>>>>>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs >>>>>>>>>> and how much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your >>>>>>>>>> thoughts and which we should pick up. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC >>>>>>>>>> chair Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that >>>>>>>>>> on due time. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who >>>>>>>>>> can be the lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and >>>>>>>>>> Michaela can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for >>>>>>>>>> continuous improvement. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited >>>>>>>>>> the new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot >>>>>>>>>> meet him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>>>>>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>>>>>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG >>>>>>>>>> issue forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>>>> can you share more about the >>>>>>>>>> selected topic and agenda? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-PC mailing list >>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fr.namra at gmail.com Fri Feb 21 17:41:17 2025 From: fr.namra at gmail.com (Namra Naseer) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:41:17 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi all, Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera even then. This is for Saturday. Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me know I might be able to manage those as well. On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mili, > > Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda next > week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani > escreveu: > >> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >> >> -- >> With gratitude >> *Mili Semlani* >> LinkedIn : community building >> for new media >> Instagram : evocative travel >> stories and mind musings >> >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>> , how about you two? >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hey Pedro, >>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>> >>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>> >>>> >>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>> >>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>> Version: 3.1 >>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- >>>> Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>> >>>> >>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for others >>>> in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>> >>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , and >>>> others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss the >>>> Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but traveling >>>> Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Pedro, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did a >>>> quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the previous >>>> forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the speakers >>>> from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can secure their >>>> presence. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Rafik >>>> >>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would >>>> like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be >>>> done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>> >>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least >>>> one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the >>>> Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>> >>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The >>>> more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>> >>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an >>>> Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Kind Regards, >>>> >>>> Andrea >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Andrea, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma >>>> and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could >>>> be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> >>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>> , >>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>> >>>> Researcher >>>> >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>> , >>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>> >>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>> , >>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>> >>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>> >>>> >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>> >>>> Hello Pedro, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda >>>> for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you >>>> would like me to send this to? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>> [docs.google.com] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>> >>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>> >>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>> >>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>> >>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Sat Feb 22 00:23:10 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:23:10 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Recording & attendance NCSG- EC call 17 February 2025 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <09572046-09DB-4A55-9182-99AC13643AFE@icann.org> Hello all, Please find below the recordings from the last NCSG EC meeting. Also attached are the notes/Ais from the meeting. Thanks! Kind Regards, Andrea From: Nathalie Peregrine Date: Monday, February 17, 2025 at 08:59 To: "ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is" Cc: Andrea Glandon , Daniel Gluck Subject: Recording & attendance NCSG- EC call 17 February 2025 Dear NCSG EC members, Please find below the recording and attendance of the NCSG EC call held today on the 17 February 2025 at 13:00 UTC Attendees: Tapani Tarvainen, Rafik Dammak, Pedro de Perdigao Lana, Amin Hacha, Adedokum Adewale, ICANN org: Nathalie Peregrine Audio Replay Zoom replay You may also find the information here Thank you! Nathalie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCSG EC NOTES 17Feb2025.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 150012 bytes Desc: NCSG EC NOTES 17Feb2025.pdf URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Sat Feb 22 03:39:01 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:39:01 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, The CSG chair brought the proposal to discuss board composition and having 2 seats from each house, meaning NCSG and CSG can select their own board member. The topic will be discussed under the board seat 14 agenda item. I responded that I think something we can discuss and we raised previously. More than agreeing or not on the idea, the question is how to proceed and advocate this effectively knowing there will be a certain opposition. Best, Rafik Le ven. 21 f?vr. 2025 ? 09:55, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi all, > > Please find attached the slides deck with the draft agenda for the NCPH > meeting. Let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions or if you want > to lead one of the topics. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > Le jeu. 20 f?vr. 2025 ? 11:59, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a ?crit : > >> Sometimes I make stupid questions, but better safe than sorry hehe >> >> Thanks! >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 , Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR >> ) >> Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra), >> Coordena??o/Diretoria/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> e CC Brasil . >> Essa mensagem ? restrita ao remetente e destinat?rio(s). Se recebida por >> engano, favor responder informando o erro. >> >> >> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 20:57, Rafik Dammak < >> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >> >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> Thanks for the material, let me check and see if we can share them with >>> GAC. >>> If we meet with CSG, it means de facto a NCPH meeting :) >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rafik >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 00:48 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Rafik, >>>> >>>> As a follow-up, I'm not sure if we will be able to have someone on our >>>> side who was involved with the SubPro/New gTLDs from the beginning and is >>>> deeply knowledgeable on the subject on this day, so it may not be very >>>> fruitful to have this discussion. >>>> >>>> (Btw, I may have confused myself a bit - are we having a separate >>>> session only with the CSG, or are we talking about the NCPH session here?) >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 22:34, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Hi Rafik, all, >>>>> >>>>> We do have slides prepared by multiple members of NCSG, but more of an >>>>> explanation of the ASP handbook. They do, however, have some important >>>>> commentaries about gaps and risks among them. We also have the Public >>>>> Comment that Bolu led re: Review of the Draft Applicant Support Program >>>>> Handbook >>>>> >>>>> Besides those who are focused on the ASP, we have public comments we >>>>> elaborated collectively to the Second Proceeding and Third Proceeding of >>>>> the Next Round of AGB, which are useful for a potential discussion with the >>>>> CSG about the Next Round (if others feel that there are topics that would >>>>> benefit from a conversation with the CSG in this area) >>>>> >>>>> I am sending those four documents attached. I hope they are helpful. >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em ter., 18 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:02, Rafik Dammak < >>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> a reminder if you have any comments on the draft agenda. >>>>>> On the other hand, we got a request from GAC if we have any material >>>>>> about HRIA on DNS and gTLD Applicant Support we want to share with them and >>>>>> to be added to the briefing for GAC members. @farzaneh badii >>>>>> @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>> do you have anything we can share >>>>>> or if we can prepare something quickly based on previous work >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeu. 13 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:09, Rafik Dammak >>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> some updates to share >>>>>>> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities >>>>>>> - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH >>>>>>> - Regular quarterly house meetings >>>>>>> - WSIS + 20 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition we proposed those: membership system follow-up, board >>>>>>> seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14 >>>>>>> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then. >>>>>>> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed >>>>>>> previously with them >>>>>>> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views >>>>>>> and ask how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead. >>>>>>> let me know if you agree with this list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to >>>>>>> the GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda: HRIA on DNS and gTLD >>>>>>> Applicant Support >>>>>>> >>>>>>> any comment or question for the rest? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak >>>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, >>>>>>>> ALAC and GAC, the current status is: >>>>>>>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >>>>>>>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >>>>>>>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >>>>>>>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant >>>>>>>> support, ethics policy and community participant code, continuous >>>>>>>> improvement program) with ALAC waiting for their comments and >>>>>>>> Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >>>>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >>>>>>>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >>>>>>>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this >>>>>>>> initial topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic >>>>>>>> from their side yet. >>>>>>>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >>>>>>>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >>>>>>>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >>>>>>>> HRIA on DNS >>>>>>>> gTLD Applicant Support >>>>>>>> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and >>>>>>>> how much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts >>>>>>>> and which we should pick up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC >>>>>>>> chair Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that >>>>>>>> on due time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the >>>>>>>> lead for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela >>>>>>>> can handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous >>>>>>>> improvement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited >>>>>>>> the new policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot >>>>>>>> meet him in Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >>>>>>>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >>>>>>>> can share from his side. For the NCSG >>>>>>>> issue forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>> can you share more about the >>>>>>>> selected topic and agenda? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So please give me your input about the points above. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From milisemlani at gmail.com Sat Feb 22 10:41:01 2025 From: milisemlani at gmail.com (Mili Semlani) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 11:41:01 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up sharing my thoughts below: 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the speakers asap and block their availability. 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with other tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although I think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, online moderation during the session. Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for the session. -- With gratitude *Mili Semlani* LinkedIn : community building for new media Instagram : evocative travel stories and mind musings On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: > Hi all, > > Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I can > do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera even > then. This is for Saturday. > > Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me know I > might be able to manage those as well. > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Mili, >> >> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani >> escreveu: >> >>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>> >>> -- >>> With gratitude >>> *Mili Semlani* >>> LinkedIn : community building >>> for new media >>> Instagram : evocative travel >>> stories and mind musings >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>> , how about you two? >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> >>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>> >>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>> >>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- >>>>> Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for others >>>>> in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>> >>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , and >>>>> others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss the >>>>> Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but traveling >>>>> Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did >>>>> a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>> secure their presence. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Rafik >>>>> >>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and would >>>>> like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to be >>>>> done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>> >>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least >>>>> one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the >>>>> Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>> >>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! The >>>>> more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>> >>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in an >>>>> Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Andrea >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, Narma >>>>> and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and could >>>>> be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> >>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>> , >>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>> >>>>> Researcher >>>>> >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>> , >>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>> >>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>> , >>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>> >>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda >>>>> for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you >>>>> would like me to send this to? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>> >>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>> >>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>> >>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>> >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Mon Feb 24 17:55:07 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:55:07 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Joint Session: At-Large and NCSG Message-ID: <987525c665fa433ba4580988f85d9038@icann.org> At-Large will be hosting NCSG in room Regency A on Sunday, 09 March at 15:00 local time. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 1608 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Mon Feb 24 20:32:04 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:32:04 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be super helpful already. Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani escreveu: > Hi > Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up sharing > my thoughts below: > > 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the speakers > asap and block their availability. > 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with other > tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although I > think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and > experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the > discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, > online moderation during the session. > > Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for the > session. > > -- > With gratitude > *Mili Semlani* > LinkedIn : community building > for new media > Instagram : evocative travel > stories and mind musings > > > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I can >> do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera even >> then. This is for Saturday. >> >> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me know I >> might be able to manage those as well. >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mili, >>> >>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >>> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With gratitude >>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>> LinkedIn : community >>>> building for new media >>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>> stories and mind musings >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>> , how about you two? >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>> >>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>> >>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- >>>>>> Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for others >>>>>> in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>> >>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I did >>>>>> a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Rafik >>>>>> >>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least >>>>>> one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the >>>>>> Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! >>>>>> The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>> >>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in >>>>>> an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrea >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> >>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>> , >>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>> >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>> , >>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>> >>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>> , >>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>> >>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda >>>>>> for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you >>>>>> would like me to send this to? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>> >>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>> >>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>> >>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fr.namra at gmail.com Mon Feb 24 20:39:27 2025 From: fr.namra at gmail.com (Namra Naseer) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:39:27 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I can do it thursday! Also, I suggest using a When2meet . It will make it easier to find a time that works for all! On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:32?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be super > helpful already. > > Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani > escreveu: > >> Hi >> Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up sharing >> my thoughts below: >> >> 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the speakers >> asap and block their availability. >> 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with other >> tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although I >> think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and >> experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the >> discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, >> online moderation during the session. >> >> Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for the >> session. >> >> -- >> With gratitude >> *Mili Semlani* >> LinkedIn : community building >> for new media >> Instagram : evocative travel >> stories and mind musings >> >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I >>> can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera >>> even then. This is for Saturday. >>> >>> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me know >>> I might be able to manage those as well. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Mili, >>>> >>>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >>>> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With gratitude >>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>> building for new media >>>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>>> stories and mind musings >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>>> , how about you two? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ >>>>>>> PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for >>>>>>> others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I >>>>>>> did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least >>>>>>> one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the >>>>>>> Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! >>>>>>> The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in >>>>>>> an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>>> , >>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>>> , >>>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>>> , >>>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda >>>>>>> for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you >>>>>>> would like me to send this to? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Mon Feb 24 20:49:08 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:49:08 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Thursday 20h30 it is! I'll start reaching out to people so we can finish everything by this date. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em seg., 24 de fev. de 2025 ?s 15:40, Namra Naseer escreveu: > I can do it thursday! Also, I suggest using a When2meet > . It will make it easier to find a time that > works for all! > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:32?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be super >> helpful already. >> >> Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani >> escreveu: >> >>> Hi >>> Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up sharing >>> my thoughts below: >>> >>> 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the speakers >>> asap and block their availability. >>> 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with other >>> tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although I >>> think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and >>> experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the >>> discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, >>> online moderation during the session. >>> >>> Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for the >>> session. >>> >>> -- >>> With gratitude >>> *Mili Semlani* >>> LinkedIn : community building >>> for new media >>> Instagram : evocative travel >>> stories and mind musings >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I >>>> can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera >>>> even then. This is for Saturday. >>>> >>>> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me know >>>> I might be able to manage those as well. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Mili, >>>>> >>>>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >>>>> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> With gratitude >>>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>>> building for new media >>>>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>>>> stories and mind musings >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>>>> , how about you two? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ >>>>>>>> PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for >>>>>>>> others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I >>>>>>>> did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at >>>>>>>> least one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead >>>>>>>> so the Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! >>>>>>>> The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in >>>>>>>> an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum >>>>>>>> agenda for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else >>>>>>>> you would like me to send this to? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wisdom.dk at gmail.com Tue Feb 25 01:35:25 2025 From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:35:25 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: That will be great *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) President & CEO Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. agdic.info Tel: +233 20 812 8851 Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee Member ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Specialization: E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, Event Planning & Management, On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:49?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Thursday 20h30 it is! > > I'll start reaching out to people so we can finish everything by this date. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em seg., 24 de fev. de 2025 ?s 15:40, Namra Naseer > escreveu: > >> I can do it thursday! Also, I suggest using a When2meet >> . It will make it easier to find a time that >> works for all! >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:32?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be >>> super helpful already. >>> >>> Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani < >>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up >>>> sharing my thoughts below: >>>> >>>> 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the >>>> speakers asap and block their availability. >>>> 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with >>>> other tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although >>>> I think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and >>>> experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the >>>> discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, >>>> online moderation during the session. >>>> >>>> Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for >>>> the session. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With gratitude >>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>> LinkedIn : community >>>> building for new media >>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>> stories and mind musings >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I >>>>> can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera >>>>> even then. This is for Saturday. >>>>> >>>>> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me >>>>> know I might be able to manage those as well. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Mili, >>>>>> >>>>>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >>>>>> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>>>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> With gratitude >>>>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>>>> building for new media >>>>>>> Instagram : evocative >>>>>>> travel stories and mind musings >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>> , how about you two? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ >>>>>>>>> PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for >>>>>>>>> others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I >>>>>>>>> did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at >>>>>>>>> least one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead >>>>>>>>> so the Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! >>>>>>>>> The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down >>>>>>>>> in an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum >>>>>>>>> agenda for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else >>>>>>>>> you would like me to send this to? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wisdom.dk at gmail.com Tue Feb 25 01:36:19 2025 From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:36:19 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Sure. *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) President & CEO Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. agdic.info Tel: +233 20 812 8851 Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee Member ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Specialization: E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, Event Planning & Management, On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:32?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be super > helpful already. > > Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani > escreveu: > >> Hi >> Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up sharing >> my thoughts below: >> >> 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the speakers >> asap and block their availability. >> 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with other >> tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although I >> think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and >> experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the >> discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, >> online moderation during the session. >> >> Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for the >> session. >> >> -- >> With gratitude >> *Mili Semlani* >> LinkedIn : community building >> for new media >> Instagram : evocative travel >> stories and mind musings >> >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I >>> can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera >>> even then. This is for Saturday. >>> >>> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me know >>> I might be able to manage those as well. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Mili, >>>> >>>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >>>> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With gratitude >>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>> building for new media >>>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>>> stories and mind musings >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>>> , how about you two? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ >>>>>>> PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for >>>>>>> others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I >>>>>>> did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at least >>>>>>> one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead so the >>>>>>> Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! >>>>>>> The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in >>>>>>> an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>>> , >>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>>> , >>>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>>> , >>>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum agenda >>>>>>> for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else you >>>>>>> would like me to send this to? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Tue Feb 25 09:25:18 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:25:18 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Review of applications for Prague travel slot Message-ID: hi all, Deadline just passed and we received 3 applications for the travel slot to Prague meeting: - Peterking Quaye - Carlos Dionisio Aguirre - Pedro de Perdig?o Lana @Andrea Glandon Please double check if I missed any applications. note: Pedro won't be involved in the decision making and selection process. we might need to discuss offlist the selection. sharing below and attaching motivation statements. Please review them . Best, Rafik ======================================================= * PeterKing Quaye Dear Rafik, I am excited to express my interest in attending the ICANN meeting in Prague as a newcomer eager to deepen my involvement in the NCSG and broader ICANN community. This opportunity would mark a significant step in my journey toward actively contributing to policy discussions and advocating for the interests of non-commercial stakeholders. *Commitment to ICANN and NCSG Engagement* While I am at the early stages of my ICANN participation, I am 3 times ICANN Fellow , been engage in the community I have been actively following key policy discussions, attending NCSG sessions, and engaging with PDPs to understand the crucial role of non-commercial voices in internet governance. My background in digital policy and advocacy has fueled my passion for contributing to ICANN?s multistakeholder processes, particularly in areas related to digital rights, cybersecurity, and internet access. *Why This Opportunity Matters* Attending this meeting in person would allow me to: - Gain firsthand experience in ICANN?s decision-making processes. - Engage directly with key stakeholders and mentors within the NCSG. - Contribute fresh perspectives while strengthening my ability to represent non-commercial interests effectively. *Commitment to Active Participation* If selected, I fully commit to: - Attending all relevant NCSG, GNSO Council, and PDP sessions. - Preparing by reviewing key governance documents and ongoing policy discussions. - Actively engaging with the community to build relationships and contribute to discussions. I am eager to take this step toward deeper involvement in ICANN and to grow as a dedicated advocate for non-commercial stakeholders. Thank you for considering my application?I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute and learn. ================================== * Pedro de Perdigao Lana Hi Rafik, Andrea, I'm interested in applying for the travel slot of the GNSO Councillor who cannot attend ICANN83. *Considering I am part of the NCSG EC, I ask to be removed from the deliberations regarding this position from the beginning, so others do not feel uncomfortable to present their position if they believe another candidate is more suitable than I am.* I want to attend the meeting as part of the continuous work that I've been developing for the last few months (I started being more active in ICANN and the NCSG from 2023 on, in ICANN76, initially as a NextGen ), i*ncluding as an Executive Committee member for the NCUC (since September 2023) and NCSG (since July 2024). *I have been particularly active in the NCUC EC, as registered in our tracking document , and I'm trying to help as much as I can in the NCSG EC as well. I have also gone to ICANN79 as a fellow and then to ICANN81 as a member of the NCSG EC, *having never used the NCUC EC slot in both my terms* (2023-2024 and now 2024-2025), giving way to other EC members who could benefit more from this opportunity in those moments. The effort mentioned above involves not only administrative work (such as helping to organize multiple NCUC Issue Forums), where I try to promote a few changes that I believe will be beneficial to the non-commercial community; but also policy work related particularly to (i) Rights Protection Mechanisms (*I'm an active member of the RPM IRT * and my almost full attendance to the meetings of this team can be checked here ) and the (ii) Next Round of new gTLDs (highlighting the ASP, *which was the subject of our NCUC Issue Forum in ICANN81*), while also participating (less intensively) in a few other policy topics, such as privacy matters. I'm part of (and try to always contribute to, speaking or through chat) most of the recent Policy Committee meetings, something that can be proven by attendance registrations and recordings . I try to follow most GNSO meetings that are included in the agenda topics that I'm working with, so I am becoming more familiar, during the last few months, with the functioning of the Council. I have also recently become a member of the GNSO Standing Selection Committee . *Tomslin gently provided me with a letter of support as well, attached, if I go as an alternate to the GNSO Councilor.* My time at ICANN meetings is directed to the diverse types of work listed above, trying to go beyond the basic obligations of the positions that I'm currently on (*for example, in ICANN79 and ICANN81 I was in conversations with PIR staff so we could develop an NCSG Policy Fellowship funded by this entity*). This is something that I also plan to do in ICANN83, especially because many of these demands and plans that I have, aiming to improve the non-commercial strength within ICANN, are continuing efforts. Being onsite helps a lot to get things going faster and more effectively, particularly when it depends on connecting with new people and being recognized by them as someone trustworthy and capable of completing my assigned tasks. Finally, I also intend to *start a dialogue and capacity building among the non-commercial community on the incoming UDRP review*, which will be a big subject for the next few months and my main subject of interest since I started following ICANN, *and advance a few extra steps on the work we are doing regarding the ASP and the SubPro/Next Round*. As a side note, I believe it is important to be onsite at the meeting because my day-to-day work in a ccTLD - I joined NIC.br after starting my activities in ICANN and after assuming my NCUC EC position, so I don't represent this organization in ICANN in any manner - allows me to dedicate my time fully to ICANN meetings I'm participating in, even on non-ccTLD related work (as long as they are not funding, which is the case regarding my ICANN/GNSO commitments and roles). This means that, when traveling to the Meetings, I can focus only on NCSG activities, something that I cannot do while participating online because of a normally quite heavy workload. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Motivation Statement.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 15889 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Recommendation Letter for Pedro de Perdig?o Lana for NCSG ICANN83 Travel Slot.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 50839 bytes Desc: not available URL: From andrea.glandon at icann.org Tue Feb 25 15:58:03 2025 From: andrea.glandon at icann.org (Andrea Glandon) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:58:03 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Review of applications for Prague travel slot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello! I do not see any other applications. Kind Regards, Andrea From: Rafik Dammak Date: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 at 01:28 To: NCSG EC , Andrea Glandon Subject: [Ext] Review of applications for Prague travel slot hi all, Deadline just passed and we received 3 applications for the travel slot to Prague meeting: - Peterking Quaye - Carlos Dionisio Aguirre - Pedro de Perdig?o Lana @Andrea Glandon Please double check if I missed any applications. note: Pedro won't be involved in the decision making and selection process. we might need to discuss offlist the selection. sharing below and attaching motivation statements. Please review them . Best, Rafik ======================================================= * PeterKing Quaye Dear Rafik, I am excited to express my interest in attending the ICANN meeting in Prague as a newcomer eager to deepen my involvement in the NCSG and broader ICANN community. This opportunity would mark a significant step in my journey toward actively contributing to policy discussions and advocating for the interests of non-commercial stakeholders. Commitment to ICANN and NCSG Engagement While I am at the early stages of my ICANN participation, I am 3 times ICANN Fellow , been engage in the community I have been actively following key policy discussions, attending NCSG sessions, and engaging with PDPs to understand the crucial role of non-commercial voices in internet governance. My background in digital policy and advocacy has fueled my passion for contributing to ICANN?s multistakeholder processes, particularly in areas related to digital rights, cybersecurity, and internet access. Why This Opportunity Matters Attending this meeting in person would allow me to: ? Gain firsthand experience in ICANN?s decision-making processes. ? Engage directly with key stakeholders and mentors within the NCSG. ? Contribute fresh perspectives while strengthening my ability to represent non-commercial interests effectively. Commitment to Active Participation If selected, I fully commit to: ? Attending all relevant NCSG, GNSO Council, and PDP sessions. ? Preparing by reviewing key governance documents and ongoing policy discussions. ? Actively engaging with the community to build relationships and contribute to discussions. I am eager to take this step toward deeper involvement in ICANN and to grow as a dedicated advocate for non-commercial stakeholders. Thank you for considering my application?I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute and learn. ================================== * Pedro de Perdigao Lana Hi Rafik, Andrea, I'm interested in applying for the travel slot of the GNSO Councillor who cannot attend ICANN83. Considering I am part of the NCSG EC, I ask to be removed from the deliberations regarding this position from the beginning, so others do not feel uncomfortable to present their position if they believe another candidate is more suitable than I am. I want to attend the meeting as part of the continuous work that I've been developing for the last few months (I started being more active in ICANN and the NCSG from 2023 on, in ICANN76, initially as a NextGen), including as an Executive Committee member for the NCUC (since September 2023) and NCSG (since July 2024). I have been particularly active in the NCUC EC, as registered in our tracking document, and I'm trying to help as much as I can in the NCSG EC as well. I have also gone to ICANN79 as a fellow and then to ICANN81 as a member of the NCSG EC, having never used the NCUC EC slot in both my terms (2023-2024 and now 2024-2025), giving way to other EC members who could benefit more from this opportunity in those moments. The effort mentioned above involves not only administrative work (such as helping to organize multiple NCUC Issue Forums), where I try to promote a few changes that I believe will be beneficial to the non-commercial community; but also policy work related particularly to (i) Rights Protection Mechanisms (I'm an active member of the RPM IRT and my almost full attendance to the meetings of this team can be checked here) and the (ii) Next Round of new gTLDs (highlighting the ASP, which was the subject of our NCUC Issue Forum in ICANN81), while also participating (less intensively) in a few other policy topics, such as privacy matters. I'm part of (and try to always contribute to, speaking or through chat) most of the recent Policy Committee meetings, something that can be proven by attendance registrations and recordings. I try to follow most GNSO meetings that are included in the agenda topics that I'm working with, so I am becoming more familiar, during the last few months, with the functioning of the Council. I have also recently become a member of the GNSO Standing Selection Committee. Tomslin gently provided me with a letter of support as well, attached, if I go as an alternate to the GNSO Councilor. My time at ICANN meetings is directed to the diverse types of work listed above, trying to go beyond the basic obligations of the positions that I'm currently on (for example, in ICANN79 and ICANN81 I was in conversations with PIR staff so we could develop an NCSG Policy Fellowship [docs.google.com] funded by this entity). This is something that I also plan to do in ICANN83, especially because many of these demands and plans that I have, aiming to improve the non-commercial strength within ICANN, are continuing efforts. Being onsite helps a lot to get things going faster and more effectively, particularly when it depends on connecting with new people and being recognized by them as someone trustworthy and capable of completing my assigned tasks. Finally, I also intend to start a dialogue and capacity building among the non-commercial community on the incoming UDRP review, which will be a big subject for the next few months and my main subject of interest since I started following ICANN, and advance a few extra steps on the work we are doing regarding the ASP and the SubPro/Next Round. As a side note, I believe it is important to be onsite at the meeting because my day-to-day work in a ccTLD - I joined NIC.br after starting my activities in ICANN and after assuming my NCUC EC position, so I don't represent this organization in ICANN in any manner - allows me to dedicate my time fully to ICANN meetings I'm participating in, even on non-ccTLD related work (as long as they are not funding, which is the case regarding my ICANN/GNSO commitments and roles). This means that, when traveling to the Meetings, I can focus only on NCSG activities, something that I cannot do while participating online because of a normally quite heavy workload. Cordially, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fr.namra at gmail.com Wed Feb 26 08:08:17 2025 From: fr.namra at gmail.com (Namra Naseer) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 01:08:17 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Thanks, Pedro, for taking the initiative on this! I?d be happy to cover the portion you suggested at the forum. If there are any resources available to help me gather that information, I?d appreciate your help finding them. I also have some documents from the PTP pilot (that covered the 2012 round), which I?ll review as well. On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:36?PM Wisdom Donkor wrote: > Sure. > > *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) > President & CEO > Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa > Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) > P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. > agdic.info > Tel: +233 20 812 8851 > Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk > > _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group > Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous > Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association > Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF > Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee > Member > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________ > Specialization: > E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet > Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber > Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name > Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, > Event Planning & Management, > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:32?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < > pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be super >> helpful already. >> >> Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >> Researcher >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >> (ICANN), IODA >> and CC Brasil >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by >> mistake, please reply informing it. >> >> >> Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani >> escreveu: >> >>> Hi >>> Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up sharing >>> my thoughts below: >>> >>> 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the speakers >>> asap and block their availability. >>> 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with other >>> tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although I >>> think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and >>> experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the >>> discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, >>> online moderation during the session. >>> >>> Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for the >>> session. >>> >>> -- >>> With gratitude >>> *Mili Semlani* >>> LinkedIn : community building >>> for new media >>> Instagram : evocative travel >>> stories and mind musings >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I >>>> can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera >>>> even then. This is for Saturday. >>>> >>>> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me know >>>> I might be able to manage those as well. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Mili, >>>>> >>>>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >>>>> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>>>> >>>>> Cordially, >>>>> >>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>> Researcher >>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>> (ICANN), >>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>> >>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> With gratitude >>>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>>> building for new media >>>>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>>>> stories and mind musings >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>>>> , how about you two? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ >>>>>>>> PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for >>>>>>>> others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I >>>>>>>> did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at >>>>>>>> least one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead >>>>>>>> so the Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! >>>>>>>> The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down in >>>>>>>> an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum >>>>>>>> agenda for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else >>>>>>>> you would like me to send this to? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wale at nog.ng Wed Feb 26 17:35:52 2025 From: wale at nog.ng (Wale Adedokun) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:35:52 +0100 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Review of applications for Prague travel slot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Rafik, When do you want us to discuss this considering that the deadline is passed already? Wale On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:25?AM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > hi all, > > Deadline just passed and we received 3 applications for the travel slot to > Prague meeting: > - Peterking Quaye > - Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > - Pedro de Perdig?o Lana > > @Andrea Glandon Please double check if I > missed any applications. > > note: Pedro won't be involved in the decision making and selection > process. we might need to discuss offlist the selection. > > sharing below and attaching motivation statements. Please review them . > > Best, > > Rafik > > ======================================================= > * PeterKing Quaye > > Dear Rafik, > > I am excited to express my interest in attending the ICANN meeting in > Prague as a newcomer eager to deepen my involvement in the NCSG and broader > ICANN community. This opportunity would mark a significant step in my > journey toward actively contributing to policy discussions and advocating > for the interests of non-commercial stakeholders. > *Commitment to ICANN and NCSG Engagement* > > While I am at the early stages of my ICANN participation, I am 3 times > ICANN Fellow , been engage in the community I have been actively following > key policy discussions, attending NCSG sessions, and engaging with PDPs to > understand the crucial role of non-commercial voices in internet > governance. My background in digital policy and advocacy has fueled my > passion for contributing to ICANN?s multistakeholder processes, > particularly in areas related to digital rights, cybersecurity, and > internet access. > *Why This Opportunity Matters* > > Attending this meeting in person would allow me to: > > - Gain firsthand experience in ICANN?s decision-making processes. > - Engage directly with key stakeholders and mentors within the NCSG. > - Contribute fresh perspectives while strengthening my ability to > represent non-commercial interests effectively. > > *Commitment to Active Participation* > > If selected, I fully commit to: > > - Attending all relevant NCSG, GNSO Council, and PDP sessions. > - Preparing by reviewing key governance documents and ongoing policy > discussions. > - Actively engaging with the community to build relationships and > contribute to discussions. > > I am eager to take this step toward deeper involvement in ICANN and to > grow as a dedicated advocate for non-commercial stakeholders. Thank you for > considering my application?I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to > contribute and learn. > > ================================== > > * Pedro de Perdigao Lana > Hi Rafik, Andrea, > > I'm interested in applying for the travel slot of the GNSO Councillor who > cannot attend ICANN83. *Considering I am part of the NCSG EC, I ask to be > removed from the deliberations regarding this position from the beginning, > so others do not feel uncomfortable to present their position if they > believe another candidate is more suitable than I am.* > > I want to attend the meeting as part of the continuous work that I've been > developing for the last few months (I started being more active in ICANN > and the NCSG from 2023 on, in ICANN76, initially as a NextGen), i*ncluding > as an Executive Committee member for the NCUC (since September 2023) and > NCSG (since July 2024). *I have been particularly active in the NCUC EC, > as registered in our tracking document > , > and I'm trying to help as much as I can in the NCSG EC as well. I have also > gone to ICANN79 as a fellow and then to ICANN81 as a member of the NCSG EC, *having > never used the NCUC EC slot in both my terms* (2023-2024 and now > 2024-2025), giving way to other EC members who could benefit more from this > opportunity in those moments. > > The effort mentioned above involves not only administrative work (such as > helping to organize multiple NCUC Issue Forums), where I try to promote a > few changes that I believe will be beneficial to the non-commercial > community; but also policy work related particularly to (i) Rights > Protection Mechanisms (*I'm an active member of the RPM IRT > * and my almost full > attendance to the meetings of this team can be checked here > ) and the (ii) Next > Round of new gTLDs (highlighting the ASP, *which was the subject of our > NCUC Issue Forum in ICANN81*), while also participating (less > intensively) in a few other policy topics, such as privacy matters. > > I'm part of (and try to always contribute to, speaking or through chat) > most of the recent Policy Committee meetings, something that can be proven > by attendance registrations and recordings > . > I try to follow most GNSO meetings that are included in the agenda topics > that I'm working with, so I am becoming more familiar, during the last few > months, with the functioning of the Council. I have also recently become > a member of the GNSO Standing Selection Committee > . > > *Tomslin gently provided me with a letter of support as well, attached, if > I go as an alternate to the GNSO Councilor.* > > My time at ICANN meetings is directed to the diverse types of work listed > above, trying to go beyond the basic obligations of the positions that I'm > currently on (*for example, in ICANN79 and ICANN81 I was in conversations > with PIR staff so we could develop an NCSG Policy Fellowship > funded > by this entity*). This is something that I also plan to do in ICANN83, > especially because many of these demands and plans that I have, aiming to > improve the non-commercial strength within ICANN, are continuing efforts. > Being onsite helps a lot to get things going faster and more effectively, > particularly when it depends on connecting with new people and being > recognized by them as someone trustworthy and capable of completing my > assigned tasks. Finally, I also intend to *start a dialogue and capacity > building among the non-commercial community on the incoming UDRP review*, > which will be a big subject for the next few months and my main subject of > interest since I started following ICANN, *and advance a few extra steps > on the work we are doing regarding the ASP and the SubPro/Next Round*. > > As a side note, I believe it is important to be onsite at the meeting > because my day-to-day work in a ccTLD - I joined NIC.br after starting my > activities in ICANN and after assuming my NCUC EC position, so I don't > represent this organization in ICANN in any manner - allows me to dedicate > my time fully to ICANN meetings I'm participating in, even on non-ccTLD > related work (as long as they are not funding, which is the case regarding > my ICANN/GNSO commitments and roles). This means that, when traveling to > the Meetings, I can focus only on NCSG activities, something that I cannot > do while participating online because of a normally quite heavy workload. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Wed Feb 26 22:19:41 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:19:41 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi everyone, I'm sorry. I confused myself with time zones, and I'll have another meeting exactly at this time. Can we postpone it to 21h30 UTC? I've just sent an invite to a Google Meet (through the ISOC Brasil account) call. Please let me know if you can't at this time. Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em qua., 26 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:08, Namra Naseer escreveu: > Thanks, Pedro, for taking the initiative on this! I?d be happy to cover > the portion you suggested at the forum. If there are any resources > available to help me gather that information, I?d appreciate your help > finding them. > > I also have some documents from the PTP pilot (that covered the 2012 > round), which I?ll review as well. > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:36?PM Wisdom Donkor wrote: > >> Sure. >> >> *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) >> President & CEO >> Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa >> Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) >> P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. >> agdic.info >> Tel: +233 20 812 8851 >> Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk >> >> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group >> Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous >> Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association >> Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF >> Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee >> Member >> >> ____________________________________________________________________________________________ >> Specialization: >> E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet >> Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber >> Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name >> Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, >> Event Planning & Management, >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:32?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be >>> super helpful already. >>> >>> Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani < >>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up >>>> sharing my thoughts below: >>>> >>>> 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the >>>> speakers asap and block their availability. >>>> 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with >>>> other tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although >>>> I think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and >>>> experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the >>>> discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, >>>> online moderation during the session. >>>> >>>> Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for >>>> the session. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With gratitude >>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>> LinkedIn : community >>>> building for new media >>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>> stories and mind musings >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I >>>>> can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera >>>>> even then. This is for Saturday. >>>>> >>>>> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me >>>>> know I might be able to manage those as well. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Mili, >>>>>> >>>>>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >>>>>> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>>>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> With gratitude >>>>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>>>> building for new media >>>>>>> Instagram : evocative >>>>>>> travel stories and mind musings >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>> , how about you two? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ >>>>>>>>> PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for >>>>>>>>> others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I >>>>>>>>> did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at >>>>>>>>> least one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead >>>>>>>>> so the Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! >>>>>>>>> The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down >>>>>>>>> in an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum >>>>>>>>> agenda for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else >>>>>>>>> you would like me to send this to? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Feb 27 14:36:59 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:36:59 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Review of applications for Prague travel slot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Wale, We will discuss this by email in separate thread. Deadline which passed is about the application not about the review. Best, Rafik On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, 00:36 Wale Adedokun wrote: > Hi Rafik, > When do you want us to discuss this considering that the deadline is > passed already? > > Wale > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:25?AM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> hi all, >> >> Deadline just passed and we received 3 applications for the travel slot >> to Prague meeting: >> - Peterking Quaye >> - Carlos Dionisio Aguirre >> - Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >> >> @Andrea Glandon Please double check if I >> missed any applications. >> >> note: Pedro won't be involved in the decision making and selection >> process. we might need to discuss offlist the selection. >> >> sharing below and attaching motivation statements. Please review them . >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> ======================================================= >> * PeterKing Quaye >> >> Dear Rafik, >> >> I am excited to express my interest in attending the ICANN meeting in >> Prague as a newcomer eager to deepen my involvement in the NCSG and broader >> ICANN community. This opportunity would mark a significant step in my >> journey toward actively contributing to policy discussions and advocating >> for the interests of non-commercial stakeholders. >> *Commitment to ICANN and NCSG Engagement* >> >> While I am at the early stages of my ICANN participation, I am 3 times >> ICANN Fellow , been engage in the community I have been actively following >> key policy discussions, attending NCSG sessions, and engaging with PDPs to >> understand the crucial role of non-commercial voices in internet >> governance. My background in digital policy and advocacy has fueled my >> passion for contributing to ICANN?s multistakeholder processes, >> particularly in areas related to digital rights, cybersecurity, and >> internet access. >> *Why This Opportunity Matters* >> >> Attending this meeting in person would allow me to: >> >> - Gain firsthand experience in ICANN?s decision-making processes. >> - Engage directly with key stakeholders and mentors within the NCSG. >> - Contribute fresh perspectives while strengthening my ability to >> represent non-commercial interests effectively. >> >> *Commitment to Active Participation* >> >> If selected, I fully commit to: >> >> - Attending all relevant NCSG, GNSO Council, and PDP sessions. >> - Preparing by reviewing key governance documents and ongoing policy >> discussions. >> - Actively engaging with the community to build relationships and >> contribute to discussions. >> >> I am eager to take this step toward deeper involvement in ICANN and to >> grow as a dedicated advocate for non-commercial stakeholders. Thank you for >> considering my application?I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to >> contribute and learn. >> >> ================================== >> >> * Pedro de Perdigao Lana >> Hi Rafik, Andrea, >> >> I'm interested in applying for the travel slot of the GNSO Councillor who >> cannot attend ICANN83. *Considering I am part of the NCSG EC, I ask to >> be removed from the deliberations regarding this position from the >> beginning, so others do not feel uncomfortable to present their position if >> they believe another candidate is more suitable than I am.* >> >> I want to attend the meeting as part of the continuous work that I've >> been developing for the last few months (I started being more active in >> ICANN and the NCSG from 2023 on, in ICANN76, initially as a NextGen), i*ncluding >> as an Executive Committee member for the NCUC (since September 2023) and >> NCSG (since July 2024). *I have been particularly active in the NCUC EC, >> as registered in our tracking document >> , >> and I'm trying to help as much as I can in the NCSG EC as well. I have also >> gone to ICANN79 as a fellow and then to ICANN81 as a member of the NCSG EC, *having >> never used the NCUC EC slot in both my terms* (2023-2024 and now >> 2024-2025), giving way to other EC members who could benefit more from this >> opportunity in those moments. >> >> The effort mentioned above involves not only administrative work (such as >> helping to organize multiple NCUC Issue Forums), where I try to promote a >> few changes that I believe will be beneficial to the non-commercial >> community; but also policy work related particularly to (i) Rights >> Protection Mechanisms (*I'm an active member of the RPM IRT >> * and my almost full >> attendance to the meetings of this team can be checked here >> ) and the (ii) Next >> Round of new gTLDs (highlighting the ASP, *which was the subject of our >> NCUC Issue Forum in ICANN81*), while also participating (less >> intensively) in a few other policy topics, such as privacy matters. >> >> I'm part of (and try to always contribute to, speaking or through chat) >> most of the recent Policy Committee meetings, something that can be proven >> by attendance registrations and recordings >> . >> I try to follow most GNSO meetings that are included in the agenda topics >> that I'm working with, so I am becoming more familiar, during the last few >> months, with the functioning of the Council. I have also recently become >> a member of the GNSO Standing Selection Committee >> . >> >> *Tomslin gently provided me with a letter of support as well, attached, >> if I go as an alternate to the GNSO Councilor.* >> >> My time at ICANN meetings is directed to the diverse types of work listed >> above, trying to go beyond the basic obligations of the positions that I'm >> currently on (*for example, in ICANN79 and ICANN81 I was in >> conversations with PIR staff so we could develop an NCSG Policy Fellowship >> funded >> by this entity*). This is something that I also plan to do in ICANN83, >> especially because many of these demands and plans that I have, aiming to >> improve the non-commercial strength within ICANN, are continuing efforts. >> Being onsite helps a lot to get things going faster and more effectively, >> particularly when it depends on connecting with new people and being >> recognized by them as someone trustworthy and capable of completing my >> assigned tasks. Finally, I also intend to *start a dialogue and capacity >> building among the non-commercial community on the incoming UDRP review*, >> which will be a big subject for the next few months and my main subject of >> interest since I started following ICANN, *and advance a few extra steps >> on the work we are doing regarding the ASP and the SubPro/Next Round*. >> >> As a side note, I believe it is important to be onsite at the meeting >> because my day-to-day work in a ccTLD - I joined NIC.br after starting my >> activities in ICANN and after assuming my NCUC EC position, so I don't >> represent this organization in ICANN in any manner - allows me to dedicate >> my time fully to ICANN meetings I'm participating in, even on non-ccTLD >> related work (as long as they are not funding, which is the case regarding >> my ICANN/GNSO commitments and roles). This means that, when traveling to >> the Meetings, I can focus only on NCSG activities, something that I cannot >> do while participating online because of a normally quite heavy workload. >> >> Cordially, >> >> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Thu Feb 27 15:03:01 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:03:01 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Follow up: Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: hi all, some updates about the "how to meet" proposal. it seems we will have to submit again. it can be an opportunity to elaborate more but it also indicates that reaching common ground might be challenging (and expectations to complete earlier unrealistic). I think there will be a session in ICANN82 about the proposal. Best, Rafik ---------- Forwarded message --------- De : DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> Date: mer. 26 f?vr. 2025 ? 23:57 Subject: [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Follow up: Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group To: gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org Dear SG/C Chairs, I wanted to follow up with a status update on this work. Your feedback has been passed onto ICANN. However, it seems that ICANN?s proposals will not be materially altered before being presented at ICANN 82. The rationale here is that different groups within the GNSO (and other SO/ACs) had conflicting opinions on the proposals and it seems worthwhile to get the Community?s feedback on all questions presented. This means your groups will likely need to reiterate your views on these proposals in an upcoming public comment. On a more constructive note, I think the feedback illustrated to ICANN that most proposals will take further analysis, and deeper dives are required on several areas (e.g., most of you noted that ICANN should be more creative about sponsorship opportunities and other options for fundraising). Happy to discuss further. Thanks, Greg *From:* DiBiase, Gregory via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership < gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org> *Sent:* Friday, January 17, 2025 7:53 AM *To:* gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org *Subject:* [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Feedback Requested: How We Meet Community Group - *Attachments protected by Amazon: * - Updated Cost Data Related To ICANN Pu...copy.pdf | - How We Meet - Summary of Input from C...copy.pdf | - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & ...copy.pdf | - 2022 - 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN In...copy.pdf | - Final - Charter for the Community Gro...tegy.pdf | - DRAFT - How We Meet Community Group R...Docs.pdf | - ICANN | - ATT00001.txt | Amazon has replaced the attachments in this email with download links. Downloads will be available until February 16, 2025, 15:53 (UTC+00:00). Tell us what you think For more information click here Dear SG/C Chairs, I am hoping for your help gathering feedback on ICANN?s proposals for ?How We Meet? (a.k.a. how to make ICANN?s meetings more cost effective). As GNSO Chair, I?ve been tasked with gathering feedback on potential recommendations that will go out to the Community for public comment. Attached are a number of documents breaking down the cost of ICANN meetings, but I think the most pertinent is one titled ?How We Meet Community Group Report?. ICANN has labeled this document as a ?draft strawman proposal? but it?s really a menu of options for reducing cost. I think a good first step is for each SG/C to review these options and provide feedback on: 1. What options are missing? 2. What options are unacceptable/problematic? (i.e., should not be put out for public comment). 3. Do you have more granular feedback on the options provided? I think this could give me a starting point for giving feedback to ICANN. I have already flagged to ICANN that the GNSO is a diverse body and will likely have disagreements, so a broader public comment on the ?strawman? will be necessary. Please provide any other thoughts you may have as this group starts their work. Thank You! Greg *From:* Alperen Eken via How-we-meet-2025 *Sent:* Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:46 PM *To:* how-we-meet-2025 at icann.org *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [How-We-Meet-2025] Agenda and Documents - Meeting #1 - How We Meet Community Group *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Dear all, Happy New Year! I hope this message finds you well and that you?ve had a wonderful start to 2025. Next week, we will hold our first meeting to discuss updates to the ICANN Meetings Strategy. This meeting is scheduled for: Date: 13 January 2024 Time: 1700-1800 UTC We?re looking forward to your participation and valuable contributions. Please find attached the meeting agenda, some documents we prepared for this group, and background documents that were previously shared with SOAC Chairs: 1. Meeting invitation ICS file 2. Agenda 3. Final - Charter for the Community Group for the Meeting Strategy 4. Draft - How We Meet Community Group Report Background Documents: 5. How We Meet - Summary of Input from Community Groups 6. Updated Cost Data Related to ICANN Public Meetings 7. 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Travel & Meetings 8. 2022 ? 2024 Cost Analysis of ICANN Intersessional Meetings We are aware that there are a lot of materials, therefore we are keeping a drive folder for you where you can find all these documents, meeting agendas, and notes of our future meetings in addition to any document that we will be collaborating on. Here is the link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-IGp5C4QAZjj5OJlkYRARnpsg2HBgtV_?usp=drive_link Your input is essential as we will be working within a tight timeline. I will serve as the project manager for this work, if you have any questions, additional topics to propose for the agenda, or any other issue please feel free to reach out at alperen.eken at icann.org . We appreciate your participation and look forward to seeing everyone at the meeting! Kind regards, Alp Eken Policy Development Support Senior Specialist Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) ------------------------------ NOTICE: This communication from Perkins Coie LLP may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. _______________________________________________ GNSO-SG-C-Leadership mailing list -- gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-sg-c-leadership-leave at icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fr.namra at gmail.com Thu Feb 27 19:23:30 2025 From: fr.namra at gmail.com (Namra Naseer) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:23:30 -0500 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: That works for me. On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 3:19?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm sorry. I confused myself with time zones, and I'll have another > meeting exactly at this time. Can we postpone it to 21h30 UTC? > > I've just sent an invite to a Google Meet (through the ISOC Brasil > account) call. Please let me know if you can't at this time. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em qua., 26 de fev. de 2025 ?s 03:08, Namra Naseer > escreveu: > >> Thanks, Pedro, for taking the initiative on this! I?d be happy to cover >> the portion you suggested at the forum. If there are any resources >> available to help me gather that information, I?d appreciate your help >> finding them. >> >> I also have some documents from the PTP pilot (that covered the 2012 >> round), which I?ll review as well. >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:36?PM Wisdom Donkor >> wrote: >> >>> Sure. >>> >>> *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) >>> President & CEO >>> Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa >>> Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) >>> P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. >>> agdic.info >>> Tel: +233 20 812 8851 >>> Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >>> ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group >>> Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous >>> Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association >>> Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF >>> Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee >>> Member >>> >>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________ >>> Specialization: >>> E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet >>> Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber >>> Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name >>> Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, >>> Event Planning & Management, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:32?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be >>>> super helpful already. >>>> >>>> Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? >>>> >>>> Cordially, >>>> >>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>> Researcher >>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>> (ICANN), IODA >>>> and CC Brasil >>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani < >>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up >>>>> sharing my thoughts below: >>>>> >>>>> 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the >>>>> speakers asap and block their availability. >>>>> 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with >>>>> other tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although >>>>> I think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and >>>>> experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the >>>>> discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, >>>>> online moderation during the session. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for >>>>> the session. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With gratitude >>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>> building for new media >>>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>>> stories and mind musings >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I >>>>>> can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera >>>>>> even then. This is for Saturday. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me >>>>>> know I might be able to manage those as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Mili, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full >>>>>>> agenda next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>>>>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> With gratitude >>>>>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>>>>> building for new media >>>>>>>> Instagram : evocative >>>>>>>> travel stories and mind musings >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>>> , how about you two? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>>>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ >>>>>>>>>> PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for >>>>>>>>>> others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I >>>>>>>>>> did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC >>>>>>>>>> a ?crit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at >>>>>>>>>> least one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead >>>>>>>>>> so the Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue >>>>>>>>>> Forum! The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down >>>>>>>>>> in an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum >>>>>>>>>> agenda for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else >>>>>>>>>> you would like me to send this to? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com Thu Feb 27 23:33:58 2025 From: pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_de_Perdig=C3=A3o_Lana?=) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:33:58 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda In-Reply-To: References: <8A11F241-D0F2-46C1-8098-0D30768DE236@icann.org> <1519183467.1332263.1740060873689@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi everyone! I sent a calendar invite to you all, but I'm also sending the link here: NCSG Issue Forum Coordination Meeting: https://meet.google.com/uhi-widi-wqy Cordially, *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR Researcher PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG (ICANN), IODA and CC Brasil This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by mistake, please reply informing it. Em seg., 24 de fev. de 2025 ?s 15:49, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu: > Thursday 20h30 it is! > > I'll start reaching out to people so we can finish everything by this date. > > Cordially, > > *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* > Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR > Researcher > PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) > Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG > (ICANN), IODA > and CC Brasil > This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by > mistake, please reply informing it. > > > Em seg., 24 de fev. de 2025 ?s 15:40, Namra Naseer > escreveu: > >> I can do it thursday! Also, I suggest using a When2meet >> . It will make it easier to find a time that >> works for all! >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:32?PM Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Mili, helping with the report and online moderation will be >>> super helpful already. >>> >>> Everyone - can we all meet on Wednesday, 20h30 UTC? >>> >>> Cordially, >>> >>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>> Researcher >>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>> (ICANN), IODA >>> and CC Brasil >>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received >>> by mistake, please reply informing it. >>> >>> >>> Em s?b., 22 de fev. de 2025 ?s 05:41, Mili Semlani < >>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> Since I am not available over the weekend and to speed this up >>>> sharing my thoughts below: >>>> >>>> 1. The session topic looks good and I think we need confirm the >>>> speakers asap and block their availability. >>>> 2. Since I am not a policy/topic expert, I am happy to assist with >>>> other tasks for the Issue Forum that include: on site moderation (although >>>> I think Pedro you are better suited for it given your expertise and >>>> experience), preparing a session report with the key takeaways from the >>>> discussion to be shared with the community and published on the website, >>>> online moderation during the session. >>>> >>>> Let me know what you think and need support on any other aspects for >>>> the session. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With gratitude >>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>> LinkedIn : community >>>> building for new media >>>> Instagram : evocative travel >>>> stories and mind musings >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 18:41, Namra Naseer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Pedro, weekend is not ideal for me. However, if it works for others I >>>>> can do sometime around 1700 UTC or later. Probably have to be off camera >>>>> even then. This is for Saturday. >>>>> >>>>> Alternatively if there are some options that work for most, let me >>>>> know I might be able to manage those as well. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:08 Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Mili, >>>>>> >>>>>> Those two dates are not possible options, sorry, I have a full agenda >>>>>> next week, This weekend is the only moment I'll be available. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>> Researcher >>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 ?s 09:32, Mili Semlani < >>>>>> milisemlani at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Wed and Thur next week are better for me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> With gratitude >>>>>>> *Mili Semlani* >>>>>>> LinkedIn : community >>>>>>> building for new media >>>>>>> Instagram : evocative >>>>>>> travel stories and mind musings >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 15:25, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana < >>>>>>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi @Mili Semlani and @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>> , how about you two? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2025 ?s 11:14, Juan Manuel Rojas < >>>>>>>> jumaropi at yahoo.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Pedro, >>>>>>>>> I am available any day of the weekdays after 20 UTC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc.* >>>>>>>>> Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia >>>>>>>>> NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO >>>>>>>>> M.Sc. Information Technology >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Registered Linux User No.*533108.* >>>>>>>>> http://www.jmanurojas.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Cel. +57 301 743 56 00Instagram: jmanurojas* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- >>>>>>>>> Version: 3.1 >>>>>>>>> GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ >>>>>>>>> PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ >>>>>>>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2025, 09:04:56 a.m. GMT-5, Pedro de >>>>>>>>> Perdig?o Lana escribi?: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Will do! I think we can still wait for the end of this day for >>>>>>>>> others in this thread to review, then we may proceed with the invitations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Mili Semlani , @Namra Naseer >>>>>>>>> and @Juan Manuel Rojas , >>>>>>>>> and others who are interested, do you want to have a quick call to discuss >>>>>>>>> the Issue Forum? I'll be available during most of the weekend, but >>>>>>>>> traveling Sunday morning (UTC-3). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 19 de fev. de 2025 ?s 21:24, Rafik Dammak < >>>>>>>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the proposal and to members involved in drafting it. I >>>>>>>>> did a quick review and I think the agenda is fine as follow-up from the >>>>>>>>> previous forum. My only concern is that we need to reach out asap to the >>>>>>>>> speakers from RSP, ICANN staff etc. That should be initiated so you can >>>>>>>>> secure their presence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rafik >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2025 ? 21:17, Pedro de Perdig?o Lana via NCSG-EC < >>>>>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> a ?crit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *We finished the first initial draft of the NCSG Issue Forum and >>>>>>>>> would like to gather your input and collaboration on the tasks that need to >>>>>>>>> be done in the following months, indicated in the Google Do*cs: >>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7VHwULRGy8FhTJGfQQQxy7o64Fi7eWPTHWdGBYU7dw/edit?tab=t.0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My plan is to keep helping organize it but also let others (at >>>>>>>>> least one person from the NCUC and one person from the NPOC) take the lead >>>>>>>>> so the Issue Forum stays a sustainable initiative of our community. *Juan >>>>>>>>> already mentioned he would like to be an active part of it, as well as >>>>>>>>> Mili, and Namra also showed interest in the subject.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let's get to it and have an amazing and collaborative Issue Forum! >>>>>>>>> The more we get our community involved, the merrier! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After we have closed this planning phase, we need to sum it down >>>>>>>>> in an Agenda for Andrea, so it can become public info on the ICANN website. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> Lawyer , GEDAI/UFPR >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ NCUC & NCSG >>>>>>>>> (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> IODA and CC Brasil >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 12:46, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From: *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana >>>>>>>>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 09:45 >>>>>>>>> *To: *Andrea Glandon >>>>>>>>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN82 NCSG Issue Forum Agenda >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For now, you can add me and Kathy for a first draft - then Mili, >>>>>>>>> Narma and Juan expressed they would like to be a a part of the effort and >>>>>>>>> could be added to finish the draft that will be presented to the ECs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cordially, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Pedro de Perdig?o Lana* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lawyer [nic.br] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Researcher >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR [isoc.org.br] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> NCUC [ncuc.org] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> & NCSG (ICANN), >>>>>>>>> YouthLACIGF [youthlacigf.lat] >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> IODA [ioda.org.br] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and CC Brasil [br.creativecommons.net] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If >>>>>>>>> received by mistake, please reply informing it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Em qua., 29 de jan. de 2025 ?s 11:49, Andrea Glandon < >>>>>>>>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Pedro, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wanted to start the conversation about the NCSG Issue Forum >>>>>>>>> agenda for ICANN82. I have created a Google doc below. Is there anyone else >>>>>>>>> you would like me to send this to? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/164Vs6bSeCp_yurZgFwLu8aai7IGk-OhRh1LlJiAy8X0/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>>>> [docs.google.com] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Andrea Glandon* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Skype ID:* acglandon76 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafik.dammak at gmail.com Fri Feb 28 02:31:18 2025 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com (Rafik Dammak) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:31:18 +0900 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: hi all, to summarize current draft agenda for the joint sessions: - Meeting with CPH: - Current Policy Topics - DNS Abuse - DNS Abuse and HRIA - Code of Conduct (RySG) - Accuracy - Next Steps/Future Coordination Let me know if you have any comments for those proposed topics. - Meeting with GAC - Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) - Discussion on (25 mins) : - HRIA on DNS - gTLD Applicant Support - NCPH meeting - Administrative matters (Rafik and Mason) - Membership system and mailing list follow-up - Regular quarterly house meetings - Board seat 14 procedures (review of the incumbent) (Paul) - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH(Rafik and Mason) - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN - priorities / follow up on CEO Town Hall (Rafik and Mason) - DNS abuse positions and plan going forward (Mason) - WSIS + 20 (NCSG) - for ALAC agenda, it is still not confirmed yet 1- Opening remarks 2- Human Rights Impact Assessment on DNS Abuse 3- Next Round/Applicant Support Program 4- Continuous Improvement Program 5- Update to Operating Standards for Specific Reviews 6- Ethics Policy and Community Participant Code 7- AOB and conclusion We need to decide on the leads for some of the topics and if we need to prepare some slides to help. Best, Rafik Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a ?crit : > Hi all, > > I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC > and GAC, the current status is: > - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: > membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. > They didn't propose anything yet from their side. > - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics > policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC > waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( > https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en > ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. > - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial topic > of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their side yet. > - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: > 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) > 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : > HRIA on DNS > gTLD Applicant Support > Public Interest Commitments (PICs) > > I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how > much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and > which we should pick up. > > - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair Ram > Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due time. > > In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead > for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can > handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. > > Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new > policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in > Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. > For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar > can share from his side. For the NCSG issue > forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can you > share more about the selected topic and agenda? > > So please give me your input about the points above. > > Best, > > Rafik > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wisdom.dk at gmail.com Fri Feb 28 02:37:01 2025 From: wisdom.dk at gmail.com (Wisdom Donkor) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:37:01 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: No comments from me. *Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+, CISM, CEH Certified,) President & CEO Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (AODIRF) | Africa Geospatial Data and Internet Conference (AGDIC) P.O. Box CT 2439, Cantonments, Accra | www.aodirf.org / www. agdic.info Tel: +233 20 812 8851 Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom | Twitter: @wisdom_dk _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group Member | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF Member | Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee Member ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Specialization: E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet Governance, Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering, Event Planning & Management, On Fri, 28 Feb 2025, 12:31?am Rafik Dammak, wrote: > hi all, > > to summarize current draft agenda for the joint sessions: > - Meeting with CPH: > > - Current Policy Topics > - DNS Abuse > - DNS Abuse and HRIA > - Code of Conduct (RySG) > - Accuracy > - Next Steps/Future Coordination > > Let me know if you have any comments for those proposed topics. > - Meeting with GAC > > - Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) > - Discussion on (25 mins) : > - HRIA on DNS > - gTLD Applicant Support > > - NCPH meeting > > - Administrative matters (Rafik and Mason) > - Membership system and mailing list follow-up > - Regular quarterly house meetings > - Board seat 14 procedures (review of the incumbent) (Paul) > - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH(Rafik and > Mason) > - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN > - priorities / follow up on CEO Town Hall (Rafik and Mason) > - DNS abuse positions and plan going forward (Mason) > - WSIS + 20 (NCSG) > > - for ALAC agenda, it is still not confirmed yet > 1- Opening remarks > 2- Human Rights Impact Assessment on DNS Abuse > 3- Next Round/Applicant Support Program > 4- Continuous Improvement Program > 5- Update to Operating Standards for Specific Reviews > 6- Ethics Policy and Community Participant Code > 7- AOB and conclusion > > We need to decide on the leads for some of the topics and if we need to > prepare some slides to help. > > Best, > > Rafik > > > Le ven. 7 f?vr. 2025 ? 17:29, Rafik Dammak a > ?crit : > >> Hi all, >> >> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC >> and GAC, the current status is: >> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics we shared: >> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. >> They didn't propose anything yet from their side. >> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics >> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC >> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report ( >> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en >> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list. >> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial >> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their >> side yet. >> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion: >> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins) >> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) : >> HRIA on DNS >> gTLD Applicant Support >> Public Interest Commitments (PICs) >> >> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how >> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and >> which we should pick up. >> >> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair >> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due >> time. >> >> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead >> for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can >> handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement. >> >> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new >> policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in >> Seattle we will schedule a call with him later. >> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar >> can share from his side. For the NCSG issue >> forum, @Pedro de Perdig?o Lana can you >> share more about the selected topic and agenda? >> >> So please give me your input about the points above. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: