[NCSG-EC] Fwd: NCUC/NCSG Project Proposal to PIR

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Hi Caleb! Thanks for your message and contribution!

I understood from the conversation we had a while back with PIR that the
formalization of the support would be made through NCUC, and there is a
historical component of the NCUC-PIR that would help process the proposal
as well. I can't remember fully the reasons now and did not ask for more
details back then, but, in the next meeting, I'll get more info and come
back to you. Besides that, I believe the day-to-day tasks of overseeing the
project will be implemented by NCUC EC members, following the planning
phase.

However, since this is a policy-focused pilot project, and policy has been
made mostly at NCSG level, NPOC ideas and principles will surely be a part
of it. From my perspective, one of the main internal objectives of this
project is to bring the whole non-commercial group together! 🙂

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
<https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em ter., 30 de abr. de 2024 às 09:55, Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele <
muyiwacaleb at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Pedro.
>
> Great work on this proposal. However, may I suggest that we don't just
> make it a NCUC /NCSG proposal. It is safer to make it an NCSG proposal or
> better still a NCUC /NCSG /NPOC proposal.
> Historically there has been some inter constituency relationship break
> down in the past as NPOC also has a stake in PIR. Infact given the name
> NPOC PIR also tends to deal alot with them in the past. I think the best
> way it was resolved was to route it through NCSG only as mothership and
> then the NCSG allocate resources.
>
> On the other hand, I should declare a conflict of interest in further
> engaging on this conversation as I'm currently on ISOC board that oversee
> the PIR. I can only provide advisory commentary going ahead.
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024, 1:21 AM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC <
> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>
>> Including NCSG EC in the discussion.
>>
>>         Julf
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject:        NCUC/NCSG Project Proposal to PIR
>> Date:   Mon, 22 Apr 2024 11:01:32 -0300
>> From:   Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>
>> To:     Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>, Tomslin Samme-Nlar
>> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
>> CC:     Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Julf, Tomslin,
>>
>> This is the proposal of the pilot project we want to propose to PIR, to
>> kickstart the supporting relation we aim. I need help thinking of
>> valuers and other items to be inserted into the budget:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pM1Z-Wh-6msTdRxV17gDxLeT8Y1Paopi4fpB6gM6sqQ/edit?usp=sharing
>> <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pM1Z-Wh-6msTdRxV17gDxLeT8Y1Paopi4fpB6gM6sqQ/edit?usp=sharing
>> >
>>
>> If you think anyone else could contribute to the draft and should be
>> included in our conversation, please say it.
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>> Researcher
>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>> Board Member @ CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>, ISOC BR
>> <https://isoc.org.br/> and IODA <https://ioda.org.br/>
>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
>> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20240506/f8b88cef/attachment.htm>