[NCSG-EC] NCSG EC travel for ICANN81 (Istanbul)

[Bruna Martins dos Santos]

It’s not Orgs place to define how NCSG and its constituencies distribute
their travel resources, really.

The most appropriate way to deal with this situation would be - again - to
open a call for applications to fill this slot or lose it. I would also be
extra wary of raising this issues to staff since we don’t want them to
think we don’t need these slots as we don’t have people putting their hands
up.

Open a call, say NCUC members will be prioritised since this was a slot for
NCUC EC reps and let’s be more transparent w/ membership.

Best,




*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

Global Campaigns Manager | Digital Action <http://digitalaction.co>

German Chancellor Fellow 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander von
Humboldt Foundation <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>

Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  <https://igcaucus.org/>

Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
bruna.martinsantos
Email: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com


farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> schrieb am Di. 25. Juni
2024 um 12:21:

> ICANN org is not setting our travel policy so they cannot provide clarity!
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:19 PM Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:
>
>> On 25/06/2024 11:43, farzaneh badii wrote:
>> > Why are we asking this?
>>
>> Because I appreciate clarity in the rather poorly documented
>> ways travel slots are allocated. There doesn't seem to be
>> any public document outlining how Org allocates travel
>> slots to constituencies and groups.
>>
>>         Julf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20240625/2ba2a44c/attachment.htm>