[NCSG-EC] Fwd: Request: Your view on reviving CSCG for UN High Level Advisory Body on AI
Johan Helsingius
julf at Julf.com
Thu Aug 10 22:25:38 EEST 2023
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Request: Your view on reviving CSCG for UN High Level Advisory
Body on AI
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:15:13 +0100
From: Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
To: parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>, Richard Hill
<rhill at hill-a.ch>, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
CC: Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, valeria
Betancourt <Valeriab at apc.org>
Dear Richard, Parminder, Johan,
We hope you are well.
Bruna and I, along with Valeria (as representatives of the IGC and APC
respectively) are getting in touch with regards to the recent call by
the UN for experts to serve on the global multistakeholder Advisory Body
on Artificial Intelligence. The deadline is August 31. More information
is here: https://www.un.org/techenvoy/content/artificial-intelligence
<https://www.un.org/techenvoy/content/artificial-intelligence>
While we know the Civil Society Coordination Group (CSCG) has been
inactive since the MAG 2021 elections, and is not participating in the
current nominations for the MAG, we would be interested to hear whether
you believe that r/eviving the CSCG for the purposes of providing civil
society nominations to the Advisory Body on AI /would be of interest to
you/your constituencies. If so, we would propose an alternative process
to that we have normally used in order to ensure we can collect and
submit nominations within the timeframe. For example, we would suggest
that each constituency run its own selection process and submit (up to)
two names, and the CSCG then submit all those names (up to eight, should
all four constituencies participate). We think this particular process,
considering the importance of the topic area (the current 'race' to
regulate AI and develop standards), combined with the possible role of
the UN as a multilateral institution in such debates, the lack of
clarity around the mandate of the body and its eventual make-up,
particularly necessitates engagement from civil society at this early
stage. It is for these reasons we recommend utilising the CSCG for this
purpose.
We also wanted to let you know that we will be putting together a letter
to the SG's office expressing concern about the lack of information on
the process, the body itself, and the short timeframe for nominations.
To go ahead, we would request that you let us know whether your
constituencies would engage in a nomination process /*this week* /- so
that we can issue calls next week, allowing for c. two weeks to collect
nominations/run nomination processes.
We look forward to hearing what you think!
Best wishes
Sheetal, Bruna and Valeria.
--
*
*
*Sheetal Kumar*
Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT| M: +44 (0)7739569514 |
PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
---
<https://www.4dayweek.co.uk/>
GPD is proud to be an accredited four-day week organisation that cares
about the well-being of its team. Please note that our office hours are
now Monday to Thursday (9am-5pm UK time). Find out more here
<https://www.gp-digital.org/news/gpd-becomes-a-four-day-week-organisation/>.
<https://www.gp-digital.org/news/gpd-becomes-a-four-day-week-organisation/>
More information about the NCSG-EC
mailing list