From mesumbeslin at gmail.com Wed Mar 3 11:03:59 2021 From: mesumbeslin at gmail.com (Tomslin Samme-Nlar) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 20:03:59 +1100 Subject: [NCSG-EC] [NCSG-PC] NCSG Board Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I can only add: What tangible steps do the board thinks can be taken to address the high community burnout and decrease in participation from some stakeholder groups, considering that such a decline poses a threat to the multistakeholder model? Cheers, Tomslin On Wed., 24 Feb. 2021, 16:05 Bruna Martins dos Santos, < bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear NCSG PC and EC, > > I need to provide our talking points for the NCSG meeting with the ICANN > Board by Feb. 26th, the latest. On that note, I would like to ask if any of > you would like to suggest and/or lead any of these discussions. > > For the ones not familiar with our Joint meeting with the Board at ICANN > meetings, this is a 1h meeting where both the NCSG and ICANN Board will > prepare their talking points for each other. We normally go with 2 to 3 > talking points and its also nice to see our community leaders leading the > discussions, so feel free to send your suggestions here and we can start > working on the discussion agenda. > > For my 1:1 meeting with the CEO that happened this week I chose to ask the > following questions, but I would like to hear from you whether you think > its good to repeat them: > > *SSAD and Content Moderation* > > > - *On a recent communication that was sent to the Board and to you, we > asked a few questions regarding an "ICANN Org Comments on the > Recommendations 01/2020 on Measures That Supplement Transfer Tools to > Ensure Compliance With the EU Level of Protection of Personal Data". NCSGs > letter was seeking clarification about an specific part of the statement > that highlighted that SSAD was "instrumental for stopping and preventing > the dissemination of illegal content and in order to avoid related societal > harms". On that note, I would like to ask you how the development of a new > System for Standardized Access/Disclosure falls within the realm of > instruments for preventing the dissemination of illegal content ?* > - *When the document mentions the prevention of the dissemination of > illegal content and societal harm, does it relate to factors other than the > access to information object of legitimate requests by legal authorities > and/or related to investigations ? * > > *DNS Abuse and the DNS Security Facilitation Initiative Technical Study > Group* > > > - *Do you believe ICANN is not working toward security and stability > and fighting with abuse as much as its mission allows? Why do you think > that ?* > - *NCSG would also like to know more about the DNS Security > Facilitation Initiative Technical Study Group. Where does this technical > study group fall within ICANNs strategy for dealing with DNS abuse? * > > > > Looking forward to hearing back from you! > > Best, > > -- > *Bruna Martins dos Santos * > > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos > @boomartins > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: