From robin at ipjustice.org Fri Sep 7 19:16:09 2018 From: robin at ipjustice.org (Robin Gross) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:16:09 -0700 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Please review new members applications (individuals) In-Reply-To: <906742598.1474892.1535725160448@mail.yahoo.com> References: <906742598.1474892.1535725160448@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <570B9A8B-B153-4B2C-89A1-4B91CFAFA9CA@ipjustice.org> My comments are in also. Thanks, Robin > On Aug 31, 2018, at 7:19 AM, Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-EC wrote: > > Thanks Farzi, > I've just given my comments on individual applications > > Best Regards > > JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. > Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia > Membership Committee Chair. Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) - ICANN > Cluster Orinoco TIC member > Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes > > Cel. +57 3017435600 > Twitter: @JmanuRojas > > > > > > > > > El viernes, 31 de agosto de 2018 2:09:33 a. m. GMT-5, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC escribi?: > > > all, > > Fortunately, our CIVICRM is getting fixed and developers are working on it. > > Please evaluate the individual applicants (we don't have new organizational ones). Please do so very soon we are behind. Preferably by next week Friday. Thank you very much. > > Juan, you can now access the system, please let me know if there is any problem. > > > Best > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 01:09:07 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 18:09:07 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Organizations and Individuals representations at NCSG Message-ID: Hi all, I shared these procedures with you a couple of months ago and also shared with the mailing list. I have now gone through it again and considered members comments. You can comment here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gt7vfXOl1RjTdh_iQd7E4yUjEiGez24jexNodQopgks/edit?usp=sharing There is one important question that needs to be answered: In our charter small orgs are defined as any org that doesnt qualify as large org. In these procedures I thought it might be better to consider only for these procedural purposes to divide small orgs to those of up to 10 members or employees and those up to 50 members or employees. : The charter does not say we cannot do this but it says: "The Executive Committee shall, at its discretion, determine limits to the total number of Individual members who can join from any single organization (provided the limit shall apply to all Organizations, of the same size category, equally)." So I am wondering if this is ok because it would be unfair to apply the same membership limitation to an org with 30 members and an org with 3 members. Let me know, I would like to approve these by the end of September the latest so if you have objections and want to change the document substantively please do so by 21st of September. Best Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 01:16:03 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 18:16:03 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines Message-ID: Hi everyone, I also shared this document with you: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about the applicants' guidelines. It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved. Best regards Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 12:45:09 2018 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 12:45:09 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Organizations and Individuals representations at NCSG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just as a starting point to the discussion, the number of employees is a very different indicator to the amount of members of an organisation. We shouldn't treat them the same. If I understood correctly, you'd want to divide the small organisations into tiny and small. Since only four people can represent an organisation at NCSG (two reps for each constituency), I feel it's unnecessary to create additional restrictions on participation. -Raoul On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:09, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hi all, > > I shared these procedures with you a couple of months ago and also shared > with the mailing list. > > I have now gone through it again and considered members comments. You can > comment here: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gt7vfXOl1RjTdh_iQd7E4yUjEiGez24jexNodQopgks/edit?usp=sharing > > There is one important question that needs to be answered: > > In our charter small orgs are defined as any org that doesnt qualify as > large org. In these procedures I thought it might be better to consider > only for these procedural purposes to divide small orgs to those of up to > 10 members or employees and those up to 50 members or employees. : > > > > The charter does not say we cannot do this but it says: "The Executive > Committee shall, at its discretion, determine limits to the total number of > Individual members who can join from any single organization (provided the > limit shall apply to all Organizations, of the same size category, > equally)." > > > So I am wondering if this is ok because it would be unfair to apply the > same membership limitation to an org with 30 members and an org with 3 > members. > > > Let me know, I would like to approve these by the end of September the > latest so if you have objections and want to change the document > substantively please do so by 21st of September. > > Best > > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 13:05:52 2018 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 13:05:52 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in having the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in the NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are already active in our community, when they change organisation or they want to give room for new organisational representatives. They would then have to apply again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to change something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the other identity, basically, whichever had less weight. -Raoul On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I also shared this document with you: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about > the applicants' guidelines. > > It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing > list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from > you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved. > > Best regards > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 16:06:37 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 09:06:37 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Raoul To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't agree with? We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only one kind of membership. So the member goes from the category of individual member to the category of organizational member. Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too. In this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If you could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat applications then we can think about modifying them. n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: > I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in having > the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in the > NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are already > active in our community, when they change organisation or they want to give > room for new organisational representatives. They would then have to apply > again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to change > something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the other > identity, basically, whichever had less weight. > > -Raoul > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I also shared this document with you: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about >> the applicants' guidelines. >> >> It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing >> list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from >> you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved. >> >> Best regards >> >> >> Farzaneh >> > _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 16:40:13 2018 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 16:40:13 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Section five. I don't really agree on any of it. What's the rationale behind it? -Raoul On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:06, farzaneh badii wrote: > Hi Raoul > > To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't agree > with? > > We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual > member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only > one kind of membership. So the member goes from the category of individual > member to the category of organizational member. > > Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too. In > this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If you > could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat applications > then we can think about modifying them. > > > n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: > >> I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in having >> the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in the >> NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are already >> active in our community, when they change organisation or they want to give >> room for new organisational representatives. They would then have to apply >> again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to change >> something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the other >> identity, basically, whichever had less weight. >> >> -Raoul >> >> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I also shared this document with you: >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about >>> the applicants' guidelines. >>> >>> It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing >>> list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from >>> you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>> >> -- > Farzaneh > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 16:45:16 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 09:45:16 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: The executive committee has to come up with guidelines based on which it approves or rejects applicants. Applicants have asked for it and you need to base your decision on something that is not ad hoc. I responded to section five issue on the mailing list. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:40 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: > Section five. I don't really agree on any of it. What's the rationale > behind it? > > -Raoul > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:06, farzaneh badii > wrote: > >> Hi Raoul >> >> To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't >> agree with? >> >> We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual >> member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only >> one kind of membership. So the member goes from the category of individual >> member to the category of organizational member. >> >> Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too. In >> this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If you >> could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat applications >> then we can think about modifying them. >> >> >> n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: >> >>> I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in having >>> the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in the >>> NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are already >>> active in our community, when they change organisation or they want to give >>> room for new organisational representatives. They would then have to apply >>> again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to change >>> something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the other >>> identity, basically, whichever had less weight. >>> >>> -Raoul >>> >>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < >>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I also shared this document with you: >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about >>>> the applicants' guidelines. >>>> >>>> It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing >>>> list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from >>>> you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved. >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> >>>> >>>> Farzaneh >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>> >>> -- >> Farzaneh >> > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 17:11:41 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 10:11:41 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Raoul I shared two documents by the way. You probably agree with most of the applicants guidelines because that's how we now function (except Q5 which you disagree with) . It's the other procedures that might be problematic. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:45 AM farzaneh badii wrote: > The executive committee has to come up with guidelines based on which it > approves or rejects applicants. Applicants have asked for it and you need > to base your decision on something that is not ad hoc. > > I responded to section five issue on the mailing list. > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:40 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: > >> Section five. I don't really agree on any of it. What's the rationale >> behind it? >> >> -Raoul >> >> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:06, farzaneh badii >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Raoul >>> >>> To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't >>> agree with? >>> >>> We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual >>> member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only >>> one kind of membership. So the member goes from the category of individual >>> member to the category of organizational member. >>> >>> Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too. In >>> this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If you >>> could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat applications >>> then we can think about modifying them. >>> >>> >>> n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: >>> >>>> I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in >>>> having the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in >>>> the NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are >>>> already active in our community, when they change organisation or they want >>>> to give room for new organisational representatives. They would then have >>>> to apply again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to >>>> change something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the >>>> other identity, basically, whichever had less weight. >>>> >>>> -Raoul >>>> >>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < >>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I also shared this document with you: >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about >>>>> the applicants' guidelines. >>>>> >>>>> It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing >>>>> list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from >>>>> you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Farzaneh >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>> >>>> -- >>> Farzaneh >>> >> -- > Farzaneh > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Sun Sep 9 18:37:52 2018 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 18:37:52 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Yes, I meant that I don't agree with any of the section five. On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 17:12, farzaneh badii wrote: > Raoul > > I shared two documents by the way. You probably agree with most of the > applicants guidelines because that's how we now function (except Q5 which > you disagree with) . It's the other procedures that might be problematic. > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:45 AM farzaneh badii > wrote: > >> The executive committee has to come up with guidelines based on which it >> approves or rejects applicants. Applicants have asked for it and you need >> to base your decision on something that is not ad hoc. >> >> I responded to section five issue on the mailing list. >> >> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:40 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: >> >>> Section five. I don't really agree on any of it. What's the rationale >>> behind it? >>> >>> -Raoul >>> >>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:06, farzaneh badii >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Raoul >>>> >>>> To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't >>>> agree with? >>>> >>>> We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual >>>> member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only >>>> one kind of membership. So the member goes from the category of individual >>>> member to the category of organizational member. >>>> >>>> Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too. >>>> In this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If >>>> you could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat >>>> applications then we can think about modifying them. >>>> >>>> >>>> n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in >>>>> having the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in >>>>> the NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are >>>>> already active in our community, when they change organisation or they want >>>>> to give room for new organisational representatives. They would then have >>>>> to apply again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to >>>>> change something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the >>>>> other identity, basically, whichever had less weight. >>>>> >>>>> -Raoul >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < >>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I also shared this document with you: >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about >>>>>> the applicants' guidelines. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the >>>>>> mailing list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an >>>>>> objection from you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Farzaneh >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Farzaneh >>>> >>> -- >> Farzaneh >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Sep 11 20:23:21 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 13:23:21 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Adding Bruna to EC list Message-ID: Hi all I think it's not a bad idea to add Bruna for the moment to this list since it would be good for NCSG EXCOMand chair to work with constituencies leadership. She won't have posting rights will just be receiving emails. Raoul, does Joan want to join? -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Wed Sep 12 00:05:13 2018 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:05:13 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Adding Bruna to EC list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yeah, I think it would be beneficial to have our chairs up to date in real time. I'll forward this request to Joan. On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 20:23, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hi all > > I think it's not a bad idea to add Bruna for the moment to this list since > it would be good for NCSG EXCOMand chair to work with constituencies > leadership. She won't have posting rights will just be receiving emails. > Raoul, does Joan want to join? > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joankerr at fbsc.org Wed Sep 12 04:18:57 2018 From: joankerr at fbsc.org (Joan Kerr) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 21:18:57 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Adding Bruna to EC list In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Hi Raoul, Farzi I think it's a good idea to join. It helps to have info so we can work closely. Regards, On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:05 PM Raoul Plommer wrote: > Yeah, I think it would be beneficial to have our chairs up to date in real > time. I'll forward this request to Joan. > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 20:23, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I think it's not a bad idea to add Bruna for the moment to this list >> since it would be good for NCSG EXCOMand chair to work with constituencies >> leadership. She won't have posting rights will just be receiving emails. >> Raoul, does Joan want to join? >> -- >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -- Joan Kerr, Entrepreneur, Artist, Humanitarian T: +1 (416) 907-0783 Skype: joankerr_fbsc fbsc.org, www.fbsc.eco Chair: Victory Garden Leadership Implementation Team Chair, Sustainable Agriculture, Global Humanitarian Technology Conference Chair: IEEE Smart Villages Project, Sustainable Agriculture Working Group Chair: ICANN Not for Profit Operational Concerns Constituency Recipient of the United Nations Civil Society Award (WSIS 2004) Recipient, Region of Durham Community Partnership Award Advisor, IEEE Humanitarian Initiatives Committee Advisor, Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network, (CSAYN) Global Coordination Unit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robin at ipjustice.org Thu Sep 13 00:02:08 2018 From: robin at ipjustice.org (Robin Gross) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:02:08 -0700 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Adding Bruna to EC list In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <991067A8-5C22-420C-8C67-3B13D030B97E@ipjustice.org> Agreed. Thanks, Robin > On Sep 11, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Raoul Plommer via NCSG-EC wrote: > > Yeah, I think it would be beneficial to have our chairs up to date in real time. I'll forward this request to Joan. > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 20:23, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC > wrote: > Hi all > > I think it's not a bad idea to add Bruna for the moment to this list since it would be good for NCSG EXCOMand chair to work with constituencies leadership. She won't have posting rights will just be receiving emails. Raoul, does Joan want to join? > -- > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Fri Sep 14 03:26:59 2018 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 21:26:59 -0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Adding Bruna to EC list In-Reply-To: <991067A8-5C22-420C-8C67-3B13D030B97E@ipjustice.org> References:

<991067A8-5C22-420C-8C67-3B13D030B97E@ipjustice.org> Message-ID: Thanks all for adding us! :) Em qua, 12 de set de 2018 ?s 18:02, Robin Gross via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu: > Agreed. > > Thanks, > Robin > > On Sep 11, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Raoul Plommer via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > > Yeah, I think it would be beneficial to have our chairs up to date in real > time. I'll forward this request to Joan. > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 20:23, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I think it's not a bad idea to add Bruna for the moment to this list >> since it would be good for NCSG EXCOMand chair to work with constituencies >> leadership. She won't have posting rights will just be receiving emails. >> Raoul, does Joan want to join? >> -- >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > > > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos @boomartins -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Sep 18 22:20:18 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:20:18 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Arsene's travel slot transfer Message-ID: Arsene unfortunately cannot join us in Barcelona. I will follow our re-allocation procedure and issue a call for applicants. Will share the call with you before posting. Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Sep 18 22:34:18 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:34:18 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Arsene's travel slot transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Issue a call for applicant for the travel slot, sorry I was not clear. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:20 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com wrote: Arsene unfortunately cannot join us in Barcelona. I will follow our re-allocation procedure and issue a call for applicants. Will share the call with you before posting. Farzaneh Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Sep 18 23:04:32 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:04:32 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Arsene's travel slot transfer In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <4dc55a73-addb-a21d-e12f-fbc241068085@mixmax.com> Hi Here is the call I drafted. I will send this as soon as possible to give applicants time to apply. Unfortunately one of our council members cannot make it to Barcelona. Hence a travel slot has become available. Please send in you motivation letter to me by 22 September at 12? UTC.? and cc Maryam Bakoshi. Your motivation statement should? include the requirements of operating procedures. Please indicate if you would like to be the alternate on the Council and provide the necessary documents as required by the procedures to be submitted to NCSG EC for consideration. 1. The Motivation Statement must explain in detail why the applicant would like to attend the meeting, provide evidence of full and verifiable engagement in Domain Name System policy deliberations, proof that the applicant has previously attended calls and contributed to PDPs, NCSG Policy Committee meetings and other relevant policy and related meetings, and explain why their physical presence is important for this meeting, mentioning specific tasks they commit to carry out on behalf of the NCSG. The tasks must be related to the NCSG and advance the NCSG?s interests at that specific ICANN meeting. If the applicant is to be an alternate to a GNSO Councillor, he or she should have an understanding of how the Council works and have observed their meetings beforehand. They must provide a letter of recommendation from either a) the Chair of the NCSG Policy Committee, or (b) a serving member of the Council in his or her second term. While Executive?Committee? travel slots may be allocated to newcomers, newcomers should commit to attending ?sessions of the NCSG leading up to the ICANN meeting, as well as undertaking revision and background reading on at least one internal governance document and a PDP. The applicant must commit to attending the ICANN meeting fully, be at the meeting venue every day, and be present to the greatest extent possible at all NCSG meetings, constituency meetings, GNSO Council meetings, and PDP sessions for which they have expressed interest in their Motivation Statement. If the selected applicant does not appear to be present at the venue without justification, s/he will not be eligible to be allocated a travel slot in the future. The decision of such ineligibility will be made by the NCSG Executive Committee (in the evaluation of at least two members). The NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will send all eligible requests received for travel support to the NCSG EC mailing list. Ineligible requests are those applications that do not have Motivation Statements. (If a Motivation Statement is missing and the application has been received well before the deadline, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will endeavor to remind the candidate to re-submit their application before the deadline with the Motivation Statement completed.) In addition, after the deadline has passed, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will inform any applicants whose application was unsuccessful due to being incomplete. An application is incomplete if it only expresses the desire to travel but does not provide a detailed justification for being present during the meeting and fulfill the criteria set out under section 4 Read more about the operating procedures here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures#OperatingProcedures-996937310 On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:34 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com wrote: Issue a call for applicant for the travel slot, sorry I was not clear. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:20 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com wrote: Arsene unfortunately cannot join us in Barcelona. I will follow our re-allocation procedure and issue a call for applicants. Will share the call with you before posting. Farzaneh Farzaneh Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robin at ipjustice.org Tue Sep 18 23:29:41 2018 From: robin at ipjustice.org (Robin Gross) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:29:41 -0700 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Arsene's travel slot transfer In-Reply-To: <4dc55a73-addb-a21d-e12f-fbc241068085@mixmax.com> References:

<4dc55a73-addb-a21d-e12f-fbc241068085@mixmax.com> Message-ID: <351E7341-3713-48B7-8BE2-C73913CFDE2C@ipjustice.org> This looks good to me. I have one question though. What is meant by ?if you would like to be an alternate on the council?? Does this mean to be the temporary replacement for the absent GNSO councilor during GNSO Council sessions? Since we don??t always provide the travel slot to the same person who serves as the temporary replacement on council, one might not realize that we sometimes have an ex-councilor or other experienced member (who already has other travel support) serve as the temporary replacement GNSO Councilor during the meeting and this travel slot can go to someone else working in the PDPs who we also need to be at the specific meeting. We do have some flexibility in how we choose to allocate the travel slots. Thanks, Robin > On Sep 18, 2018, at 1:04 PM, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC wrote: > > Hi > > > > Here is the call I drafted. I will send this as soon as possible to give applicants time to apply. > > Unfortunately one of our council members cannot make it to Barcelona. Hence a travel slot has become available. > > Please send in you motivation letter to me by 22 September at 12 UTC. and cc Maryam Bakoshi. > > Your motivation statement should include the requirements of operating procedures. Please indicate if you would like to be the alternate on the Council and provide the necessary documents as required by the procedures to be submitted to NCSG EC for consideration. > The Motivation Statement must explain in detail why the applicant would like to attend the meeting, provide evidence of full and verifiable engagement in Domain Name System policy deliberations, proof that the applicant has previously attended calls and contributed to PDPs, NCSG Policy Committee meetings and other relevant policy and related meetings, and explain why their physical presence is important for this meeting, mentioning specific tasks they commit to carry out on behalf of the NCSG. The tasks must be related to the NCSG and advance the NCSG?s interests at that specific ICANN meeting. > > If the applicant is to be an alternate to a GNSO Councillor, he or she should have an understanding of how the Council works and have observed their meetings beforehand. They must provide a letter of recommendation from either a) the Chair of the NCSG Policy Committee, or (b) a serving member of the Council in his or her second term. > > While Executive Committee? travel slots may be allocated to newcomers, newcomers should commit to attending sessions of the NCSG leading up to the ICANN meeting, as well as undertaking revision and background reading on at least one internal governance document and a PDP. > > The applicant must commit to attending the ICANN meeting fully, be at the meeting venue every day, and be present to the greatest extent possible at all NCSG meetings, constituency meetings, GNSO Council meetings, and PDP sessions for which they have expressed interest in their Motivation Statement. If the selected applicant does not appear to be present at the venue without justification, s/he will not be eligible to be allocated a travel slot in the future. The decision of such ineligibility will be made by the NCSG Executive Committee (in the evaluation of at least two members). > > > The NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will send all eligible requests received for travel support to the NCSG EC mailing list. Ineligible requests are those applications that do not have Motivation Statements. (If a Motivation Statement is missing and the application has been received well before the deadline, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will endeavor to remind the candidate to re-submit their application before the deadline with the Motivation Statement completed.) In addition, after the deadline has passed, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will inform any applicants whose application was unsuccessful due to being incomplete. An application is incomplete if it only expresses the desire to travel but does not provide a detailed justification for being present during the meeting and fulfill the criteria set out under section 4 > > Read more about the operating procedures here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures#OperatingProcedures-996937310 > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:34 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com wrote: > Issue a call for applicant for the travel slot, sorry I was not clear. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:20 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com wrote: > > > Arsene unfortunately cannot join us in Barcelona. I will follow our re-allocation procedure and issue a call for applicants. Will share the call with you before posting. > > Farzaneh > > > > Farzaneh > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Tue Sep 18 23:31:43 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:31:43 +0000 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Arsene's travel slot transfer In-Reply-To: <351E7341-3713-48B7-8BE2-C73913CFDE2C@ipjustice.org> References:

<4dc55a73-addb-a21d-e12f-fbc241068085@mixmax.com> <351E7341-3713-48B7-8BE2-C73913CFDE2C@ipjustice.org> Message-ID: Thanks Robin. The operating procedures are clear that others active in PDP can also apply but I wanted to remind people that if they are applying to be an alternate, they should provide the documents that operating procedure asks them. I will clarify that. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 4:29 PM, Robin Gross robin at ipjustice.org wrote: This looks good to me. ?I have one question though. ?What is meant by ?if you would like to be an alternate on the council?? ?Does this mean to be the temporary replacement for the absent GNSO councilor during GNSO Council sessions? Since we don??t always provide the travel slot to the same person who serves as the temporary replacement on council, one might not realize that we sometimes have an ex-councilor or other experienced member (who already has other travel support) serve as the temporary replacement GNSO Councilor during the meeting and this travel slot can go to someone else working in the PDPs who we also need to be at the specific meeting. ?We do have some flexibility in how we choose to allocate the travel slots. Thanks,Robin On Sep 18, 2018, at 1:04 PM, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC wrote: Hi Here is the call I drafted. I will send this as soon as possible to give applicants time to apply. Unfortunately one of our council members cannot make it to Barcelona. Hence a travel slot has become available. Please send in you motivation letter to me by 22 September at 12? UTC.? and cc Maryam Bakoshi. Your motivation statement should? include the requirements of operating procedures. Please indicate if you would like to be the alternate on the Council and provide the necessary documents as required by the procedures to be submitted to NCSG EC for consideration. 1. The Motivation Statement must explain in detail why the applicant would like to attend the meeting, provide evidence of full and verifiable engagement in Domain Name System policy deliberations, proof that the applicant has previously attended calls and contributed to PDPs, NCSG Policy Committee meetings and other relevant policy and related meetings, and explain why their physical presence is important for this meeting, mentioning specific tasks they commit to carry out on behalf of the NCSG. The tasks must be related to the NCSG and advance the NCSG?s interests at that specific ICANN meeting. If the applicant is to be an alternate to a GNSO Councillor, he or she should have an understanding of how the Council works and have observed their meetings beforehand. They must provide a letter of recommendation from either a) the Chair of the NCSG Policy Committee, or (b) a serving member of the Council in his or her second term. While Executive?Committee? travel slots may be allocated to newcomers, newcomers should commit to attending ?sessions of the NCSG leading up to the ICANN meeting, as well as undertaking revision and background reading on at least one internal governance document and a PDP. The applicant must commit to attending the ICANN meeting fully, be at the meeting venue every day, and be present to the greatest extent possible at all NCSG meetings, constituency meetings, GNSO Council meetings, and PDP sessions for which they have expressed interest in their Motivation Statement. If the selected applicant does not appear to be present at the venue without justification, s/he will not be eligible to be allocated a travel slot in the future. The decision of such ineligibility will be made by the NCSG Executive Committee (in the evaluation of at least two members). The NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will send all eligible requests received for travel support to the NCSG EC mailing list. Ineligible requests are those applications that do not have Motivation Statements. (If a Motivation Statement is missing and the application has been received well before the deadline, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will endeavor to remind the candidate to re-submit their application before the deadline with the Motivation Statement completed.) In addition, after the deadline has passed, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will inform any applicants whose application was unsuccessful due to being incomplete. An application is incomplete if it only expresses the desire to travel but does not provide a detailed justification for being present during the meeting and fulfill the criteria set out under section 4 Read more about the operating procedures here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures#OperatingProcedures-996937310 On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:34 PM, farzaneh badiifarzaneh.badii at gmail.comwrote: Issue a call for applicant for the travel slot, sorry I was not clear. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:20 PM, farzaneh badiifarzaneh.badii at gmail.comwrote: Arsene unfortunately cannot join us in Barcelona. I will follow our re-allocation procedure and issue a call for applicants. Will share the call with you before posting. Farzaneh Farzaneh Farzaneh_______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From plommer at gmail.com Wed Sep 19 07:34:33 2018 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:34:33 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Arsene's travel slot transfer In-Reply-To: References:

<4dc55a73-addb-a21d-e12f-fbc241068085@mixmax.com> <351E7341-3713-48B7-8BE2-C73913CFDE2C@ipjustice.org> Message-ID: Looks good, thanks for composing this. :) -Raoul On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 at 23:31, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Thanks Robin. > > The operating procedures are clear that others active in PDP can also > apply but I wanted to remind people that if they are applying to be an > alternate, they should provide the documents that operating procedure asks > them. I will clarify that. > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 4:29 PM, Robin Gross robin at ipjustice.org wrote: > >> This looks good to me. I have one question though. What is meant by ?if >> you would like to be an alternate on the council?? Does this mean to be >> the temporary replacement for the absent GNSO councilor during GNSO Council >> sessions? >> >> Since we don??t always provide the travel slot to the same person who >> serves as the temporary replacement on council, one might not realize that >> we sometimes have an ex-councilor or other experienced member (who already >> has other travel support) serve as the temporary replacement GNSO Councilor >> during the meeting and this travel slot can go to someone else working in >> the PDPs who we also need to be at the specific meeting. We do have some >> flexibility in how we choose to allocate the travel slots. >> >> Thanks, >> Robin >> >> >> On Sep 18, 2018, at 1:04 PM, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < >> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> Here is the call I drafted. I will send this as soon as possible to give >> applicants time to apply. >> >> Unfortunately one of our council members cannot make it to Barcelona. >> Hence a travel slot has become available. >> >> Please send in you motivation letter to me by 22 September at 12 UTC. >> and cc Maryam Bakoshi. >> >> Your motivation statement should include the requirements of operating >> procedures. Please indicate if you would like to be the alternate on the >> Council and provide the necessary documents as required by the procedures >> to be submitted to NCSG EC for consideration. >> >> 1. >> >> The Motivation Statement must explain in detail why the applicant >> would like to attend the meeting, provide evidence of full and verifiable >> engagement in Domain Name System policy deliberations, proof that the >> applicant has previously attended calls and contributed to PDPs, NCSG >> Policy Committee meetings and other relevant policy and related meetings, >> and explain why their physical presence is important for this meeting, >> mentioning specific tasks they commit to carry out on behalf of the NCSG. >> The tasks must be related to the NCSG and advance the NCSG?s interests at >> that specific ICANN meeting. >> 2. >> >> If the applicant is to be an alternate to a GNSO Councillor, he or >> she should have an understanding of how the Council works and have observed >> their meetings beforehand. They must provide a letter of recommendation >> from either a) the Chair of the NCSG Policy Committee, or (b) a serving >> member of the Council in his or her second term. >> 3. >> >> While Executive Committee? travel slots may be allocated to >> newcomers, newcomers should commit to attending sessions of the NCSG >> leading up to the ICANN meeting, as well as undertaking revision and >> background reading on at least one internal governance document and a PDP. >> 4. >> >> The applicant must commit to attending the ICANN meeting fully, be >> at the meeting venue every day, and be present to the greatest extent >> possible at all NCSG meetings, constituency meetings, GNSO Council >> meetings, and PDP sessions for which they have expressed interest in their >> Motivation Statement. If the selected applicant does not appear to be >> present at the venue without justification, s/he will not be eligible to be >> allocated a travel slot in the future. The decision of such ineligibility >> will be made by the NCSG Executive Committee (in the evaluation of at least >> two members). >> 5. >> >> The NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will send all eligible >> requests received for travel support to the NCSG EC mailing list. >> Ineligible requests are those applications that do not have Motivation >> Statements. (If a Motivation Statement is missing and the application has >> been received well before the deadline, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support >> staff will endeavor to remind the candidate to re-submit their application >> before the deadline with the Motivation Statement completed.) In addition, >> after the deadline has passed, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will >> inform any applicants whose application was unsuccessful due to being >> incomplete. An application is incomplete if it only expresses the desire to >> travel but does not provide a detailed justification for being present >> during the meeting and fulfill the criteria set out under section 4 >> >> Read more about the operating procedures here: >> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures#OperatingProcedures-996937310 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:34 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com >> wrote: >> >> Issue a call for applicant for the travel slot, sorry I was not clear. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:20 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Arsene unfortunately cannot join us in Barcelona. I will follow our >> re-allocation procedure and issue a call for applicants. Will share the >> call with you before posting. >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> >> >> > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Sep 19 07:35:39 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:35:39 -0400 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Arsene's travel slot transfer In-Reply-To: References:

<4dc55a73-addb-a21d-e12f-fbc241068085@mixmax.com> <351E7341-3713-48B7-8BE2-C73913CFDE2C@ipjustice.org>

Message-ID: Thanks Raoul You are very welcome. sent it to the list. Will get back to you with the applications on Friday. On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:34 AM Raoul Plommer wrote: > Looks good, thanks for composing this. :) > > -Raoul > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 at 23:31, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < > ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > >> Thanks Robin. >> >> The operating procedures are clear that others active in PDP can also >> apply but I wanted to remind people that if they are applying to be an >> alternate, they should provide the documents that operating procedure asks >> them. I will clarify that. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 4:29 PM, Robin Gross robin at ipjustice.org wrote: >> >>> This looks good to me. I have one question though. What is meant by >>> ?if you would like to be an alternate on the council?? Does this mean to >>> be the temporary replacement for the absent GNSO councilor during GNSO >>> Council sessions? >>> >>> Since we don??t always provide the travel slot to the same person who >>> serves as the temporary replacement on council, one might not realize that >>> we sometimes have an ex-councilor or other experienced member (who already >>> has other travel support) serve as the temporary replacement GNSO Councilor >>> during the meeting and this travel slot can go to someone else working in >>> the PDPs who we also need to be at the specific meeting. We do have some >>> flexibility in how we choose to allocate the travel slots. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Robin >>> >>> >>> On Sep 18, 2018, at 1:04 PM, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < >>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> Here is the call I drafted. I will send this as soon as possible to give >>> applicants time to apply. >>> >>> Unfortunately one of our council members cannot make it to Barcelona. >>> Hence a travel slot has become available. >>> >>> Please send in you motivation letter to me by 22 September at 12 UTC. >>> and cc Maryam Bakoshi. >>> >>> Your motivation statement should include the requirements of operating >>> procedures. Please indicate if you would like to be the alternate on the >>> Council and provide the necessary documents as required by the procedures >>> to be submitted to NCSG EC for consideration. >>> >>> 1. >>> >>> The Motivation Statement must explain in detail why the applicant >>> would like to attend the meeting, provide evidence of full and verifiable >>> engagement in Domain Name System policy deliberations, proof that the >>> applicant has previously attended calls and contributed to PDPs, NCSG >>> Policy Committee meetings and other relevant policy and related meetings, >>> and explain why their physical presence is important for this meeting, >>> mentioning specific tasks they commit to carry out on behalf of the NCSG. >>> The tasks must be related to the NCSG and advance the NCSG?s interests at >>> that specific ICANN meeting. >>> 2. >>> >>> If the applicant is to be an alternate to a GNSO Councillor, he >>> or she should have an understanding of how the Council works and have >>> observed their meetings beforehand. They must provide a letter of >>> recommendation from either a) the Chair of the NCSG Policy Committee, or >>> (b) a serving member of the Council in his or her second term. >>> 3. >>> >>> While Executive Committee? travel slots may be allocated to >>> newcomers, newcomers should commit to attending sessions of the NCSG >>> leading up to the ICANN meeting, as well as undertaking revision and >>> background reading on at least one internal governance document and a PDP. >>> 4. >>> >>> The applicant must commit to attending the ICANN meeting fully, >>> be at the meeting venue every day, and be present to the greatest extent >>> possible at all NCSG meetings, constituency meetings, GNSO Council >>> meetings, and PDP sessions for which they have expressed interest in their >>> Motivation Statement. If the selected applicant does not appear to be >>> present at the venue without justification, s/he will not be eligible to be >>> allocated a travel slot in the future. The decision of such ineligibility >>> will be made by the NCSG Executive Committee (in the evaluation of at least >>> two members). >>> 5. >>> >>> The NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will send all eligible >>> requests received for travel support to the NCSG EC mailing list. >>> Ineligible requests are those applications that do not have Motivation >>> Statements. (If a Motivation Statement is missing and the application has >>> been received well before the deadline, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support >>> staff will endeavor to remind the candidate to re-submit their application >>> before the deadline with the Motivation Statement completed.) In addition, >>> after the deadline has passed, the NCSG Chair or ICANN support staff will >>> inform any applicants whose application was unsuccessful due to being >>> incomplete. An application is incomplete if it only expresses the desire to >>> travel but does not provide a detailed justification for being present >>> during the meeting and fulfill the criteria set out under section 4 >>> >>> Read more about the operating procedures here: >>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures#OperatingProcedures-996937310 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:34 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> >>> Issue a call for applicant for the travel slot, sorry I was not clear. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 3:20 PM, farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Arsene unfortunately cannot join us in Barcelona. I will follow our >>> re-allocation procedure and issue a call for applicants. Will share the >>> call with you before posting. >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NCSG-EC mailing list >>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >>> >>> >>> >> >> Farzaneh >> _______________________________________________ >> NCSG-EC mailing list >> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec >> > -- Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Sep 24 02:57:31 2018 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 16:57:31 -0700 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applicants for Travel Support Message-ID: Hi all Farrel and Kris applied for travel support. We need to decide very soon. >From the applications, Farrel stands out as he has been doing a lot at the Policy Committee, can be on the GNSO council if needed and his attendance on calls are verifiable and been involved in drafting public comments. Please chime in quickly so that we can get the name to the travel support soon. Best regards Farzaneh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Krishna Seeburn-ML-NCSG.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 15886 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Travel-Supp-Farrel.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 170091 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Letter of Recommendation.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 46962 bytes Desc: not available URL: From plommer at gmail.com Mon Sep 24 10:58:56 2018 From: plommer at gmail.com (Raoul Plommer) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:58:56 +0300 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applicants for Travel Support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm fine with this. On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 02:58, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC < ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote: > Hi all > > Farrel and Kris applied for travel support. We need to decide very soon. > From the applications, Farrel stands out as he has been doing a lot at the > Policy Committee, can be on the GNSO council if needed and his attendance > on calls are verifiable and been involved in drafting public comments. > > Please chime in quickly so that we can get the name to the travel support > soon. > > Best regards > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jumaropi at yahoo.com Mon Sep 24 16:00:22 2018 From: jumaropi at yahoo.com (Juan Manuel Rojas) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applicants for Travel Support In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <222506304.1416810.1537794022996@mail.yahoo.com> I agree with Farrel JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. Presidente?-?AGEIA DENSI?ColombiaMembership Committee Chair.?Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) - ICANNCluster Orinoco TIC memberMaster IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes Cel. +57 3017435600 Twitter:?@JmanuRojas ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? El lunes, 24 de septiembre de 2018 2:59:12 a. m. GMT-5, Raoul Plommer via NCSG-EC escribi?: I'm fine with this. On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 02:58, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC wrote: Hi all Farrel and Kris applied for travel support. We need to decide very soon.? >From the applications, Farrel stands out as he has been doing a lot at the Policy Committee, can be on the GNSO council if needed and his attendance on calls are verifiable and been involved in drafting public comments.? Please chime in quickly so that we can get the name to the travel support soon. Best?regards?? Farzaneh _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec _______________________________________________ NCSG-EC mailing list NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robin at ipjustice.org Mon Sep 24 20:54:36 2018 From: robin at ipjustice.org (Robin Gross) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:54:36 -0700 Subject: [NCSG-EC] Applicants for Travel Support In-Reply-To: <222506304.1416810.1537794022996@mail.yahoo.com> References:

<222506304.1416810.1537794022996@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <6AD99655-3A04-4360-8750-85DB40DB4386@ipjustice.org> I also support Farrel for this slot. Shall we also ask him to fill-in on GNSO Council for Arsene in Barcelona? Since Farrel is already on the policy council and doing this work, it would make sense to ask him to fill-in on council as well. Thanks, Robin > On Sep 24, 2018, at 6:00 AM, Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-EC wrote: > > I agree with Farrel > > JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P. > Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia > Membership Committee Chair. Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) - ICANN > Cluster Orinoco TIC member > Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes > > Cel. +57 3017435600 > Twitter: @JmanuRojas > > > > > > > > > El lunes, 24 de septiembre de 2018 2:59:12 a. m. GMT-5, Raoul Plommer via NCSG-EC escribi?: > > > I'm fine with this. > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 02:58, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC > wrote: > Hi all > > Farrel and Kris applied for travel support. We need to decide very soon. > From the applications, Farrel stands out as he has been doing a lot at the Policy Committee, can be on the GNSO council if needed and his attendance on calls are verifiable and been involved in drafting public comments. > > Please chime in quickly so that we can get the name to the travel support soon. > > Best regards > > > Farzaneh > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec > _______________________________________________ > NCSG-EC mailing list > NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: