[EC-NCSG] Letter to Appellents
Poncelet Ileleji
pileleji
Mon Aug 29 14:04:41 EEST 2016
As Monika, has endorsed, if its okay with Joan and Robin then good to go,
its better we clear this.
Thanks
On 29 August 2016 at 06:29, Zalnieriute, Monika <Monika.Zalnieriute at eui.eu>
wrote:
> Dear Tapani and all,
>
>
> Tapani, thank You very much for drafting this. I think its very nice of
> You to accept responsibility, and also clearly state this in the letter to
> the appellants.
>
>
> I think this should get us going, and get this matter solved:)
>
>
> Others agreeing, I am happy to send this letter,
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
> Monika
>
>
>
>
> ----
>
> Dr. Monika Zalnieriute
>
>
> Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au I
>
> Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I
> cmds.ceu.edu I
>
> Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I icann.org
> I
>
> Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I
> zephiroplatform.org I
>
> Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I
> cihr.eu I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* EC-NCSG <ec-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org> on behalf of Tapani
> Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 6:07 AM
> *To:* ec-ncsg at ipjustice.org
> *Subject:* Re: [EC-NCSG] Letter to Appellents
>
> Dear all,
>
> Now I've read the discussion and the various drafts of the letter.
> A few points:
>
> First, it is important to be precise, in particular the point about
> what happens in case of tie with NOTA, but I'm happy with any wording
> that's unambiguous.
>
> Second, I think it would be useful to explicitly state that voting for
> NotA along with one or two candidates is allowed, rather than leaving
> it implied.
>
> Third, I don't want to leave the impression that the Chair would not
> face a possible rejection, so in
>
> "with the understanding that every candidate on the ballot faces
> possible rejection, which means that with respect to the election for
> GNSO Council [...]"
>
> I would drop the words "with respect to the election
> for GNSO Council".
>
> Fourth, I'm fine with calling this a compromise solution.
>
> Fifth, I have one major problem with the letter: it does not clearly
> point the blame to where it belongs, namely me. I want to add text
> explicitly blaming me for acting on my own without EC's consensus.
>
> So, here's my suggestion for the letter:
>
>
> "This email is in response to the appeal filed by the group of 21
> members of the Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG) on 23 August
> 2016 regarding the decision of the NCSG Executive Committee (EC) to
> continue with the ongoing annual election using the existing ballots.
>
> In fact the EC did not make such a decision: it was an unilateral act
> of the Chair, which the EC did not approve and decided to override in
> its emergency meeting on August 24. The Chair, by signing this letter,
> accepts his responsibility and the EC's chastisement of his hasty
> action.
>
> In its meeting the EC discussed the the appeal and considered possible
> options in response. In that meeting, the EC decided to propose a
> compromise solution to the appellants in lieu of suspending the
> ongoing election as requested.
>
> Specifically, the EC decided to continue with the ongoing annual
> election as originally planned, using the existing ballots already
> sent to members, but with the understanding that voting simultaneously
> for "None of the Above" and one or two candidates for council is
> valid, and that every candidate on the ballot faces possible rejection,
> which means that those candidates who receive less votes than "None of
> the Above" (NOTA) on the ballot shall be deemed not elected to the
> GNSO Council in this year?s election.
>
> We understand that this compromise is not perfect, however we believe
> it is a solution which will allow us to go forward with the existing
> election as planned and still satisfy concerns about representation
> and confusion on the ballot.
>
> In the unlikely event that the GNSO seats are left unfilled after the
> election, the EC will follow the procedures described in the charter to
> fill that seat.
>
> We regret the confusion caused and will endeavour to fix any remaining
> concerns before the ballot is sent in next year's annual election.
>
> Please indicate at your earliest convenience if this compromise
> proposal is acceptable to you and that your appeal is accordingly
> withdrawn. Thank you.
>
> Signed,
> Executive Committee of the Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group"
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received
> this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material from any computer.
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
>
>
--
Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS
Coordinator
The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio
MDI Road Kanifing South
P. O. Box 421 Banjul
The Gambia, West Africa
Tel: (220) 4370240
Fax:(220) 4390793
Cell:(220) 9912508
Skype: pons_utd
*www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm>http://jokkolabs.net/en/
<http://jokkolabs.net/en/>www.waigf.org
<http://www.waigf.org>www,insistglobal.com <http://www.itag.gm>www.npoc.org
<http://www.npoc.org>http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753
<http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753>*www.diplointernetgovernance.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20160829/b554a080/attachment.html>
More information about the NCSG-EC
mailing list