[EC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] By Laws Section 2.4.2.1 Appeal on the election process

[Robin Gross]

I understand it to mean 24 August, but good idea for the request to confirm.  Thanks.

Best,
Robin

> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Zalnieriute, Monika <Monika.Zalnieriute at EUI.eu> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> yes, I am available, just double checking whether 'tomorrow' is in fact 24th or 25th August?
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Monika 
> 
> ----
> 
> Dr. Monika Zalnieriute
> 
> 
> Melbourne Law School | The University of Melbourne I law.unimelb.edu.au <http://law.unimelb.edu.au/> I
> Center for Media, Data and Society I Central European University I cmds.ceu.edu <http://cmds.ceu.edu/> I 
> Executive Committee I Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group I ICANN I icann.org <http://icann.org/> I
> Z E P H I R O : Progressive Platform for Human Rights I zephiroplatform.org <http://zephiroplatform.org/> I
> Centre for Internet & Human Rights I European University Viadrina I cihr.eu <http://cihr.eu/> I
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: EC-NCSG <ec-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org> on behalf of Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 9:50 PM
> To: Tapani Tarvainen
> Cc: ec-ncsg at ipjustice.org
> Subject: Re: [EC-NCSG] [NCSG-Discuss] By Laws Section 2.4.2.1 Appeal on the election process
>  
> I am.  
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
> 
> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
> > 
> > So the next step is to take the appeal under our consideration.
> > 
> > We obviously need to have a proper meeting.
> > 
> > Are you all available tomorrow at 1300 UTC?
> > 
> > Tapani
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 06:15:23PM +0300, Tapani Tarvainen (ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info) wrote:
> > 
> >> See attached.
> >> 
> >> For reference, our charter says
> >> 
> >> "Any decision of the NCSG-EC can be appealed by requesting a
> >> full vote of the NCSG membership. There are several ways in which
> >> an appeal can be initiated:
> >> 
> >> * If 15 NCSG members, consisting of both organizational and
> >> individual members, request such an appeal the NCSG Executive
> >> Committee will first take the appeal under consideration.
> >> 
> >> * If, after consideration of any documentation provided by those
> >> making the appeal, the NCSG-EC does not reverse its decision,
> >> the NCSG-EC and those making the appeal should attempt to
> >> negotiate a mutually agreeable solution.
> >> 
> >> * If the NCSG-EC and those making the appeal cannot reach a
> >> mutually acceptable agreement on the decision within 30 days,
> >> then an NCSG vote will be scheduled as soon as practicable.
> >> 
> >> * For this type of appeal to succeed 60% of all of the NCSG
> >> members must approve of the appeal in a full membership vote as
> >> defined in section 4.0."
> >> 
> >> So we need to take this under consideration.
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Tapani Tarvainen
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > EC-NCSG mailing list
> > EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg>
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg>
>  
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20160823/bf2067c5/attachment-0001.html>