[EC-NCSG] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] By Laws Section 2.4.2.1 Appeal on the election process

[Joan Kerr]

Hi Tapani,

Yes, we need to dialogue and respond to concerns raised in the
communication.

Joan

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <
ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:

> So the next step is to take the appeal under our consideration.
>
> We obviously need to have a proper meeting.
>
> Are you all available tomorrow at 1300 UTC?
>
> Tapani
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 06:15:23PM +0300, Tapani Tarvainen (
> ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info) wrote:
>
> > See attached.
> >
> > For reference, our charter says
> >
> > "Any decision of the NCSG-EC can be appealed by requesting a
> > full vote of the NCSG membership. There are several ways in which
> > an appeal can be initiated:
> >
> > * If 15 NCSG members, consisting of both organizational and
> > individual members, request such an appeal the NCSG Executive
> > Committee will first take the appeal under consideration.
> >
> > * If, after consideration of any documentation provided by those
> > making the appeal, the NCSG-EC does not reverse its decision,
> > the NCSG-EC and those making the appeal should attempt to
> > negotiate a mutually agreeable solution.
> >
> > * If the NCSG-EC and those making the appeal cannot reach a
> > mutually acceptable agreement on the decision within 30 days,
> > then an NCSG vote will be scheduled as soon as practicable.
> >
> > * For this type of appeal to succeed 60% of all of the NCSG
> > members must approve of the appeal in a full membership vote as
> > defined in section 4.0."
> >
> > So we need to take this under consideration.
> >
> > --
> > Tapani Tarvainen
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20160823/e84513b2/attachment.html>