[EC-NCSG] QUICK: Ballot question
Tapani Tarvainen
ncsg
Mon Aug 22 20:56:03 EEST 2016
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:48:26AM -0700, Robin Gross (robin at ipjustice.org) wrote:
> Section 2.4 of NCSG Charter says the Committee must supervise and
> monitor the elections.
Yes.
> and section 2.3 states the Committee is responsible for monitoring
> and supervising the chair's performance of executive functions.
Yes.
> and it also explicitly says the chair carries out executive
> functions under the Committee's oversight.
Yes.
In each case it is up to the EC to decide what is an appropriate
level of supervision and oversight.
> Without ballot approval and given this new interpretation of NOTA
> (unilaterally issued by one member of the EC to much surprise of the
> others) that contradicts the understanding of NOTA held by the 3
> previous NCSG EC Chairs,
... that has been documented nowhere, apparently.
> I expect to see a petition launched by the membership pursuant to
> the charter to challenge this new interpretation of the NOTA.
They certainly may do so.
> These ballots did not have adequate supervision and monitoring and
> oversight by the EC
The EC can of course so decide and chastise me and do whatever
it sees fit to correct the situation.
So far I don't see the EC willing to do that, only you.
--
Tapani Tarvainen
More information about the NCSG-EC
mailing list