[EC-NCSG] QUICK: Ballot question

Robin Gross robin
Mon Aug 22 19:16:01 EEST 2016


> On Aug 22, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 08:52:27AM -0700, Robin Gross (robin at ipjustice.org) wrote:
> [?]
> 
>> The way NOTA has always been used in the past meant that if NOTA got
>> the most votes, none of the candidates win.
> 
> You mean it has actually happened?
> 
> Or that a formal decision to that effect has been made?
> 

NOTA has not defeated any candidate yet, but every candidate is running against NOTA.
This has been the clear meaning for several years and was why we started to include NOTA on the ballots years ago.  We wanted to be sure that each candidate is in fact running, and that this is a true election and not merely a symbolic gesture.  You may want to consult with Avri (the NCSG Chair before me) and Rafk (NCSG Chair after me) to confirm that this has been the interpretation of NOTA since NCSG was created.

Thanks,
Robin


> -- 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
> 





More information about the NCSG-EC mailing list